(It was considered at the 114th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of New York, on 2 December 2011, through the publication of Decree No. 192 of 21 December 2011 of the People's Government Order No. 192 of 21 December 2012.

Chapter I General

In order to increase corporate credit levels, improve government services, regulate corporate social responsibility evaluation, promote corporate and social, environmental coordination and sustainable development, and develop this approach in accordance with relevant legal, regulatory provisions.

Article 2

Article 3. The evaluation of corporate credit regulation and social responsibility should be guided by the principles of objectivity, regulation, equity, openness and impartiality, in accordance with the law, to preserve national interests, social interests and legitimate corporate rights.

The evaluation of social responsibility is implemented with government-led, corporate ownership, social participation and the independent evaluation of evaluation institutions.

Article IV is responsible for the integration and coordination of the development of a market-wide enterprise credit system with the corporate social responsibility system.

Article 5. The municipal and business administration sector is entrusted by the Government of the city and is responsible for the management of the market-wide enterprise credit information database, which is responsible for the record, sharing, and integrated management of corporate social responsibility evaluation. The business administration sector in the district (market) is responsible for the record, sharing, and integrated management of corporate credit information in the current administrative region.

The government of the city and the district (market) has established or established an enterprise social responsibility evaluation body responsible for the evaluation of corporate social responsibility within this administrative area.

The executive branch at all levels, as well as organizations mandated by law to assume the functions of the administration of public affairs, shall exercise oversight, management and services in accordance with their respective responsibilities for corporate credit and the fulfilment of social responsibility.

The Business Federation, industry associations and other industry organizations have contributed to promoting corporate credit and social responsibility.

Chapter II Information records and sharing

Article 6

People's banks, national taxes, customs, national vertical management and people's courts, etc., can cooperate in the sharing and management of corporate credit information resources in accordance with the agreement with the municipal business administration.

Article 7. Scope of corporate credit information records includes:

(i) Business credit information registered under the law in the city;

(ii) Innovate enterprise credit information for operating activities in this city.

The company registered under the law in this city has branches and the credit information of the branch should be consolidated with its corporate credit information.

Article 8. The municipal and business administration sector should develop an enterprise credit information catalogue system with municipal information administrations, which serves as a basis for sharing corporate credit information and business synergies across the municipal administration. Business credit information included in the New York City Administration for sharing the enterprise credit information catalogue system must be shared.

The corporate credit information provider should disaggregate the available corporate credit information resources by identifying what can be shared and sharing conditions, providing corporate credit information to the business administration sector in accordance with the contents of the enterprise credit information inventory system, as set out in the Innin City Administration, and ensuring that information is authentic, reliable, complete and timely.

Article 9. The business administration sector is responsible for integrating the information provided by the corporate credit information provider and incorporating the enterprise credit information database.

The corporate credit information that is integrated by the business administration should be consistent with the information provided by the corporate credit information provider and should not be altered, mandating or selectively integrated.

Article 10 Business administrations and corporate credit information providers should establish a corporate credit information security management system that guarantees the safety of corporate credit information.

Article 11, in addition to national secrets, commercial secrets, personal privacy and corporate credit information that may not be publicized in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State, the business administration and corporate credit information providers should provide basic credit information to public enterprises in society through public media such as the Internet.

Citizens, legal persons and other organizations are free of charge to the basic credit information of enterprises through the commune government's corporate credit management website.

Chapter III Corporate credit regulation

Article 12. The enterprise credit information provider should establish the enterprise credit management system for this unit, the system, and identify classification signs.

The corporate credit hierarchy, in addition to the provisions of the law, regulations and regulations, is divided into subcategories A, B, C, D4: a small demonstration of credit risk in category A; a smaller credit risk in category B; a greater credit risk in category C; and a high credit risk in category D.

The corporate credit information provider should provide for specific elements of the state of corporate credit according to the actual management needs, as well as the progressive implementation of dynamic regulation and the timely updating of relevant corporate credit information.

The executive branch at all levels, as well as the organization mandated by law to perform statutory oversight and inspection duties, shall determine the frequency of reasonable oversight, in conjunction with the classification of corporate credit status. In addition to legal regulations and other provisions of the national sector, regulatory effects should be improved in accordance with the enterprise's credit hierarchy and industry characteristics, according to the level of regulation A, B, C and D.

(i) Category A management. Implementation of low frequency management. Enterprises that are classified as Category A are applicable. This type of enterprise should be reduced or exempted from daily supervision inspections, which may be subject to cross-annual oversight inspections;

(ii) Category B management. Low frequency management is implemented. Enterprises that are classified as Category B are applicable. This type of enterprise should be subject to annual oversight inspections and supervision of changes in the problem;

(iii) Category C management. High frequency management is implemented. Enterprises that are classified as category C are applicable. This type of enterprise should conduct less than two oversight inspections per year, with a focus on monitoring the rehabilitation of violations and understanding of the concerns required by the law;

(iv) Category D management. High frequency management is implemented. Enterprises that apply to the classification of D or are included in the national priority control industry. This type of enterprise should strengthen the regular supervision of inspections or increase the frequency of screening, monitor in a timely manner the reorientation of violations and understand the concerns required by the law.

Article 14. The municipal and business administration sector, in accordance with the credit status confirmed by the various corporate credit information providers, is identifiers of the enterprise's overall credit hierarchy.

The corporate consolidated credit hierarchy is divided into A, B, C, D. The specific approach identified by the enterprise's integrated credit hierarchy is developed and published separately by the municipal business administration.

Integrated corporate credit levels are shared in real time between the corporate credit information delivery units and are made public in the commune government's corporate credit management website and other public media to receive public advice, evaluation and oversight.

Article 15. Enterprises can access all their credit information on the Internet through digital certificates on the landing government's corporate credit management website, and can access credit information from this enterprise through random numbers generated by digital certificates.

Article 16 considers that the commune government's corporate credit management website or the related management collects, preserves, externally provides information that is wrong and missing and has the right to challenge the management concerned and request corrections.

Upon receipt of an objection by the management concerned, verification and processing shall take place within 20 working days of the date of receipt of the objection and will respond to the results.

Chapter IV

Article 17

Article 18 The corporate social responsibility evaluation body conducts evaluation and proactive evaluation of corporate social responsibility according to corporate credit status.

The results of the evaluation are made public on the basis of an evaluation by the corporate social responsibility evaluation body, based on the application of the enterprise's corporate corporate social responsibility evaluation system for its performance of its social responsibility;

Enterprises with an integrated credit hierarchy are D, and corporate social responsibility evaluation agencies can incorporate the scope of active evaluation, conduct evaluation and publish evaluation findings in due course.

Article 19 Business applications for social responsibility evaluation should be submitted to the corporate social responsibility evaluation body and accountable for the authenticity of the content of the application.

Article 20 evaluates the performance of corporate social responsibilities, notably in relation to enterprise development, labour relations, environmental relations, social relations, organizational relationships, enterprise culture and the satisfaction of business workers and social recognition.

Article 21 Specific criteria for the evaluation of corporate social responsibility are implemented in accordance with the provisions of the Industrial Social Responsibility Evaluation Guidelines.

The Corporate Social Responsibility Assessment Guidelines are drafted by the Urban Corporate Corporate Social Responsibility Evaluation Body, the Municipal Business Administration, the Municipal Economic and Informationization Administration, and should be widely consulted with the relevant industry associations and experts.

Following the finalization of the Corporate Social Responsibility Assessment Guidelines, the relevant local standard-management administrative authorities have been approved and made available to society.

Article 2: The corporate social responsibility evaluation body assesses the three levels of evaluation in terms of the application evaluation.

The corporate social responsibility evaluation agency has offered an evaluation to assess the absence of a mark or the serious absence of an evaluation hierarchy.

In accordance with the application for evaluation, the evaluation of corporate social responsibility is two years each. Each evaluation cycle has been effective for a period of six months prior to the expiration of each evaluation cycle, and eligible enterprises can propose re-evaluation requests.

Article 23 Evaluations of corporate social responsibility should be conducted in accordance with the following procedures:

(i) To receive the application;

(ii) To verify the status of corporate credits and to submit a review by management responsibilities;

(iii) Organizing an initial evaluation in accordance with the Corporate Social Responsibility Evaluation Guidelines, by conducting a staff assessment, client satisfaction and socially recognized measurement;

(iv) A review of initial assessment observations and the development of evaluation ratings;

(v) Applying the evaluation hierarchy developed to society;

(vi) Identification of evaluation levels and delivery of evaluation results to enterprises.

Article 24, with regard to the application for evaluation, is one of the following cases in which the corporate social responsibility evaluation body should make the decision inadmissible:

(i) The occurrence of accidents in the production of security more generally;

(ii) Including the incidence of occupational groups in violation of labour and social security legislation;

(iii) The occurrence of serious criminal cases;

(iv) Major administrative penalties for violations of the relevant administrative laws and regulations.

The criteria for major criminal cases and major administrative penalties in the previous paragraph are implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of the provinces and municipalities.

Article 25 The corporate social responsibility evaluation body shall take a decision to grant it within 7 days of the date of receipt of the application for evaluation of corporate social responsibility. Inadmissibility should explain the grounds and inform the enterprise that it may apply for review to the corporate social responsibility evaluation body within 20 days.

Article 26

(i) The choice of enterprises to determine the proposed proactive evaluation in enterprises with an integrated credit hierarchy as D;

(ii) To verify the status of corporate credits and to submit a review by management responsibilities;

(iii) Preliminary evaluation observations in accordance with the evaluation guidelines on corporate social responsibility;

(iv) Approval of preliminary evaluation observations in accordance with the relevant provisions and setting evaluation levels;

(v) Applying the evaluation hierarchy developed to society;

(vi) Publicize evaluation findings to society.

Article 27 allows the corporate social responsibility evaluation body to form an evaluation group to undertake corporate social responsibility evaluation. The members of the evaluation expert group were chosen by the corporate social responsibility evaluation body from the corporate social responsibility assessment expert pool.

Article 28 considers that evaluation results are unreasonable or incompatible with reality, and may apply for review evaluation to the corporate social responsibility evaluation body within 15 days.

The corporate social responsibility evaluation body should re-establish the evaluation expert group to undertake a review.

The evaluation expert group should fully listen to business presentations and take final review evaluation decisions in accordance with evaluation criteria.

Article 29 obtained a mark, a high level of evaluation, one of the following cases, and the corporate social responsibility evaluation body confirmed that it should reduce or withdraw its evaluation rating levels:

(i) The provision of false information and information in the evaluation, or the collusion of staff from the evaluation body, resulting in a failure to assess the evaluation;

(ii) Restructification, falsification, rent and borrower evaluation rating certificates;

(iii) Administrative penalties such as a fine of a higher amount, forfeiture of illegal proceeds, a period of suspension and the suspension of administrative licences;

(iv) Other violations of the provisions of the law.

Enterprises that have been reduced to the evaluation cycle may not submit an evaluation request within two years, and enterprises that have been removed from the evaluation hierarchy may not make an application for evaluation within three years.

The corporate social responsibility evaluation body should inform businesses and inform society in writing of decisions to reduce or withdraw the evaluation hierarchy.

Article 33 The corporate social responsibility evaluation body should develop relevant work systems and management provisions for the evaluation of corporate social responsibility, conduct impartial, independent and objective evaluation activities, take reasonable and effective measures to ensure the quality of evaluation and accept oversight, inspection by the relevant management.

Article 31 allows businesses to develop plans and annual plans to promote corporate social responsibility, as required by the Corporate Social Responsibility Assessment Guidelines.

Business is encouraged to publish in public media such as the Internet, the annual report on social responsibility.

Article 32 encourages the Business Association to establish an industrial corporate social responsibility evaluation system, participate in the drafting of evaluation criteria for corporate social responsibility, and undertake activities such as knowledge of corporate social responsibility, training, counselling.

The corporate social responsibility evaluation body may entrust industry associations with reviewing the performance of corporate social responsibility.

Article 33 entrepreneurship stakeholders and consumers can monitor the performance of corporate social responsibility and report on the adverse behaviour of enterprises in fulfilling their social responsibilities.

The corporate social responsibility evaluation body should provide timely responses to the corporate reporting cases on the performance of social responsibility and inform the reporting person.

Chapter V Use of results

Article 34, city, district (community) and business administration should provide a regular overview, analysis, assessment of the overall state of corporate credit regulation in the current administration area, recommendations for work and report to the Government of the people at this level.

The corporate social responsibility evaluation body should conduct regular analyses of the overall performance of corporate social responsibility, make recommendations for work, report to the current people's Government and develop an open system for the annual report on corporate social responsibility evaluation.

Article 335 The corporate social responsibility evaluation body should regularly disclose to society the directory of enterprises with high-quality, mark, non-application evaluation hierarchy and social responsibility for serious misconduct of corporate names.

Business, social responsibility, which is not subject to the evaluation hierarchy, may be interviewed by the relevant administration authorities for its statutory representative or head.

Article XVI sets up the most socially responsible enterprise awards for the communes of the city and district (communes) and awards for awards.

The most socially responsible enterprise awards have been generated through open selection in enterprises with a high level of social responsibility evaluation.

Article 337 is an excellent enterprise with an integrated credit hierarchy as category A or a social responsibility evaluation rate, and the management concerned should implement the following incentives:

(i) Tax relief within the framework of statutory competence;

(ii) Priority in government funding subsidies for science and technology, social security, energy efficiency and environmental protection;

(iii) Provide appropriate support for the allocation of public resources, such as industrial development, the construction of the use of the right to use;

(iv) To serve as an important evaluation factor in the solicitation of government procurement and government investment projects;

(v) Priorities for recommending, arranging their corporate legal representatives or leading heads to participate in all types of advanced assessment and political treatment;

(vi) Other incentives provided for in laws, regulations, regulations and normative documents.

Article 338 evaluates enterprises, social responsibilities that do not meet the mark for the integrated credit hierarchy or social responsibility, and the management concerned shall take the following sanctions within the statutory terms:

(i) Administrative punishment by law;

(ii) Removal of the eligibility of the relevant honour;

(iii) No tax relief and the Government's non-levant income shall be granted to all types of government funding subsidies or participation in government procurement and government investment projects;

(iv) Restrictions on the allocation of public resources, such as industrial development, the construction of the use of the right to use;

(v) Risk alerts to society for consumption, work and investment;

(vi) Other sanctions under laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 39 presents a serious shortfall in corporate responsibility for integrated credit hierarchy D or social responsibility, and financial institutions can reduce their award levels, insurance agencies may not conduct business insurance operations except statutory compulsory insurance, and may include their legal representative or key supervisors in adverse credit lists.

Article 40 examines and evaluates the various types of business-related inspections, and should fully apply the results of the evaluation of corporate credit regulation and social responsibility, without repetitive evaluation and not increase the unreasonable burden of enterprises.

The enterprise's integrated credit hierarchy is a high level of evaluation of corporate social responsibility, and its evaluation results should serve as the main basis for the selection of the city's advanced corporate units.

Article 40 requires national and international solicitation institutions to understand, assess the credits and fulfil the social responsibility of the current city's enterprises, and may require the municipal business administration and the municipal corporate social responsibility evaluation agencies to provide proof of the credit and performance of the enterprise.

In the case of national and international solicitation institutions consistent with the conditions, the municipal and business administration and the municipal corporate social responsibility evaluation body should provide free proof of the city's credit and the performance of social responsibility.

Evaluations provided by the municipal corporate social responsibility evaluation body can serve as a basis for the assessment of corporate social responsibilities in the city by national and external solicitation institutions.

Chapter VI Legal responsibility

Article 42 provides corporate credit information without the provision of this approach to the business administration and the corporate social responsibility evaluation body, which is provided in writing by the business administration sector and the corporate social responsibility evaluation body, which is not provided late and is criticized by the Government of the current people or administratively disposed of by the responsible person.

Article 43 thirteenth provides units for corporate credit information, the business administration or the corporate social responsibility evaluation body and its staff are one of the following acts, which are subject to the responsibility of the Government of the people at this level and to administrative disposition of the responsible person; inflicts damage on civil responsibility under the law; constitutes an offence punishable by law:

(i) Disclosure or disclosure of corporate credit information relating to State secret, commercial secret and personal privacy;

(ii) Ferze, modify and provide false corporate credit information;

(iii) Use of corporate credit information for operating activities;

(iv) A description of the enterprise's integrated credit hierarchy as Category A or an enterprise's social responsibility evaluation level is a good enterprise and no incentives are required;

(v) Enterprises, social responsibilities that are not marked by an integrated credit hierarchy as D or socially responsible evaluations, are not subject to prescribed sanctions;

(vi) Other abuses of authority, omissions, provocative fraud.

Chapter VII

Article 44 provides for an evaluation of corporate credit regulation and social responsibility at all levels of government budget and no charges are charged to enterprises.

Article 45

(i) Corporate credit regulation means that the management of business is supported by information technology at all levels of administration and by organizations authorized by law to assume administrative functions, through credit information records, credit management evaluations, credit information announcements, etc., to stimulate, limit, corrections, etc.

(ii) Corporate credit information, which refers to data and information generated by the executive branch at all levels and by organizations mandated by the law to perform public management functions in the identification of business status, reflecting the state of business, the performance of the credits, etc., and reflecting the relevant corporate legal representative, the principal head responsible, including basic information, good information and indicative information.

(iii) The commune government's corporate credit management website, which refers to the Internet site of the People's Government of New York at www.nbcredit.net.

(iv) Corporate social responsibility means the full development, natural environment and resource protection of the State and society, while pursuing its own development, and the responsibilities to be assumed by stakeholders such as shareholders, creditors, workers, customers, consumers, suppliers, communities.

(v) Harmony enterprises, which are consistent in labour relations, productive and environmental coordination, sustainable competitiveness, and performance of social responsibility to meet the criteria.

Article 46

Article 47 provides that the business administration sector, the corporate social responsibility evaluation body may evaluate the management and social responsibility of individual business and related practitioners, taking into account the provisions of this approach.

Article 48 is implemented effective 1 March 2012.