Quality System Activities Context. With The Use Of Nuclear Energy

Original Language Title: systém jakosti při činnostech souvis. s využíváním jaderné energie

Read the untranslated law here: https://portal.gov.cz/app/zakony/download?idBiblio=66994&nr=132~2F2008~20Sb.&ft=txt

132/2008 Sb.



DECREE



from day 4. April 2008



on the quality system in the implementation and provision of activities related to the

the use of nuclear energy and radiation activities and assurance

the quality of the selected devices with regard to their inclusion in the

safety classes



State Office for nuclear safety shall be determined according to § 47 para. 7 to the

implement section 2 (a). I), section 4, paragraph 4. 8 and § 13 para. 3 (b). (d)) and paragraph 2. 5

Law No. 18/1997 Coll. on peaceful uses of nuclear energy and

ionizing radiation (the Atomic Act), and amending and supplementing certain

laws, as amended by Act No. 13/2002 Coll. and Act No. 253/2005 Coll.:



§ 1



The subject and scope of editing



This Decree regulates the



and quality) system requirements on the implementation or provisioning activities

associated with the use of nuclear energy or radiation activities



(b)) the requirements for filling a quality assurance programme



(c)), the criteria for inclusion and the distribution of the selected device to the

safety classes



(d)) the basic requirements for quality assurance of selected device

in view of their inclusion in the safety classes and



(e)), the scope and the implementation of the list of selected devices.



§ 2



Tiered access



Anyone who introduces a system of quality, apply a tiered approach.

A tiered approach must take into account the



and the complexity of the process, activity), their inputs and outputs and their significance

in terms of nuclear safety and radiation protection,



(b)) the classification of ionizing radiation sources, way of dealing with them and

the category of the site at which the radiation activities



(c)) the treatment of nuclear materials and radioactive waste management

provided for by other legislation "^ 1") and



(d) the inclusion of the selected devices to) security classes according to § 12.



§ 3



General requirements for the quality system



The quality system must be



and) designed processes and activities, related to the quality of the items, including

products, affecting nuclear safety or radiation protection (hereinafter

"the processes and activities"), their inputs and outputs, including their

the potential impact on nuclear safety or radiation protection,



b) sequence and interrelationship of processes and activities,



c) processes and activities are planned, managed, executed, authenticated and

evaluated so as to achieve the quality of the items with respect to its

importance in terms of nuclear safety, radiation protection, or



(d)) used by the acceptance criteria and methods for planning, management,

the implementation, validation and assessment of the processes and activities



(e)) established the organizational structure and its changes, including the rights,

obligations and the reciprocal relationships of persons processes and activities planned,

controls are carried out, verified or evaluated in order to ensure their effective

synergies,



(f)), there is a way to communicate within an organizational structure and method

communication with people different from the subject of the quality system,

that the implementation of processes and activities involved in, or to which processes

and activities are directed,



g) set out the requirements on suppliers who are involved in the implementation of the

processes and activities



h) performed monitoring and control of processes, activities, inputs and

the outputs in terms of their quality requirements to demonstrate compliance

their properties with the requirements prescribed in the system documentation

the quality,



I) modalities and criteria for the evaluation of the quality system of the continuous

with regard to its efficiency; evaluation of the quality system, shall be carried out



1. the persons responsible for the evaluation of its own activities pursuant to § 5 in them

control areas of the quality system and



2. the independent evaluation of the quality system cleared persons who

participate in the planning, management or execution of a process or activity,

which are the subject of reviews,



j) secured the personnel, technical, material and financial resources,

including a suitable working environment, needed to maintain and improve the

quality system and for the implementation of the processes and activities and to deploy,

maintain and continuously improve their effectiveness,



k) applied measures to improve the quality of items affecting

nuclear safety or radiation protection,



l) carried out improvement of the quality system by the application of corrective and

preventive measures based on the results of the evaluation.



§ 4



The requirements for the documentation of the quality system



(1) any person who establishes a system of quality, it must be documented.

The quality system documentation includes



and a document describing the quality system) with regard to General requirements

pursuant to § 3,



b) documented procedures describing processes and activities within the system

quality and their management and implementation,



c) working documents following the documented procedure in detail

describing the way of planning, verification, implementation, reviews and proceedings

process or activity and the evaluation of the quality system, including their

outputs or product specifications; the working documents are, in particular,

manuals, instructions, rules, rules, training plans,

programs, documents or drawings for production in any medium, and



d) records demonstrating the activities performed or results achieved in

the performance of the quality system requirements or requirements for individual items

affecting nuclear safety and radiation protection, as set out in

documented procedures or in the working documents.



(2) the quality system documentation must be



and easy to understand, complete) uniquely identifiable, traceable and to

available as amended to all persons carrying out relevant activities,



(b)) prior to the introduction in terms of reviewing the suitability,

adequacy, effectiveness, clarity, correctness, and completeness, and

approved persons designated and



c) safely stored and archived for a period fixed by other legal

Regulation ^ 2) or, if the time is not for a specific document archiving as follows

established, for a period specified by the documented procedure for process

Archiving; time to archive records concerning quality assurance

the selected device is laid down in § 13 para. 2.



§ 5



Persons in the system of quality



(1) within the quality system shall be determined by the persons responsible for the



and the maintenance of the quality system) in accordance with the General requirements under section

3,



(b) documenting the process under §) 4 (4). 1 (b). b) to (d)),



(c)) to ensure effective interaction and links between processes,



(d) ensuring and documenting compliance) the output of the process with the requirements of the

This output laid down in the quality system documentation,



e) recording and monitoring during the process,



f) resolve disagreements processes and their outputs,



g) evaluating the effectiveness of the process and its changes and



h) support for process improvement.



(2) a person designated within the quality system referred to in paragraph 1 shall be

established rights and obligations necessary to carry out the intended entrusted to them,

activities.



§ 6



Processes and activities



(1) planning, management, verification, implementation and evaluation processes, and

activities in the quality system must be carried out by persons with qualifications

appropriate to the type and importance of their work. This qualification

the lowest allowable is achieved by determining the qualifying

requirements on such persons by ensuring that their training and assessment

the effectiveness of the training so that these persons can carry out allocated

activity and have notice the influence of its activities on nuclear safety

or radiation protection. The qualification of such persons, including their

education and training must be documented.



(2) processes and activities must be planned and carried out under the following

terms and conditions:



and) documented procedures and working documents relating to the item

affecting nuclear safety or radiation protection are available,



(b)) the implementation of processes and activities are in conformity with the requirements of the documented

the procedures and the working documents for processes and activities,



(c)) is used in the proper equipment for the implementation of the processes and activities and are

secured the necessary working conditions and environment for their implementation,



(d)) performs monitoring and checking the properties of items affecting

nuclear safety or radiation protection,



(e)) production, monitoring, measuring or test equipment is maintained in

enabling the State to demonstrate the achievement of permanent line items affecting

nuclear safety or radiation protection with skill requirements;

for the control, monitoring, calibration and maintenance of measuring and testing

the device will process the procedures to ensure that the measurement uncertainty

corresponds to the required competency measurement, and



f) changes to the processes and activities shall be carried out only on the basis of the proposal,

substantiated and zhodnoceného in terms of the purpose of the change and its impact on

nuclear safety or radiation protection, and demonstrate the impact of the changes on the

level of nuclear safety and radiation protection afterwards.



(3) every process within the quality system must be evaluated in terms of

efficiency. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the process must be carried out by comparing the

the outputs of the process with the requirements imposed on it in the system documentation

the quality.



(4) the processes and activities should be subjected to review to confirm

the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the items affecting the nuclear


safety or radiation protection (hereinafter referred to as "the review"), authentication to

confirm the line items affecting nuclear safety or radiation

with the requirements of the protection of its property (hereinafter referred to as "verification") and validation

to confirm the line items affecting nuclear safety or

radiation protection, with the requirements of its intended use (hereinafter referred to as

"validation"). For the review, verification and validation of processes and activities

must be determined and documented the schedule, scope, method of implementation

the review, verification and validation and acceptance criteria and must be

determined by the responsibility of persons for compliance with these criteria. The examination,

verification or validation processes can perform only the person responsible for

activities referred to in section 5, and at the same time a person different from those people that are

-participating in the implementation of the process or activity. The results of the examination,

verification and validation of processes and activities are documented in the form of

records.



(5) If, in the course of a process or activity in the documented

procedures or working documents established checkpoints, you cannot

process or activity to continue without demonstrable consent

the designated person, issued on the basis of status or result of the validation check.



(6) the requirements for the processes carried out by the supplier shall be given in the documentation

the quality system pursuant to § 4 paragraph 2. 1.



§ 7



Some processes requirements related to the product



(1) the process of designing the product, including development, design, and

designing the product, (hereinafter referred to as the "design process") must be further considered

the following conditions:



and review of inputs) is performed in the design process from the viewpoint of nuclear

safety and radiation protection to evaluate their compliance with the requirements of

other legislation relating to the product and with the agreed

specifications,



(b)) is performed a review of the design process to evaluate the ability of

the output of the design process to meet the requirements set out in the inputs and

the requirements, which are a prerequisite for the intended use of the product,



(c)) is performed in the design process validation to determine if the outputs of the

the design process comply with the applicable legal requirements and

laid down by the specification relating to the product with regard to nuclear

safety and radiation protection, and whether it is determined how to resolve imbalances

from these requirements,



(d) the final output) will process the documentation of the design process, including

putting its changes in a form that will allow its verification in relation to

inputs for the design process by qualified persons, which participated in the

its processing, or by independent qualified persons and



e) validation of the design process is carried out to determine whether the proposed

the product according to the final output of the design process documentation meets the

the requirements for the intended use in terms of nuclear safety or

radiation protection.



(2) the process of production of the product must be carried out on the following conditions:



and product specifications), including its amendments, is in accordance with the technical

regulations, technical specifications or technical standards, which

include the applicable requirements of other legislation for

nuclear safety and radiation protection,



(b) the method of manufacture of the product) is documented in accordance with the requirements of

set out in the final output documentation for the design of the product,



(c)) is determined by the type, method and scope of the review, verification and validation

the product, including acceptance criteria, before its intended use,



(d)) the product is unmistakable way identified and this identification

to maintain,



(e)) are available for information about current or past status, location, and

use of the product, or on the current or past treatment

product at any time during the production process,



(f)) the product is supplied in a State that allows authentication and



g) match product with the requirements specified in the documented

the procedures and the working documents for its production is documented

records.



(3) the process of procuring the product must take place on the following conditions:



and the documentation for the procurement) are set correctly and completely

the requirements for the product, including the requirements of quality assurance

of the product. The documentation for the procurement and the requirements shall be specified on the

reporting and address the identified mismatches,



(b)) in the course of the procurement process is carried out supervision of contractors,



(c)) are established in advance in the requirements for the selection and evaluation of suppliers

product based on their ability to supply product; product vendors

are selected and evaluated on the basis of those requirements, and



(d) conformity of the delivered products with) the prescribed requirements for procurement is

documented records that are available before using the product.



(4) the processes and activities in the transport, storage and maintenance of the product

must be carried out in a manner which prevents damage, unintended use

or destruction of the product.



(5) the requirements for processes whose compliance with these requirements cannot be in

full validate subsequent inspection or test of the product, in particular

on the forming, welding, non-destructive testing, heat treatment,

creation of software or computing resources,

the implementation of medical exposure of patients (hereinafter referred to as "special processes")

must be laid down in the product specification, which is a special

processes apply. Special processes be governed, validate, implement and evaluate

only sufficiently qualified persons whose knowledge and skills must

be regularly audited and demonstrably. To the implementation of the specific

processes may be used only for technical equipment is regularly

compliance with the requirements of the project, the specific processes. The fulfilment of the

qualification requirements and verify compliance with the requirements of the Special

processes must be kept.



§ 8



Management of the divisions and their correction and preventive measures against conflicts



(1) the processes and activities, their inputs and outputs, which are not in conformity

with the requirements laid down in the schedule referred to in section 4 (hereinafter referred to as "mismatch

the entry "), are subject to the process of management disagreements.



(2) the process of management disagreements in the quality system, shall be carried out in accordance with the

the requirements of section 6 (1). 2 and in accordance with a documented procedure for the management of

disagreements that must provide for



and requirements for the implementation of identification) disagreement immediately after its

finding and documenting,



(b)) the requirements for the notification process to the relevant responsible persons of mismatches

the subject of the quality system,



(c)) treatment do not agree the entry and the requirements in order to avoid

the inappropriate use of non-conforming items, including the removal of disagreements, and



d) requirements for evaluation of the consequences and possible other effects of mismatch

for nuclear safety or radiation protection when using mismatched

item.



(3) to remedy the non-conformity must be in accordance with a documented procedure for

the management of disagreements to ensure



and the review of the non-conforming items)



(b) an analysis of the causes of disagreement)



c) determine how the solution of disagreement,



(d) evaluation of the necessary measures) to prevent recurrence

the occurrence of mismatches and



e) determination, documentation and implementation of appropriate remedial measures

the consequences of disagreement.



(4) to avoid disagreements that might arise (hereinafter referred to as "potential

mismatch "), must be processed and introduced documented procedure for

the exclusion of potential discord, which lays down requirements for the



and finding potential disagreements and) their possible causes,



(b) assessment of the necessary measures to) prevent the occurrence of potential

disagreements and



c) determining, documenting and the introduction of preventive measures of reasonable

the potential impact of potential disagreement; to determine the preventive

It uses its own measures of operational experience and operational

the experience of other bodies, if they are available.



(5) corrective or preventive measures Imposed must be kept

monitored and evaluated in terms of the status of their implementation and

efficiency.



§ 9



The quality system at the implementation or securing radiological activities



(1) the quality system at the implementation or securing radiological activities

in the workplace (IV). category must comply with the requirements of § 3 to 8.



(2) in the implementation of the quality system or the provision of radiological activities

in the workplace III. category must comply with the requirements of section 3 (b). a) to

(h)), (b). (I) point 1 (a)). j) to (l)), § 4, 5, § 6 (1). 1 to 5, § 7

paragraph. 3 (b). a), (c)) and (d)), para. 4 and 5, § 8 para. 1 to 3 and odst. 5.



(3) the quality system at the implementation or securing radiological activities

at work II. category and in the implementation of personal dosimetry and

other services relevant from the point of view of radiation protection shall comply with the

the requirements of section 3 (b). a) to (h)), (b). (I) point 1 (a)). j) to (l)), § 4, 5,

§ 6 para. 1-3, para. 5, § 7 (2). 3 (b). and) and (d)), para. 4 and 5, § 8

paragraph. 1 to 3 and odst. 5.



(4) the quality system at the implementation or securing radiological activities

in the workplace category and in the training of selected

workers must meet the requirements of section 3 (b). a) to (h)), (b). (j)), and k), section

4, 5 and § 8 para. 1.



§ 10



The requirements for filling a quality assurance programme for povolované

activities pursuant to § 9 para. 1 (b). a) to (g)), (b). I), (j)), n) and r)

the Atomic Act




(1) the Program shall document the quality assurance system in place

the quality. The filling of the quality assurance programme for povolované activities

According to § 9 para. 1 (b). a) to (g)), (b). I), (j)), n) and r) of the Atomic

the law must comply with the requirements of section 4, paragraph 4. 2 and be subject to regular

revisions that it brought in line with any changes made to the

the quality system.



(2) quality assurance programme must include



and the subject's identifier information), whose quality system program

quality assurance documents (the "submitter"); u

legal person, company or business name, registered office and identification form

number, if assigned; for natural persons first and last name, date of

of birth and address of the place of residence or other residence on the territory

The United States, or the address of the place of residence outside the territory of the Czech Republic,



(b)) the subject, location, and scope of activities of the petitioner,



(c)), with the exception of the workplace III. and the lower categories of personally identifiable information

direct suppliers of products used by the submitter; for legal

person, business name or the name, registered office and identification number, form,

If it was allocated; for natural persons first and last name, date of birth and

address of the place of residence or other residence in the territory of the United

Republic or the address of the place of residence outside the territory of the Czech Republic,



d) enumerate processes and their belonging to the activities for which the programme

quality assurance covers, showing the processes and activities

carried out by the supplier in a manner



e) documented procedures or references to these procedures with their

a unique identification,



(f) a description of the quality system) promoters including



1. responsibilities, rights and obligations and the reciprocal relationships of persons

plan, manage, validate, implement, evaluate processes and activities,



2. mutual relations and breakdown of the departments or work groups involved in

in the planning, management, verification, implementation and evaluation processes, and

activities, including the method of control and communication within the body with its

the vendor,



3. the principles of the quality system requirements and quality assurance

the quality of the processes, activities and products related to povolované

activities, including links to documented procedures



g) with the exception of the workplace III. and the lower category, the scope and

the application of the requirements of this Decree on the quality system and to secure

the quality of the suppliers, including the method of evaluation of the quality system and

authentication of quality assurance for these vendors,



(h) the method and specify the frequency) of the independent reviews cleared system

quality, if it is carried out, including the manner and form of the results of

These audits, and



I) method and specify the frequency of revisions assurance programme

the quality.



§ 11



The requirements for filling a quality assurance programme for povolovanou

activity according to § 9 para. 1 (b). l) of the Atomic Act



The filling of the quality assurance programme for povolovanou activities under section 9

paragraph. 1 (b). l) Atomic law provides § 4 paragraph 2. 2 Decree No.

145/1997 Coll. on the registration and control of nuclear materials and their

a closer definition, as amended.



§ 12



The criteria for classification and distribution of the selected device in the security

classes



The selected device are classified and divided into safety classes 1, 2 and

3. In the annex, there are criteria for inclusion and distribution of selected

the device in the security classes.



section 13 of the



The basic requirements for quality assurance of selected device

in view of their inclusion in the safety classes



(1) the quality assurance of the selected device must be used

the quality system documentation processed in accordance with section 4, which is

refers to the processes and activities in the design, construction, putting into

operation, operation or decommissioning of the selected device, in particular

records relating to the selected device



and) concerning special processes pursuant to § 7 para. 5,



(b) the listed in the security class) 1 or 2, demonstrating compliance with

the quality requirements of the selected device and final output validation

documentation of the design process of the selected device from the viewpoint of compliance with all the

acceptance criteria imposed on the selected device, its parts, and to

the materials used for its manufacture, or



(c) the listed in the security class) 1 or 2-resistant pressure

the working fluid, documenting the defects that have been detected by checking and

removed how to perform repairs of selected devices and consciously

left defects which are further monitored.



(2) the quality assurance of the selected device must be carried out

records demonstrating compliance with the requirements on the quality of the selected device in the

scale and in a manner that will allow at any time to assess the status of the selected

device. These records, and the records referred to in paragraph 1 must be securely

stored and archived for the lifetime of the selected device,

starting with the design of the selected device and its parts, after his

decommissioning.



(3) in the design process of the selected device must be in the final output

documentation of the design process for the selected device included in the safety

class 1 or 2 intended



and tracking the lifetime) the criteria for the selected device, conditions for

treatment with your device and its operation and



b) acceptance criteria needed for the performance of its security features.



(4) when the procurement process for the selected device must be in advance

the agreed scope of the reviewed documentation system of quality vendor

the selected device in terms of compliance with the requirements on the quality of items

affecting nuclear safety or radiation protection referred to in

evaluating the factors listed in section 4, paragraph 4. 2 (a). b). Of this

a review of the record must be made.



(5) in the process of commissioning and the operation of the selected device must

be



and documented way to provide identification) to the selected device, and

obtaining and maintaining information about current or past status, location, and

the use of the selected device or the present or the past how

treatment with your device at any time during the process of putting into

service and operation,



b) handled, loaded and maintained plans and programmes carrying out checks

selected devices and plans and programmes, the implementation of the maintenance, repair and

reconstruction of the selected device and



(c)) use spare parts of the selected devices that meet the

the requirements set out in the specification of the selected device.



§ 14



The scope and method of making the list of selected devices



(1) the selected device shall be clearly identified prior to their obtaining

for a nuclear device and for each nuclear facility must be

documented in the form of a list of the selected device.



(2) the list of the selected device in the text section must identify the

each of the selected device, with an indication of their safety classes, and

the selected device has to be broken down in terms of the performance of their security

features. In the drafting of the list of selected devices must be



a) schematically shown technology systems and building parts that

contain the selected device, with an indication of their distinguished

safety classes and highlight the boundaries between the selected and the other

device or other parts of buildings, and



b) identification details of the selected devices marked and for more information

which is clearly obvious functions for the selected device in the system or

the location of the selected device in the context of the construction of a nuclear device.



(3) included in the list of selected devices must be rules for the



and determine the boundaries between systems), devices or parts of the construction of the nuclear

device means a security feature and other systems

the device or parts of the construction of a nuclear installation and



(b) the boundary between the) determination of the safety of selected classes

device.



(4) the list of selected devices in stage designing of nuclear equipment

must conform to the approved project documentation and in the phase of operation

the nuclear device to the actual implementation of a nuclear device.



(5) before making changes to the design of a nuclear installation on

the selected device to determine whether the consequences of its implementation does not affect the

nuclear and technical security negatively and whether there are changes in the

the list of selected devices.



§ 15



Transitional provisions



(1) the quality assurance system and quality assurance programs must be reported to the

accordance with the requirements of this order not later than two years after the acquisition of its

efficiency.



(2) quality assurance of selected equipment must be put into

accordance with the requirements laid down by this Decree within two years

After the entry into force of this Decree.



section 16 of the



Regulation (EEC)



Repeals the Decree 214/1997 Coll. on quality assurance in

activities related to the use of nuclear energy and the activities of the

leading to exposure and about the establishment of criteria for the classification and Division

the selected device in the security classes.



§ 17



The effectiveness of the



This Decree shall enter into force on 1 January 2000. May 22, 2008.



Chair:



Ing. Drábová, Ph.d. in r.



Annex




The criteria for classification and distribution of the selected device in the security

classes



1. Criteria for classification and distribution of the selected device to the

safety classes for nuclear facilities, which includes the

PWR



1.1. Selected devices included in the safety class 1 are

bordering the pressure device the refrigeration cycle of a nuclear reactor,

with the exception of those devices for which it is possible to compensate for the damage

normal system for refilling of refrigerant.



1.2. Selected devices included in the safety class 2

cover the nuclear fuel facilities bordering the pressure circuit

nuclear reactor coolant which does not belong to safety class 1 and

filling device safety function of the system of which they are a part of, and it

device



1.2.1. to shut down the nuclear reactor as necessary so that the

due to the expected operational event there has been fullest

the project, and to shut down the nuclear reactor to mitigate

the consequences of the maximum project accidents



1.2.2. in order to maintain a sufficient amount of coolant for the cooling of the active

the zone of a nuclear reactor during emergency conditions, where

no infringement of the pressure of the coolant circuit of a nuclear reactor, and, after

the aftermath of these conditions,



1.2.3. to ensure heat dissipation from the active zone of a nuclear reactor in

violation of boundaries of the pressure of the refrigerant circuit, so as to limit the

damage to the nuclear fuel,



1.2.4. for removal of residual heat from the active zone of a nuclear reactor in

during all operating conditions and for emergency conditions, where

There has been no violation of the integrity of the boundary of the pressure of the refrigerant circuit,



1.2.5. necessary to limit releases of radioactive substances from the hermetic

envelope during and in the aftermath of emergency conditions,



1.2.6. necessary for energy supply or for traffic control devices

included in the safety class 2 in carrying out their security

features.



1.3. Selected devices included in the security class 3 are

filling device safety function of the system of which they are a part of, and it

device



1.3.1. to prevent unacceptable transition processes in the reactivity,



1.3.2. for maintaining the nuclear reactor in the conditions of safe

unset, after all the activities, which led to its withdrawal, after each

from his unset,



1.3.3. to maintain a sufficient amount of coolant for the cooling of the active

the zone of a nuclear reactor in all States of normal and abnormal

operation of a nuclear installation in the project under consideration,



1.3.4. for heat dissipation of the safety systems until the end of the degree

heat dissipation,



1.3.5. for maintaining the exposure of the population and of workers of nuclear facilities

below specified limit values during and in the aftermath project

accidents and serious accidents, resulting in leakage occurs

radioactive substances and ionizing radiation from sources

outside the protective envelope,



1.3.6. for maintaining the environmental conditions inside a nuclear installation,

necessary for the operation of the safety systems and the access of workers to

performance of activities important to safety,



1.3.7. to prevent leaks of radioactive substances from irradiated nuclear

fuel transported or stored inside nuclear facilities outside

nuclear reactor cooling system during all conditions of normal and

abnormal operation,



1.3.8. rozpadového heat dissipation from the irradiated fuel storage

inside the nuclear facility outside the nuclear reactor cooling system,



1.3.9. to maintain sufficient fuel stored inside the podkritičnosti

nuclear facilities outside the nuclear reactor cooling system,



1.3.10. necessary for the discharge of radioactive substances under the restriction provided for

the limit values over all States of normal and abnormal operation



1.3.11. for energy supply or for traffic control equipment

to safety class 3 in the performance of their security functions,



1.3.12. to ensure the functional ability of the other device listed

in safety classes 1, 2 or 3 in the performance of their security

functions, with the exception of proceedings or of energy supply,



1.3.13. designed to prevent or limit the consequences of failures of other

devices, systems, or parts of the construction of a nuclear device, included in the

safety class 1, 2 or 3, whose failure could lead to

distortion performance of their security functions,



1.3.14. the secondary circulation, for which the calculation of the working media pressure when

the calculated temperature of more than 100th. (C) is greater than 4 MPa and lightness of the pipeline

is greater than DN 200, if they are not included in the safety class 2

While the border between the selected device and the other devices is the place

anchor the last swing limiter or similar device from the

the secondary circuit.



2. the criteria for the classification and distribution of the selected device to the

safety classes for nuclear installations for the storage of radioactive

waste



2.1. The selected devices included in the safety class 2

packaging files for storage of radioactive waste from the revised

nuclear fuel.



2.2. Selected devices included in the security class 3 are

device forming engineering artificial barriers and the facilities necessary for the

prevent leakages of radioactive substances and ionizing radiation into the

and the work environment over the limit values laid down in the course of all

the project States of operation.



3. The criteria for the classification and distribution of the selected device to the

safety classes for facilities for the storage of spent nuclear

nuclear fuel



3.1. Selected devices included in the safety class 2



3.1.1. packing files for the storage of spent nuclear fuel



3.1.2. equipment necessary to maintain the required podkritičnosti

nuclear material.



3.2. Selected devices included in the security class 3 are

device forming engineering artificial barriers and the facilities necessary for the

prevent leakages of radioactive substances into the environment and the working environment

over the limit values laid down in the course of all project traffic conditions,

including devices that monitor the packaging parameters for file

storage of spent nuclear fuel, essential for compliance with the limits

and conditions of safe operation of these devices.



4. Criteria for classification and distribution of the selected device to the

safety classes for nuclear installations for the storage of radioactive

waste and spent nuclear fuel and nuclear facilities for the production,

processing, storage, and storage of nuclear materials



4.1. Selected devices included in the safety class 2



4.1.1. packaging files for storing spent nuclear fuel and

radioactive waste resulting from the revised nuclear fuel,



4.1.2. equipment necessary to maintain sufficient podkritičnosti

nuclear material.



4.2. Selected devices included in the security class 3 are

device forming an additional barrier to prevent artificial engineering leakage

radioactive substances into the environment over a specified limit

values.



1) Decree No. 307/2002 Coll., on radiation protection, as amended by Decree No.

499/2005 Coll., Decree 145/1997 Coll. on the registration and control of nuclear

materials and their closer, as amended by Decree No. 316/2002

SB.



2) Decree No. 307/2002 Coll., as amended by Decree No. 499/2005 Coll.