First chapter General first article for effective perform enterprise State-owned assets funded people duties, maintenance owner interests, implementation State-owned assets hedge value-added responsibility, established sound effective of incentive and constraints mechanism, guide central enterprise mention quality increased effect upgrade, achieved do strong do excellent big, according to people's Republic of China Enterprise State-owned assets method, and Enterprise State-owned assets supervision management interim regulations, about legal regulations and CPC Central Committee State on deepening State-owned enterprise reform of guide views
As well as deepening the reform of central management of enterprise salary system and other relevant provisions, these measures are formulated.
Second approach to evaluation of Central enterprises, is signed by the authorized by the State-owned assets supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (hereinafter referred to as the SASAC) to fulfil the responsibilities of investor capital contribution from the State Enterprise (hereinafter referred to as company) by the central authorities and the State-owned assets supervision management personnel. Third head of enterprise performance evaluation guided by the following principles: (a) adhere to the law and regulations.
Strict implementation of the relevant laws and regulations of the State, as requested by the unity of rights, obligations and responsibilities, establish and improve law compliance management, traceability of the responsibility system of assets operation. (B) adhere to market-oriented reforms.
According to the requirements of market economy, follow the rules of enterprise development, implementation and business functions, the nature of the business and the business features of the classification assessment, more targeted and effective. (C) the persistence and incentive constraint combination.
Establishing selection match, with heads of enterprises and Enterprise functions adapted to, closely linked with the performance difference of incentive and restraint mechanisms. (D) adhere to the unity of short-term goals and long-term development.
Strengthen the international benchmarking and industry benchmarking, building combined with the term assessment of the annual appraisal, based on the current, long-term evaluation system.
Fourth annual performance evaluation and term of performance evaluation by SASAC Director or his or her authorized representative signed with heads of main responsibility approach to operating performance.
Chapter II examination-oriented quality of fifth development, guide enterprises to firmly establish innovation, coordination, development of green, open, shared ideas, adapt to and to lead the economic development of the new normal, and continuously improve their business management, high quality and sustainable development.
Article sixth emphasis on capital efficiency, guide enterprises to increase economic efficiency as the Center and optimizing distribution of capital, norms of capital operations, increase return on capital, maintenance, capital safety, improving the ability to create value.
Article seventh to define enterprise features, guide enterprises in the service of national strategic objectives, to protect national security and the national economy, the development of forward-looking strategic industries and play an important role in completing special tasks, enhance the vitality of the State-owned economy, zoom function of State capital.
Eighth innovation development, guide enterprises to in-depth implementation of the strategy of innovation-driven development, and strengthen independent innovation, strengthening collaborative innovation, vigorously promote mass venture much innovation, speed up scientific and technological achievements, to enhance the core competitiveness.
Nineth emphasis on international operations, guide enterprises to actively participate in the "area" of major projects, strengthen international cooperation capacity and equipment manufacture, promote products, technologies, standards, services go, standardized and orderly participation in competition in the international market, fostering world-class multinationals.
Tenth good accountability mechanisms to guide enterprises in scientific decision-making, and compliance management in accordance with law, guard against managing risk, preventing the loss of State-owned assets.
Chapter III classification evaluation 11th according to the State-owned capital's strategic positioning and development goals, business practice, for different functions and types of businesses, highlighting the focus of different assessment, setting business performance indicators and weights, determine differentiated assessment criteria, classified assessment. Article 12th fields of industry in a competitive industry and commercial enterprises, to enhance the vitality of the State-owned economy, amplifying state capital functions, of State-owned capital value-oriented, focusing on enterprises economic benefit levels, return on capital and market competitiveness, guide enterprises to improve the efficiency of capital operations, enhance the value of creativity.
Encouraging enterprises to actively bear social responsibility. 13th article on main in relationship national security, and economy lifeline of important industry and key field, and main bear major special task of commercial class enterprise, to support enterprise sustainable development and service national strategy for oriented, in guarantee reasonable returns and State-owned capital hedge value-added of based Shang, strengthening on service national strategy, and guarantees national security and economy run, and development forward sex strategic industry and completed major special task situation of assessment. Indicators on economic benefit of minor adjustments and increment of State-owned capital rate index weight, determines the economic value added index of cost of capital rates.
Commitment to national security, common technology enterprises with poor or national major projects completed, no special objective reasons, be points in the performance appraisal or downgrade. Article 14th public business, to better protect the people's livelihood, services to support enterprise society, the provision of public goods and services-oriented, persist in combining economic and social benefits, social benefits first, focusing on assessment products and services quality, cost control, efficiency of operations and support capabilities. According to different characteristics of enterprises, a differentiated economic value added and included in the annual appreciation rate of State-owned capital and term assessment, due to lower test weights and return requirements.
Social indicators for third party assessment, evaluation of enterprises with poor results, depending on the circumstances, be points in the performance appraisal or downgrade.
15th according to the nature of the business, development, and management short Board and industry feature, set the targeted difference index. 16th special items list management system of establishing and perfecting the performance evaluation.
Of the enterprise to protect national security, public services important forward-looking strategic industries, development, implementing "going out" major strategic projects and other special matters included in the management list, have a significant impact on business performance for the current period of special matters, appraisal and dealing with them appropriately.
Fourth chapter 17th SASAC in accordance with target management enterprise development commensurate with the development of the national economy, and match the backbone role in national economic construction, and stronger better and bigger requirements conform to the principles, leading to determine overall business performance objectives (hereinafter referred to as overall objectives).
18th Enterprise assessment value should be dovetailed with the overall objective, according to the different functions of enterprises, based on the reference value be approved.
19th annual assessment benchmarks based on Enterprise appraisal completed last year, three years before completing the average of the values and external factors, to determine.
20th annual profit, economic value added (also known as economic profit, the same below) target value is set to three.
First gear: target reached the highest level in history, completed or significantly better than the previous year and increase the value above the overall target.
Second gear: target value not less than the reference value.
Third gear: target value is lower than the reference value.
Industry benchmarking, target values in the leading international outstanding level or national level, do not enter the third goal.
21st annual profits of State-owned enterprises total goal value, economic value added index and score, result ratings are combined together.
First target, complete index score, while target advanced degree granting bonus rewards.
Second value after the completion of the normal scoring.
Third target, plus restricted after the completion, evaluation results shall enter a level.
22nd total profit targets linked to the salary budget. First target value, total wages higher than the level of the budget.
Exceeded the target, according to the payroll budget management system can be implemented with particular incentives.
Second target values, payroll budget in principle not be less than year ago levels (more complete value target value is lower than the previous year).
Third target, payroll budget should decline over the previous year. 23rd term checking Datum value according to the previous mandate completed value and determine the value completed one term of the third year on.
Target value for the assessment by the best in the industry after the completion of the score; assessment values below the base value plus points is limited.
The fifth chapter review article 24th performance assessment in State-owned enterprises operating under the leadership of SASAC performance assessment leadership group organizations.
25th annual performance evaluation to calendar years for the assessment period, term of performance evaluation to a three-year assessment period.
Article 26th performance responsibility: (a) company name, job title, and name of both parties; (b) the evaluation content and index (iii) evaluation and reward and punishment; (iv) responsibility for the modification, rescission and termination; (v) other promise.
27th performance responsibility sign program: (a) the beginning of the assessment period, according to the SASAC performance evaluation requirements, review period test objectives recommended and necessary documentation submitted to the Commission.
(B) the SASAC to audit assessment recommended values, target values and assessment and related content with the corporate communication to be determined.
(C) by the SASAC Director or his or her authorized representative entered into business performance with Enterprise chief responsibility.
28th test period, the SASAC implement dynamic monitor of performance responsibility implementation, test objectives to complete enterprise provides early warning of the progress unsatisfactory. Article 29th report on important matters.
Larger enterprises and over production safety accidents, major environmental emergencies and above, significant and quality accidents, loss of significant assets, major legal disputes, major investment and financing and asset restructuring, have a significant impact on business performance, should be reported to the State-owned assets supervision, and reported the presence of the enterprises.
Article 30th performance appraisal completed in accordance with the following procedures: (a) the assessment period, enterprises based on audited financial statement data to form operating performance analytical reports submitted to the Commission, with a copy to accredited enterprises.
(B) basis of SASAC audited audited financial report on the accounts of and reviewed statistical data, combined with the analysis of the report and listen to the opinion of the Supervisory Board, head of enterprise implementation of assessment objectives for evaluation, formation evaluation and rewards and punishments. (C) the SASAC will assess and reward feedback to heads of enterprise organization. Disagrees with the views on the assessment and reward of Heads of enterprises, can be reflected to the SASAC.
The SASAC will finally confirm assessment results within a certain range.
31st to implement performance evaluation terms of reference of the Board of managers.
(A) examination by the Board that managers of enterprises, SASAC signed with the authorized representative of the Board of Directors and term of the year performance guarantee, the Board of Directors according to the State-owned assets supervision assessment requirements and the actual situation of the enterprise managers implementing performance evaluation.
(B) the business performance of State-owned assets supervision according to corporate responsibility and the Board assessment targets, annual and term of Office of the corporate Chief performance evaluation scores and grades.
(C) the Board performance evaluation results according to the SASAC, with managers personal duty performance, managers assessment results and determine salary scheme.
Article 32nd of the Board of Directors shall formulate and perfect the enterprise performance evaluation method, SASAC record.
Sixth chapter of rewards and punishments article 33rd annual performance evaluation performance evaluation and term grades are divided into a, b, c, and d four levels. Article 34th SASAC according to the annual performance evaluation results on the mandate and business leaders to implement rewards and punishments.
Performance evaluation results as head of enterprise salary distribution the main basis and an important basis for their appointment and removal. 35th head of enterprise compensation is composed of base salary, performance salary and incentive income term three parts.
Base salary is the basic annual income of enterprises. Article 36th material incentives and spiritual incentives against business leaders. Material includes results and performance assessment performance linked incentive income salary and tenure.
Spirit incentives include giving briefing in recognition of the mandate, and so on.
37th head of enterprise performance salary base salary as a base, according to results of the annual performance evaluation and performance salary adjustment coefficient. 38th performance salary in accordance with a percentage to implement released monthly in advance.
SASAC annual results for six months to assess results based on business owners advance performance salary to be adjusted, the relevant measures shall be formulated separately.
39th term incentive income according to the term of performance evaluation results, do not exceed term overall salary levels of the heads of enterprises within 30% OK. 40th annual comprehensive examination of Heads of enterprises evaluated as incompetent shall not be eligible for performance salary.
Term of incompetent comprehensive evaluation shall not be eligible for incentive income term. 41st enterprise in charge of distribution coefficient is 1, the rest are assessors head of distribution coefficients by the enterprise in accordance with the results of the performance evaluation, determined at between 0.6-0.9, a moderate distance.
Distribution Commission audits performed after filing, with a copy to presence of the company's Supervisory Board.
42nd to significant technological innovations, take on special tasks and social participation have made outstanding contributions, plus incentives given in the annual performance evaluation.
Article 43rd on management of outstanding performance and innovation in science and technology, brand building outstanding achievements, international management, energy-saving and emission reduction, assessed by the State-owned assets supervision of enterprises after term incentives.
44th Annual performance evaluation results of d for two consecutive years or term of d-level enterprise performance evaluation results, and no significant objective reasons, adjustments to the business leaders.
45th article Enterprise occurred following case one of of, SASAC according to specific plot give downgraded or buckle points processing, and corresponding withholding or recourse buckle back Enterprise statutory representative people and the related head of performance salary or term incentive income; plot serious of, give disciplinary or on Enterprise head for adjustment; suspected crime of, law transferred judicial organ processing: (a) violation people's Republic of China accounting method, and enterprise accounting guidelines, about legal regulations regulations, false, and concealed financial status of;
(B) the legal representative and the person in charge of the enterprise in violation of State laws and regulations, leading to major mistakes in decision-making, the larger and older production safety accidents, serious quality accidents, major environmental pollution accident, a major disciplinary offence and legal disputes and foreign competition, had a significant adverse impact or loss of State-owned assets.
Seventh chapter supplementary articles article 46th in the review period assets, head of restructuring, major changes, SAC can change relevant elements of the performance guarantee under the circumstances.
47th full-time head and Secretary of Commission for discipline inspection of the party organization of Central enterprises (head of the discipline inspection group) evaluation of other provisions, those provisions. 48th state capital joint stock company, the merged enterprise heads of enterprises managed by the State-owned assets supervision and its performance evaluation in accordance with the measures implemented.
Specific performance evaluation issues identified in the performance guarantee.
49th on the new establishment had not yet reached normal operating enterprises, mainly engaged in technical research and development and investment in the State-owned capital operation companies, performance evaluation to implement a business plan.
50th in all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities and the Xinjiang production and construction Corps of the State-owned assets supervision and administration bodies, district municipalities, prefecture-level head of the State-owned assets supervision and administration of State-funded enterprises performance evaluation, may make specific reference to this approach and the practical requirements.
51st explain these measures by the SASAC, specific implementation plan be developed. 52nd these measures come into force on the date of promulgation.
The head of interim measures for the performance evaluation of Central enterprises (SASAC 30th) repealed simultaneously.
