Key Benefits:
Completion of the Board of Conventions on merit in university education (the meritankenannavnor notice)
In accordance with section 18 (a) (a) Article 34 (3) and Article 34 (3). 1, in the case of universities (university law), cf. Law Order no. 1368 of 7. In December 2007 :
§ 1. The notice shall apply to appeal to the studies on the impact of the student (s) of the case of merit, including prior merit, cf. Section 18 (1) of the university law. 6, no. 4, at the degree of undergraduate training and master training and second subgeneration according to the university law, cf. However, section 2, no. 2, and section 3.
§ 2. The Board of Studienament may, in accordance with the rules of the notice of training (training notices) following a professional assessment, can decide that :
1) already passed training elements from another Danish education at the same level may replace parts of the university education which the student has been applying to, or has been recorded at (merit for Danish training elements),
2) already passed training elements from a foreign education at the same level may replace parts of the university education that the student has been applying to, or has been recorded in (merit for foreign foreign policy) ; training elements), and
3) planned training elements from a different Danish or foreign education at the same level may replace part of the university education that the student is included on and signed at (pre-merit).
§ 3. Study of the Studienaet on the impact or partial disbursements of merit for Danish training elements and advance merit, cf. § 2, nr. The judgment relates to the professional assessment by 1 and 3 in accordance with this notice. However, this shall not apply to the decision of the student (es) of the Student / Proposal for Foreign Education Elements, cf. § 2, nr. 2 which may be submitted for the Qualification Board, cf. law on the evaluation of foreign and training qualifications etc.
§ 4. The plaintiff is making the appeal to the university. The Anken must be written and reasoned.
Paragraph 2. The application shall be submitted within two weeks of the fact that the complainant has been made aware of the decision of the student of the student.
Paragraph 3. The university may dispensers from the time limit referred to in paragraph 1. 2 if exceptional conditions exist.
§ 5. If the appeal contains a legal question, the university will decide in the case, including whether the student Board of Study Board shall make a new technical assessment.
Paragraph 2. The university is giving the complainant a notice of the decision as soon as possible.
Paragraph 3. The University of the College may be brought to the University of the College and the Construction Authority, cf. § 10.
§ 6. The headmaster will set the meritance name as soon as possible after the submission of an appeal. The principal may set up permanent recences and to lay down detailed internal rules on this subject.
Paragraph 2. The Board of Appeal shall consist of a representative of scientific staff at the same or related training at the university and a representative of scientific staff at the same or related training at another university.
§ 7. The Meritanken Board shall examine the matter in writing if the representatives are in agreement on this. In the event of disagreement between the representatives of the judgment of an anke, the representative of the second university, which has the voice giving voice.
Paragraph 2. The Board of Appeal
1) give the complainant merit or advance merit for more training items than the student board has been approved, or
2) reject the appeal.
Paragraph 3. The Board of Appeal may, by way of exception, send the request back to the Student Board.
§ 8. The decision of the Meritankenth shall be notified to the university as soon as possible and at least one month after the principal has set up the Board of Indiiles. In the calculation, no July of the month.
Paragraph 2. The university shall notify the complainant as soon as possible of the declaration of the inane.
Paragraph 3. The appeal may not be admissible within the provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article. The university must inform the complainant as soon as possible, with a justification and information on when the request is expected to be completed.
§ 9. The decision of the Meritankenas may not be subject to any other administrative authority as far as the professional assessment is concerned.
Paragraph 2. Appeal to the State of the Board of Appeal may be brought to the university, where the complaint relates to legal matters.
Paragraph 3. The complaint shall be submitted to the university no later than two weeks after the decision of the Board of Appeal has been notified to the complainant.
Paragraph 4. The university can dispensers from paragraph 1. 3 if exceptional conditions exist.
Paragraph 5. The university decision in accordance with paragraph 1. 2 may be brought to the University of the University and the Construction Authority, cf. § 10.
§ 10. The decisions of the College following this notice may be submitted to the College and Facilities Management Board of the Decision (s) to which the complaint relates to legal matters. The deadline for filing a complaint is two weeks from the date on which the decision has been announced.
Paragraph 2. The appeal shall be submitted to the university issuing a statement. The complainant shall have the opportunity to comment on the opinion of the university within a period of at least 1 week. The university sends the complaint to the Board attached to the statement and any comments made by the complainant.
Paragraph 3. The decisions of the Management Board shall not be brought to a higher administrative authority.
§ 11. The university and construction management board may dispense from this notice, when it is justified in exceptional circumstances, except in cases where the university may dispensers, cf. Section 4 (4). 3, and section 9 (3). 4.
§ 12. The announcement shall enter into force on 1. April 2008, cf. however, paragraph 1 2.
Paragraph 2. The announcement shall take effect on the studies on the merit of the Danish training element (s) and the prior merit, cf. § 2, nr. 1 and 3, which shall be taken on 1. April 2008 or later.
