Details Of Professional Reviews Of Civil Servants

Original Language Title: podrobnosti služebního hodnocení státních zaměstnanců

Read the untranslated law here: https://portal.gov.cz/app/zakony/download?idBiblio=84226&nr=134~2F2015~20Sb.&ft=txt

134/2015 Sb.



GOVERNMENT REGULATION



of 8 March. June 2015



about the details of professional reviews of civil servants and custody

the result of the staff reviews the personal allowance for State employees



Government decrees for the implementation of Act No. 234/2014 Coll. on State service,

(hereinafter referred to as the "Act"):



§ 1



The evaluation criteria



A government employee in each of the evaluated areas according to § 155

paragraph. 3 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as "rated area") shall be assessed on the basis of

evaluation criteria, the list of which is given in annex 1 to this

of the regulation. Institution in the staff regulation in advance from the list

the criteria that reflect the needs of the staff of the place.



§ 2



Shares of investigational areas on the outcome of professional reviews



(1) the area is on the outcome of professional reviews of the State

the employee who carries out the State service on the service in the

to 5. up to 10. grade, involved in



and) 15% in the case of knowledge and skills,



b) 70% in the case of the exercise of State services in terms of accuracy, speed

and autonomy in accordance with the stated objectives of the individual,



(c)) 10% in the case of compliance with the business discipline,



d) 5% in the case of the results of training.



(2) the area is on the outcome of professional reviews of the State

the employee who carries out the State service on the service in the

to 11. up to 16. grade, involved in



and) 25% in the case of knowledge and skills,



(b)) 60% in the case of the exercise of State services in terms of accuracy, speed

and autonomy in accordance with the stated objectives of the individual,



(c)) 10% in the case of compliance with the business discipline,



d) 5% in the case of the results of training.



§ 3



Rating the performance of the evaluated areas



(1) Assessed the area according to § 2 (2). 1 (b). a) and b) and section 2 (2). 2

(a). a) and b) classifies the



and) 7 points, if it is filled with high above and beyond the rights to her asked,



(b)) 5 points if fulfilled beyond claims it asked,



c) 3 points, if it is not made in the context of the claims it asked,



(d)) 1 point, if it is not made in the context of claims it asked with occasional

reservations, or



e) 0 points if fulfilled.



(2) Rated the area according to § 2 (2). 1 (b). (c)), and (d)) and section 2 (2). 2

(a). (c)), and (d)) shall be classified



and 1 point), if complied with, or



(b)) 0 points if fulfilled.



(3) the Framework of the claims referred to in paragraph 1 means the average level of compliance

evaluation criteria, which is required on staff.



(4) when you select multiple criteria for the area to be evaluated according to § 2 (2). 1

(a). a) and b) and section 2 (2). 2 (a). and a) and b) with rated range

classifies collectively for all the selected criteria as laid down in

paragraph 1.



(5) the area according to § 2 (2). 1 (b). (d)) and section 2 (2). 2 (a). (d))

classifies the 1 point, when, during the rating period was not

education required.



(6) the State employees for the first time the staff reviews

the area to be evaluated according to § 2 (2). 1 (b). (d)) and section 2 (2). 2 (a). (d))

allocate 1 point.



The conclusion of the staff reviews



§ 4



The conclusion of the staff assessment shall be determined in the manner prescribed in annex 2 to the

This regulation, expressed verbally and contains recommendations on admission

increase, reduction or withdrawal of the personal staff of State surcharge

or to keep the personal supplement unchanged.



§ 5



(1) a public employee who performs a public service on the staff place

which is covered by 5. up to 10. grade, represented in the civil service



and excellent results, if) the result of the calculation referred to in annex 2 to the

This regulation is at least 4.7 point and in any of the evaluated areas

According to § 2 (2). 1 (b). a) and b) been classified 0 points



(b)) good results, if the result of the calculation referred to in annex 2 to this

Regulation is at least 3 points and a maximum of 4.69 point and in any of the

ranked areas according to § 2 (2). 1 (b). a) and b) not classified

0 points,



(c) sufficient results) result of the calculation referred to in annex 2 to the

This Regulation shall be at least 0.9 the point and up to 2.99 point or make

more than 2.99 point, but a civil servant was in at least one of the

ranked areas according to § 2 (2). 1 (b). a) and b) classified 0

points, or



d) unsatisfactory results if the result of the calculation referred to in annex 2 to the

This regulation is less than 0.9 point.



(2) a public employee who performs a public service on the staff place

which is covered by 11. up to 16. grade, represented in the civil service



and excellent results, if) the result of the calculation referred to in annex 2 to the

This regulation is at least 4.6 point and in any of the evaluated areas

According to § 2 (2). 2 (a). a) and b) been classified 0 points



(b)) good results, if the result of the calculation referred to in annex 2 to this

Regulation is at least a point and not more than 3.2 4.59 point and in any of the

ranked areas according to § 2 (2). 2 (a). a) and b) not classified

0 points,



(c) sufficient results) result of the calculation referred to in annex 2 to the

This Regulation shall be at least 0.9 point and maximum point or make 3.19

more than 3.19 point, but a civil servant was in at least one of the

ranked areas according to § 2 (2). 2 (a). a) and b) classified 0

points, or



d) unsatisfactory results if the result of the calculation referred to in annex 2 to the

This regulation is less than 0.9 point.



§ 6



The amount of the personal supplement



(1) in respect of a State employee who, pursuant to section 5



and excellent results, must not) be a personal allowance of more than 50%

the salary rate and the highest step in the grade in which

by virtue of a business is the place where the employee carries out the State

Government service,



(b)) good results, not to be a personal allowance of more than 30%

the salary rate and the highest step in the grade in which

by virtue of a business is the place where the employee carries out the State

Government service,



c) sufficient results, personal allowance must not be higher than 10%

the salary rate and the highest step in the grade in which

by virtue of a business is the place where the employee carries out the State

Government service, or



d) unsatisfactory results, it cannot be a personal allowance. such

State employees are granted a personal allowance to be withdrawn.



(2) the personal allowance of up to 100% of salary of the highest

step in the grade in which the duty station is included,

on which the civil servant shall perform civil service may be granted

State employees, which is an excellent, generally accepted

the expert shall exercise a civil service seconded to the place which is covered by 10.

up to 16. grade in the civil service was excellent results

and the result of the calculation referred to in annex 2 to this regulation, it shall be

at least the 5.6 point.



Common and transitional provisions



§ 7



Business reviews shall be carried out for those public servants who, in the

the past calendar year engaged in government service for more than 6

months, unless it is a case referred to in § 155 para. 2 sentence third act.



§ 8



(1) the State employees, which was terminated pursuant to section 185 up to

188, 190 to 192 § or § 194 of the Act and which was to the first of the staff

reviews granted a personal allowance in an amount which exceeds the permissible

the amount provided for in § 6 (1). 1 (b). a) and b), can be based on the outcome of the

the first professional reviews admit on the period to another service

evaluation of the personal allowance in the amount, if the State

employee



and good results and above) granted a personal premium of more than 30

% but does not exceed 50% of the salary of the highest grade

in the grade to which, by virtue of a business is the place where the State

an employee of the State shall be exercised by the service, or



(b) adequate results and above) granted the personal supplement

exceeds 10% but does not exceed 30% of the salary rate of the Supreme

step in the grade in which the duty station is included,

on which the civil servant shall perform civil service.



(2) exceeds the amount of the granted the personal supplement before the first staff

evaluation of the maximum amount referred to in paragraph 1, the personal allowance is to

the period between the first and the second the staff assessment adequately

reduced.



§ 9



Business reviews per calendar year 2015 shall be carried out by the State

employees who worked in the calendar year 2015 after government service

For more than two months.



§ 10



The effectiveness of the



This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2000. July 2015.



Prime Minister:



Mgr. Sobotka in r.



Minister of the Interior:



Inmate in r.



Annex 1



A list of evaluation criteria for the area to be assessed



I. knowledge and skills



And knowledge of the legislation) laid down procedures, rights and rules

necessary for the performance of the civil service



B) Skills



1. communication



1.1. the oral and written expression



1.2. communication when dealing



1.3. capacity to act



2. Teamwork and cooperation



2.1. the ability to maintain constructive relationships



2.2. the ability of teamwork




2.3. ability and willingness to share their knowledge and skills with others



3. the personal approach and initiative



3.1. the openness to new approaches



3.2. the ability to adapt to change



3.3. creative ability



3.4. strategic thinking



3.5. determination, ability and willingness to take responsibility



4. Self reflection and self-management



5. Accuracy, thoroughness and attention to detail



6. Cooperation with the client



6.1. the ability to professionally deal with clients (internal, external)

standard and non-standard situations



6.2. the survey and the perception of the needs of the client



7. Handling of difficult situations and conflict resolution



8. Leadership and motivation



8.1. the ability to lead and organize



8.2. the ability to encourage, appreciate and objectively and fairly evaluate



II. Performance of State services in terms of accuracy, speed and

autonomy in accordance with the stated objectives of the individual



1. Achieving results-organisation of the performance of the civil service



1.1. planning for performance of the civil service



1.2. execution of tasks



1.3. organizing the civil service performance and quality assurance performed

the tasks of the



2. problem solving and judgement



2.1. analysis of the issues



2.2. selection of solution



2.3. application solutions



III. compliance with the business discipline



Access to compliance with the obligations arising from legislation,

relating to the civil service in a scope of the civil service,

for official rules and commands.



IV. The results of training



Personal development in the context of the civil service.



Annex 2



How to calculate the result of professional reviews State employee



1. the staff which is covered by 5. up to 10. grade shall be treated

According to the formula



V1 = 0.15 x and + 0.7 x B + 0.1 x C + 0.05 x D,



2. the service which is covered by 11. up to 16. the grade is

proceed according to the formula



V2 = 0.25 x A + x B + 0.6 0.1 x C + 0.05 x D,



where



V1

It is the result of professional reviews of the State employees on staff in the

to 5. up to 10. grade,



V2

It is the result of professional reviews of the State employees on staff in the

to 11. up to 16. grade,



And

is the number of points gained according to the nomenclature referred to in § 3 for the highest rated area of knowledge

and skills,



(B)

is the number of points gained according to the nomenclature referred to in § 3 for the rated performance of the State's area

services in terms of accuracy, speed and autonomy in accordance with the stated objectives of the individual,



(C)

is the number of points gained according to the nomenclature referred to in § 3 for the evaluated area compliance

staff discipline



(D)

is the number of points gained according to the nomenclature referred to in § 3 for the evaluated area results

education.