(Summit of the Hygiene People's Government on 11 January 2010 to consider the publication of the Execution of 1 April 2010 through Decree No. 2 of 15 January 2010 of the Honduran People's Government)

Article 1 promotes the administration of the rule of law and accelerates the construction of the Rule of Law Government, in accordance with the relevant provisions, in the light of the actual practice of the city.

Article 2

The scope of the major administrative decision-making matters in the city is defined in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Hearing of Major Administrative Decision-Making (Time pilot).

Major administrative decision-making at the municipal level is within the scope of normative documents and applies the relevant provisions of normative documentation.

Article 3. The municipal rule of law sector is responsible for the review of the legality of major administrative decision-making in the municipality; the municipal government office, the hosting units of major administrative decision-making (hereinafter referred to as “decision-making offices”) and the relevant units and individuals involved in the review of legality should be synchronized.

Article IV. The pre-reviewed, validated by the decision-making organs, shall be informed of the participation of the rule of law institutions of this unit; and, in order to enhance the efficiency of the work, the municipal authorities may also participate in the pre-assessment, demonstration of the decision-making matters.

Article 5

(i) Policy options and decision-making options statements (including basic briefings, necessaryness, feasibility, cost-benefit analysis of decision-making);

(ii) Relevant laws, regulations, normative documents and policy bases, and if the field practices are to be brought to their relevant information;

(iii) Relevant statistical data, survey analysis and assessment reports;

(iv) To seek comments and their consolidated materials;

(v) Expert advice hearings and hearings should be conducted, subject to advice, hearings;

(vi) Legal opinions from the rule of law institutions of the decision-making organs;

(vii) Other information required for the review of legality.

The decision-making office is responsible for the authenticity and reliability of the submissions.

Article 6. The Executive Office of the Municipal Government shall, prior to the consideration of major administrative decisions to the relevant meetings of the municipal government, communicate the decision-making options and relevant information to the municipal authorities for the review of legality.

Article 7

(i) Whether decision-making authority is lawful;

(ii) Whether the decision-making process is lawful;

(iii) The legitimacy of decision-making.

Article 8

(i) Written review;

(ii) To conduct research studies by the relevant units and, if necessary, to carry out studies;

(iii) A wide range of views on all aspects of society, including through the holding of colloquiums, memorials, hearings, coordination meetings, written requests, public requests for views on the municipal government website;

(iv) To organize legal advice or argument by the experts concerned and to listen to the views and proposals of the experts concerned.

The duration of the work set out in paragraphs (ii), (iii), (iv) of the previous paragraph shall not be calculated within the time frame for review under article 9.

Article 9. The municipal rule of law sector should be completed within 15 working days from the date of receipt of the decision-making option and the relevant information, as well as the written review of the Government of the municipality; the complexity of the situation, which can be extended for 10 working days; and the municipality has special requirements and should be completed by the requested time frame.

Article 10. The municipal rule of law sector considers that decision-making options require additional material or need to be refined, may be brought to the municipal government or directly to the institution of decision-making, which shall be completed within a specified period of time.

During the period of replenishment and improvement, no calculation was made within the period of review of legality.

A decision-making office contested the provision of additional material to the municipal authorities' rule of law sector or the modification of a better opinion, which should be made in writing, with full justification and presentation of the basis.

Article 11. The review of the significant administrative legitimacy of the municipal authorities' reports to the municipal authorities should clarify the legal or legal, part of the law, the relevant observations and the grounds, and the basis of the views expressed incompatible with the decision-making offices and should be provided in the review of legality.

The municipal rule of law sector provides a review of the opinions that are available only for use within the Government and that the units or individuals are not disclosed to the outside.

Article 12 Major administrative decision-making is not lawfully reviewed or reviewed and does not be brought to the consideration of the relevant collective meetings of the municipal government and the municipality does not take a decision on this important administrative decision.

In the context of the study of major administrative decisions by the municipal authorities on collective meetings, the heads of the rule of law sector of the municipality should attend and provide clarifications on the review of legality of the relevant major administrative decisions.

Article 14.

Article 15. The main administrative legality review system for the sound unit should be established and submitted to the municipal authorities for information.

Article 16 states, districts and communes (markets) Governments may, in conjunction with local practice, develop a system of review of the legitimacy of major administrative decision-making in the region and report to municipal governments; or review of the legitimacy of major administrative decisions in the light of this provision.

Article 17 deals with important administrative decisions that should be subject to review of legality and decisions taken by collective discussions, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State Department's Civil Service Disposal Regulations, without legality or consultation.

Article 18