Article 2 provides for the following major administrative decisions (hereinafter referred to as decision-making) applicable to the Government of the above-mentioned province and its departments (hereinafter referred to as decision-making bodies):

(i) Important planning and major reform measures in economic and social development;

(ii) Major policies in the areas of social security, health and family planning, education, and environmental protection, resource allocation;

(iii) Major construction projects implemented by governmental organizations that may have a greater impact on the interests of the groups concerned;

(iv) Other decision-making matters identified by policymaking organs.

Specific decision-making matters are determined by the decision-making organs in accordance with the preceding paragraph and in conjunction with the relevant considerations in decision-making; the decision-making organs may, in accordance with actual needs, develop a directory of decision-making matters to be made public to society.

Article 3 responds to, legislation, rural and urban planning, land use master planning, land use and house collection and compensation, government pricing, local standard development, and other decision-making procedures, and their decision-making activities apply the relevant legal, legislative and regulatory provisions.

The decision-making organs of the former paragraph may, in accordance with the actual circumstances, refer to the detailed and normative process of decision-making.

Article IV decision-making bodies should guarantee, in accordance with the law, the right to informed decision-making, participation, expression and oversight of citizens, legal persons and other organizations.

Article 5 does not have a legal basis on which decision-making organs may not make decisions to detract from the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations or increase their obligations.

The decision-making organs of Article 6 should conduct in-depth research in decision-making, provide adequate information, strengthen coordination, focus on the protection of legitimate rights and avoid laserization and conflicting.

Article 7 shall be subject to the following procedures, in addition to the circumstances in which the law shall be confidential or, in order to guarantee public safety, social stability and the need for immediate decisions by the executive branch:

(i) Organizing public participation in decision-making matters that directly involve the interests of the relevant groups or concerns of the general public;

(ii) Organizing expert perceptions on issues of greater professionalism in decision-making matters;

(iii) Organizing risk assessments on issues related to public safety, social stability, environmental protection and differences in views in decision-making matters;

(iv) Legal review of decision-making programmes;

(v) The decision-making programme is reviewed by the decision-making organs in a collective manner.

Organizations involved in Article 8 public participation, expert perceptions and risk assessment are covered by the drafting units of the decision-making programme, which, according to their specific circumstances, can be carried out together or commissioned by third-party professional bodies to implement them.

The review of legality is governed by the rule of law institutions of the policymaking organs. The decision-making body concerned more than two units, with the responsibility of the principal body of the rule of law. Government decision-making, after the first instance of legality by the rule of law body of the drafting body of the decision-making programme, is subject to a review of legality by the Government's rule of law institutions.

Article 9 organizes public participation and should, inter alia, hear views, suggestions and recommendations from grass-roots, relevant group representatives and relevant units.

After the formation of the decision-making programme, public information within the context of the decision-making impact, such as the press column, the Government website or the media, should be published through public information that is accessible to the public in the context of the decision-making impact, the announcement of the decision-making programme or the relevant content of public interest, and the views of the social parties should be sought, except in accordance with the law, matters of confidentiality or content.

There are significant differences in views or major adjustments in interest relations in Article 10 decision-making programmes and hearings should be held.

Article 11, which organizes public participation, should strengthen public communication, communication, general public attention and greater professionality, should be interpreted in a way that is understandable, describe or provide the public with access to participate, monitor and support for decision-making.

In the decision-making process, in accordance with the content and needs of decision-making matters, decision-making bodies should be widely heard by representatives of the human person, members of the political union, and democratic parties, business associations, people's groups.

Article 13 organizes expert arguments and should focus on issues related to professionality and the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of decision-making.

Experts participating in the argument may be those in the expert pool established by decision-making organs or other personnel who have experienced or studied related issues at the request of invitations.

The expert argument should generally be used in the form of meetings; it would be difficult to meet or other forms.

After the expert's participation in the argument, the written observations of his/her signature should be made.

Article XIV organizes risk assessments and should consider possible problems related to decision-making, social stability, public safety, the ecological environment, the cost of implementation, paying attention to public participation and the differing views expressed in expert perceptions, determine the maturity and overall risk of decision-making conditions, and study relevant measures to control and respond to risks.

Decision-making matters that directly relate to the interests of the groups concerned and may affect social stability should be implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State and the province; decision-making on specific risk assessments, such as environmental impact evaluation, in accordance with the relevant provisions.

The assessment reports should be produced after the risk assessment; specific risk assessments under the law or the conduct of risk assessments in conjunction with public participation, expert perceptions could also be reflected through relevant materials.

Article 15 reviews the legitimacy of the decision-making programme, with the main review of the following:

(i) Whether decision-making organs have the corresponding legislative authority;

(ii) Whether the relevant elements of the decision-making programme have a statutory basis and whether the relevant legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions are incompatible;

(iii) It is in compliance with statutory procedures in the formulation of decision-making programmes;

(iv) Other elements requiring review.

Article 16 draws collective discussions on decision-making matters, and should be accompanied by draft decisions on decision-making programmes and information materials.

The information should reflect the following:

(i) Basic circumstances;

(ii) The basis for decision-making;

(iii) The main work of public participation, expert opinions, risk assessment, as mandated;

(iv) Overall views, principally different, risk assessment opinions, legitimacy review and treatment of views;

(v) Other references.

Article 17 is a matter of government decision-making and should be discussed by the Standing Committee of the Government or in plenary meetings; matters of sectoral decision-making should be taken by the heads of departments.

Matters relating to the drafting of decision-making programmes by the sector and the decision-making by the Government should be taken by the heads of departments to discuss them collectively.

In collective discussions under article 18, the participants should comment; no comments were considered to be agreed.

Would the decision-making programme be adopted by the executive head on the basis of collective discussions.

The views of the participants, the discussions and decisions of the Conference should be documented and archived.

The decision-making matters in question should be taken in accordance with the provisions of the competent body, the People's Congress or its Standing Committee, or if they are invited to ratify, decide on the basis of the relevant provisions.

After Article 20 decision-making, the decision-making organs should make public information and inquiries in accordance with the provisions; they are final decisions that, in addition to the fact that they are not public in accordance with the law, should be made accessible to the public.

Article 21 decision-making bodies should follow up on the implementation of decision-making matters, and, where necessary, should conduct a summary of the implementation, problems and measures based on improved and adaptive measures, including through public advice, expert perceptions and commissioning third-party assessments.

Article 2 imposes significant losses and adverse social impacts on decision-making, and should be held accountable, accountable and accountable to executive heads, other responsible heads and relevant responsibilities in accordance with the law.

When a collective discussion determines decision-making matters, the person concerned has a clear sense of inadmissibility or a reservation to the decision-making process and should be exempted or mitigated.

Article 23 is responsible for the violation of confidentiality provisions in the decision-making process, in accordance with the relevant provisions of confidentiality laws, regulations and regulations.

Major decision-making activities in the town of the town of Art. 24 are carried out in the light of this provision.

Article 25.