55/2017 Sb.
LAW
of 19 December 2003. January 2017,
amending the Act No. 40/2009 Coll., the criminal code, as amended by
amended, Act No. 141/1961 Coll., on criminal court proceedings
(code of criminal procedure), as amended, and other related laws
Parliament has passed the following Act of the United States:
PART THE FIRST
Amendment to the criminal code
Article. (I)
Act No. 40/2009 Coll., the criminal code, as amended by Act No. 306/2009 Coll.,
Act No. 181/2007 Coll., Act No. 330/2007 Coll., Act No. 357/2007 Coll.
Law No 375/2007 Coll., Act No 420/2007 Coll., Act No. 193/2009 Coll.,
Act No. 360/2012 Coll., Act No. 390/2009 Coll., Act No. 399/2012 Coll.
Act No. 494/2012 Coll., Act No. 105/2013 Coll., Act No. 241/Sb.
Constitutional Court declared under No 259/2013 Coll., Act No.
141/2014 Coll., Act No. 86/2015 Coll., Act No. 165/2015 Coll., Act No.
377/2015 Coll., Act No. 47/2016 Coll., Act No. 150/2016 Coll., Act No.
163/2016 Coll., Act No. 188/2016 Coll., Act No. 321/2016 Coll., Act No.
323/2016 Coll. and Act No. 455/2016 Coll., is amended as follows:
1. in section 70 is at the end of paragraph 3 the following sentence "the penalty of confiscation
affects both the fruits and benefits such things that belong to the offender. ".
2. In article 98 para. 1, the word "stuff" the words ", prevents the parts
the property ".
3. In paragraph 98, at the end of paragraph 3 the following sentence "prevents part of the assets
Unable to save in addition to forfeiture of the same part of the property. ".
4. In § 101 paragraph. 1 introductory part of the provisions for the text "section 70 ' shall be
the words "paragraph. 2 (a). and) ".
5. In article 101, paragraph 2 reads as follows:
"(2) the Court may save prevents things, which was obtained by the criminal offence
or as a reward for a criminal offence or that was, albeit only partially,
acquired as a matter of a criminal offence or obtained as a matter of forming a reward for
a criminal offence, if the value of things, which was obtained by the criminal offence, or
as a reward for him, not in relation to the value of the acquired things insignificant,
and if such a thing
and the perpetrators, which belongs to) has been convicted of a crime from which the thing
comes,
(b)) perpetrators, which cannot belong to prosecute or condemn,
(c)), from which the perpetrator belongs to the punishment the Court dropped,
(d)) belong to the person who committed the insane act of a different crime,
e) belongs to another person, to which the offender is transferred or that such a thing
otherwise acquired, or
(f)) is part of the assets in the Trust Fund or other similar device (hereinafter
"the Trust Fund") or in a mutual fund. ".
6. In article 101, paragraph 2, the following paragraph 3 is added:
"(3) prevents you from things affects even the fruits and benefits of the things that belong to the
a person whose case is occupying. ".
Paragraphs 3 to 5 shall become paragraphs 4 to 6.
7. In § 101 paragraph. 6, the number "4" is replaced by "5".
8. in paragraph 102, the following new section 102a including title:
"section 102a
Prevents part of the assets
(1) the Court may save prevents the part of the perpetrator, which was recognized by the
guilty vandalized, for which the Criminal Code provides for the punishment
the deprivation of liberty of a maximum of at least four years of penalties, or
the offence of production and other dealings with child pornography (section 192),
unauthorized access to computer systems and the information medium (§
230), and possession of access device and password to
the computer system, and other such data (section 231), scheming when you enter
public procurement and tender procedures (para. 257), the scheming in the public
auction (section 258), the illicit cultivation of plants containing narcotic
or psychotropic substance pursuant to § 285 para. 2 to 4, the spread of drug addiction (§
287), active bribery (article 332) or indirect bribery (article 333), if
the perpetrator of such a crime for himself or for another won or
trying to get the property benefits and the Court finds that a certain part of his
the property is the proceeds of crime due to the fact that the value of
the property, which the offender has acquired or transferred to another person or to
the assets in the Trust Fund at the time of not more than 5 years before committing
such a criminal offence at the time of committing a criminal offence, or when it is
in gross income disparity of the offender acquired in accordance with the law or
other factors were found which would justify such a conclusion.
(2) the Court may save prevents part of the assets in relation to things that would
otherwise could be taken pursuant to paragraph 1, if the offender is such a thing
and transferred to another person) free of charge or at advantageous conditions
and that person knew or could and should have known, that such a thing
converted the reason to avoid it prevents, or that such a thing
has been obtained in violation of the law,
(b)) to a person nearby,
c) transferred to the legal entity, in which it has itself or in conjunction with
persons close to a majority stake, a majority shareholding on
voting rights or decisive influence on proceedings, and such a thing
the offender is free of charge or at advantageous terms used
(d) the assets transferred in) Trust Fund, or
e) became the common property of the spouses.
(3) the Court in the determination of part of the assets, which prevents stores, provides
specific things subject to prevent. If the gross discrepancy has been detected
between the value of the assets and income of the offender acquired in accordance with the law
in the reference period can determine any matter the offender in
the value up to the observed gross disparity.
(4) if it is not known where things that might be used, located,
or prevents is not appropriate, in particular with regard to the rights of third
people, or if the one who could be a thing seized, it
the decision to prevent the destroy, damage, steal, or otherwise prevent
stymie, a court may impose prevents the replacement value, including cash
of the amount, up to the amount which corresponds to the value of such things. The value of things,
which prevents the Court, could the Court determined on the basis of vocational
representation or an expert.
(5) prevent affects even the fruits and benefits of the things that belong to the person
such a thing occupies. Prevents does not apply to things that are strictly
need to satisfy basic needs of the person, which occupies part of the
property, or people whose nutrition or education of the person referred to in
the law required to take care of. ".
9. In § 103 para. 1 the second sentence, the words "4 and 5" are replaced by the words "5 and 6".
10. In § 104 paragraph. 1, after the word "thing", the words "occupied part of
the property ".
11. In § 104 paragraph. 2, after the words "saving stuff" prevents the words "
prevents part of assets ", the words" § 101 paragraph. 4 "shall be replaced by the words" §
paragraph 101. 5 "and the words" § 101 paragraph. 5 "shall be replaced by the words" § 101 paragraph.
6. "
12. In paragraph 135, the words "or the owner of the" and the word "owner" shall be deleted.
13. in paragraph 227, the words "their assets or the assets of a legal person,
You shall be entitled to act, "shall be replaced by the word" property ".
14. At the end of footnote 1, the following sentence "Directive
The European Parliament and of the Council of 2014/42/EU of 3. April 2014
seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime in the
The European Union ".
Article II
Transitional provision
For the purposes of the imposition of a safeguard measure prevents part of assets pursuant to section
102A of Act No. 40/2009 Coll., in the version in force from the date of entry into force of
This law, can be used in determining the amount of the gross disparity between the value of
the property, which the offender has acquired or transferred to another person or to
the assets in the Trust Fund, or similar device, and its income
acquired in accordance with the law to take into account only to the property which the offender
acquired or transferred to another person or to the assets in the Trust Fund
or similar device from the date of entry into force of this Act.
PART TWO
Amendment to the criminal procedure code
Article. (III)
Act No. 141/1961 Coll., on criminal court proceedings (code of criminal procedure), in
amended by Act No. 59/1965 Coll., Act No. 58/1969 Coll., Act No. 149/1969
Coll., Act No. 48/1973 Coll., Act No. 29/1978 Coll., Act No. 43/1980
Coll., Act No. 159/1989 Coll., Act No. 175/1990 Coll., Act No. 303/1990
Coll., Act No. 563/1991 Coll., Act No. 25/1993 Coll., Act No. 115/1993
Coll., Act No. 293/1993 Coll., Act No. 154/1994 Coll., constitutional
the Court declared under no. 214/1994 Coll., Constitutional Court
declared under the No. 8/1995 Coll., Act No. 152/1995 Coll., Act No.
150/1997 Coll., Act No. 209/1997 Coll., Act No. 148/1998 Coll., Act No.
166/1998 Coll., Act No. 191/1999 Coll., Act No. 29/2000 Coll., Act No.
30/2000 Coll., Act No. 227/2000 Coll., the Constitutional Court declared
under Act No. 77/2001 Coll., Act No. 143/2001 Coll., Act No. 265/2001 Coll.
Constitutional Court declared under no. 424/2001 Coll., Act No.
200/2002 Coll., Act No. 227/2002 Coll., Act No. 320/2002 Coll., Act No.
218/2003 Coll., Act No. 279/2003 Coll., Act No. 235/2004 Coll., Act No.
257/2004 Coll., Act No. 283/2004 Coll., Act No. 539/2004 Coll., Act No.
587/2004 Coll., Constitutional Court declared under no. 45/2005 Coll.
Constitutional Court declared under no 239/2005 Coll., Act No.
394/2005 Coll., Act No. 413/2005 Coll., Act No. 79/2006 Coll., Act No.
112/2006 Coll., Act No. 115/2006 Coll., Act No. 115/2006 Coll., Act No.
165/2006 Coll., Act No. 253/2006 Coll., Act No. 321/2006 Coll., Act No.
170/2007 Coll., Act No. 179/2007 Coll., Act No. 345/2007 Coll., the award
The Constitutional Court declared under no. 90/2008 Coll., Act No. 121/2008 Coll.,
Act No. 129/2008 Coll., Act No. 135/2008 Coll., Act No. 177/2008 Coll.,
Act No. 274/2008 Coll., Act No. 301/2008 Coll., Act No. 384/2008 Coll.,
Act No. 457/2008 Coll., Act No. 480/2008 Coll., Act No. 7/2009 Coll.,
Act No. 41/2009 Coll., Act No. 52/2009 Coll., Act No. 218/2009 Coll.,
Act No. 272/2009 Coll., Act No. 306/2009 Coll., Constitutional Court
declared under the No 163/2010 Coll., Act No. 197/2010 Coll., the award
The Constitutional Court declared under no 219/2010 Coll., Act No. 150/2011
Coll., Act No. 181/2007 Coll., Act No. 207/2007 Coll., Act No. 330/2011
Coll., Act No. 341/2011 Coll., Act No. 348/2007 Coll., Act No. 357/2011
Coll., Act No. 459/2011 Coll., Constitutional Court declared under no.
43/2009 Coll., Act No. 193/2009 Coll., Act No. 273/2009 Coll., Act No.
390/2009 Coll., Act No. 45/2013 Coll., Act No. 105/2013 Coll., Act No.
141/2014 Coll., Act No. 77/2015 Coll., Act No. 86/2015 Coll., Act No.
150/2016 Coll., Act No. 163/2016 Coll., Act No. 243/2016 Coll., Act No.
264/2016 Coll., Act No. 298/2016 Coll., Act No. 301/2016 Coll. and act
No 455/2016 Coll., is amended as follows:
1. in paragraph 7, the following paragraph 7a is inserted:
"§ 7a
(1) to determine the nature, size or location of the goods for the purposes of their
ensure, to determine the financial circumstances of the accused or for the purposes of
ensure the enforcement of criminal penalties, the President of the Senate and in the preparatory
the management of the public prosecutor or police authority shall ask the person whose property
is discovered, or a person close to her, that he laid down in the appropriate
the time limit has sent a statement of assets a person whose property is explored.
Invited person has right to refuse to make statements about the property; in doing so,
apply by analogy to § 92 para. 1, § and § 158 paragraph 100. 8. In the invitation is to be
to notify a person who has to make a declaration of assets, on the consequences of
non-compliance of this request and instructed her to deny her right to make
statement of assets.
(2) the person referred to in paragraph 1, shall be invited, so that in the statement of assets
in so far as such facts are known, the data
relating to the assets of the person whose assets are discovered, in particular
and the rewards of) the payer of an employment relationship, or the relationship of the like relation
employment or other income and the amount of such remuneration or other
income,
(b)) in which banks, savings and credit cooperatives, institutions
electronic money, electronic money issuer is small,
the payment institution, the payment service provider is small or
similar to a foreign person has this person, the amount of receivables and accounts numbers
accounts, or other unique identifiers according to the law on payment systems
c) borrowers, in respect of which the person claims, their reason, amount and
time limit for payment,
d) overview of the things in the possession or ownership of that person, including
the amount of co-ownership and the location of the goods, and
e) trust funds or similar device, that this person has set up,
or for which the beneficiaries.
(3) the President of the Senate and in preliminary proceedings, the Prosecutor or
Police Authority may ask the person referred to in paragraph 1 to make
the new statement of assets a person whose property is discovered, if the
It is reasonable to consider that there was a change of matrimonial property regimes of the person whose
assets are discovered.
(4) If a person does, which was invited to make a statement about
property, this Declaration within the time limit or if the authority
criminal proceedings, to make her statement of assets called on the
doubts about the veracity or completeness of the declarations made by her, may
her subpoena to give evidence; the provisions of this law governing
submission of explanation, the hearing of the accused and the witness shall apply
mutandis. ".
2. In section 8 paragraph 1. 2, the first sentence is replaced by the phrase "if it is in
criminal proceedings must be to properly clarify the circumstances indicating
the fact that the crime has been committed, to identify the nature, scope or
the location of the goods for the purposes of their collateral, to determine matrimonial property regimes
the accused or for the purpose of securing the enforcement of criminal penalties, the State
Representative and on submission of the prosecution or punishment of the President of the Senate proposal
request data, which are subject to banking secrecy, and the data from the
registration of investment instruments and the dematerialized securities. ".
3. In § 8 para. 2, the second sentence is inserted after the phrase "in criminal proceedings, in
where you can save the protective measures will prevent the parts of the property, the State
Representative and on submission of the prosecution or punishment of the President of the Senate proposal
ask the tax information from the decision on the determination of income tax
for the purposes of assessing compliance with the conditions for the imposition of this protective
measures or for the purpose of ensuring its performance; the provision of information
According to this provision, it is not a violation of the obligations of confidentiality under the
the tax code. "
4. In section 8 paragraph 1. 2 the fourth sentence, after the words "taxes", the words "for
other purposes ".
5. In section 8 paragraph 1. 3 the first sentence after the word "instruments", the words "or
book-entry securities "and the words" special Act "are replaced by the
the words "other legislation".
6. In article 8 d of paragraph 1. 2 the second sentence, the words ' devoid of legal
capacity or of limited competence to perform legal acts "shall be replaced by
"with limited legal capacity".
7. In article 8 d of paragraph 1. 2 at the end of the text of the second sentence, the words "or
the guardian ".
8. In section 11 (1) 1, the following point (e)) the following points (f) and (g)))
shall be added:
"(f)) against the severe disease permanently rule out its position before
the Court,
g) against whom mental illness that occurred after committing
the Act, makes it impossible to understand the meaning of permanently criminal prosecutions ".
Subparagraph (f)) to) shall become letters (h)) to m).
9. in section 11 (1) 2 (a). (b) point 4), the words ' i) or (j)) "shall be replaced by
"k) or (l))".
10. In section 11 (1) 4, the words "or i)" shall be replaced by "or".)
11. in section 30 paragraph 2. 1, after the words "legal representatives" is inserted after the word ",
guardians ".
12. In § 33 para. 1 the seventh sentence, the words "if it is deprived of the capacity to
legal capacity or if his competence to perform legal acts is limited "
replaced by the words "if his legal capacity is restricted".
13. In the title of § 34, the words "legal representative" shall be replaced by
"The guardian".
14. in section 34 para. 1 the first sentence, the words "the legal representative of the accused,
that is deprived of legal capacity or the capacity to
legal capacity is limited "is replaced by" Guardian of the accused,
which is limited in the incapacitation ".
15. in section 34 para. 1 the second sentence of § 37, para. 1, section 198 paragraph 1. 2 and section 215
paragraph. 1 the words "legal representative" are replaced by the word "guardian".
16. In article 34 paragraph 2 reads as follows:
"(2) in the event that there is a risk of delay and a guardian cannot
to exercise their rights referred to in paragraph 1, or if the accused was not
appointed, although there are reasons for its provisions, the President of the Senate
and in preliminary proceedings, the Prosecutor shall designate the accused person for the performance of
These rights of the guardian. Another person than a lawyer can be appointed
guardian only with its consent. Could appoint a person, in respect of which
You can have a reasonable concern that for their interest in the outcome of the proceeding will be
duly defend the interests of the accused. The provisions of the resolution on the guardian
indicates a person who is appointed by, and shall not preclude the nature of things,
whether or not the accused. Against the resolution on the provision of custodian is admissible
complaint. ".
17. § 36 odst. 1 (b)):
"(b)), if his legal capacity is limited,".
18. in § 36a para. 1, letter a) is added:
"and if his) is a limited legal capacity".
19. in § 37 para. 1 the second sentence, the words "deprived of the legal
capacity or if his competence to perform legal acts is limited "is replaced by
the words "limited in incapacitation".
20. In § 41 para. 4, the words "the accused person deprived of legal
capacity or if his competence to perform legal acts "shall be replaced by
"the legal capacity of the accused".
21. in § 42 para. 1, after the word "thing", the words "or part of the
the property ".
22. In article 42, paragraph 3 reads:
"(3) if the person concerned is not fully enjoys or is limited in
incapacitation, performs its rights under the law, her legal
representative or guardian. In the event that there is a risk of default, and
legal representative or guardian cannot exercise the rights referred to in the sentence
the first, or if the guardian has not been appointed, although there are reasons for
its provisions, it is necessary to immediately appoint a guardian. Guardian
It is necessary to establish without delay in the event that there is a risk of
the delay and the person concerned is a legal person and has the person
the eligible amount to acts in the proceedings. ".
23. In article 42, paragraph 3, the following paragraph 4 is added:
"(4) the President of the Senate and appoints the Guardian in preparatory proceedings
State representative. Another person than a lawyer can be appointed guardian
only with its consent. Could appoint a person can have
reasonable concern that for your interest in the outcome of the proceedings will not be properly defend
the interests of the person concerned. Resolution on provisions of a guardian shall be notified
a person who is appointed by, and shall not preclude the nature of things, whether or not
to the person concerned. The decision on the provision of a guardian is
admissible complaint. ".
The current paragraph 4 shall become paragraph 5.
24. In § 42 para. 5, the words "of the trust or mutual" are replaced by
the words "in a trust fund, or similar device, or in mutual"
and the words "trustee" with the words "Device Manager
like svěřenskému Fund ".
25. In paragraph 45, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be added:
"(1) if there is a damaged person fully competent or is limited in
incapacitation, its rights exercised under this Act its legal
representative or guardian. In the event that there is a risk of default, and
legal representative or guardian cannot exercise the rights referred to in the sentence
the first, or if the guardian has not been appointed, although there are reasons for
its provisions, it is necessary to immediately appoint a guardian. Guardian
It is necessary to establish without delay in the event that there is a risk of
the delay and the sufferer is a legal entity and does not have a person do
acts in the proceedings.
(2) the President of the Senate and appoints the Guardian in preliminary proceedings the State
representative. Another person than a lawyer can be appointed guardian only with
its consent. Could appoint a person can have a reasonable
afraid for his interest in the outcome of the proceedings will not be duly defend the interests
the injured party. Resolution on provisions of the guardian shall be notified to the person who is
appointed by him, and does not exclude the nature of things, whether or not the victim. Against the
the decision on the provision of custodian is admissible a complaint. ".
26. in § 47 para. 3 the words "real estate" is replaced by "immovable
case ".
27. in § 47 para. 5, after the words "enforcement", the words ",
public auction ".
28. in paragraph 47 of the text at the end of paragraph 5, the words "shall be added; This does not apply,
If the enforcement is carried out or if it is with this property in enforcement
or insolvency proceedings or at a public auction and usage to meet
the claim of the State ".
29. in paragraph 47, at the end of paragraph 5, the following sentence "on payment of the debt,
that are subject to enforcement, public sale, execution or
insolvency proceedings are preferably used assets intact
decision. ".
30. In paragraph 47, at the end of paragraph 8, the following sentence "when you check in, issue and
another treatment is secured, the things that have been issued or revoked,
progressing reasonably under the provisions on the return, issue, and another
dealing with things important for the criminal proceedings. ".
31. in § 50 para. 1 at the end of the text of the first sentence, the words "shall be added; about
It is necessary to teach ".
32. In § 50 para. 2 the words "is deprived of the capacity to perform legal acts
or whose capacity to perform legal acts is limited "shall be replaced by
"it is not fully enjoys or whose legal capacity is limited".
33. In section 51b para. 1, the words ' the interpreter, the accused, the legal representative
the accused, the defence counsel of the person concerned, damaged, agent
the victim, agent of an interested person, a confidant of the accused or
the injured party, the expert shall be replaced by the accused, the person concerned,
damaged, their legal representatives, guardians, agents and důvěrníci,
lawyer, expert, interpreter ".
34. In article 65 paragraph 1. 1 the second sentence, the words "have the guardians"
replaced by the words "has a legal representative or guardian" and the words "are
deprived of legal capacity or if their eligibility for
limited legal capacity "are replaced by the words" are not fully enjoys or
If their legal capacity is limited ".
35. under the first heading of the head in the fourth after the word "THINGS"
the words "that are IMPORTANT for the CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS".
36. In part one of the fourth head in the heading section of the fourth word
"the things", the words "relevant to criminal proceedings".
37. under the first head of the fourth section of the fourth, the following new subsection
1, including the title reads as follows:
"Subsection 1
Common provisions
section 77b
(1) the things important for the criminal proceedings is the thing that
and) can be used for evidentiary purposes,
(b)) was intended to commit an offence or a criminal offence was to
used (hereinafter referred to as "crime"),
(c)) was obtained by the criminal offence or as a reward for a criminal offence, or
It was, even if only in part, acquired as a matter of a criminal offence or obtained as a matter of
forming a reward for criminal offences, including fruits and benefits (hereinafter referred to as "revenue from the
crime "), or
(d) the replacement value) is a thing referred to in subparagraphs (a) (b)), and (c)).
(2) if the collateral is subject to a thing that is part of the assets in the trust
Fund or mutual fund, shall be svěřenskému or Manager
obhospodařovateli mutual fund. If it is not known who matter
for the criminal proceedings shall include without mentioning the person to whom it was
ensured; the measure shall specify when and where and for what reason, to ensure the
things occurred.
(3) ensuring things for evidentiary purposes has priority over other reasons
ensuring things. The reason for ensuring you can change in the course of criminal proceedings
the resolution, against which a complaint is admissible. Because of the change
ensure there is no need to adjudicate in the case when the conditions are met
no forfeiture or prevent things that is secured to the
evidentiary purposes.
(4) if it does not jeopardise the achievement of the purpose of criminal proceedings, does not ensure the thing
worthless or thing whose collateral is inappropriate for other reasons. Always
However, ensure that the thing to be forfeited or be taken on the basis of
the Court's decision, which have not yet acquired legal force.
(5) unless otherwise provided by law, the rights of third parties to secured stuff
important for criminal proceedings apply only in proceedings relating to
civil. ".
38. under the first head of the fourth section of the fourth, after subsection 1 the following
a new subsection 2, including the title reads as follows:
"Subsection 2
Ensuring things for evidentiary purposes ".
39. section 78 and 79, including the following titles:
"§ 78
Obligation to submit or issue
(1) who has a thing that can be used for evidentiary purposes, it is required to
submit it to the Court, the public prosecutor or the police
authority; If it is necessary for the purposes of the proper findings of fact
important for the criminal proceedings shall be obliged to ensure that such a thing to
This prompted authorities to issue. When you are prompted, it should be noted,
that does not comply with the invitation, he may be the thing taken away, as well as other consequences
fail (section 66). Call for submission or issue is entitled to
President of the Chamber, in preliminary proceedings, the Prosecutor or the police
authority.
(2) the obligation referred to in paragraph 1 shall not apply to the Charter or to another
tangible medium containing video, audio or data record, which
the content relates to the circumstances of that prohibition on questioning, unless there has been a
exemptions from the obligation to maintain secrecy or to acquittal
obligations of confidentiality.
(3) you cannot force Anyone to submit or taken a thing that at a time when
her submission is requested or the release, can be used as evidence
against him or against him in; This is without prejudice to the provisions of
the withdrawal of the case, a search warrant, search warrant other premises and land and
personal search.
(4) if it is necessary for the purpose of preventing the destruction of the forfeiture or
prevents things, authority in criminal proceedings referred to in paragraph 1 shall issue
the statement that the person to whom the case was ensured, not for ensuring the
such a thing to any other person or to encumber it. Legal act
made in contravention of this prohibition is null and void; Court to the invalidity of the
even without taking into account the proposal. About how you need to teach this person.
(5) a person who has submitted or issued a thing which can be used for
evidential purposes, the authority that carried out the operation immediately a written confirmation
on the acceptance of the item or a copy of the Protocol; thing in them must be sufficiently
precisely described, so that it was possible to determine her identity.
(6) the Body active in criminal proceedings to which the thing was released, which may
serve for evidential purposes, takes her into custody.
(7) a person to whom a case has been ensured, is entitled to request reimbursement of the
that sort of thing. Such applications shall authority in criminal proceedings
referred to in paragraph 1 shall decide without delay. If the application is rejected,
It may be this person, unless new reasons, repeating until after the
the expiration of 30 days from the decision.
§ 79
The withdrawal of the case
(1) if the thing which can be used for evidential purposes, at the invitation
presented, or issued by, who has it on him, he may be on the command
President of the Senate, and in preparatory proceedings at the behest of the public prosecutor or
the police authority revoked. The police authority it needs to issue such
the prior approval of the public prosecutor; without the prior consent of the
the command can be issued to the police authority only if you cannot
the prior consent of reach and the matter urgent.
(2) if the authority fails to make that command to the things he published, the withdrawal of the case
himself, performs a cover of the police's authority.
(3) the withdrawal of the things possible, from requiring a person who is not on the things
involved.
(4) are removed from the thing shall apply by analogy to § 78 para. 4 to 7. ".
40. under the first head of the fourth section of the fourth behind section 79 the following
a new subsection 3, including the title reads as follows:
"Subsection 3
Ensure the instrumentalities and proceeds from criminal activity and the replacement values ".
41. Section 79a of up to 79 grams including the following titles:
"§ 79a
Ensure the instrumentalities and proceeds of crime
(1) if the facts Indicate that a certain thing is a tool
or the proceeds of crime, the President of the Senate and in the preparatory
the management of the public prosecutor or police authority may decide to provide
that sort of thing. The police authority to such a decision needs the previous
the consent of the Attorney General. The prior consent of the public prosecutor is not
in urgent cases, should be that they can't be in delay. Police authority
in such a case shall, within 48 hours of their decision to submit
to the Prosecutor, who either give their consent, or is canceled.
The decision on the complaint is admissible.
(2) in the decision or in the attached schedules is required
and accordingly to define things subject to ensure unmistakable. If
provided by law, which may be provided and the right only in the future
incurred. In the decision to provide it, to whom the case was ensured,
disables after notification of the decision to such a thing to another or
It has put, and if secured tangible thing, also, that it intentionally
damaging or destroying. If it is necessary for the purpose of securing or
the Administration secured the things can be in the decision regarding the securing of the case or even
subsequent decision to prohibit or restrict the exercise of other rights also
related with assured things, including rights only in the future
incurred, as well as the call for the release of all documents or other tangible
carriers, whose submission is required to exercise a right to
secured by stuff, with a warning of the consequences of non-compliance of such a challenge in
the prescribed time limit (section 66 and 79). The additional decision on the prohibition or
restrictions on the exercise of other rights related with things
the provisions of the decision regarding the securing of apply mutatis mutandis.
(3) in the decision to provide it, to whom the case was secured,
to law enforcement authority, which decided to ensure
within 15 days of notification of the decision said what the rights of third persons
related to the case, whether it is secured in any other way restricted the rights of her performance
to dispose of, and if it was to ensure the right of property, whether or not the person who is
required to provide the appropriate performance, with a warning of the consequences of
non-compliance of such invitation within the time limit (section 66).
(4) the Body active in criminal proceedings, which took the collateral, shall take
all acts necessary for the performance of such a decision.
(5) the decision on the complaint is admissible.
§ 2
The delivery of the decision on seizure and notification about it
(1) the authority in criminal proceedings, which took the collateral,
promptly deliver a decision regarding the securing of a body or person that are
relevant for the implementation of the collateral, and then, what authority or person shall
collateral, and the person for whom the case was secured. At the same time authorities or persons
competent to perform, to ensure, if it finds that the things
that was assured, treated that threatens the destruction of or worsening of the purpose
ensure, without delay, notify him of that fact. The authority or person
relevant for the implementation of the collateral shall, immediately after delivery
the decision to provide the make and do everything to ensure things needed to
to avoid infringement of the prohibitions and restrictions laid down in the decision
ensuring things.
(2) if the secured claim, and unless the claim on the account to
the Bank or any other body authorized to lead the account for another, the authority
active in criminal proceedings, which took the decision shall ensure
ensure the debtor of the claim and the owner also saves him instead
the performance of the owner of the subject of performance, he composed in his custody or to other
the specified point. The composition of the subject of performance into custody or to a specified location
the debtor their commitment in the range of the service provided. The decision on the
ensure the debtor shall be notified before the owner of the secured debt.
(3) where the Authority considers active in criminal proceedings, which took the
ensure necessary for achieving the purpose of the collateral, it shall notify the
ensuring things other than institutions and persons referred to in paragraph 1, that
on the basis of other legislation the stored records, supervisory
or other obligation in relation to the secured case or its owner
or the holder of, and at the same time asks you to give him, if it determines that it is
secured goods handled in a way that threatens to thwart the purpose of their
ensure, without delay, notify this fact; These bodies and persons
are required to meet such a challenge. In addition to ensuring informed persons and
authorities, for which he is known to have secured an option to purchase things,
lease or other right, or proceeding in which lead was restricted performance
rights with such things. Body active in criminal proceedings,
decided to ensure a share of the business corporation, of this fact
shall inform the legal power of such a decision is also the business corporation.
(4) the Body active in criminal proceedings, which took the ensuring real estate
things shall inform the land registry office on the legal force of such
decision.
§ 79c
Implementation of the collateral of movable property
(1) who has a movable thing, which may be subject to ensure it is
shall such a thing on the invitation of the President of the Senate, and in preparatory proceedings
the public prosecutor or police authority to issue; If it does, you may
him be withdrawn. On the procedure for the issue and the withdrawal of the movable property shall be used
Similarly, section 78 and 79.
(2) the authority in criminal proceedings, to issue an order for the withdrawal of
things may, in the assessment of all the relevant circumstances leave the movable thing
at the place where it is located, if the
and) withdrawal of such things would lead to its devaluation or to
the depreciation of the things with which it is functionally linked,
(b)) the withdrawal of such things would be associated with inadequate technical
difficulties,
(c)) it is a matter requiring special care or is it associated with care
disproportionate costs, or
(d)) it is a matter of negligible value.
(3) If a movable thing left in place where it is located, this
the fact is, along with the reason for such a procedure to the Protocol and the
movable thing is adequately define so as not to be confused with the other.
The competent authority responsible for issuing the deprivation of things at the same time issue a command to
refraining from dealing with things in which the movable thing properly and
the unmistakable shall define and forbid it ever legally treated
or in fact treated in a way that would lead to the destruction of the purpose of its
ensure in particular that has been converted to another injured, damaged
or destroyed. Prohibition of acts against all and is effective at the moment of posting
command on the spot where the movable thing is located; in this sense, it must command
include lessons learned, including warnings on the consequences associated with the violation of the
the ban. Legal action taken in breach of the prohibition referred to in the
is invalid, and the Court shall take into account the invalidity without design. Movable
thing left on the spot shall be marked so that it was clear that her
apply command to refrain from dealing with things.
(4) Leaving movables in the place where it is located, does not prevent the
body active in criminal proceedings the competent to decide on such things
Subsequently, whenever called for the release of such things or issued a command to
the withdrawal, if it considers that this is necessary from the perspective of the purpose of the detention.
Body active in criminal proceedings, to rule on the issued or
withdrawal of movable property may at any time decide that leaves it for reasons of
referred to in paragraph 2, the person that has been secured; When it progresses
mutatis mutandis in accordance with paragraph 3. It is not a complaint against this decision
permissible.
(5) a decision under Section 79a on the movable property that was
issued or withdrawn in accordance with paragraph 1, or that has been left in place
referred to in paragraph 2 must be given within 96 hours from the time of such Act.
(6) paragraphs 1 to 5 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the identified machines or other
fixed devices that are part of the immovable property and are
separable.
section 79 d
Inspection of immovable property
(1) on the basis of an order for examination of real estate property issued by the Chairman of the
the Chamber and the pre-trial judge on the proposal of the public prosecutor may
the Court or prosecutor or on the basis of their instruction of the police
authority shall carry out an inspection of immovable property and its accessories for the purpose of
determine the State of the immovable property and the assessment of the effectiveness of the latter.
Body active in criminal proceedings, conducting an inspection of immovable property
inform about the time and place of inspection, the owner of the immovable property or person,
It lives in a common household, and also the person that is known,
It has immovable property rights. These persons are required to explore real estate
the case and its accessories.
(2) the authority conducting the inspection, it may put the person whose participation
When an inspection is necessary, in particular for the purposes of the valuation of immovable property.
(3) if the examination of immovable property or movable machine detected
or other attached devices that are part of the immovable property and are
separable, for which there are grounds for seizure under Section 79a,
You can proceed by analogy with § 79c para. 2 to 5 without issuing the
a house search or inspection of other premises and land.
§ .79e
The effects of collateral
(1) legal actions taken by the person in respect of whom directed the prohibitions referred to in
the decision to provide, in violation of the prohibitions referred to in it, it is
invalid; about how you need to teach this person. Court to the invalidity of the
even without taking into account the proposal.
(2) goods, which are subject to the decision to ensure the
enforcement, public sale, execution or of insolvency proceedings
handle only with the prior consent of the President of the Senate, and in the preparatory
control of the public prosecutor; This does not apply if the enforcement is carried out
or if it is with this thing in enforcement or insolvency proceedings or in the
public auction managed to satisfy the claims of the State. To cover the
claims that are subject to enforcement, public auctions,
execution or insolvency proceedings are preferably used thing untouched
a decision on detention.
(3) if the transfer or to establish rights to secured the necessary write stuff
in the register kept under other legislation, authority or person,
that lead such evidence, may, after notification of the decision to provide
Enroll to such things on the basis of legal proceedings the person was
thing, only with the prior consent of the President of the Senate and in the
the preliminary proceedings, the Prosecutor.
(4) If, according to land registry Act filed for registration of the rights to
real estate property in the land register on the basis of legal proceedings
the person to whom the immovable thing assured, before issuing a resolution on the
collateral, and pending such resolution on secure it was about him
the competent authority of a final decision, losing his proposal, submitted
legal effect at the date of acquisition of the legal force of the resolution on its collateral.
(5) if the secured claim in the account, to ensure it applies to
the funds, which are found on the account at the time in which the
the Bank or any other body, who leads the account for another, delivered
decisions about their collateral, up to the amount specified in this
decision and its accessories. Exceeds the amount referred to in
the decision to ensure the balance of funds on the account, subject to the
to ensure even on funds that subsequently run out of account, and
It's up to the amount specified in the decision, including its accessories.
Unless otherwise provided in this Act, from the time of service of the order on the
ensure the claims on the bank account or another entity authorized
lead account for another is prohibited in any way dispose of cash
resources that are on your account, up to the amount of the collateral.
section 79e
Revocation or limitation to ensure
(1) ensuring things are canceled or restricted, unless it no longer needed or it
There is no need in the determined range. It was cleared to ensure things
She was left in a place where it is located, also appeals to delay command
We handle things.
(2) the person to whom a case has been ensured, has the right at any time to request a cancellation
or limitation of collateral. On such an application it is necessary to urgently
decide. If the application is denied, the person may, unless
the new grounds, repeating until after the expiration of 30 days from the decision.
(3) the revocation or limitation of collateral shall be decided by the President of the Senate, and in
the preliminary proceedings, the Prosecutor or with the prior consent of the
the police authority.
(4) the decision on the revocation or limitation of collateral is permissible
the complaint, which has a suspensory effect.
(5) the final decision on the abolition of the collateral shall be delivered to, and constraints
authorities and the persons to whom it was delivered a decision on detention. Authorities and the
persons who have been informed of the decision to provide, you must
inform about the decision referred to in the first sentence; on the limitation of collateral
notify only those of them which the restriction refers to.
§ 79 grams
Ensure the replacement values
(1) If you cannot ensure that the thing that is an instrument or proceeds of crime
activities may be provided instead of the replacement value, which corresponds to,
even if only in part, its value; in doing so, proceed by analogy with the
the relevant provisions governing seizures, which is an instrument
or the proceeds of crime (Section 79a to 79e). Replacement value can be
ensure that the person who had the obligation to endure to ensure the original stuff.
(2) the President may, for important reasons of the Senate, and in preparatory proceedings
State representative, on the proposal of the person that was the replacement value
assured of the Act, which applies to secured the replacement values.
Against this decision is admissible a complaint, which has suspensive
effect. ".
42. under the first head of the fourth section of the fourth behind § 79 grams is added to
new subsection 4, which including the title reads as follows:
"Subsection 4
Return, release and other waste things relevant to criminal
control ".
43. the heading above section 80 shall be repealed.
44. In § 80 para. 1 the first sentence, the words "in accordance with § 78 released or pursuant to §
79 "shall be replaced by" or "released.
45. In § 80 para. 1 at the end of the fourth sentence of the text, the words "; thing
worthless shall be destroyed ".
46. In § 80 para. 1 and 2, the last sentence shall be deleted.
47. In paragraph 80, the following paragraph 4 is added:
"(4) case on the basis of the decision of sale referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 will sell
the one who has it in the Administration, or the one who is in charge of sales,
the procedure under special legislation. ".
48. In article 81 paragraph 1. 1 the first sentence, the words "the accused released or withdrawn
the thing received or is likely to get a criminal offence "shall be replaced by
the words "issued or revoked thing that was obtained or was
probably obtained a criminal offence ".
49. In article 81 paragraph 1. 2 the first sentence, the word "accused" is replaced by "because you
to whom a case has been ensured ".
50. in § 81 para. 2 the second sentence, the words "for the danger of destruction" be deleted and the
the word "accused" shall be replaced by the words "to ensure it,".
51. In article 81 paragraph 1. 2 the third sentence, the words "that the accused was awarded"
replaced by the words "obtained" and the words "If the accused has not requested"
replaced by the words "did not apply if the person who was assured".
52. In paragraph 81, the following paragraph 5 is added:
"(5) in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 4 shall also apply mutatis mutandis, if the
ensure unknown person or thing if the person to whom the matter was
assured, dying, was declared dead or missing or
ceased to exist, is not known to the person to whom the thing could be issued, and such things
It is no longer needed for further proceedings. ".
53. In section 81a, the words "of the funds in the account, book-entry
securities, real estate and other intangible things that were
provided in accordance with § 79a to .79e "shall be replaced by" immovable property and
intangible things that have been secured under Section 79a of the "and the words" in accordance with §
79e "are replaced by the words" in accordance with § 79 grams ".
54. In § 85 para. 3, the words "in § 79 paragraph 2. 5 "shall be replaced by the words" in § 78
paragraph. 5. "
55. In article 130 paragraph 1. 2 the words "legal representative" shall be replaced by
"the guardian".
56. In article 130 paragraph 1. 3, after the words "legal representative" the words
"or guardian" and after the words "legal representatives" with the words
"or guardian".
57. In article 137 para. 2 the second sentence, the words "deprived of the capacity to
legal capacity or capacity to act is limited, "
replaced by the words "which is not fully enjoys or whose legal capacity is
limited and ".
58. In article 137 para. 2 at the end of the text of the second sentence, the words "or
guardian ".
59. In article 137 para. 3 the first sentence, the words "which is deprived of the capacity to
legal capacity or the capacity to perform legal acts is limited "
replaced by the words "whose legal capacity is limited" and the words "lawful
the representatives of "shall be replaced by the word" guardian ".
60. In article 137 para. 3 the second sentence, the words "capacity to act"
shall be replaced by "legal capacity".
61. In paragraph 143 of paragraph 1. 1, § 248 paragraph. 2 and § 265e para. 2, the words
"legal representative" are replaced by the word "guardian".
62. In paragraph 144 of paragraph 1. 3 § 250, para. 3 and § 280 para. 4, the words "legal
representative "shall be replaced by the word" guardian ".
63. In § 146a of paragraph 1. 1 letter c) is added:
"(c)) thing about the established facts indicate that it is
tool or the proceeds of crime, decided to limit such
security or has not complied with a request for revocation or limitation of such
ensure ".
64. In § 146a of paragraph 1. 1, points (d) to (f))) shall be deleted.
Subparagraph (g)) to l) shall become points (d) to (i))).
65. In § 146a of paragraph 1. 1 (b). (d)), the text "(section 79e)" is deleted.
66. In § 146a of paragraph 1. 1 (b). (e)), the text "(§ 79 grams)" is deleted.
67. In § 146a of paragraph 1. 1 (b). (f)), the text "(section 47 and section 48 para. 2 to 4) "
repealed.
68. In § 146a of paragraph 1. 1 (b). (g)), the text "(section 344a, 344b, 347 and 349)"
repealed.
69. In § 146a of paragraph 1. 1, letter g) the following point (h))
added:
"h) ensure assets for performance purposes prevents under assets, decided to
the limitations of such collateral, did not perform the Act concerning
seized property, or has not complied with a request for revocation or limitation
such collateral ".
Subparagraph (h)) and i) are referred to as letters i) and (j)).
70. in § 146a of paragraph 1. 2 the words "pursuant to section 66 paragraph 1. 1, Section 79a of the paragraph. 1, §
paragraph 2, § 79c. 2, 3 and 5, § 79 d of paragraph 1. 1 and 7, § .79e para. 1, 2 and 8, §
79e para. 1 or § 79 grams "are replaced by the words" which have decided to save
fine, changed the reason for securing things, thing
the established facts indicate that it is a tool, or the income from the
crime, decided to limit such security or has not complied with
a request for revocation or limitation of such collateral, secured the replacement
a value judgment on the restrictions to ensure the replacement value or fail
a request for revocation or limitation of such collateral ".
71. In section 158 paragraph 2. 5, and in section 233 para. 1, after the words "legal representative"
the words "or guardian".
72. In Section 163a para. 1 (b). (b)), the words "has been deprived of the capacity to
legal capacity, or that it was his capacity to perform legal acts "
replaced by the words "was his legal capacity".
73. In paragraph 173 of paragraph 1. 2, the first sentence is inserted after the phrase "providing things
important for the criminal proceedings and during the break of the criminal takes
prosecution. ".
74. In § 178 odst. 1 the words "protective treatment or security
detention or protective upbringing or the prevents things "shall be replaced by
"some of the protective measures".
75. In paragraph 196 of paragraph 1. 1 the first sentence, the words "deprived of the legal
capacity or if his competence to perform legal acts is limited "is replaced by
the words "limited in incapacitation" and the words "legal representative" with the
shall be replaced by the word "guardian".
76. In paragraph 196 of paragraph 1. 1 sentence of the third paragraph and section 230. 3, the word "stuff"
the words "or part of the assets".
77. the heading above section 239 is added:
"Protective measures".
78. In article 239 para. 1 the words "treatment, detention or about security
prevents the things "shall be replaced by the word" measures ".
79. In article 239 para. 2 the words "healing, about security detention and about the
prevents the things "shall be replaced by the word" measures ".
80. in section 239a, the following paragraph 4 is added:
"(4) Likewise, in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 3 shall proceed in the proceedings to prevent
part of the property. ".
81. In paragraph 246 para. 1 at the end of the text of subparagraph (c)), the words "or
prevents part of the assets ".
82. In paragraph 247 of paragraph 1. 2 sentence third paragraph and in section 265d. the fifth sentence the words 2
"deprived of legal capacity or if his capacity to
legal capacity is limited "is replaced by" limited in incapacitation "and
the words "legal representative" shall be replaced by the word "guardian".
83. In article 257 paragraph. 2 the term "i)" shall be replaced by "to)".
84. In § 278 at the end of paragraph 2 the following sentence "restoration procedure, which
ended by a final court resolution to halt a prosecution for
inadmissibility for reasons mentioned in section 11 (1) 1 (b). f) or (g))
enables changes to the State of health of the accused so that the defection of the reasons
to prevent his prosecution. ".
85. In § 278 at the end of paragraph 3 the following sentence "restoration procedure, which
ended by a final resolution of the Prosecutor to stop the criminal
the prosecution as inadmissible on the grounds referred to in section 11 (1) 1 (b). (f))
or (g)), shall be allowed, if the State of health of the accused, so that
the reasons for his defection to prevent prosecution. ".
86. In paragraph 308 of paragraph 1. 3, the word "f)" is replaced by "(h))".
87. In article 314e para. 6 (a). and) the words "which is deprived of the capacity to
legal capacity or capacity to act is "be replaced by
the words "whose legal capacity is."
88. under the third head of the 20th the first section heading of the seventh:
"The performance of the protective measures".
89. in paragraph 358, the following new section 358a and that including heading 358b
shall be added:
"§ 358a
Performance prevents part of the assets
On the performance of part of the assets avoids shall apply mutatis mutandis to section 345 and 346.
§ 358b
Ensure performance prevents part of the assets
(1) if the accused Is prosecuted for an offence for which it is to be given to the
the nature and gravity of the offence and the circumstances of the accused expected
Save prevents part of the assets, the Court and, in preliminary proceedings the State
representative to ensure things the accused or of another person where revision
the facts established that the conditions are met to prevent them
pursuant to section 102a of the criminal code.
(2) to ensure that you cannot take the assets that are under a special legal
prescription excluded from enforcement of the collateral.
(3) the decision on the complaint is admissible.
(4) On making a decision on securing the exercise of part of the assets and how to prevent
while ensuring the otherwise applicable § 47 para. 4 to 6 and § 47 para. 8
by analogy. The decision on the revocation or limitation of collateral and to allow
the Act of the seized assets shall apply by analogy to § 344b. ".
PART THREE
Amendment of the Act on property in the Czech Republic and its representation in legal
relations
Article IV
In § 16 para. 2 of Act No. 219/2000 Coll., on the property of the Czech Republic and
its representation in legal relations, the words "the penalty of forfeiture of
^ 29) property Affairs and resources for which the doubts that may arise
they are necessary to meet the basic needs of the convicted person, or
people whose nutrition or education of the person obliged to take care ^ 30) and
are the assumptions that could be claimed for their exemption ^ 31)
the appropriate organizational unit (section 11) carrying out the punishment of confiscation of the
assets disposed of with these things and means only after 3 months from the
the date on which the judgment became legally valid "shall be replaced by the words" the punishment of confiscation of the
property or protective measure prevents part of the assets of the 29 ^ ^), and
resources, which may arise from doubts about whether they are strictly
necessary to satisfy the basic needs of the convicted person, or other person whose
part of the property was seized, or people whose nutrition or education is
the convicted person is obliged to take care or this ^ 29), and the assumptions,
that could be claimed for their exemption ^ 30), the
organisational unit (section 11) carrying out the punishment of confiscation of property, or
protective measures to prevent part of the assets disposed of with these things and
funds up after 3 months from the date on which the decision took
legal power. "
Footnote # 29 and 30:
"29) section 66 and 102a of the criminal code.
30) § 346 paragraph 1. 1 of the criminal procedure code and article 358a. ".
Footnote 31 is repealed.
PART FOUR
Amendment of the Act on the judiciary in matters of youth
Article. In
Act No. 218/2003 Coll., on juvenile liability for unlawful acts and the
the judicial system in matters of youth and on amendments to certain acts (the Act on
the judicial system in matters of youth), as amended by law no 383/2005 Coll., Act
No 253/2006 Coll., Act No. 345/2007 Coll., Act No. 129/2008 Coll., Act
No 41/2009 Coll., Act No. 181/2007 Coll., Act No. 301/2007 Coll., Act
No 357/2010 Coll., Act No. 375/2007 Coll., Act No. 459/2007 Coll., Act
No 193/2009 Coll., Act No. 390/2009 Coll., Act No. 45/2013 Coll., Act
No 77/2015 Coll., Act No. 86/2015 Coll., Act No. 150/2016 Coll. and act
No. 250/2016 Coll., is amended as follows:
1. In article 11 (1) 2 first sentence, section 20 (2). 2 the first sentence and section 20 (2).
3, after the words "representatives" shall be inserted the word "guardian".
2. In article 11 (1) 2 the second sentence and in § 20 para. 2 the second sentence after the word
"representative" shall be inserted the word "guardian".
3. In article 20 (2). 1, after the word "representative", the words "or
guardian ".
4. in section 21 para. 1, after the words "things ^ 9)" the words ", prevents the
part of the assets ^ 37) ".
Footnote No. 37:
"37) section 102a of the criminal code.".
5. in section 21 para. 2, the words "and avoid the things" shall be replaced by ", prevents the
things, and prevents the part of the assets ".
6. In the title of § 43, after the words "representative", the words "or
the guardian ".
7. In § 43 para. 1, after the words "legal representative" and after the words "legal
the representative of "the words" or guardian ".
8. In section 43 at the end of paragraph 1, the following sentence "the legal representative or
the guardian of the young person also has the right to ask questions of the persons examined,
look in the files, with the exception of the Protocol on the vote and personal data
a witness pursuant to § 55 para. 2 of the code of criminal procedure, the claims of these excerpts and
notes and take the cost of a copy of the files and their parts ".
9. In article 43, paragraph 2 reads as follows:
"(2) in the event that there is a risk of delay and legal representative or
the guardian of the young person cannot exercise their rights referred to in paragraph 1
or if the guardian has not been appointed, although there are reasons for his
the provisions of the President of the Senate and, in preliminary proceedings, the Prosecutor
establishes juvenile to exercising these rights of the guardian. Another person than
a lawyer can be appointed guardian only with its consent. It cannot be
establishing a person can have a reasonable concern that for your interest in
the result of the proceeding will be duly defend the interests of the young person. Resolution on the
the provisions of the guardian shall be notified to the person who is appointed by, and
does not exclude the nature of things, whether or not a juvenile. Against the resolution on the
the provisions of the custodian is admissible a complaint. ".
10. In section 44 para. 2 the first sentence after the word "representative" shall be replaced
"or guardian".
11. In paragraph 44, the following paragraph 4 is added:
"(4) a young person who is not a Lawyer fully enjoys may exercise
the rights referred to in § 41 para. 2 and 3 of the code of criminal procedure, even against the will of
juvenile. ".
12. In § 46 para. 2 and in section 60, after the words "representative", the words "or
guardian ".
13. in § 54 para. 1 the first sentence, after the words "Attorney, guardians"
inserted the word "guardian" and the words "agent, guardian"
the words "and the guardians".
14. in section 64 shall be inserted at the beginning of paragraph 2, the phrase "President of the Senate can be
a copy of the indictment to deliver also the legal representative or guardian
juvenile. ".
15. In § 64 para. 2 the second sentence, after the words "whether or not" the words
"the legal representative or guardian of the juvenile and".
16. in section 67 para. 1, the word "also", the words "legal representative
or guardian of the juvenile, ".
17. In article 67, the following paragraph 3 is added:
"(3) announces the juvenile, which is not fully enjoys the resolution,
against which it has the right to lodge a complaint, you need to notify to him, so
even its advocates and its legal representative or guardian. "
18. In paragraph 72, at the end of paragraph 1, the following sentence "appeal and the appeal in
favour of a young person is not fully enjoys can be given, and
against his will, whether or not its legal representative or guardian and its
advocate. ".
19. in paragraph 72, the following new section 72a, which including the title reads as follows:
"§ 72a
The deadline for lodging an appeal and the withdrawal
(1) the time limit for bringing an appeal against a decision
delivers or Announces as a juvenile, and his lawyer, or
legal representative or guardian, runs from effected, or
the announcement, which was carried out at the latest.
(2) a complaint against the order or appeal against the judgment, filed in
favour of a juvenile other authorised person or a young person
counsel or legal representative or guardian may be taken
back only with the express consent of the juvenile. The Prosecutor may, however,
take such a challenge back even without the consent of a juvenile; in this
the event runs juvenile new time limit for appeal from the
Notice that the appeal was withdrawn.
(3) the application for reopening proceedings brought for the benefit of the young person
other authorised person or young person an advocate or a legal
representative or guardian may be withdrawn only with the express
consent of the young person; This does not apply if such a proposal filed by State
representative or, if such a proposal was filed by an authorized person after death
juvenile. ".
20. in section 88a of paragraph 1. 3 (b). (c)), after the word "stuff" the words "or
protective measures to prevent part of the assets ".
21. in section 91 paragraph 2. 1, after the words "legal representatives" the words "or
the guardian ".
22. in paragraph § 95a. 1 third sentence, the words "the parents or other legal
representative "are replaced by the words" legal representative or guardian ".
23. in paragraph § 95a. 3 and § 95a paragraph. 4 the second sentence, after the words "legal
the representative of "the words" or guardian ".
PART FIVE
Amendment of the Act on the enforcement of the property and things in criminal proceedings
Čl.VI
Act No. 279/2003 Coll. on the execution of the property and Affairs of the criminal
management and amending certain laws, as amended by law No 112/2006 Coll.
Act No. 115/2006 Coll., Act No. 253/2006 Coll., Act No. 218/2009 Coll.,
Act No 420/2007 Coll., Act No. 18/2009 Coll., Act No. 193/2009 Coll., and
Act No. 86/2015 Coll., is amended as follows:
1. In article 1 (1). 1, after the word "punishment" the words ", performance
the protective measures will prevent part of the assets ".
2. in paragraph 1 of the text at the end of paragraph 3, the words "unless the
the thing about the sale decision was made pursuant to section 80 of the code of criminal procedure ".
3. In article 1 (1). 5 the first sentence after the word "stuff" the words ",
the proposal to prevent part of the assets ".
4. In section 2, the following shall be added at the end of paragraph 1, the sentence "the decision to ensure the
delivered to the person or body responsible for the implementation of the collateral, and
After the authority or person shall provide, and the person for whom it was a matter of
assured. At the same time the Court authority or person responsible for the implementation of
ensure prompt, so that, if it finds that the property that has been
secured, shall be treated, that threatens to thwart or impede the purpose of ensuring
He immediately notified of this fact. ".
5. In article 2 (2). 2 the second sentence, after the words "the law", the words "and
unless the claim against the Bank on the account or to another entity
authorized lead account for another ".
6. In article 2 (2). 3, the first sentence is replaced by the phrase "if it sees fit, the Court,
who decided to ensure, as necessary for the purpose of ensuring
shall inform the other institutions and to ensure people who have, on the basis
special legislation imposed accounting, supervisory, or other
the obligation in relation to a secure asset or its owner or
holder, and at the same time asks you to give him, if it finds that it is the
seized assets are treated in a way that threatens to thwart the purpose of its
ensure, without delay, notify this fact; These bodies and persons
are required to comply with such a call. ".
7. In article 2 (2). 3, the following sentence "the first sentence of the Court which ruled on the
ensuring a share of the business corporation, shall inform after
the legal force of such decisions also business corporation. ".
8. In article 2 (2). 3 the third sentence, the word "property" is replaced by
"immovable property" and the words "real estate" is replaced by "with the immovable
things ".
9. in section 2 (2). 4, after the words "such registration", the words "on the basis of the
legal proceedings the person to whom the property has been secured, "and the words"; in
the case of the registration of rights to real estate in the land register secured
According to the land registry law, consent is only required if
is implemented on the basis of a legal act by which the accused
disposes of the property "shall be deleted.
10. section 5 and 6, including the following titles:
"§ 5
The discovery of movable assets
(1) the Court is entitled to determine the movable property for the purposes of the performance of
the decision to provide the required personal examination of the accused and a tour of the
an apartment or other premises used for housing or space to them
belonging ("the dwelling"), and other premises and land where you can
assume that the accused has his property; These tours runs the authority
that is ordered, or a police authority.
(2) the inspection authority may, that tour is performed, add also the person
whose participation during the inspection is needed in particular for the purposes of the proper
identification, valuation and security identified the sale of goods.
(3) a person who performs the inspection, prepare and of movable property to which the collateral
and if they are not movable found during the examination referred to in
decision regarding the securing of assets, will fill those of them that are not in accordance with
This law of excluded. It should be drawn up of movable property
appropriately defined so that they are not interchangeable with the other.
(4) if it is not in paragraphs 1 to 3 shall apply, unless otherwise specified on the
Regulation and enforcement of the provisions of the code of criminal procedure, mutatis mutandis, tours of the personal
the search warrant, search warrant and the search warrant other premises and land.
(5) If the accused person has the right to release or delivery of movable property,
shall transfer these things to the Court or in its instruction to the person who is responsible for
management of seized property.
(6) any person who has a movable assets from the assets of the accused, it is after
a decision regarding the securing of property, shall, without delay, about
notify the Court or the person who has been entrusted with the administration of the secured assets.
§ 6
Management identified by the movable things
(1) if it is necessary for the purposes of ensuring things written, pursuant to section 5 shall
who is he, withdraw, if the challenge is issued; in doing so,
proceed by analogy with § 78 and 79 code of criminal procedure. The authority conducting the
a tour of the may assessment of all the relevant circumstances, leave the
matter where it is located, if the
and withdrawal of such things) would have led to its deterioration or to
the depreciation of the things with which it is functionally linked,
(b)), the withdrawal of such things has been associated with inadequate technical
difficulties,
(c)) it is a matter requiring special care or is it associated with care
disproportionate costs, or
(d)) it is a matter of negligible value.
(2) If a movable thing left in place where it is located, this
the fact is, along with the reason for such a procedure to the inventory and the thing
define properly so as not to be confused with the other. Authority
at the same time issues the inspection to refrain from dealing with
things, in which case properly and unmistakably define, and disables the
was ever legally or de facto, of the branch, and usage in a way that would
thwarting the purpose of the led to ensure in particular that has been converted to
another injured, damaged, or destroyed. Prohibition of acts against all and is
effective upon posting the statement on the place where the thing is located; in this
the meaning of the command must include the lesson, including a warning of the consequences of
associated with the violation of the ban. Legal action taken in breach of the prohibition
specified in the command is invalid, and the Court shall take into account to the invalidity of the
without design. Movable thing left on the spot shall be marked so as to be
clearly, that applies to it the command to refrain from dealing with things.
(3) Leaving movables in the place where it is located, does not prevent the
body active in criminal proceedings the competent to decide on such things
According to the code of criminal procedure at any time subsequently called for the release of such things or
issued a command to its withdrawal, if it considers that this is necessary from the point of view
the purpose of the detention.
(4) the authority in criminal proceedings the competent to decide on the matter issued by the
or withdrawn in accordance with the criminal procedure code may at any time decide that leaves it
for the reasons mentioned in paragraph 1 for the person to whom it was provided; in doing so,
shall proceed mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph 2. Against such a decision is not
the complaint admissible.
(5) paragraphs 1 to 3 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the identified machines or other
fixed devices that are part of the immovable property and are
separable. ".
11. In the heading of section 7, the words "book-entry securities," shall be deleted and the
the words "and other" shall be replaced by the words "in cash and".
12. In paragraph 7 (2). 1 the first sentence, after the words "book-entry securities"
the words "and investment tools".
13. in section 7 (2). 1 the first sentence and second sentence, and paragraph 7 (1). 5, after the words
"book-entry securities", the words "and investment tools".
14. in section 7 (2). 1 the second sentence, after the words "book-entry securities"
the words "and investment instruments".
15. in section 7 (2). 1 at the end of the text of the second sentence, the words "and
investment instruments ".
16. In the heading of section 8 the word "property" is replaced by "immovable
things ".
17. in § 8 para. 1 the first sentence, the word "property" is replaced by
"immovable property".
18. in § 8 para. 1 the second sentence, the word "property" is replaced by
"the real thing".
19. in § 8 paragraph 2 reads as follows:
"(2) on the basis of an order for examination of real estate property issued by a court, and in
preliminary proceedings by the judge on the proposal of the public prosecutor or the Court may
the Prosecutor, or on the basis of the instruction of the police authority to perform
inspection of immovable property and its accessories in order to determine the status of
immovable property and assess the effectiveness of the latter. Authority
law enforcement conducting the inspection of immovable property shall notify the time and
site inspection, the owner of the immovable property or a person who lives with him in the
a common household, and also the person that is known, that has real estate
the case law. These persons are required to explore the real estate property and its
allow the accessories. The authority conducting the examination may add to it
persons whose participation in the inspection is needed, in particular for the purposes of
valuation of immovable property. If the examination of real estate property found movable
thing or a machine or other attached devices that are part of the
immovable property and are separable, for which there are reasons for their
ensure you can ensure by leaving in place even without the issue of the
tour of homes or other premises, and inspection of land; in doing so,
proceed by analogy with § 6 para. 1 to 3 ".
20. In § 8 para. 3, the first sentence shall be deleted.
21. in § 8 para. 3, the words "this resolution" be replaced by "resolution
of the ensuring of immovable property ".
22. in section 10, paragraph 1. 1 (b). (b)), the words "or" shall be deleted.
23. in section 10, paragraph 1. 3, the words "or the owner" shall be deleted.
PART SIX
Amendment of the Act on the criminal liability of legal persons and proceedings against them
Article. (VII)
Act No. 418/2007 Coll. on criminal liability of legal persons and proceedings
against them, as amended by Act No 105/2013 Coll., Act No. 141/2014 Sb.
Act No. 86/2015 Coll., Act No. 375/2015 Coll., Act No. 135/2016 Coll.
Act No. 183/2016 Coll. and Act No. 455/2016 Coll., is amended as follows:
1. in article 15, the end of the text of paragraph 2, the words "or the prevents
part of the assets ".
2. in article 15, paragraph 2. 3 the second sentence, after the words "financial penalty"
the words "or the prevents part of the assets" and the words "in addition to forfeiture"
the words "the same parts".
3. In the third section, in the title of title IV is replaced by the word "TRADE"
the word "TRADE".
4. under section 26 the following new section 26a, which including the title reads as follows:
"§ 26a
Prevents part of the assets
The Court may impose a legal person protective measure prevents the part
assets under the conditions laid down in the criminal code. ".
PART SEVEN
Amendment of the Act on international judicial cooperation in criminal matters
Article. (VIII)
Act No. 104/2013 Coll., on international judicial cooperation in matters
criminal matters, as amended by Act No. 77/2015 Coll. and Act No. 86/2015 Sb,
be amended as follows:
1. in § 9 para. 4 (b). (f)), after the words "legal guardian" is inserted
the word "guardian".
2. in § 14 para. 2 (c)):
"(c)) if limited in incapacitation".
3. § 47 para. 2 (a). (b)) after the word "asset", the words ",
the performance of a financial penalty, or part of the assets avoids performance "and the words
"fifth" section with the words "and the seventh".
4. In section 226 paragraph 1. 1 (b). a), the words "or is the proceeds of crime"
replaced by the words "(hereinafter referred to as" crime "), or has been
obtained by the criminal offence or as a reward for a criminal offence, or has been, even if
only partly, acquired as a matter of a criminal offence or obtained as a matter of forming
the reward for the crime, including the fruits and benefits (hereinafter referred to as "the proceeds of crime
the activities of the ")".
5. In § 278 paragraph. 1 (b). and that) the words "obtained a criminal offence
or as a reward for it, or has been, even if only in part, acquired a thing
that was obtained by the criminal offence or as a reward for him, or
the replacement value of the thing the Court can declare a forfeit or
occupied by "shall be replaced by the words" which is the proceeds of crime or
the replacement value for the proceeds of crime ".
6. In § 278 paragraph. 1 (b). (b)), the words "has been made, or used to
Commission of the offence "shall be replaced by the words" is a tool of criminal
activities ".
7. In § 278 paragraph 2, including footnote No 25:
"(2) in accordance with this part shall also, when recognition and enforcement
final decision of a Court of another Member State, issued in the
criminal proceedings which have been saved will prevent asset ^ 25).
25) article 5 of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council/42/EU of 3.
April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime
activities in the European Union. ".
8. In paragraph 292 paragraph 2. 1 at the end of the text of subparagraph (c)), the words ", or
It was saved under assets. "prevents the
PART EIGHT
The EFFECTIVENESS of the
Article. (IX)
This Act shall take effect on the 15th day following the date of its publication.
Hamáček in r.
Zeman in r.
Sobotka in r.