Advanced Search

Implementation Measures For Administrative Law Enforcement Responsibility System In Huainan City

Original Language Title: 淮南市行政执法责任制实施办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(The 26th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Turkmen Republic of 20 March 2006 considered the adoption of Decree No. 102 of 24 March 2006 of the Order of the Government of the Turkmen People, which was issued as of 1 May 2006)

Chapter I General
Article 1, in order to promote the administration of law enforcement and administrative law enforcement officials, to increase the level of law enforcement, to ensure the proper implementation of laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, and to develop this approach in line with the relevant provisions of the State.
Article 2 refers to the administrative law enforcement responsibility system established by the administrative law enforcement authorities to guarantee the proper and effective implementation of their administrative law enforcement responsibilities.
Article 3. Administrative law enforcement and law, legislative authority or organization entrusted under the law (hereinafter referred to as the administrative law enforcement department), should be established and implemented in accordance with this approach.
Article IV. The Government of the People's Government is responsible for the establishment, implementation and monitoring of administrative law enforcement responsibilities in the administration area and conducts review of administrative law enforcement in the respective sectors (hereinafter referred to as a summary).
The administrative law enforcement services are responsible for the establishment, implementation and supervision of administrative law enforcement responsibilities in this sector and in the administration of law enforcement officials.
Administrative law enforcement organizations authorized or commissioned should establish and implement administrative law enforcement responsibilities, as required by the same-level people's Government, the superior authority or the delegated authority.
Article 5
Departments such as inspection, personnel, finance, audit, should work in close collaboration with their respective responsibilities in the area of administrative law enforcement responsibility.
Article 6. The introduction of administrative law enforcement responsibilities should be mandatory, law enforcement must be rigorous, and the law enforcement should be lawful, impartial, integrity and efficiency.
Chapter II Administrative law enforcement responsibility
Article 7. The Government of the city, the district (zone) shall clean up, identify and inform the administrative law enforcement actors within the current administration of society, clear the results to be backed by the Government's rule of law institutions at the highest level, and changes in the executive law enforcement actors should be made promptly to the social public.
Article 8. The main heads of the administrative law enforcement sector are the first responsible for the administration of justice in this sector and assume leadership responsibility for the administration of justice in this sector.
Article 9. The administrative law enforcement authorities should detract from the administrative law enforcement functions provided for by law, regulations, regulations and regulations to the establishment of internal institutions, law enforcement positions and law enforcement officials to determine the terms, responsibilities and objectives of law enforcement, and to establish a specific appraisal, awards and administrative accountability for violations.
Article 10. The executive law enforcement sector should rationalize the laws, regulations, regulations and regulations implemented, classify, list, classify, classify and classify, classify clear, form science and inform society accordingly.
Law enforcement is based on changes in laws, regulations, regulations, regulations and regulations, which should be restructured and communicated to society in a timely manner.
Article 11. The administrative law enforcement sector should be given equal treatment to the relative and non-discrimination of the administration; the exercise of the right to liberty should be in accordance with the legal purposes and the measures taken and instruments should be necessary and appropriate; and the implementation of administrative administration could take a variety of ways to achieve administrative purposes and the manner in which the interests of the parties should be avoided.
The executive administration of the executive branch should be carried out in strict compliance with the statutory procedures, paying attention to the views of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, informing them of their rights under the law, guaranteeing the right to information, participation and relief for the management of the relative, the humane.
Administrative law enforcement officials should avoid exercising their responsibilities in relation to the relative existence of the management.
The executive administration of the executive branch should be carried out in accordance with the statutory time frame, the fulfilment of the statutory responsibilities and the provision of quality services.
The administrative law enforcement sector should expedite e-government construction and expand the scope of online office; intersectors should ensure that administrative information is exchanged and resource-sharing, increase efficiency and reduce management costs.
Article 14. Administrative law enforcement should be faithful. The administrative decisions that are not subject to statutory matters and which are already in force shall not be revoked, altered or otherwise subject to the requirements of the State's interests, public interest or other statutory matters shall be carried out in accordance with the statutory authority and procedures, and shall be compensated by law for the damage suffered by the relative owner.
Article 15. Administrative law enforcement authorities should be public in practice, with the exception of matters involving State secrets. The administrative law enforcement authorities should make public access to matters such as the basis, competence, scope, responsibilities, conditions, time frames, procedures, fees standards and results.
Article 16 should establish an internal decision-making system, which is governed by law-making, scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making and improved decision-making procedures.
Article 17 applies to the same law, regulations, regulations and regulations in more than two administrative law enforcement departments, which shall be performed by their respective divisions and shall be accountable to each other; the responsibility is not clear and shall be determined by law by the common superior executive body.
Laws, regulations and regulations stipulate that the main administrative law enforcement authorities are required to cooperate with other administrative law enforcement authorities, and that the main sectors should proactively strengthen contacts and cooperate with the relevant departments.
The administrative law enforcement authorities with the functions of the Civil Disputes Coordination Service should be redeployed in a timely manner in accordance with the principles of openness, equity and justice, in accordance with the statutory authority and procedures.
Article 19 should establish a system of reporting, complaints, publication of telephones, supervision of social law enforcement, coverage of media such as newspapers, radio, television, and civil, legal persons and other organizations for prosecution and alleged violations of administrative conduct.
Article 20 requires the executive law enforcement authorities to accept the monitoring and democratic supervision of the organs of power, and to exercise self-respect for the judgement and decision of the People's Court of Legality.
Article 21
(i) The development and documentation system for normative documents;
(ii) Major administrative penalties reserve systems;
(iii) Issuance and management of administrative law enforcement documents;
(iv) The learning training system of the administrative law enforcement team;
(v) Administrative law enforcement review system;
(vi) Administrative enforcement inspection system;
(vii) The system of administrative review and administrative proceedings;
(viii) Administrative compensation and administrative recovery systems;
(ix) The system of administrative periodic reports under the law;
(x) Administrative law enforcement appraisal system;
(xi) The system of accountability for violations;
(xii) Other administrative law enforcement systems.
Article 22 does not include:
(i) Existence in the development of normative documents beyond statutory competence, with the authorization to establish administrative mandates such as administrative penalties, administrative licences, administrative fees;
(ii) Applications, petitions, reports of non-acquisition or denial, in a timely manner;
(iii) Non-response of statutory or unjustified delays;
(iv) Specific administrative acts are not lawful or manifestly inappropriate;
(v) Violations require that citizens, legal persons and other organizations comply with their obligations;
(vi) Execution of funds or fees for subordinate administrative law enforcement agencies, personnel;
(vii) The non-implementation of the payment system, linking forfeiture into awards and funds in the administrative law enforcement sector, or intercepting private separations, transcendents forfeiture;
(viii) Failure to enforce the judgement and decision of the People's Court of Legality;
(ix) Persons who are not eligible for law enforcement activities;
(x) Other violations.
Article 23. Administrative law enforcement officials must be subject to the training of candidates for the examination of qualifications and access to administrative law enforcement documents and must perform their duties in strict accordance with the competencies and procedures set forth in the laws, regulations and regulations, impartial law enforcement and civilized law enforcement.
Administrative law enforcement officials must produce legal and effective administrative law enforcement documents when carrying out their official duties; they do not produce documents, and manage the relative right to refuse cooperation.
Article 24 shall not include:
(i) Disclosure of State secrets that undermine national interests;
(ii) Corruption is bribeed and favour private law;
(iii) Collection of evidence or concealment of evidence in violation;
(iv) Distortion, abuse of power, abuse and harassment of the public and violations of the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations;
(v) The use of the power to gain private gain for themselves or others;
(vi) Business activities in the area of profitability;
(vii) To combat reprisals against complaints, complaints, citizens, legal persons and other organizations reporting;
(viii) Other violations.
Chapter III
Article 25 Administrative law enforcement evaluation should be guided by the principles of openness, equity, justice and objective evaluation of law enforcement in the administration of justice and administrative law enforcement officials.
Article 26 should include the following:
(i) Implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities;
(ii) Construction of the administrative law enforcement team;
(iii) Legal, normativeization of administrative law enforcement;
(iv) Administrative law enforcement was initiated with administrative review and administrative proceedings;
(v) Accountability for administrative law enforcement;
(vi) The quality of the case;
(vii) Other elements should be included in the evaluation.
Article 27 assesses the administrative law enforcement sector by:
(i) A report on administrative law enforcement in the archaeological sector;
(ii) On-site inspection of administrative law enforcement;
(iii) A sample of administrative law enforcement files and administrative law enforcement information;
(iv) The convening of a comparative panel on administration to seek the views of all communities;
(v) Conduct a legal quality assessment of the heads of the evaluation department and law enforcement personnel;
(vi) Other possible ways.
The evaluation of administrative law enforcement officials should include the following:
(i) Capacity and level of administrative law enforcement;
(ii) Whether the facts of administrative law enforcement cases are clear, based on the accuracy, legitimacy and discretion of the process;
(iii) Whether the administrative law enforcement case files are regulated;
(iv) Individual violations;
(v) Other elements should be included in the evaluation.
The evaluation of administrative law enforcement officers can be structured in a manner that combines the evaluation, self-assessment and mutual evaluation.
Article 31 should develop an evaluation programme to clarify the criteria for evaluation and combine the daily evaluation with the annual evaluation.
Article 31 quantifies the form of the administrative law enforcement evaluation, which should be made public and serve as an important basis for the evaluation and the work of law enforcement officials.
An application for review should be submitted in writing to the evaluation body, which should be answered within 10 days.
Article 32, which is reviewed, has been marked by the effectiveness of administrative law enforcement, which is recognized by the archaeological body and can be commended for the persons concerned. The recognized sectors can give appropriate material incentives to law enforcement staff.
The Government of the city, the district (zone) can organize, within the current administrative region, an advanced unit for administrative law enforcement and an assessment of the advanced individuals, specifically by the Government's rule of law agencies.
Article 33 was rated and administrative law enforcement was lagging behind, giving deadlines to be renovated, to inform criticism, to eliminate the higher qualifications.
Specific administrative actions taken by the administrative law enforcement authorities were found to be high in administrative review and administrative proceedings, with a low level of satisfaction or a negative response to the introduction of administrative law enforcement responsibilities, misappropriation, accountability for their duration; in serious circumstances, criticism or cancellation of advanced qualifications.
Article 34, which is rated by the fact that there is a miscarriage of administrative law enforcement officers in specific administrative acts that are in conflict with the law or misappropriation of the law, according to the pattern of error, the size of the damage, the circumstances, the criticization of education, induction training, dismissal of law enforcement positions, removal of law enforcement qualifications, or administrative disposition by law; and the transfer of suspected crimes to the judiciary.
Article XV is responsible for administrative law enforcement and should be realistic and objective. Prior to the treatment of the responsible person, the views of the responsible person should be heard in order to guarantee their statements and the right to be heard.
Article XVI imposes on individuals the full cost of compensation due to the intentional infliction of State compensation, and the cost of compensation should be borne in accordance with the criteria of 3 to 5 per cent of the loss, up to 5,000 dollars. The laws, regulations, regulations and regulations provide for their provisions.
Chapter IV
Article 37 of this approach was implemented effective 1 May 2006.