Article 2 In the province's executive region, the Government of the people at the local level and its functional departments or organizations authorized by laws, regulations apply this approach to the assessment of social stability.

Article 3. Risk assessment of social stability, as described in this approach, means identifying, analysing and preventing factors that exist in major administrative decision-making prior to major administrative decisions.

Article IV. Social stabilization risk assessment should be carried out in accordance with the procedure set out in this approach, in accordance with the principles of scientific legitimacy, public justice, accountability and coherence.

Article 5. The Government of the people at the local level leads and manages the assessment of social stability in the present administration, with relevant decision-making actors, assessment subjects and implementing actors responsible for the implementation of specific organizations.

(i) Where significant administrative decision-making decisions are taken, the Government of the people at all levels and its functional departments or organizations authorized by laws, regulations are the subject of decision-making.

(ii) The local governments at all levels of the population and their functional sectors or legal, legislative and regulatory mandates are the subject of assessment.

(iii) To organize local governments, departments or other organizations that implement major administrative decisions.

The coordination body responsible for the overall coordination and promotional guidance of the assessment of social stability in the current administrative region.

Article 6 assesses that the subject is responsible for organizing a socio-sustainability risk assessment by the relevant departments or experts, and may also entrust the intermediary with conducting a social stabilization risk assessment and review the social stabilization risk assessment report.

Intermediating organizations are entrusted with conducting a social stabilization risk assessment, and the subject should be assessed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the law, regulations, and national and provincial levels, by making competitive determination of intermediary organizations, by signing a social stabilization risk assessment commission under the law, by agreeing to assess content, procedures, funding, default responsibilities.

Article 7. Funding and assessment of major administrative decision-making social stabilization risk assessments are included in the budgets of the relevant sectors of the same-level people's Government.

Article 8 Governments should establish social stabilization risk assessment indicators, and provincial administrations should establish the system's social stabilization risk assessment indicators in accordance with the social stabilization risk assessment indicators developed by the Provincial Government.

Article 9. The provincial price administration should establish the criteria for the regulation of fees for social stabilization risk assessment for intermediary organizations and include the criteria for the guidance for social stabilization risk assessment in the Sichuan province.

The following major administrative decisions should conduct a social stabilization risk assessment:

(i) Significant matters relating to the restructuring, reshaping, re-entry, removal and distribution of income for State-owned enterprises involved in the movement of employees or changes in the interests of their workers; matters relating to institutional reform of the enterprise units;

(ii) Major adjustments in social insurance systems, such as old-age insurance, health insurance, and social assistance policies; major adjustments in commodity, service prices and fees that are of interest to the public;

(iii) Major policy and reform measures relating to collective land collection, compensation for resettlement and immigration resettlement in rural areas; major changes in housing security policies, such as affordable housing; major policy adjustments involving urban infrastructure construction and State-owned housing payments and residential resettlement;

(iv) Large medium-sized hydropower works related to the preparation of a planning outline for the development of the expropriation of migrants, the preparation of a plan for the resettlement of migrants and the restructuring of programmes, the organization of sampling receipts, and matters such as the high number of people, the critical sensitivity of the people of migrants;

(v) Relevant to significant adjustments in administrative areas;

(vi) Construction projects that may result in significant environmental impacts or significant environmental risks, which may result in construction projects that are hidden by major security accidents, and major rehabilitation projects after natural disasters;

(vii) Extensive and sensitive activities that may have an impact on social stability;

(viii) Other major administrative decision-making that may have an impact on social stability.

Article 11. The elements of a social stabilization risk assessment should include assessment of legality, reasonable assessment, security assessment, feasibility assessment, and control assessment.

(i) The assessment of legality should include compliance with legal, regulatory, regulatory and national policy provisions by the subject of decision-making, decision-making, decision-making processes, decision-making elements.

(ii) A reasonable assessment should include social benefits, economic benefits and eco-efficiency, such as major administrative decision-making, in conformity with the people's real interests, long-term interests and legitimate rights.

(iii) Safety assessments should include the existence of national security, public safety, etc., of major administrative decisions.

(iv) The feasibility assessment should include major administrative decision-making implementation programmes, implementation of material conditions, compliance with regional, industrial development and popular interests.

(v) Controlable assessments should include socially stable risk factors in major administrative decisions and their preventive measures and emergency disposal scenarios.

Article 12: The subject of the assessment shall carry out a social stabilization risk assessment in accordance with the following procedures:

(i) Develop a programme of work for socio-sistency risk assessment based on the content of major administrative decisions and seek the views of the parties;

(ii) The collection of relevant information, including information, on the basis of the work programme on social stability risk assessment, on the ground survey, questionnaire surveys, public opinion tests, interviews, cyberwarfares, hearings, publicity;

(iii) Identification, analysis of the risk factors of social stability, based on relevant information, and identification of the types, probability, scope, etc.;

(iv) Develop preventive measures based on social stability risk factors;

(v) Determination of the level of risk of social stability in accordance with social stabilization risk assessment indicators and preventive measures, which are classified as low-risk, medium- and high-risk;

(vi) Determination of possible implementation, suspension and non-implementation evaluation findings based on the level of social stability risk;

(vii) Preparation of a report on social stabilization risk assessment. The report on social stabilization risk assessment should include essential administrative decision-making, assessment processes and methods, assessment content, analysis, preventive measures, risk ratings and assessment findings.

The risk of social stability in major administrative decision-making involving State secret should be subject to the relevant national confidentiality provisions.

In accordance with the report on the assessment of social stability, the decision-making subjects are to be implemented, suspended and non-implemented in accordance with the statutory procedures.

Article XIV provides for major administrative decisions to be taken, and the subject of implementation shall establish emergency disposal scenarios in accordance with laws, regulations and regulations, such as the People's Republic of China Act on Responses to Fidents.

Article 15. In the course of the implementation of major administrative decisions, key social stability risk factors or the occurrence of social stabilization risks should be properly disposed of in accordance with preventive measures and emergency response scenarios; and when preventive measures and emergency disposal pres are not effective, decision-making actors should take timely decisions on suspension or termination of implementation.

Article 16 suspension, non-implementation or termination of major administrative decision-making, and decision-making actors should undertake a social stabilization risk assessment in accordance with this approach.

Article 17, in violation of the provisions of this approach, provides that the relevant laws, regulations and regulations are in place from their provisions.

In violation of this approach, the competent and other persons directly responsible for decision-making are treated in accordance with the law and are transferred to the judiciary for criminal responsibility in accordance with the law:

(i) The absence of a social stabilization risk assessment prior to the decision of major administrative decisions;

(ii) In the course of implementation of major administrative decisions, significant social stability risk factors or social stabilization risks have been identified, and preventive measures and emergency disposal presupposes are not effective, without timely decision to suspend or terminate implementation;

(iii) The suspension, non-implementation or termination of major administrative decision-making, and the re-decision-making process does not provide for a risk assessment of social stability in accordance with this approach;

(iv) Other violations of the provisions of the law, regulations and regulations.

Article 19, in violation of this approach, provides for the assessment of one of the competent and other persons directly responsible for the subject, to be treated in accordance with the law, and the transfer of criminal responsibility to the judiciary if committed:

(i) The assessment process and the content of a social stabilization risk assessment in accordance with this approach;

(ii) In the context of socio-sistance risk assessment, in favour of private fraud, abuse of authority and misappropriation;

(iii) Unless, in accordance with laws, regulations, regulations and national and provincial provisions, the selection of intermediary organizations to conduct a social stabilization risk assessment of major administrative decision-making through competitive determination;

(iv) No review of the report on the assessment of social stability submitted by the intermediary organizations;

(v) Other cases in violation of laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 20, in violation of this approach, provides that the competent and other persons directly responsible for the implementation of the subject have one of the following acts, which are taken in accordance with the law; the alleged offence is committed and transferred to the judiciary to be criminalized by law:

(i) In the course of the implementation of major administrative decisions, significant social stability risk factors or risk of social stability have not been properly disposed of in accordance with preventive measures and emergency response;

(ii) Other cases in violation of laws, regulations and regulations.

In violation of this approach, the intermediary has one of the following acts in the process of conducting a socio-sistance risk assessment, which is recorded by the development reform administration in the recruitment system by the intermediary organizations and participating personnel; triggering social stabilization risks, the intermediary organizations and participants are not allowed to participate in the social stabilization risk assessment operation from the date of the requisitioning system; the alleged offender is transferred to the judiciary to be criminalized by law:

(i) Resistance in the assessment of social stability;

(ii) Example assessment findings;

(iii) Other circumstances that violate the provisions of laws, regulations and regulations.

In violation of this approach, State organs and their staff retreats, misappropriations, exclusions, exclusions, fraud and social stabilization risk assessment funds are governed by law by the relevant executive branch and are treated by law against the competent and other responsible persons directly responsible.

Article 23 of this province is implemented in the light of this approach by reference to the assessment of social stability in the State-owned enterprises and in the State Control Unit.

Article 24