Advanced Search

Kunming Municipal Government Major Policy Decision

Original Language Title: 昆明市政府重大事项决策规定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Decision-making provisions of the Kymin municipality on major matters

(Adopted at the 138th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Turkmen Republic of 1 September 2009, No. 92 of the Decree No. 92 of 27 September 2009, on the date of publication)

In order to enhance the scientific, democratic decision-making capacity of the municipal government, to improve administrative decision-making mechanisms to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, to promote economic and social health development, in line with the provisions of the People's Congress and Local Government Act of the People's Republic of China, the Department of State's Comprehensive Promotion of the Framework for the Implementation of the Law of the State.

Article 2

The laws, regulations, and provincial government documents provide otherwise for the decision-making process on major matters.

Article 3 Governments should establish mechanisms for decision-making on major matters that integrate public participation, expert opinions, government decision-making, and establish a system for follow-up feedback and accountability for the implementation of major matters, as well as the implementation of legal decision-making, scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making.

Article IV. The main matters referred to in this article include:

(i) Significant matters decided by the Standing Committee;

(ii) The report on the work of the Government to be considered by the Standing Committee of the Municipalities, the report on the national plan for economic and social development, the financial report, the major financing schemes;

(iii) Draft local legislation, government regulations and important normative documents;

(iv) Economic and social development planning, urban overall planning, urban system planning, land-use master planning and focus planning;

(v) Major reform programmes and public policies related to the public interest of the people;

(vi) Major adjustments such as the day-to-day process of popular conduct and social public service matters;

(vii) Major public activities involving mass production and response programmes for major public events;

(viii) Enhance major matters for the construction of the municipal government itself;

(ix) Other important matters requiring municipal government decision-making.

5 Mayor, Deputy Mayor, and the Secretary-General may submit proposals for decision-making matters in accordance with their respective responsibilities, to be carried out by the Executive Office of the Municipal Government.

The municipalities, the municipalities (communes) are of the view that matters requiring municipal government decision-making can be made to the municipalities.

Article 6 Representatives of the communes, representatives of the communes, members of the municipal council may make recommendations on decision-making matters to the municipal government either through advice, advice or otherwise.

The decision-making matters set out in the previous paragraph are recommended by the Executive Office of the Municipal Government to conduct a study by the relevant authorities of the municipality or the district (communes) in accordance with the recommendations and to make decisions to the municipality in question.

Article 7. Citizens, legal persons and other organizations may make proposals for decision-making matters to the Municipal Government, which, with the approval of the Executive Office of the Municipal Government, is considered to require the decision-making of the municipality, to be sent by the Deputy Mayor or the Secretary-General, after the consent of the Municipal Government.

Article 8

For more complex or controversial, more than two options should be proposed.

Significant matters relate to more than two sectors or units, and the host sector should be fully consulted to form consultations; the inconsistency of the consultations could also be reported to the Deputy Mayor, the Secretary-General or the Under-Secretary-General for Coordination.

In principle, cost-benefit analysis should be carried out by a department or office of the matter.

Article 9. Recognition of major matters:

(i) Develop decision-making programmes and notes, on the basis of a thorough study, to be presented to the Executive Office of the Municipal Government;

(ii) The Executive Office of the Municipal Government provides for a decision-making programme or a description of the matter, conducts the first instance, examines whether it is a matter of great importance and submits comments to the municipality for review. Of these, the restructuring and renovation of the overall urban planning process, the approval of the sub-regional planning, control and detailed planning, should be reviewed by the municipal council, with the approval of the post-communication government; the legal affairs should be reviewed by the municipal authorities.

Article 10. Decision-making procedures for major matters:

(i) The submission of sectoral or sub-offices should conduct an investigation into decision-making matters, which may be taken by a colloquium, an opinion hearing, a hearing, public media, or by more than one form, to hear views from democratic parties, social groups, experts, grass-roots units.

(ii) The need for hearing in accordance with the major decision-making hearings system, and the provision of a department or office of the matter shall organize hearings in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State, the province, the city and make a review of the hearings report a basis for decision-making.

(iii) The submission of sectoral or sub-offices should incorporate the sound views of the various communities concerned and the soundness of the various sectors of society, and accompany the programme note. It should include the need, legitimacy or reasonableness and feasibility of implementing the programme; the situation and the manner in which the views are sought; and the analysis of the economic, social implications of the programme after its implementation.

(iv) Submissions by the Executive Office of the Municipal Government of the programme and description of the matter or of the institution of the institution of the office of the host State shall be carried out either in the first instance or in the relevant sector review. Where necessary, the review sector may also use a colloquium, a consultation, an opinion, a hearing, public media, or a form of a wide range of views in the relevant sectors, democratic parties, social groups, experts, grass-roots units.

(v) The Government of the city adopts the municipal council meetings or municipal government plenary decisions on major matters. On the subject to discussion, the Deputy Mayor, the Secretary-General or the Under-Secretary-General of the Municipal Government shall organize a coordination and full study at the pre-session organization and, subject to the conditions at hand, the mayor of the report.

(vi) Significant matters to be considered by the Committee of the Municipalities or by the Standing Committee of the Municipalities, to be discussed by the Standing Committee of the Municipal Government or by the municipal plenary, and to form a report or a bill to invite the Municipal Council or the Municipal Council. After the finalization of the adoption, the municipal government was organized.

Article 11. Significant matters before the municipal government decision-making shall be submitted to the following material:

(i) Reports on decision-making matters;

(ii) Programmes and notes;

(iii) Materials for consultation;

(iv) Expert advice;

(v) Other relevant materials.

Significant matters have been heard, and hearings reviewed by the Government's rule of law sector should also be submitted.

Article 12

Depending on the needs of decision-making matters, experts or advisory bodies, industry associations, intermediary agencies, stakeholders, people's groups may also be invited to attend meetings.

Article 13. Decision-making on major matters of the municipal government, after collective consideration by the municipal plenary or the Standing Conference, shall be adopted, adopted or reconsidered by the Mayor on the basis of the discussions at the Conference.

The decision was adopted by the Mayor or the Deputy Mayor authorized by the Mayor; the decision was taken once again, the matter raised or the contractor's unit was refined in accordance with the Conference's request, and the Municipal Government was invited to reconsider it by the process.

Article 14. In addition to the fact that there is no public or open matter under the law, decisions on major matters should be made public to society, including through Government websites, government bulletins and media. Government regulations and important normative documents should also be published in the main newspapers of the city.

Article 15 The municipal authorities should incorporate the implementation and completion of decisions on major matters into the annual work objective, as an important basis for awards.

Governments of all relevant sectors and districts (markets) should report regularly to the municipal authorities on the implementation and completion of the decision-making on major matters.

Article 16 establishes an evaluation mechanism for major matters decision-making and its implementation effectiveness, and receives public opinions through the Government's website or the media, undertakes a sample of inspections, follow-up surveys, assessments, and evaluates, as appropriate, the decision-making and the effectiveness of their implementation.

In the course of the implementation of the major decision-making units, it is important to report to the municipal authorities in a timely manner on the main issues encountered and to adjust them to the procedures established in this provision, in accordance with this provision.

Article 18

Article 19

Article 20

Article 21 provides for implementation from the date of publication. The decision-making process of the Know City of Kymin, enacted on 23 November 2004 (No. 53 of the Order of the Government of the Turkmen) was repealed.