Key Benefits:
(Adopted by the 59th Standing Committee of the People's Government of Oxford, 21 November 2005) No. 97 of 1 December 2005 on the occasion of 1 January 2006 (Act No. 97) Article 1 regulates the economic order of the market, strengthens the quality supervision of commodities in the area of circulation, protects the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, and develops this approach in the light of the relevant provisions of the law, regulations and regulations. Article II provides for quality monitoring of commodities, which is referred to in this approach, to the organization by the municipal business administration in accordance with its statutory responsibilities, the implementation of sampling testing, quality determinations of commodities in the area of circulation, the publication of quality information on commodities, the direction of consumption and the inspection of quality of commodities that are dealt with by law in the sale of non-qualified commodities. The legal, administrative and regulatory provisions provide for the quality monitoring sector. Article 3. Quality monitoring of commodities, including the harmonization of the national business administration and the commission of specific monitoring by the municipal business administration sector and monitoring by the municipal business administration sector in accordance with the specific circumstances of the city. Article IV Quality monitoring of commodities should uphold the principles of impartiality, equity and openness. Article 5 (i) Commodities that may be human health and physical, property security; (ii) Significant commodities for people living in the country; (iii) Consumers, relevant organizations concentrate on commodities with quality problems; (iv) Other commodities requiring monitoring are regulated by laws, regulations and regulations. Article 6. The municipal and business administration sector may not duplicate the same commodity within the same quarter. In the following cases, the supervision of the municipal and commercial administration can be subject to the limitations set out in the preceding paragraph: (i) Accept monitoring by the superior sector; (ii) The occurrence of sudden public incidents and the need for temporary special monitoring; (iii) Monitoring of other types of non-qualified commodities requires monitoring; (iv) Other cases provided for in the legislation. Article 7. The business administration sector, in its commodity quality monitoring, determines that the commodities meets the following requirements: (i) The absence of a State standard, industry standards and local standards that endanger the safety of the person, property and the safety of the person, and the safety of the person, should be in compliance with the standards; (ii) Useability of commodities should be available; (iii) In line with the criteria for the products used in commodity or packaging, consistent with the quality indicated by commodity notes, physical samples; (iv) The commodity mark is in compliance with legal and national standards. Article 8. The quality of commodities monitored is based on national standards, industry standards, local standards and State-related provisions, as well as the explicit corporate standards or quality commitments for commodity packaging. The indicators of safety, health, etc., which are expressly used by commodity packaging, are less than mandatory or relevant by the State, are based on mandatory standards or relevant national provisions; are higher than mandatory standards or national provisions to determine the quality of corporate standards or quality commitments expressly used in commodity packaging. Without corresponding mandatory standards or specific national provisions, the criteria or quality commitments expressly used for packaging commodities can be used as a basis for quality determination. There are no corresponding mandatory standards, national specific provisions, explicit corporate standards and quality commitments for commodity packaging, which are based on the corresponding recommended national standards, industrial standards. Article 9. The industrial and commercial administration sector organizes quality monitoring in the area of commodity flows and should prepare, in advance, a monitoring plan for the current year (cash) or temporary specialization. Monitoring plans should include monitoring sites, monitoring of commodity varieties, schedules, inspection bodies, funding budgets. Article 10. Organization of the municipal and commercial administration sector, implementation of quality monitoring of commodities, shall be entrusted with the establishment by law of a commodity quality test body (hereinafter referred to as an inspection body) to monitor the quality of commodities. Following the inspection body's authorization, specific monitoring programmes should be proposed, including testing projects, testing methods, test-based standards, qualified boundaries and determination principles, and the identification of a sample number, location, method, envelope, mode of delivery, timing, etc. The testing programme was implemented after the review of consent by the municipal and business administration. Article 11. In implementing the monitoring of sample samplings by the municipal and commercial administration, the documents of the monitored operators (hereinafter referred to as monitoringers) should be presented and communicated to their rights obligations. Article 12 The monitors shall provide, if they do so, evidence, information on the monitoring needs of samples and related instruments, entry prices, inventory sites, inventory volumes, without undue delay or refusal. Article 13. Market hosting units or market operators should assist the municipal and business administration in quality monitoring of the commodities of their operators in the market, and, if they are provided with the goods and other convenience conditions of the operator, to monitor operators in the market. Article 14. The number of samples, in addition to ensuring that the test needs are met, should also be retained, but the number of samples should not exceed the reasonable requirements for monitoring. The sample monitoring shall not affect the normal operation of the monitored person. Article 15. Monitoring samples will be drawn by a sample of the licensee and by law enforcement officials in the business administration. The sample should be sampled and confirmed by samplers, law enforcement officials in the business administration and by the monitoror; the sampling process should have a detailed record that the samplers, the monitors should be signed in the Monitoring Check (Proceived) sample (hereinafter referred to as “similar lists”); the monitoror belongs to the operators in the market, the market hosting units or the head of the market operating authority should also be signed in the sample file. The author's refusal to sign was seen as a refusal. Monitoring of the samples required is provided by the non-receipt of the monitored person and informing the number of samples confirmed by the samplemarks as producers (hereinafter referred to as “products”). The remaining sample was stored at the Monitoring Service, and the monitors should be kept in good custody, without private demolitions, mediation and destruction. Article 16 concluded by the sample, the prosecution body, the business administration sector involved in the sample retained a sample file and sent a copy of the monitoror. The licensee should send a letter of confirmation of commodity quality monitoring samples to producers in a timely manner (hereinafter referred to as the letter of confirmation). From the date of receipt of the letter of confirmation, a sample confirmation should be carried out within three days that it is not produced by itself, should provide evidence within five days and that it is not confirmed or that the evidence is not provided as confirmation of the samples. Article 17, following the examination of samples, the licensee shall submit the results to the municipal and business administration in a timely manner and inform producers. The municipal business administration should inform the monitors of the results of the test within three days of the date of receipt of the test results and take appropriate measures in accordance with the law. After the examination of samples, samples of the test of qualifications and the continued use of value should be returned promptly to the monitored. Upon the request of the monitoringor, no return has been returned, the monitors have the right to complain to the relevant sectors. Article 19 shall immediately cease the sale of unqualified commodities for monitoring. In order to be sold, effective measures should be taken promptly to inform consumers of the re-electing of commodities; timely re-recruit should be required for non-mandatory standards. Article 20 is subject to an objection by the monitors, producers to the results of the test and shall submit a written review request to the business administration in the city within 15 days of the date of receipt of the notice of the test results, with the exception of the State's non-applicability of the application for review. The failure to submit a review application was considered to be an acknowledgement of the results. The self-dissemination, redeployment or destruction of the vetting samples by the monitoringor is considered to have been abandoned. Article 21, upon receipt of a review request by the municipal and business administration, the review considers it necessary to review the applicant in a timely manner and to designate the review body. The review should test the full sample of the original test sample. The full sample should be drawn jointly by commercial and administrative law enforcement officials, the reviewers and sent to the review body. After the review, the review body should submit the results of the review to the municipal business administration in a timely manner. The municipality's business administration should inform the applicant in writing within three days of the date of receipt of the review. The review resulted in the final outcome of the commodity quality test. Article 2 The requirements for commodity quality monitoring organized by the municipal and business administration under this approach are vested in the city's finance. The cost of conducting a review, which is not consistent with the initial test results, is borne by the original inspection body; the results of the original test are accurate and wrong and are assumed by the reviewor. Article 23 Tests for the quality monitoring of commodities should be based on the criteria in question, objectively, impartially and impartially, on the test results report, without a false or false test results report. (a) The inspection body shall deduct the corresponding test costs for false or false test results reports; Article 24: The municipal and business administration sector should provide a timely overview of the results of commodity quality monitoring and be made public to society. Monitoring information has not been published by the municipal and commercial administrations and no units and individuals may be disclosed to society. Article 25 relating to operators should, on the basis of monitoring information published by the municipal and commercial administration, proactively halt the sale of commodities that are not in accordance with the provisions of the law, regulations and standards, take the measures required under article 19 of the scheme accordingly and report on the local business administration in a timely manner. Article 26 Regional and industrial administrations are responsible for the identification of relevant commodity organizations in the Territory's markets and the treatment of unqualified commodities by law, in accordance with commodity quality monitoring information published or communicated by the municipal and commercial administration. Article 27, in violation of article 12 of this approach, is not punishable in accordance with article 24 of the Regulations on the Quality of Products in the city of Zanzi. Article 28 of the market hosting units or market operators violate article 13 of this approach, which does not provide a real supply of the operation of the operator's commodities or creates obstacles to quality monitoring of the commodities, with a fine of 5,000. Article 29, in violation of article 15 of this approach, is subject to a fine of up to 1 million dollars for private self-sealtering, redeployment, destruction of the monitoring backup samples. Article 33 Quality Tests for Commodities, in violation of article 23 of this approach, penalized by article 57 of the People's Republic of China Act on Product Quality. Article 31 criminalizes violations of this approach by the municipal and commercial administration. The law, legislation and regulations provide otherwise, from their provisions. Article 32 of the law enforcement of monitoring by the business administration, causing loss of property to citizens, legal persons or other economic organizations, shall be compensated by law, and administrative disposition of the competent and other persons directly responsible. The circumstances constitute serious crimes and are criminally prosecuted by law. Article 33 of this approach refers to enforcement national standards, industry standards and local standards. Article 34 of this approach is implemented effective 1 January 172. |
