Key Benefits:
(Adopted by the 42th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Uruz on 30 July 2006 and issued by Decree No. 79 of 15 September 2006 No. 79, No. 79, of the People's Government Order No. 79 of 16 October 2006) Article 1 regulates administrative law enforcement, oversees the exercise by executive organs of executive authority under the law and promotes the legal administration of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, and develops this approach in line with the laws, regulations, such as the Executive Office of the State Department of State, on the application of administrative law enforcement responsibilities and the administrative enforcement regulations of the city of Uluzi. Article II refers to administrative law enforcement responsibilities as described in the present approach to administrative law enforcement at all levels of administration, the legal, regulatory and administrative organs authorized by the law, the organization and the administrative organs entrusted with the exercise of administrative law enforcement functions (hereinafter referred to as administrative law enforcement agencies) and, in accordance with the statutory management competence, to declassify legal responsibilities under the laws, regulations and regulations to law enforcement positions, to identify those responsible, to establish a system of integrity, and to a system of responsibility for monitoring, evaluating, evaluating, awards and punishment. Article III applies to the establishment and enforcement of administrative law enforcement responsibilities by executive law enforcement agencies in the city. Article IV. The EXPR shall strictly observe the principles of objectivity, openness, equity and justice. The criteria, processes and results of the review of the examination are open. Article 5 Government of the city leads the administration of justice responsibilities throughout the city and monitors, inspections and evaluation of the administrative enforcement responsibilities of the executive law enforcement authorities of the various districts (the districts) people's governments, economic technology development zones, the Higher Industrial Development Board and the municipal authorities. The People's Government is leading administrative law enforcement responsibilities within this administrative area and oversees, inspects and assesses the administrative law enforcement responsibilities of the executive law enforcement agencies. The Economic Technology Development Zone and the Higher Industrial Development Zone are leading administrative law enforcement responsibilities within the Territory and overseeing, inspecting and evaluating administrative law enforcement responsibilities in the respective work sectors. The executive law enforcement agencies implement the executive law enforcement responsibilities of this body within their statutory responsibilities. Article 6 The rule of law institutions of the Economic and Technological Development Zone and the Higher Industrial Development Zone are the work agency for the implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibility oversight, inspection and evaluation in their respective sectors. The rule of law institutions of the executive branch are the working body of this body to implement administrative law enforcement responsibilities. Article 7. Administrative law enforcement agencies should establish and implement a leadership system for the administration of justice, strengthen organizational leadership for the administration of justice and establish a leadership group for administrative law enforcement. Administrative law enforcement agencies should develop a workplan for administrative law enforcement responsibility for the current year in the first month of each year, which is presented to the Government. Article 8. Administrative law enforcement agencies should establish a system of awareness-raising for the rule of law, provide information on the laws, regulations and regulations, raise the notion of the rule of law of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, as well as the self-respect of the law and the law. Administrative law enforcement agencies should provide timely and accurate responses to the advice of citizens, legal persons and other organizations on administrative law enforcement issues. Article 9 should establish a law enforcement system. The law enforcement of this organ is based on regular streamlining and delegating statutory powers, enforcement responsibilities to specific law enforcement agencies and law enforcement positions. Article 10. The development of normative documents by executive law enforcement authorities must be consistent with the Constitution, laws, regulations and local legislation, government regulations, and the harmonization of the rule of law, and must be closely aligned with practice, highlighting the operationality of normative documents. Normative documents developed by the executive law enforcement agencies should be sent to the superior body mandated to review. Article 11. Administrative law enforcement agencies should introduce a law enforcement system. Publication of the basis, conditions, competence, responsibilities, time frames, procedures and scope of the law enforcement of this body to society. Article 12. Administrative law enforcement agencies should establish training systems for law enforcement officials. The development of training and research programmes for law enforcement officials to improve the operational quality of law enforcement personnel. Article 13. Administrative law enforcement agencies should implement the law enforcement documentation management system, make use and recovery of administrative law enforcement documents and establish administrative law enforcement files. Before the law enforcement documents have been issued, a comprehensive legal training or examination of qualifications is required by law enforcement officials. Article 14. The executive law enforcement body should establish and implement a significant administrative sanctions decision-making system. Article 15. Administrative law enforcement agencies should enforce the accountability system for administrative law errors. Administrative law enforcement agencies and their law enforcement officials have caused damage to the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other social organizations, in accordance with the relevant legislation. Article 16 stipulates that administrative law enforcement authorities shall be liable to imprisonment and shall not impose penalties on the administrative law enforcement authorities and law enforcement officials, and shall not be tied to the awards in the law enforcement sector. Article 17 should establish a major administrative sanction and administrative permit hearing system, and should inform the parties that the parties apply for hearings and that the administrative law enforcement authorities should organize hearings. Article 18 should regulate law enforcement instruments. A system such as registration of law enforcement cases, investigation evidence, case clearance and the management of the archives of law enforcement instruments was developed. Article 19 Administrative law enforcement agencies should impose penalties, licences, review and v. statistical reporting systems. The administrative law enforcement authorities shall review the administrative review for a half-year period by 5 July and 5 January each year, the statistical tables of the case and the major penalties, the licensor's rule of law institutions. Article 20 should be implemented by administrative law enforcement agencies. The daily review appraisal is combined with the annual review. The quality of law enforcement in the executive branch and administrative law enforcement officials is assessed through the case file. There is a regular or no periodic review of the internal structure and law enforcement officials, and the establishment of a quality of law enforcement, quantification of indicators assessment files. An internal review of the administrative law enforcement sector, in conjunction with external review, would like to hear the relative views of the administration concerned, including through the holding of a colloquium, the issuance of a law-enforcement review card, the establishment of a public opinion box, the opening of a law enforcement review line telephone, the hiring of a supervisory parliamentarians and the holding of a civil opinion test. Article 21, the executive law enforcement body shall report annually on the laws, regulations and regulations implemented by this organ. Article 22 should establish a system of complaints, reports and referrals, and receive complaints, reports according to the law. Article 23. The executive law enforcement body shall report to the current Government, in the first quarter of each year, on the implementation of administrative licences by this body, including administrative licence matters, application of licences, licence results, applicant's complaint or application for administrative review, the proceedings initiated and their results. The report should be made available on the Government's website. Article 24 Annual administrative inspection workplans of the executive law enforcement authorities shall be reported by 30 November of the previous year to the same-ranking people's rule of law bodies, which shall be reviewed and coordinated in accordance with the principles of legality, streamlining, and reproduce the administration of justice by 30 December. The Governments of the various districts (the district) and the executive law enforcement agencies should combine administrative law enforcement responsibilities with the annual performance appraisal of the Unit and the annual civil service evaluation. Article 25 The results of the study were divided. More than 91 are excellent, 81-90 are qualified and 61-80 are divided into basic qualifications, less than 60. Article 26 (i) Be faithful to the Constitution, laws, regulations and regulations; (ii) Be faithfully and in strict compliance with the law, uphold the dignity of the law and the Government's image; (iii) Hearing popular opinions and defending the public interest and working for the people; (iv) Conservation of State secrets and preservation of the security, honour and interests of the State; (v) To be impartial and impartial; (vi) To put an end to the performance of the public service, to the integrity of the treasury and to replace civilization; (vii) Self-receptance of legal oversight, social oversight and other oversight. Article 27 shall not include: (i) Distinction of expressions that undermine the reputation of the Government, organize or engage in activities against the Government; (ii) Toys negligence and to work wrongly; (iii) To combat reprisals against citizens, legal persons and other organizations that have filed complaints; (iv) Corruption, bribery or the use of authority for personal gain; (v) Abuse of powers, harassment of the population and violations of the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations; (vi) Disclosure of State secrets and violations of commercial secrets and personal privacy; (vii) Participation, support or cover offences; (viii) Participation in or participation in operating activities of profit; (ix) Other violations. The main elements of article 28 for the administrative law enforcement sector are: (i) Leadership and promotion of education in the implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities; (ii) Establishment and implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities; (iii) regulating administrative law enforcement activities; (iv) Oversight of administrative law enforcement. Article 29 EXPRs can be used as follows: (i) Hearing reports on the establishment and implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities in the archaeological sector; (ii) Access to information on the implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities by the archaeological authorities; (iii) A sample of administrative law enforcement files; (iv) The convening of a comparative panel on administration to seek the views of the various communities of society; (v) Conduct a legal quality assessment of the heads of the VIP and administrative law enforcement personnel; (vi) Other modalities identified by the archaeological body. Article 33 is one of the following cases in the executive branch, which is criticized by the superior executive body and recommended by the rule of law organs of the executive branch that have the executive disposition of the first holder and the related head by law: (i) The establishment and implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities; (ii) There are serious violations in the administration of justice; (iii) The investigation of serious violations; (iv) Social communities reflect the poor image of their law enforcement; (v) Oversight inspections with respect to the conduct of the examination or at the superior level are not synchronized and false. Article 31 does not establish a system of complaints, reports and referrals by administrative law enforcement authorities and receive complaints, reports according to the law of the relative person. Article 32 redeploys, resigns, retires, retirements or other grounds from the job, and administrative law enforcement authorities have not recovered administrative law enforcement documents to the issuing authorities in a timely manner, and the authorities of the commune are responsible for the reform of the administrative law enforcement branch and are treated in accordance with the relevant provisions. Article 33 Annual inspection plans of the executive law enforcement bodies have not been reported to be coordinated or not carried out in accordance with the supervision plan. Article 34, Administrative law enforcement bodies have not reported to the current Government's rule of law in the first quarter of each year on the application of administrative licences, administrative licence matters, application of licences, licence results, applicant's complaints or application for administrative review, the circumstances in which administrative proceedings are initiated and the results thereof, and have not been made available on the website of this body to deal with the law in accordance with the relevant provisions. Article XV provides administrative law enforcement officials with one of the acts listed in article 26 of this approach, which is criticized by the competent organs for education, treatment of induction training, or for the recovery of their administrative law enforcement documents by administrative law enforcement documents, removal of their law enforcement qualifications, in the event of serious circumstances, administrative disposition by law, which constitutes a crime and is criminally criminalized by law. Article XVI provides for a period of rehabilitation, notification of criticism, removal of the advanced qualifications, etc. for administrative law enforcement authorities who are in conflict with the law of law or misappropriation of administrative law enforcement, according to the gravity of the consequences or the degree of severity of the impact, and for the removal of the law enforcement qualifications. Crime constituted criminal liability by law. Article 337 has been found to be high in administrative review and administrative proceedings with respect to administrative law enforcement in the administration of justice, which is considered to be in conflict with the law, null and void or change, and the removal of such proportions may be responsible for the renewal of the administrative law enforcement branch's duration; in the event of serious circumstances, it may be criticized or eliminated the assessment of advanced qualifications. Article 338 responsibilities for administrative law enforcement are excellent, and the Government of the people of the city, the district (the district) has been informed or rewarded in accordance with the relevant provisions. The results of the responsibilities of administrative law enforcement are not qualified, and the time limit is changed and criticized. Article 39 of the archaeological project and the evaluation criteria are established separately by the Office of the Rule of Law of the People's Government. Article 40 |
