Advanced Search

Through That Law 270 Of 1996 Statute On The Administration Of Justice Reform

Original Language Title: Por medio de la cual se reforma la Ley 270 de 1996 Estatutaria de la Administración de Justicia

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

1285 OF 2009

(January 22)

Official Journal No. 47.240 of 22 January 2009

CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC

By means of which the Law 270 of the Law Administration of the Administration of Justice is reformed.

Vigency Notes Summary
Effective Case-law

THE CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC

DECRETA:

ARTICLE 1o. Amend article 4or. of Law 270 of 1996:

Article 4o. Celerity and Orality. The administration of justice must be prompt, accomplished and effective in the substantive settlement of matters that are subject to their knowledge. The procedural terms will be peremptory and strict compliance by judicial officers. Their unjustified violation is a cause of misconduct, without prejudice to the criminal sanctions to be imposed. The same shall apply in respect of the holders of the disciplinary function.

The actions to be carried out in the judicial proceedings must be oral with the exceptions established by the law. It shall adopt new procedural statutes with oral proceedings and by hearings, in order to ensure the unification of judicial proceedings, and take into account new technological developments.

Effective Case-law

PARAGRAFO TRANSIENT. Authorize the National Government to include in the revenue and expense budget for the next four years an equivalent item of up to 0.5% of the Product Gross domestic in accordance with the budgetary resources, the Medium Term Fiscal Framework and the Expenditure Framework, in order to gradually develop the orality in all judicial processes that determine the law and for the execution of the decongestion.

Effective Case-law
Matching Doctrine

ARTICLE 2o. Amend article 6or. of Law 270 of 1996, which will remain so:

Article 6o. Gratuitousness. The administration of justice shall be free of charge and its functioning shall be in charge of the State, without prejudice to the agencies in law, costs, expenses and judicial duties that are established in accordance with the law.

No tariff may be charged on proceedings of a criminal, labor, labor, family, child, or constitutional control or in the exercise of constitutional control or other constitutional actions. No tariffs may be levied on persons with limited resources when the poverty protection is enacted or in those legal proceedings or proceedings that determine the law.

The judicial tariff will constitute a public income in favor of the judicial branch

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text

ARTICLE 3o. Modify the article 8or. of Law 270 of 1996 in the following terms:

" Article 8o. Alternative Mechanisms. The law may establish alternative mechanisms for the judicial process to resolve conflicts between the partners and indicate the cases in which there will be a recovery of fees for these services.

Exceptionally the law may confer jurisdictional functions upon certain and certain administrative authorities to be aware of matters which by their nature or amount may be resolved by those in an appropriate and effective manner. In such a case, the law shall indicate the powers, the guarantees due process and the other conditions necessary to protect the rights of the parties in an appropriate manner. Against final judgments or decisions which, in judicial cases, are adopted by the administrative authorities which are exceptionally empowered, they shall always be brought before the courts of the State Court, in the words and with conditions to be determined by law.

Individuals may be temporarily invested in the role of administering justice in the condition of conciliators or in the position of arbitrators duly authorized by the parties to propose rulings in law or in equity.

Superior Council of the Judiciary, in coordination with the Ministry of the Interior and Justice, will carry out the monitoring and evaluation of the measures that will be adopted under this article, and every two years will report to the Congress of the Republic.

Effective Case-law

ARTICLE 4o. Amend article 11 of Law 270 of 1996:

" Article 11. The Judicial Branch of the Public Power consists of:

I. The bodies that make up the different jurisdictions:

a) From Ordinary Jurisdiction:

1. Supreme Court of Justice.

2. Superior Judicial District Courts.

3. Civil, labor, criminal, criminal, criminal, family, criminal, criminal, and multiple-jurisdiction, and other specialized and promiscuous laws that are created in accordance with the law;

b) From the Jurisdiction of Administrative Contentious:

1. State Council

2. Administrative Courts

3. Administrative Courts

c) < Literal CONDITIONAL Unconditional > Of Constitutional Jurisdiction:

1. Constitutional Court;

Effective Case-law

d) From the Peace Jurisdiction: Judges of Peace.

2. The Office of the Prosecutor General of the Nation.

3. The Superior Council of the Judicature.

Effective Case-law

PARAGRAFO 1o. The Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court, the Council of State and the Superior Council of the Judiciary, have jurisdiction throughout the national territory. The Superior Courts, Administrative Courts and Sectional Councils of the Judicature have jurisdiction in the relevant judicial or administrative district. The circuit judges have competence in the respective circuit and the municipal judges in the respective municipality; the judges of small causes at the municipal and local level.

The decongestion judges will have the territorial competence and specific material to be pointed out to them in the act of their creation.

PARAGRAFO 2o. The Attorney General of the Nation and its delegates have competence throughout the national territory.

PARAGRAFO 3o. In each municipality, at least one Court will operate whatever its category.

PARAGRAFO 4o. In cities you will be able to organize judicial offices in a deconcentrated manner. "

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text

ARTICLE 5o. Article 12 of Law 270 of 1996 will remain so:

Article 12. From the exercise of the judicial function by the judicial branch. The jurisdictional function is exercised as its own and on a permanent basis by the corporations and persons endowed with legal investiture to do so, as specified in the Political Constitution and in this Law.

Effective Case-law

This function is exercised by the constitutional jurisdiction, the Superior Council of the Judicature, the jurisdiction of the administrative disputes, the special jurisdictions such as: the military, the indigenous and the justice of peace, and the ordinary jurisdiction to know of all matters that are not attributed by the Constitution or the law to another jurisdiction. "

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text

ARTICLE 6o. Amend article 13 of Law 270 of 1996:

Article 13. The exercise of the judicial function by other authorities and by individuals. Exercise jurisdictional function in accordance with the provisions of the Political Constitution:

1. The Congress of the Republic, on the occasion of the accusations and disciplinary errors that are made against the President of the Republic or who does his times; against the Magistrates of the Supreme Court of Justice, of the Council of State, of the Court Constitutional and the Superior Council of the Judiciary and the Attorney General of the Nation, even if they have ceased to exercise their positions.

2. The administrative authorities in respect of disputes between individuals, in accordance with the rules on jurisdiction and procedure laid down in the laws. Such authorities shall in no case be able to carry out criminal investigations or prosecution;

3. Individuals acting as conciliators or arbitrators empowered by the parties, in terms of the law. In the case of arbitration, in which the state or any of its Entities is not a party, the individuals may agree to the rules of procedure to be followed, directly or by reference to that of a Arbitration Center, respecting, in any case, the Constitutional principles that integrate due process.

Effective Case-law

ARTICLE 7o. Article 16 of Law 270, 1996, will be as follows:

Article 16. Rooms. The Supreme Court of Justice will fulfill its functions through five chambers, integrated as follows: The Full Court, by all the Magistrates of the Corporation; the Chamber of Government, made up of the President, the Vice President and the Presidents of each of the Specialised Chambers; the Civil and Agricultural Court of Cassation, consisting of seven Magistrates; the Labour Room, consisting of seven Magistrates and the Criminal Cassation Chamber, comprising nine Magistrates.

The Chambers of Civil and Labor and Criminal Cassation, will act according to their specialty as the Court of Cassation, being able to select the sentences that are the object of their pronouncement, for the purposes of unification of the jurisprudence, protection of the constitutional rights and control of the legality of the rulings. They shall also be aware of the conflicts of jurisdiction which, in the field of their specialties, arise between the Chambers of the same court, or between courts, or between them and courts of another district, or between courts of different districts ".

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text

ARTICLE 8o. Article 22 of Law 270 will remain so:

Article 22. Regime of the Courts.

The Civil, Criminal, Family, Labor, Execution Of Penas, And Small Causes Courts That, in accordance with the needs of the administration of justice, determine the Administrative Board of the Superior Council of the Judiciary, for the compliance with the functions provided for in the procedural law in each circuit or municipality, are part of the Ordinary Jurisdiction. Its characteristics, denomination and number shall be those established by such Corporations.

When the number of cases so warrants, the courts may be promiscuous for the knowledge of civil, criminal, labor, or family processes.

According to the needs of each city and each municipality there will be municipal judges of small causes and multiple jurisdiction over matters of Ordinary Jurisdiction, legally defined as minor conflicts. The location of their headquarters will be decentralized in those sectors of cities and municipalities where this is justified by the demand for justice. Their performance will be oral, summary and possible for a single hearing.

The Superior Council of the Judicature will have what is necessary to make it from the 1st. of January 2008, at least a fifth of the courts operating in the cities of more than one million inhabitants are located and begin to operate in locations distributed geographically in the different localities or communes of the respective city.

From 1o. In January 2009, forty per cent (40%) of the courts operating in the cities of more than one (1) million inhabitants and thirty per cent (30%) of the courts operating in cities of more than two hundred thousand inhabitants (200,000) must operate in locations geographically distributed among the different localities or communes of the respective city.

The Superior Council of the Judiciary will ensure that this distribution is made to all localities and communes, but it will be able to make a distribution that corresponds to three localities or communes adjoining.

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text

.

ARTICLE 9o. Amend article 34 of Law 270 of 1996, which will remain so:

Article 34. Integration and Composition. The Council of State is the highest Tribunal of the Jurisdiction of the Administrative Contentious and will be composed of thirty-one (31) magistrates, elected by the same Corporation for the individual periods that determines the Constitution Policy, from lists exceeding five (5) candidates, meeting the constitutional requirements, for each vacancy presented, submitted by the Administrative Board of the Superior Council of the Judiciary.

The State Council exercises its functions by means of three (3) chambers, integrated as follows: the Plena, by all its members; that of the Administrative Contentious, by twenty-seven (27) councilors and that of Consultation and Civil Service, by the four (4) remaining counselors ".

Effective Case-law

ARTICLE 10. Modify article 36 of the 1996 270 Act, which will be thus:

Article 36. From the Administrative Accounting Room. The Administrative Board shall be divided into five (5) Sections, each of which shall exercise separately the functions that in accordance with its specialty and amount of work is assigned to you by the Full Room of the State Council, in accordance with the law and the internal regulations of the Corporation and will be integrated as follows:

Section First, by four (4) magistrates.

Section II will be divided into two (2) Subsections, each of which will be composed of three (3) Magistrates.

Section Three will be divided into three (3) Subsections, each of which will be composed of three (3) magistrates.

Section Fourth, by four (4) magistrates, and

Section Fifth, by four (4) magistrates.

Without prejudice to the specific powers conferred by the law, the regulations of the Corporation shall determine and assign matters and matters whose knowledge corresponds to each Section and to the respective Subsections.

In any case, the action of the loss of investiture of congressmen will be of competence of the full room of the administrative litigation.

TRANSIENT PARAGRAPH. The new dispatches that are created by this law for the integration of the Third Section of the Administrative Contentious Room, will have the same organization and structure that currently has the dispatches already existing in that Section ".

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 11. Approve as new article of Law 270 of 1996, the article 36A, which will form part of the Chapter Relating to the organization of the Jurisdiction of Administrative Contentious, which will have the following text:

" Article 36A. The eventual review mechanism in the popular and group actions and the regulation of extraordinary

As a Supreme Court of the Contentious Administrative, at the request of either party or the Public Ministry, the Council of State, through its Sections, in matters corresponding to the popular or group actions may select, for any review, the judgments or other providences to determine the completion or file of the respective process, provided by the Administrative Courts, in order to unify the case-law.

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text

The request for a part or from the Public Ministry must be made within eight (8) days of the notification of the judgment or providence with which the respective process is terminated; the Administrative Courts, within the term of eight (8) days, which are counted from the date of the request, they shall forward, to the corresponding Chamber, Section or Subsection of the Council of State, the file within which the respective statement or the order that has or generates the termination of the process, so that within the the maximum term of three (3) months, starting from your receipt, the maximum Corporation of the Administrative Contentious resolve on the selection, or not, of each such providences for its eventual review. When deciding on the non-choice of a given providence, either party or the Public Ministry may insist on their selection for eventual review, within five (5) days of the notification of that.

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text

PARAGRAFO 1o. The law may provide that the eventual review referred to in this Article shall also apply in relation to processes originating in the exercise of other actions whose knowledge corresponds to the jurisdiction of the administrative disputes. In such cases the law will regulate all aspects related to the origin and processing of the eventual review, such as the determination of the deadlines within which the parties or the Public Ministry may raise their respective requests; the insistence that may be submitted with respect to the refusal of the selection; the effects to be generated by the selection; the possibility that the eventual review may be present with other ordinary or extraordinary resources.

Effective Case-law

PARAGRAFO 2o. The law will regulate all matters related to the origin and processing of the resources, ordinary or extraordinary, that may be brought against the decisions that in each case are adopt in the processes that they heal before the jurisdiction of the administrative disputes.

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text
Matches
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 12. Modify the numeral 1 of 37 of the 1996 and add a paragraph:

" 1. Resolve conflicts of competence between the Sections of the State Council.

PARAGRAFO. The conflicts of jurisdiction between the Administrative Courts, between Sections of different Administrative Courts, between the Courts and Judges of the Jurisdiction Administrative and administrative disputes pertaining to administrative judicial districts and administrative judges of the different administrative judicial districts shall be decided by the respective Sections or Subsections of the Council of State, according to his specialty. Conflicts between administrative courts of the same circuit or between sections of the same Administrative Tribunal shall be decided by the corresponding full Court. "

Effective Case-law
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 13. Approve as new article of Law 270 of 1996 the following:

" Article 42A. Judicial and extrajudicial reconciliation in administrative-administrative matters. As of the validity of this law, when matters are reconciled, it will always be a requirement for the procedure of the actions provided for in the articles 85, 86 and 87 of the Administrative Contentious Code or the rules that replace it, the processing of the extra-judicial reconciliation.

Effective Case-law
Matches
Concordant Case-law
Previous Bill Text
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 14. Approve as new article of Law 270 of 1996 the following:

" Article 60A. Judge powers. In addition to the cases provided for in the foregoing articles, the Judge may sanction with a fine of two to five minimum monthly salaries, a the parts of the process, or their representatives or lawyers, at the following events:

1. When knowingly alleged to be contrary to reality.

2. When the process is used, incident, special processing that has replaced this or resource, for clearly illegal purposes.

3. When obstructing, by way of action or omission, the practice of evidence or unreasonably does not provide timely information or documents that are in their possession and are required for judicial inspection, or by trade.

4. Where they are unreasonably not to be involved in the practice of testing and prosecution

5. When they adopt procedural behavior to dilate the process or by any means, the normal development of the process is hindered.

PARAGRAFO. The Judge will have procedural powers for the officious impulse of the processes, whatever it is, and bring it forward to the judgment if it is the case. "

Effective Case-law
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 15. Modify the 63 article in the 1996 270 Act:

Article 63. Plan and Decongestion Measures. There will be a national decongestion plan that will be arranged with the Administrative Board of the Superior Council of the Judiciary, as appropriate. This plan shall define the objectives, congestion indicators, strategies, terms and mechanisms for evaluating the implementation of the measures.

Corresponding to the Administrative Board of the High Council of the Judiciary will execute the national decongestion plan and adopt the relevant measures, including the following:

(a) The Superior Council of the Judicature, respecting the functional specialty and the territorial jurisdiction may redistribute the cases that the Courts and Courts have for failure assigning them to dispatches of the same hierarchy they have a workload which, in the judgment of the same Chamber, permits;

b) The Administrative Board will set up the positions of judges and magistrates of itinerant support in each jurisdiction to deal with the greatest congestion charges in the offices. These judges will have the competence to process and substantiate the processes within the already established offices, assuming any of the responsibilities provided for in the article 37 of C. P. C.; processes and functions shall be expressly stated;

c) Except in criminal matters, select the processes whose evidence, including inspections, may be carried out by a commission conferred by the judge of knowledge, and determine the judges to be moved out of the place of its headquarters to instruct and practice in-process tests that other judges are aware of;

d) Exceptionally, create on a transitional basis charges of judges or magistrates in accordance with the law of the budget;

(e) Temporarily linking to judicial employees responsible for performing functions that are defined in the decongestion plan of a jurisdiction, a judicial district, or specific law offices, and

f) Contry to term professional, expert, and auxiliary staff to meet the support functions to be set in the decongestion plan.

Effective Case-law
Matches
Previous Bill Text
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 16. Approve as new article of Law 270 of 1996 the following:

Item 63A. Order and Shift Prelation. When there are national security reasons or to prevent the serious involvement of the national patrimony, or in the case of serious violations of human rights, or crimes against humanity, or matters of special social importance, The Specialized Chambers of the Supreme Court of Justice, the Chambers, Sections or Subsections of the State Council, the Judicial Chamber of the Superior Council of the Judiciary or the Constitutional Court, shall indicate the class of processes to be processed and preferentially disingenuous. Such action may also be requested by the Attorney General of the Nation.

Likewise, the Chambers or Sections of the Supreme Court, the Council of State and the Superior Council of the Judiciary will be able to determine the reasons for the cases which, due to their lack of legal background, their solution is in the public interest or can have a collective impact, so that the respective processes are dealt with in a preferential manner.

The appeals brought before the Supreme Court, the Council of State or the Superior Council of the Judiciary, whose resolution integrates only the reiteration of jurisprudence, can be decided in advance. without attachment to the shift chronological order.

The Specialized Chambers of the Supreme Court, the Chambers or the Sections of the Council of State, the Constitutional Court and the Superior Council of the Judiciary; the Chambers of the High Courts and the Courts District-Administrative disputes may determine a thematic order for the preparation and study of the draft judgments; for the purpose, by agreement, they shall periodically fix the subjects under which they will be grouped together. the proceedings and shall, by means of a notice, indicate the dates of the sessions of the Chamber in which the assume the respective study.

PARAGRAFO 1o. The provisions of this Article in relation to the Jurisdiction of the Administrative Contentious shall be without prejudice to the provisions of the article 18 of Law 446 of 1998.

PARAGRAFO 2o. The rules of procedure of each judicial corporation shall indicate the days and hours of each week in which she, her Chambers and her Sections, shall hold meetings for the deliberation of the matters. jurisdiction, without prejudice to the fact that each Chamber decides to hold more frequent sessions in order to print speed and efficiency to its actions.

PARAGRAFO 3o. The Administrative Board of the Superior Council of the Judicature will regulate shifts, days and schedules to ensure the permanent exercise of the guarantee control function. In this sense it will not be able to alter the wage and loan regime in force in the Judicial Branch. "

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 17. Add article 85 of the 1996 270 Act with the following numerals:

" 30. To issue, subject to the general criteria laid down in the statute of law and in the procedural laws, the statute on the expense, costs.

31. The expenses will be pre-fixed by the Judge in order to officiously boost the process.

32. The others who point to the law. "

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 18. Amend the following paragraph to article 93 of the 1996 270 Act:

PARAGRAFO. The Auxiliary Magistrates of the State Council the Supreme Court of Justice, and the Superior Council of the Judiciary may be commissioned for the practice of decisions related to matters of processing or substantiation to resolve the resources that are brought in relation to them ".

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 19. Article 106 of Law 270, 1996, will be as follows:

" Article 106. Information systems. Subject to the applicable laws, the Superior Council of the Judiciary must design, develop, implement and maintain adequate information systems that, among others, include information systems. financial, human resources, costs, budgetary information, judicial management and access of the branch's servers, in a complete and timely manner, to the knowledge of the formal sources of the law, both national and international.

In any case, a System of Information and Statistics will be in charge that includes the management of those who are part of a Judicial Branch or exercise jurisdictional functions and allows the individualization of the processes from their initiation to completion, including verification of the procedural terms and the effective solution, in such a way as to enable an adequate diagnosis of the provision of justice.

All the agencies that are part of the Judicial Branch and those that functionally administer justice in the development of the article 116 of the Charter Policy, they have a duty to provide the information necessary to keep the data incorporated in the system up to date, according to the formats that the Superior Council of the Judicature establishes for the effect ".

Effective Case-law
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 20. Amend 191 203> from the 1996 270 Act, as follows:

" Article 191. The money to be entered at the orders of the offices of the judicial branch in accordance with the provisions of this law and in the legal provisions in force will be deposited in the Agrarian Bank of Colombia due to the most recent conditions. favourable in terms of profitability, efficiency in the collection, security and other benefits in favour of the branch.

In the same way we will proceed with the fines, rubbers and payments that the judicial authorities or the deposits that prescribe in favor of the Nation will decree.

In no case will the Agrarian Bank of Colombia pay a lower rate than the average of the five best interest rates on savings that are offered on the market, certified by the Financial Superintendency.

PARAGRAFO. Facultthe Judge of the cause so that through the incidental process execute the fine or caution within the same process ".

Effective Case-law
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 21. Modify the 192article, from the next way:

Article 192. Create the Fund for Modernization, de-congestion and Welfare of the Administration of Justice, as an account attached to the Superior Council of the Judiciary, composed of the following resources:

1. The rights, duties, emoluments and costs that are caused by the court proceedings and their performances.

2. The yields of the judicial deposits, without prejudice to the 30% destination for the Prison and Prison System established in Law 66 of 1993.

3. Donations and contributions from society, individuals and international cooperation.

4. The allocations to be set by the National Government.

PARAGRAFO 1o. The Fund will not have staff other than the one assigned to the Executive Address and Administrative Room. A specialised financial or trust institution may be recruited for its operation.

PARAGRAFO 2o. When dealing with convictions against the officers, the payment will be made once the statement is effective. The respective entity shall make the relevant retention and shall rotate the sum to the Fund within 10 days.

PARAGRAFO 3o. Individuals and individuals who make contributions to the Fund to donation title will have the tax benefits to be determined by law. "

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 22. New Item. There will be an article 209-Bis of Law 270 of 1996, which will remain so:

" Article 209 -Bis. Gradual application of court policies. The plans and programmes of decongestion, the creation and operation of the administrative judges, of the judges of full jurisdiction, will be done gradually and in certain areas of the country, according to the needs of the administration of justice determined by the Administrative Board of the High Council of the Judiciary.

The National Discongestion Plan for Justice to the Day should be designed and formulated integrally at the latest within six months of the entry into force of this law.

The National Discongestion Plan for Justice to the Day, its implementation will be done gradually, in certain areas and law offices of the country, prioritizing those that concentrate the largest volume of Inventory repression.

PARAGRAFO. Orality will be implemented gradually, according to with the budget availability consistent with the medium-term fiscal framework.

Effective Case-law
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 23. Add Article 209A.

" While demanding procedural reforms to streamline and decongestion different court processes, adopt the following provisions:

a) Executive process loss: In executive processes, if the file remains in the Secretariat for nine (9) months or more for lack of momentum when it corresponds to the plaintiff or pending the notification of the order of payment to one or more executed persons of a car when the same one corresponds to the executing, the judge of trade, or at the request of the executed person, order the waiver with the consequent return of the demand and its annexes and, if applicable, the cancellation of the precautionary measures event in which it will condemn in coasts and damage to the performer. The order that orders to return the claim is appable in the suspensive effect, and the one that denies it, in the return.

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 24. Add the article 209B.

Create a Commission of the Oral and Justice Process Pronta, made up of the Minister of the Interior and Justice, who will preside over it; the Presidents of the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court, the State Council, and of the Superior Council of the Judiciary; a Senator and a Representative to the Chamber of the Members of the First Commissions, elected by the respective Constitutional Commissions; two representatives of the academy and a representative of civil society, linked to the issues of the Administration of Justice, to deal with, inter alia, the following matters: oral proceedings and hearings in all the orders of the jurisdiction; a general statute of judicial processes that unify and simplify them, except for criminal proceedings; projects for the dejudicialization and allocation of powers; and functions of administrative authorities and individuals empowered to exercise public functions. The Technical Secretariat shall remain in the head of the Administrative Board of the High Council of the Judiciary.

The Commission of Justice Pronta will take into account the recommendations and proposals prepared by the Intersectoral Commissions for the effectiveness of the principle of Orality in the Process of Work and Security Social and for the promotion of Orality in the Family, Civil and Agrarian Regime, created by the Decrees 1098 of 2005 and 368 of 2006 ".

Effective Case-law

Effective Case-law
Previous Bill Text
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 25. New Article 626 of Law 1564 of 2012. It governs from 1o. of January 2014. In the terms of the numeral 6) of article 627, see in Previous Legislation the current text up to this date >

Editor Notes
Vigency Notes
Effective Case-law
Matches
Previous Legislation
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 26. Defeat items 1o., 2o., 3o., 4or. and 8or. of Law 66 of 1993, 203 of Law 270 of 1996, and other rules that are contrary to it.

Effective Case-law
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 27. For the financing of the costs demanded by the compliance with this Law, the Judicial Branch will make the internal budgetary adjustments to place.

Effective Case-law
Ir al inicio

ARTICLE 28. VALIDITY. This law governs from its enactment.

Effective Case-law

The President of the honorable Senate of the Republic,

HERNAN FRANCISCO ANDRADE SERRANO.

The Secretary General of the honorable Senate of the Republic,

EMILIO RAMON OTERO DAJUD.

The President of the honorable House of Representatives,

GERMAN MALE COTRINO.

The Secretary General of the honorable House of Representatives,

JESUS ALFONSO RODRIGUEZ CAMARGO.

COLOMBIA-NATIONAL GOVERNMENT

Publish and execute

Dada en Bogotá, D. C., a 22 de enero de 2009

ALVARO URIBE VELEZ

The Minister of the Interior and Justice

FABIO VALENCIA COSSIO.

* Control Preview of Constitutionality. Exequible Statement C-713 of July 15, 2008.

Ir al inicio