Key Benefits:
(Adopted at the 19th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of the Republic of Korea, held on 29 September 2007, No. 125 of the People's Government Order No. 125 of 29 September 2007 (Act of 1 November 2007) Contents Chapter I General Chapter II Chapter III Design of security facilities Chapter IV Inspection of security facilities Chapter V Legal responsibility Annex VI Chapter I General In order to prevent and reduce the production of security accidents and to guarantee the lives and property security of the people, this approach is based on the laws and regulations of the People's Republic of China Act on Safety Production and Security in the Province of Chungi. The second approach applies to the construction, alteration and expansion of production-related engineering projects in the province's administration area (hereinafter referred to as “build projects”) and their safety monitoring. Article 3 builds the security facilities of the project, which must be designed in conjunction with the main works, while at the same time construction, with inputs for production and use. Investment in security facilities should be included in the construction project estimates. Article IV. The Government of the province is responsible for the supervision of the construction of project security facilities throughout the province. The safe production supervision management of the city, district and territorial governments is responsible for the supervision of the construction of project security facilities in the current administration. Article 5 Article 6 (i) Construction projects for approval, approval and documentation by the Government of the People of the province or the Government of the province; (ii) Construction projects across the border area; (iii) New construction projects for the production, storage of cigarettes; (iv) Designation of a project for the construction of deposits of more than 1 million (with 1 million) cubic metres; (v) The Department of State Safety and Productive Regulatory Management commissioned a monitoring-management construction project; (vi) The State provides for the review and inspection of other construction projects by the Ministry's Government's safe production management. Article 7 (i) Construction projects for the approval, approval and documentation of the relevant sectors of the government of the city or the municipality of the municipality in which it is established; (ii) Construction projects in cross-districts (markets, areas); (iii) Restructuring and expansion projects for the production, storage of cigarettes; (iv) Designation of an end-of-mining project for a total of 1 million cubic metres; (v) The Ministry of the People's Government's Safety and Productive Management has entrusted oversight with construction projects. Article 8 (i) The construction projects for the approval, approval and documentation of the relevant sectors of the government of the people at the district level or at the district level; (ii) The urban Government's safety and production supervision management has entrusted oversight with construction projects. Article 9. The productive business unit should entrust security evaluation of construction projects with corresponding qualifications. The safety evaluation body should be objective, impartial and legally responsible for the evaluation findings. Chapter II Article 10 build-up units should justify the safety conditions of construction projects in the concept of project feasibility studies. Article 11. Construction units shall conduct a security advance evaluation of the following construction projects: (i) Landmine construction projects; (ii) Construction projects for the production, operation and storage of hazardous chemicals; (iii) Construction projects for the production, storage of cigarettes; (iv) The construction of fire risk-related production-building projects under the Safety and Security Code; (v) The Safety Requirements for the Deploying of Dangerous Areas provide for construction projects at the level of hazardous locations that are particularly dangerous and highly hazardous sites; (vi) Countries and provinces provide for other construction projects that are hazardous or hazardous. In accordance with article 11 of this approach, construction units should be entrusted with the preparation of the Safety Premier Evaluation Report by the corresponding security evaluation body. The Safety Preparation Assessment Report should include the following: (i) qualitative, quantitative evaluation of the extent of risk, harmful factors and harm and the impact of public safety; (ii) Assessment of the possibility of preventing and controlling major hazards and harmful factors; (iii) Possible evaluation of occupational hazards; (iv) Security response measures, safety facility design principles; (v) Advantage evaluation findings; (vi) Other matters requiring clarification. Article 13 Safety advance evaluation reports should be evaluated by experts from the IPS. The construction projects outside article 11 of this approach should be analysed in an integrated manner to the security conditions of construction projects and security facilities, as well as to the safety and production monitoring management case. Article 15. Risk-building projects should also be reviewed by enterprises in accordance with the Regulations on the Safety of Dangerous Chemicals upon completion of the safety advances evaluation. A review of the production and storage of toxic chemicals was conducted by the Ministry's Government's management for the monitoring of safe production, approval by the Government of the Provincial People's Government, and the establishment of other hazardous chemicals production, storage enterprises, which are reviewed by the urban government's security production supervision management in the area and approved by the Government of the people of the region. Chapter III Design of security facilities The preliminary design of construction projects should be delegated to design units with corresponding qualifications. The initial design of construction projects consistent with article 11 of this approach should be based on the Safety Pre-Assessment Report. It should include the following: (i) Design basis; (ii) A summary of construction projects; (iii) Safety environmental analysis around construction projects; (iv) Buddddd buildings and sites; (v) Risk and harmful analysis of production processes; (vi) Preventive measures designed by security facilities; (vii) The creation and staffing of security institutions; (viii) Safety-specific investment estimates; (ix) The response and the adoption of recommendations in the report of the security advance evaluation; (x) Expected effectiveness and problems and recommendations; (xi) Other matters requiring clarifications by the State and the province. Article 18 (i) The construction project approval (approval, documentation); (ii) The Safety Preparation and the evaluation information; (iii) Preliminary design reports and security features for construction projects; (iv) The State and the province provide for other material that needs to be submitted. Article 19, following receipt of a preliminary design review of security facilities, the management of the security production oversight shall organize, within 10 working days, an expert review of the declaration. One of the following cases shall not be subject to security clearance: (i) The design of security facilities is assumed by design units that do not have the corresponding qualifications; (ii) The main risk control measures are not in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State and the province; (iii) The design of security facilities does not meet national standards and industrial technical norms; (iv) Security equipment, facilities, equipment does not meet national standards and industrial standards; (v) None of other conditions under the law. Article 20 provides for significant changes in the design of the project security facility and shall be reported to the management of the monitoring of safe production. Article 21 provides that the construction of a project security facility is designed in a preliminary manner without the approval of the safe production management and that no work can be built. Chapter IV Inspection of security facilities The construction of the project security facility should be accompanied by the works of the subject. The construction units have found that the design of security facilities is unreasonable or that there is a significant security cover, and should stop construction and report on the restructuring of the construction units. The construction could be resumed after the replacement of qualifications. As a result of the construction of a project security facility, the construction unit should conduct a inspection of security facilities and replicate the problems identified in a timely manner. Prior to the completion of the construction project, the construction unit should entrust the security evaluation body with the corresponding qualifications to conduct a inspection evaluation of the security facility and report on the inspection of the safe production management. Article 25. The construction units shall submit the following information to the security-production management for the acquisition of safety facilities: (i) The construction of the pilot operation of the self-identification report; (ii) The findings of the evaluation of the security inspection; (iii) The creation or staffing of security institutions; (iv) Safety training for key heads, safe production managers and special operators; (v) Safe production responsibility, safety regulations and security operating protocols; (vi) The accident response relief advance; (vii) Other material submitted by the State and the province. Article 26 Upon receipt of a security facility inspection request by the security productive management of the construction units, it should be organized within 20 working days. Article 27 contains one of the following cases in the security facility inspection and shall not be collected through the security facility: (i) Security facilities and security conditions do not meet design requirements; (ii) The establishment of a security management body or a security production manager, as required; (iii) The main heads of enterprises, safe production managers and special operators are not trained in safety or are not eligible accordingly; (iv) None of other conditions under the law. The construction projects should be made available for production and use by security production monitoring authorities. Chapter V Legal responsibility In violation of the provisions of article 28, the security production facility is not designed in parallel with the work of the main subjects, works at the same time and invested in production and use, and is converted by the time limit for the management responsible for the safe production of production supervision by the Government of the more than 1,000 people at the district level. Article 29 provides false evidence of the alleged offence, transferred to the judicial body under the law; has not been criminally punished; forfeiture proceeds of the conflict; forfeiture of the proceeds of the violation amounted to more than 5,000 dollars and for the purposes of the law, for which there are no proceeds of the offence or less than 5,000 dollars of proceeds of the violation, for the sole service or for more than 5,000 fines, for the direct responsibility of the person responsible for the offence, and for the injury to the other person. Removal of the corresponding qualifications of the body having committed a former offence. Article 33 Staff of the Safety Production Monitoring Authority, one of the following acts, are subject to administrative disposition by law; suspected crimes are transferred to the judiciary by law: (i) In violation of the procedures and conditions established for the initial security review and construction of project safety tests through the construction of project security facilities; (ii) Be found that construction projects that were not approved by law and collected were not prohibited or dealt with in accordance with the law; (iii) With regard to construction projects that have been approved by law and do not perform regulatory duties, it is found that they are no longer eligible for safe production without the withdrawal of the original approval or the discovery of the non-recognition of security production offences; (iv) Designated construction projects or safety evaluation institutions; (v) Other abuses of authority, omissions, provocative fraud. Annex VI The supervision of the security facilities for the coal construction project is carried out in accordance with the provisions of the relevant legislation. Article 32 is implemented effective 1 November 2007. |
