(Adopted by the 59th Standing Committee of the People's Government of Harmira, 22 December 2009, No. 212 of 28 December 2009, by Decree No. 212 of 28 December 2009, on 1 February 2010)

Article 1 provides for the development of this approach in line with the laws, regulations and regulations of the People's Republic of China Act on Quality of Agricultural Products, the People's Republic of China Food Security Act and the veterinary Regulation of the State Department.

Article 2

Article 3 of this approach refers to avian livestock, including livestock poultry and wildlife by law.

This approach refers to the production of maizeives used for the processing of foods, tetanus, hearts, residues, axes, thans, eggs, breast milk, blood, etc.

This approach refers to the residues of poultry products, which contain drugs or their generation of expressions and other compounds.

Article IV. The veterinary veterinary administrative authorities organize this approach, which is responsible for the supervision of drug residues in livestock and poultry products in the city, which can be entrusted to the municipal veterinary inspection body for the day-to-day monitoring of the residues of livestock products in the city.

The veterinary administrative authorities are responsible for the supervision of the residues in the veterinary products within the Territory.

The executive branch, such as commerce, quality technical supervision, business, food medicine surveillance, health, finance and environmental protection, should be guided by their respective responsibilities by the relevant monitoring of the residues of the manufacturer products.

The executive authorities, such as livestock veterinary veterans, should establish and improve emergency response mechanisms for the residues of opioid products, and respond in a timely manner when the residues of opioid products occur.

Article 6. The authorities of the pastoral veterinary veterinary and municipal veterinary pharmacies should be widely publicized about the harmful effects of the residues in the manufacture of livestock breeding, breeding and livestock products, and the training of livestock residues in the production of avian product, as well as raising awareness of the quality of livestock products.

Article 7. Governments of districts, districts (markets) should encourage, support and promote the participation of producers of livestock breeding enterprises, breeders and livestock products in the Avian and Cooperative Economic Organization.

Livery breeding associations and cooperative economic organizations should strengthen industry self-regulation, promote and disseminate knowledge about the residues of arable products and lead to the production of productive businesses, breeders and livestock products by law.

Article 8. Any unit or person has the right to report, complain about violations of this scheme.

Live veterinary and other relevant administrative departments should investigate the reports, the complaints cases in a timely manner; the evidence-based evidence should be given incentives to the reporting, the complainant.

Article 9. The veterinary veterinary administrations should develop and organize control plans for the production of and monitoring of drug residues for productive products in the city, in accordance with the national and provincial plan for the control of the residues of livestock products.

The executive authorities, such as livestock veterinary veterans, are carrying out a monitoring test of the residues of poultry products, which should be entrusted with a mandated quality safety test body for the production of avian product without charge to the testor.

Article 10 Industrial inputs such as veterinary, feeding and livestock additives should be used in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State, as well as the necessary safety controls to guarantee the quality of the production of avian product.

Article 11 Avian breeding file should clarify the recording and use of opioid pharmacies. There should be no falsification of livestock breeding files.

The record of the poultry of livestock should include the following:

(i) Avian type and quantity of pharmacies;

(ii) The name of drugs, the production plant and the product-specific number and the source of drugs;

(iii) The drug use law, the use, use and stop-use dates, the duration of the medicines.

Avian breeding archives are maintained for 20 years of cattle, and for 10 years other livestock is not less than two years.

In the event of changes in the ownership of livestock, the production of avian breeding file should be transferred in conjunction with avian livestock.

Article 12

(i) The use of national veterinary drugs and other compounds (hereinafter referred to as prohibited drugs) to feed livestock poultry;

(ii) The addition of laser medicines and other drugs that are prohibited by States in feeding and livestock drinking water;

(iii) The direct addition of raw materials to feed into or feed into poultry in feeding and livestock;

(iv) The use of veterinary products that have not been approved by the State for the feeding of livestock;

(v) The use of other toxic hazardous substances to feed into poultry;

(vi) The use of drugs for livestock production;

(vii) The sale of poultry products containing prohibited drug or drug residues that exceed the national limit;

(viii) The sale of pharmacies and livestock products during the pharmacies;

(ix) Removal or dumping of drug residues that are incompatible with national provisions and that are not dealt with in a manner that is not environmentally sound, as well as liquids, wastes for avian life;

(x) Other prohibited acts provided by the State.

Livery breeding enterprises, breeders and the manufacturer of livestock products shall not be vegetation or non-treated injecting drugs under subparagraphs (i), (ii) or (iv) of this article.

Article 13. Avian livestock breeding enterprise or a cooperative economic organization shall, on its own or entrust a body for the safety and security of avian product, carry out a drug residual test of livestock products.

Acultry products congested markets should be established or commissioned to monitor the quality of livestock products and to test drug residues for the production of poultry products.

The implementation of the testing of the residues of livestock products should be recorded as such.

Article 14. Avian livestock breeding enterprise, breeding and other operators involved in the production of livestock products should be established, such as the record of the production, quantity, flow, and time of sale.

Large-scale supermarkets, livestock and poultry products consignments centres and other producers of livestock products should be established to establish a system of inspection tests for the identification of sources, species, quantity, testing and quarantine products, etc., and to establish a voucher, such as real recording of the production, quantity, freight forwarders and their means of contact, entry time.

The period of sale and the deposit shall not be less than two years.

Article 15. Collective feeding units, such as schools, hospitals, institutions, businesses, and restaurants, hotels, etc., should establish a record of the procurement of livestock products, such as the real recording of the source, species, quantity and timing of livestock.

The duration of the record of procurement shall not be less than two years.

Article 16 Industrialize, breeding and livestock producers, found that the sale of avian and abult product had a safe impact on drug residues and should be reported to and returned immediately to the relevant administration.

Article 17

(i) Access to livestock breeding, smuggler or livestock processing, operation site inspections;

(ii) Monitoring of livestock and poultry products;

(iii) To request the inspectorate and the individual or the stakeholder to provide records and other information relating to the residues of the manufacturer products, access, reproduction or seizure of the relevant records and other information;

(iv) The seizure or seizure of evidence that drug residues are not in accordance with the State-mandated livestock products;

(v) To inform the relevant administrative departments of origin of the traced drug residues that do not meet the requirements of the State;

(vi) Distinguished drug residues for livestock products by law;

(vii) Other mandates under laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 18

Any unit of Article 19 or individual shall not be entitled to sell, transfer, destroy the seized, seized and seized ultry products.

Article 20, Avian Product Quality Safety Monitoring Body and its Testers, should conduct drug residual testing for livestock products, in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations, as well as national standards and guidelines for the testing of the residues for livestock products and the development of testing reports.

The testing reports should be objective, impartial; they should not be left.

Article 21 Businesses, breeders and livestock producers, objecting to the results of the detection of drug residues in livestock products, may apply for re-exploitation to administrative authorities such as the organization of pastoral veterinary veterans testing for drug residues within 5 days of receipt of the results.

The administrative management responsible for the application should re-examine the body for the quality and safety of livestock products.

The executive authorities, such as livestock veterinary therapy, and the authorized municipal veterinary veterinary inspection body and its staff, should perform their duties seriously; in one of the following cases, the executive disposition of their administrative leadership and direct responsibilities by an organ with the executive authority:

(i) Reports of residues or complaints of drug residues in livestock products;

(ii) The failure to respond in a timely manner when there is a sudden incidence of drug residues in avian product;

(iii) In the implementation of the monitoring of the residues of livestock products, the inspection fee was charged to the testor;

(iv) Inadequate investigation of drug residues in livestock products;

(v) Use of posts to facilitate the benefit of employment;

(vi) Other acts that are not carried out by law.

Article 23, in violation of this approach, provides that livestock breeding enterprises and breeders do not establish livestock breeding files, forfeiture of livestock and forfeiture files or for lack of marketing orders, are subject to the division of labour between municipal and district, district (market) livestock veterinary administrative authorities, which are responsible for the period of time, fined for the production of livestock and fined 500,000 for livestock breeders.

Article 24, in violation of this approach, provides that the veterinary enterprises, breeders or livestock producers are one of the following acts, punishable by the municipal and district, district (market) veterinary administrative authorities in accordance with the division of labour and the following provisions:

(i) The use of prohibited drugs, veterinary products that have not been ratified by the State or other toxic harmful substances feeding into poultry, environmentally sound treatment of livestock, confiscation of proceeds of the conflict, imposition of fines of more than 500,000 yen for livestock breeders, and fines of more than 1 million for livestock breeders;

(ii) The sale of livestock containing prohibited drugs or drug residues that exceed the State's prescribed limits, the environmentally sound treatment of livestock products, confiscation of proceeds of the conflict, fines of more than 1 million yen for livestock breeding enterprises, livestock products operators, and fines for more than 500,000 yen for livestock breeders; and fines for more than 5,000 k million for livestock breeders.

(iii) The sale of pharmacies and the production of livestock during the period of recuperation, the environmentally sound treatment of livestock products, confiscation of proceeds of the law, fines of more than 3,000 dollars for livestock breeding enterprises, and the manufacturer of avian product, and fines of up to 1 million yen for livestock breeders.

(iv) Accommodating or non- treating injecting prohibited drugs, laser medicines and other drugs prohibited by the State, or veterinary products that have not been approved by the State, forfeiture the proceeds of the conflict, fined more than 500,000 dollars for the operators of livestock breeding enterprises, livestock products, and fined more than 1 million yen for livestock breeders.

Article 25 violates the provisions of this scheme that other operators involved in the production of avian product do not establish a sales desk or that have not been established in the trade market, large supermarkets and livestock distribution centres, which are subject to a fine of up to 10,000 yen.

Article 26, in violation of this approach, provides that collective feeding units such as schools, hospitals, agencies, businesses, and restaurants, meals, etc., do not establish a record of the procurement of livestock products, which is subject to a fine of up to 1 million yen.

Article 27, in violation of the present approach, provides for the unauthorized sale, transfer, destruction of seized or seized livestock products and the execution of seizures or seizures by administrative authorities, such as veterinary, district, district (market) livestock veterinary veterinary therapy, and a fine of up to 50,000 yen.

Article 28, in violation of other provisions of this approach, is punishable by the relevant executive branch in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 29 of this approach is implemented effective 1 February 2010.