Advanced Search

China (Fujian) Implementation Measures For Free Trade Zone Relatively Centralizing The Power Of Administrative Reconsideration

Original Language Title: 中国(福建)自由贸易试验区相对集中行政复议权实施办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Article 1 regulates the implementation of the right to participate in administrative review in the area of UNCTAD's free trade test in a timely and impartial manner (hereinafter referred to as a self-UNCTAD test area) in accordance with the provisions of the National People's Republic of China Administrative Review Act, the National People's Republic of China Regulations on the Application of the Administrative Review of the Law of the People's Republic of China and the General Programme for the Free Trade Pilot Zone of China (Furer) in conjunction with the actual provisions of this province.

Article 2, Civil, legal or other organizations apply to administrative review of the activities taken by the executive review body in accordance with the law.

Specific administrative actions carried out by outside investors against the Regional Management Committee and the functional sectors established do not apply for administrative review and apply this approach.

Article 3 harmonizes the exercise of administrative review rights with the division of responsibility of the Committee on Regional Management, in addition to administrative organs and national security authorities that are subject to vertical leadership, such as customs, finance, national tax, foreign exchange management.

In cases of review of the administration of the ADB, the review body responsible for the harmonization of the exercise of the executive review shall not authorize other executive organs to exercise executive review.

Article IV. The Government of the people of the province should strengthen the leadership of the self-UNCTAD pilot area in relation to the concentration of administrative review.

The Government of the People's Republic of Favu should strengthen its leadership in relation to the self-UNCTAD Test Zone House, the Foof region's relatively concentrated administrative review, and to strengthen coordination and oversight of cases in which they are centralized.

The provincial Government's rule-of-law institutions have specific responsibility for the advancement of implementation and guidance.

Article 5

The relevant functional departments of the provincial Government, the House and the People's Government of Fford are no longer in the exercise of their jurisdiction over the administrative review of the TA pilot area.

Article 6 Civil, legal or other organizations do not apply for administrative review by the Pémi District Management Committee, which is mandated by the Government of the province to receive, review and make administrative review decisions.

Individuals, legal persons or other organizations do not apply for administrative review by the House, the Fford State Council for the Management of Archives, respectively, by the House, the People's Government of the State of Favu, in the exercise of the authority to receive, consider and make administrative review decisions.

In making specific administrative actions by the executive organs set out in article 5 of this approach, they may have adverse effects on the rights, obligations of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, they should be informed that they may apply to the Committee for Administrative Review and the period of application for administrative review.

In making specific administrative acts under Article 6 of this approach, the Phea District Management Committee may have adverse effects on the rights, obligations and obligations of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, and should be informed that it may apply to the Government of the province for an administrative review and the period of application for administrative review.

The rights and obligations of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, as set out in article VI of this approach, may have a negative impact on the rights and obligations of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, should be communicated separately to the House, the people of the State of Fford and the Government of the State for application for administrative review.

Article 8 is a administrative review of the scope of administrative review, which is relatively concentrated, and the applicant may apply to the Committee for Administrative Review of the Architecture.

Article 9 Administrative review cases before the Committee on Architects are reviewed by its body responsible for the rule of law.

Article 10 Administrative review cases before the Committee on Architects, which is reviewed by its rule of law bodies, are submitted to the Committee for Administrative Review.

Article 11. The Committee on Architects should perform its administrative review role seriously, establish a system of work that is relatively focused on the right to administrative review, with dedicated administrative review personnel, and ensure that administrative review capacity is adapted to the relatively centralized administrative review mandate.

Sectors such as the preparation and financialization of the body of the Committee should be aligned with the relevant safeguards, based on the need for a relatively concentrated process of administrative review.

Article 12 Civil, legal or other organizations, when applying for administrative review under this approach, submit a request for review in conjunction with the provisions on the basis of specific administrative acts, which shall be dealt with by the Committee in accordance with article 7 of the National People's Republic of China Administrative Review Act. During the process, a review of specific administrative acts was suspended.

Article 13. This approach has been implemented since the date of publication.