(Summit meeting of the Hygiene Government of Honour 11 January 2010 to consider the adoption of Decree No. 5 of 15 January 2010 by the Government of the Metropolitan State, which came into force on 1 April 2010)

Article 1, in order to preserve the unity and political order of the socialist rule, enhances oversight of administrative normative documents, ensures the proper implementation of laws, regulations and regulations, and develops this provision in the light of the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 2 states that administrative normative documents (hereinafter referred to as normative documents) refer to the various documents relating to the management of the relative rights obligations of the people at all levels and to the sectors of the population, including the work sector, the immediate agency, the institution of conduct, the institution of dispatch, the legal regulations and the organization that authorizes the administration of public affairs, in accordance with the legislative authority and procedures, relating to the management of the relative rights obligations of the people, the universal binding and normative administration.

The documentation for the development of the institution's deployment phase is not applicable to this provision by regulating the body, the system's internal working system, the management system, the staff member's decision-making, the invitations and reports to the superior administrative body, and the letters, notifications, decisions, reviews, etc. of specific matters.

Article 3. Review of normative documents, introduction of a hierarchy of management, availability of content, need to be tried and the principle of irreparability. The executive branch should guide the development and review of normative documents of the executive organs at the supervisory level.

Article IV develops normative documents that should be based on the procedures established in the normative documents of this city, subject to the review or review of the legitimacy of the organs of the rule of law and signed by the principal heads of organs or other heads of delegation.

Article 5. The date of publication of normative documents and the period of entry into force shall not be less than 30 days. However, the absence of an immediate application would result in serious disruptions or major and urgent matters, such as security, disaster situations, epidemics. However, a release should be made available on time.

Article 6. After the development of normative documents, the design body shall, within 15 days of the date of publication of the document, communicate the request in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) The normative documents developed by the people's governments at all levels are presented at the top-level Government;

(ii) The introduction of normative documents by the Government of the people of the district level to the post of the Government of the People, while transmitting to the operational authorities at the primary level;

(iii) The publication of normative documents prepared by the Government of the People's Government at all levels to establish the People's Government for the dispatch;

(iv) The introduction of a normative paper prepared by the vertically-led sector to be backed by the competent authorities at the highest level, while transmitting the Government of the people at this level;

(v) Two or more sectors of the normative documents issued jointly by the host sector in accordance with subparagraph (ii) (iv).

Article 7. Submissions of normative documents should be submitted in one of the five copies of the reports, the formulation of notes, the development of the basis, the formal printing of normative documents, and the electronic text of normative documents.

Article 8 Normative documents are available to the Government of the People and are prepared by the Government's rule of law institutions that are ready for processing. By 15 January each year, the establishment of an organ should send the directory of normative documents developed by this body to the Government's rule of law bodies that receive the request.

Article 9

(i) In conformity with the statutory competence and procedures;

(ii) Does not violate the provisions of laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents;

(iii) Will conflict with normative documents issued by other departments;

(iv) Other elements to be reviewed.

In reviewing normative documents, Article 10 governmental rule of law institutions that are required to provide relevant material or to clarify the circumstances in question, to cooperate with the designating bodies; and to seek the views of the relevant sectors, the authorities should respond within the time frame.

Article 11 deals with issues identified in the review process, as set out below:

(i) Normative documents go beyond statutory competence or violate the provisions of laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents, and are notified by the competent governmental rule of law bodies to the establishment of organs to cease their implementation and to correct the deadlines. The Government of the people at this level has been removed or changed by delay;

(ii) Normative procedures for the development of normative documents are regulated by recommendations made by the competent governmental rule of law bodies to inform the development of a deadline for correction of organs or to request the Government of the people to withdraw them;

(iii) Contrary to the same matter between normative documents, coordinated by the competent governmental rule of law institutions. The relevant sectors should be implemented in a coordinated manner; the people's government decision to deal with the views sheets cannot be agreed upon;

(iv) The formulation of normative documents is based on contradictions, and the Government of the people at this level is not entitled to be addressed and should be reported to the Government's rule of law institutions in a process manner.

The development body of normative documents shall modify or repeal normative documents within 15 days of the date of receipt of a letter of redress and shall report in writing on the Government rule of law institutions that are in receipt of the request.

Article 12 The normative document-making body has contested the review of the Government's rule of law institutions that have received a written notice to lodge a complaint with the Government of the people who have received the request and to transmit the complaint to the Government's rule of law institutions that are seized, and the Government's rule of law institutions should submit a review note to the Government of the people and be decided by the people.

Article 13. The organ that accepts the copied is of the view that the normative document is incompatible with the law, regulations and regulations or the normative document may make a review recommendation to the competent governmental rule of law bodies.

Article 14. Civil, legal or other organizations consider that normative documents are incompatible with the law, regulations and regulations or normative documents, and may make recommendations for review to the competent governmental rule of law bodies and that the relevant governmental rule of law bodies should be verified after the review of the recommendations. There is a problem to be addressed in accordance with the relevant provisions of article 15. The recommendations for the written review should be communicated to the review.

The rule of law institutions of the superior government found that the normative documents developed by the lower-level people's Government and its constituent departments were subject to review by the rule of law responsible for their review and, where necessary, by ordering the organ to send the relevant material under Article 7.

Article 16 states that all levels of the population and the authorities of the population at the district level should strengthen the organizational leadership of the normative documentation review process, establish the internal auditing system for the review of statistical reports, review of the status of submission, accountability, etc., and place the process as an important element of administrative law enforcement responsibility.

In one of the following cases, the executive body should promptly clear the normative documents developed by the organ and make decisions to amend and repeal the facts:

(i) The legal, regulatory, regulatory, normative documents of the superior administrative body and the normative documents developed by this body have been amended, replaced or removed in part or in part;

(ii) Failure to adapt to the needs of economic and social development or to the new provisions of the superior administration;

(iii) Naturally invalid.

The normative document-making body shall, in a timely manner, report on the Government's rule of law institutions that are in receipt of the document in accordance with Article 7.

Article 18

Article 19

Article 20

Article 21 reviews and deals with the implementation of the normative documents of the vertical-led sectors, taking into account the provisions.

Article 2