Advanced Search

Administrative Measures On Supervision Of Major Hazards In Henan Province

Original Language Title: 河南省重大危险源监督管理办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Summit No. 199 of 29 October 2007 of the Government of the Southern Province considered the adoption of the Decree No. 112 of 21 November 2007 of the People's Government Order No. 112 of 21 November 2007, which came into force on 1 January 2008)

Article 1 establishes this approach in accordance with the People's Republic of China Act on Safe Productive Production, the Regulations on the Safety of Southern Province and the relevant laws, regulations and regulations to strengthen the management of major dangerous sources.
Article 2 governs and oversees the management and supervision of major dangerous sources within the province's administration.
Article III of this approach refers to long-term or temporary production, removal, use or storage of hazardous items, and the quantity of hazardous items equal to or exceed the threshold (including places and facilities). Major hazardous sources include the following 10 categories:
(i) The storage tanks (shalls);
(ii) The treasury (columnes);
(iii) Production sites;
(iv) stress pipelines;
(v) Stolen;
(vi) stress containers;
(vii) coal mines;
(viii) Lands in metal non-metallic areas;
(ix) Endehouses;
(x) Radioactive sources.
Article IV. Governments at all levels should strengthen their leadership in the management of major dangerous sources, coordinate and address critical issues in the management of oversight and prevent accidents in production.
Article 5
Other relevant authorities at the district level carry out oversight over the census, registration, evaluation and monitoring of major dangerous sources within their respective mandates.
Article 6
Article 7. Production units are responsible for censuses, sensitization, registration, evaluation and monitoring of major hazardous sources of this unit and will report regularly on safety-production monitoring and related authorities.
The main heads of the productive units are fully responsible for the safety management and detection of major hazardous sources of the unit.
Article 8. The productive business unit shall entrust the security evaluation of major hazardous sources on a regular basis with the corresponding quality of the security production intermediaries, develop monitoring programmes based on the results of the security evaluation and report safety evaluation findings and monitoring programmes to the management and relevant authorities.
A major dangerous source of toxic substances should be carried out every year in a security evaluation; other major dangerous sources should conduct a security evaluation two years. Significant dangerous sources should be re-evaluated in the production process, materials, processes, equipment, protection measures and environmental factors, or in relation to laws, regulations, national standards or industrial standards.
The safety evaluation results made by the security production intermediary are responsible for.
Article 9 Safety evaluation reports should include the following key elements:
(i) The main basis for security evaluation;
(ii) The basic circumstances of major dangerous sources;
(iii) Risk, hazard resolution;
(iv) The types and extent of damage that may occur;
(v) Major dangerous source levels;
(vi) Evaluation of the effectiveness of the pre-disaster response;
(vii) Monitoring programmes.
Article 10. The productive units should conduct regular testing of the parameters of the process of major dangerous sources, hazardous substances, testing of important equipment facilities, inspection of security conditions, record-keeping and the establishment of archives.
Article 11. The productive business units should develop major risk response relief advances, report on the safe production of management clearances by more than the population at the district level and organize regular exercises.
The pre-disaster response should include the following key elements:
(i) Emergency relief agencies, personnel and their responsibilities;
(ii) Risk resolution and evaluation;
(iii) Emergency relief equipment and facilities;
(iv) Assessment and resources of emergency response capacity;
(v) Reporting, communication liaison;
(vi) Emergency relief procedures and action programmes;
(vii) Protection measures and procedures;
(viii) Recovery and process after an accident;
(ix) Training and performance.
Article 12 Production operators should conduct regular inspections of the security conditions of major dangerous sources and identify immediate measures to exclude accidents. It is difficult to immediately exclude, and it should be organized to develop governance programmes that are time-bound. It is not possible to guarantee security prior to the exclusion of accidents or to the exclusion process, and the immediate withdrawal of operational personnel from hazardous regions, suspension or cessation of use, and effective security prevention and control measures.
Governance programmes should include elements such as accident hidden facts, governance deadlines and objectives, governance measures, accountability institutions and personnel, governance funds, material security.
The decision-making bodies and their principal heads, individual operators should ensure the financial inputs necessary for the safe management, detection, monitoring and concealment of major dangerous sources and should be accountable for the consequences of insufficient funding.
Before the insolvency or closure of the productive units, the major dangerous sources of the unit should be excluded, and their payment of the security production risk bond should be given priority to the exclusion of major dangerous sources.
Article 14. The Government of the people at the district level should organize a division of responsibility to monitor, inspect and supervise the production operation units with significant dangerous sources, and promote the monitoring of major dangerous sources.
Article 15. Any unit or person is hidden as a result of an accident involving a major dangerous source and has the right to report or report to the management or other relevant departments of safe production.
Upon receipt of reports or reports by the security productive management or other relevant departments, verification and legal treatment should be organized in accordance with the division of duties.
Article 16 contains one of the following acts by a staff member of a security production monitoring authority or other relevant authorities, which is subject to administrative disposition by law; constitutes an offence and is held criminally by law:
(i) Inadequate regulation of significant dangerous sources known to exist, resulting in accidents;
(ii) Subject to immediate verification and legal treatment after reports or reports are received;
(iii) Abuse of authority in regulatory work and violations of the legitimate rights and interests of productive units.
Article 17
Article 18
The administrative penalties provided for in this approach are determined by the management of safe production oversight; the relevant laws, regulations, regulations and administrative sanctions decisions are otherwise provided by them.
Article 20