Advanced Search

Urumqi City Housing Security Management Measures

Original Language Title: 乌鲁木齐市城市房屋安全管理办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Reviewed at the 55th ordinary meeting of the Uruz People's Government, held on 22 November 2002, through the adoption of the Decree No. 51 of 7 April 2003 of the Uruz People's Government of 7 April 2003)

Chapter I General
Article 1. To strengthen urban housing security management, to guarantee residency and security, and to develop this approach in line with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.
The second approach applies to the safe management of houses already built in the city's urban planning area.
Article III of this approach refers to activities that effectively exclude the insecurity of hazardous homes and other homes by means such as housing safety inspections, housing safety recognition.
This approach refers to activities to conduct a survey of the extent to which the housing structure and the safety of subsidiary facilities are reliable.
This approach refers to the identification and evaluation of the extent of damage and the safety of the house.
Article IV. Housing security management should be guided by the principles of prevention of ownership, periodic inspection, timely identification and integrated control.
Article 5 The Housing Authority is the administrative authority for the safe management of houses in this city (hereinafter referred to as the municipal housing security authority). The Urban Housing Safety Identification Office (hereinafter referred to as the identifier) is entrusted by the municipal housing security authorities with specific responsibility for the management of housing.
Sectors such as urban construction, planning, public safety, business and culture should be aligned with the safe management of homes within their respective responsibilities.
Chapter II Security management
Article 6. The owner, the user, shall use the house in a reasonable manner, in accordance with the design of the house, without unauthorized changes in the nature, structure, and shall not refuse, obstruct the maintenance and security of the house.
The owner, the owner and the owner shall have reasonable use of the unitary and cohabited facilities without intrusion or damage.
All persons living side by side with their homes, who use them, should maintain the security of their homes without prejudice to the interests of the contiguous side.
Article 7. In storms and rains seasons, all house owners and users should be prepared to be at risk. Measures to be taken in a timely manner in the event of a risk of housing.
Article 8 prohibits the use of the following acts:
(i) Expansion of the original Windows in the heavy wall and dismantle the rickb, concrete walls connected to the positive wing;
(ii) Reclassification of rooms that do not prevent water requirements to health;
(iii) The installation of incentives affecting the housing structure;
(iv) Other impacts on building structures and the security of use.
Article 9 has one of the following acts, which shall apply for security clearance by the identification body and may be implemented in accordance with the law:
(i) The establishment of large brands, advertisements or ironta facilities in homes;
(ii) Changes in the subject of homes and the heavy structure;
(iii) Changes in the use of homes, which are clearly increased.
Article 10 shall not be rented, borrowed or used as a swing house for the transition from evictions, as identified as hazardous houses.
Chapter III
Article 11 has one of the following conditions, and the owner shall apply to the identification body for the safety of homes:
(i) To reach or exceed the design of the time limit;
(ii) The base, the wall or other heavy components are clearly trapped, lapidated, transgressive and corrosive;
(iii) The main structure is compromised by new construction, expansion, dressing, etc.;
(iv) The five-year absence of security clearance for large-scale public premises;
(v) Other needs to be identified in safety.
The municipal housing security authorities check the circumstances indicated in the previous section, while the owner of the house has not applied for the security of the house and shall be responsible for the application of the deadline; the late rejection of the application, and the municipal housing security authorities may designate the identification body for safety.
Article 12. The house users have found that the housing is unsafe and may require the owner to apply for the security of the house; the owner rejects the application and the owner may apply for themselves.
Article 13 build-up projects that may endanger the safety of the surrounding houses in the construction (building) intensive area, and construction units should apply for the identification of institutions to follow up on the surrounding homes.
Article 14. Applications for housing safety recognition shall be completed and submitted to the following documents and information:
(i) A housing property certificate or other valid documents supporting property rights, a lease contract or other means to prove effective documents relating to the civil rights of the recognized house;
(ii) Technical and management information, such as surveying, design, construction, completion of homes, etc.
The applicant was unable to provide the information provided in paragraph (ii) of the previous paragraph, which was surveyed and tested by the identification body.
Article 15. Upon receipt of the request by the identifier, it shall normally be completed within 15 working days for the safe identification of homes, for the purpose of providing advice, for the collection of a certificate of security of the house and for the benefit of the applicant.
Article 16 provides that housing safety experts shall be trained to obtain a certificate of operations for the safety of homes, and that they may be involved in the identification of housing.
The housing safety certificate should be attended by more than two experts. In particular complex identification projects, the identification body may hire professionals or invite the relevant sector to participate in the identification.
Article 17 should validate housing safety in accordance with national standards relating to professional technology and collect identification fees as required. Accreditation fees are borne by all and are not hazardous homes and are borne by the applicant.
The construction units apply for the safe identification of houses around the construction area and the identification fee is borne by the construction units.
Article 18, which is validated by hazardous homes, shall be communicated by the accreditation body to dangerous homes in a timely manner and to the municipal housing security authorities.
All houseowners or other governance responsibilities should take timely risk removal measures against hazardous homes; they need to be dismantled and the owner should have an identification instrument and a letter of the hazardous house, to the city's construction, planning and administration authorities, and to receive the relevant preferential policy as required.
All persons living side by side with dangerous homes should jointly perform governance responsibilities in accordance with the relevant national provisions.
Article 19 Delays or refusals of all houseowners or other governance responsibilities to fulfil their governance responsibilities, and the municipal housing security authorities shall send a written notice of the limited governance. In late refusal of governance, the municipal housing security authorities can take appropriate risk-removal measures such as renovation, alteration, avoidance of risk and temporary relocation, which are borne by the responsibilities of governance.
Chapter IV Legal responsibility
Article 20, in violation of article 8 of this approach, is being corrected by the time limit of the municipal housing security authority, with a fine of up to 1000 units and a fine of €200 for individuals.
Article 21, in violation of article 9 of this approach, does not apply for security clearance, which is modified by the time limit of the municipal housing security authorities; the late refusal to be corrected and the fine of up to 1000 units may be fined to individuals by 2.0.
Article 22, in violation of article 13 of this approach, provides that the time limit for the security of the house is changed by the municipal housing security authorities; the late refusal is not rectified, and the municipal housing security authorities may designate the identification body to conduct security checks and may impose a fine of up to 1,000 dollars.
Article 23 is one of the following cases, which is being corrected by the municipal housing security authority, with a fine of up to 1000 units and a fine of €200 to the personal service:
(i) Be identified as dangerous homes without timely compliance with governance responsibilities, in accordance with deadlines of governance;
(ii) Be identified as hazardous houses, they remain rented, borrowed or used to dismantle transition swing houses.
Article 24 identifies one of the following acts by the identification body and should assume civil responsibility and administrative responsibility:
(i) The identification of non-hazardous homes for losses resulting from hazardous homes;
(ii) Identification of hazardous houses as non-risk homes and accident within an effective time frame;
(iii) Incidents caused by delays in the identification period.
Article 25, in violation of this approach, provides that the loss of life of another person shall be liable under the law; constitutes an offence and shall be criminalized by law.
Article 26 may apply for administrative review or administrative proceedings in accordance with the law.
Article 27 Abuse of tenure, provocative fraud, negligence, administrative disposition by its units or by the competent authorities at the superior level, constitutes criminal liability under the law.
Chapter V
The twenty-eighth approach was implemented effective 8 May 2003.