Advanced Search

Power Of Relatively Concentrated Administrative Punishment Measures For The Implementation Of Urban Management In Yinchuan (Trial) 2012 (Revised)

Original Language Title: 银川市城市管理相对集中行政处罚权实施办法(试行)(2012年修正本)

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Metropolitan city management is relatively focused on the application of administrative penalties (a pilot) (as amended in 2012)

(Act No. 1 of 29 May 2004 of the Order of the People's Government of the City of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of 7 February 2012 No. 2 of the Order No. 2 of the Order of the Government of the Grand Sichuan People of the Republic of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland on the date of publication)

In order to strengthen urban management and enhance the effectiveness of administrative enforcement in urban management, this approach has been developed in line with the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Punishment Act, the Department of State's decision to further advance the relatively centralized process of administrative sanctions and the provisions of the self-government in relation to the rehabilitation of administrative sanctions pilots in the area of urban management in Sichuan City and the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 2

Article 3. This approach is implemented by the Integrated Law Enforcement Bureau for Urban Management in Ganguan.

The Integrated Urban Administration Bureau of the City and Regions is governed by the leadership of the city, the people of the region, exercises comparatively focused administrative penalties within the jurisdictions, in accordance with the competence set out in this approach, and is subject to the operational guidance of the municipal administration.

The urban environment, parking forests, construction, planning and land resources, environmental protection, housing, water, business and public safety, etc., should be aligned with the urban and district integrated urban management authorities to focus administrative penalties relatively closely.

Article IV: The Integrated Law Enforcement Bureau for Urban Management performs the following duties:

(i) The right to administrative punishment under the laws, regulations and regulations governing the management of sanitation.

(ii) Part of the administrative penalties stipulated in laws, regulations and regulations relating to green management, municipal engineering facilities management, urban planning, environmental protection management, housing management, business management, public safety transport management.

(iii) The right to administrative punishment in other areas specified by the Government of the city.

Article 5: The Integrated Urban Administration Bureau is specifically responsible for the coordination of administrative penalties across the city, the organization of significant administrative law enforcement activities across the city and the handling of sudden-on-cident offences, the creation of outdoor advertisements and the imposition of administrative penalties for offences such as the operation of the tunnel, and the supervision of administrative penalties in the three districts. The city's Integrated Urban Administration Bureau is responsible for the administration of administrative penalties in urban areas within the jurisdiction of the city, which is operationally led by the Integrated Urban Management Enforcement Authority, and the day-to-day work is mobilized by the authorities of all sectors.

In particular areas such as urban parks, square brackets, the executive branch of the Territory's integrated urban administration commissioner has been entrusted with offences under the law, and its law enforcement officers are supervised by the Integrated Urban Administration Authority of the Territory.

Following the relative concentration of administrative penalties, the former administrative law enforcement authorities no longer exercise part of the administrative penalties that have been centrally delegated to the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, which are still exercised, and administrative sanctions decisions are null and void and have corresponding legal responsibilities.

Article 7 exercises the right to administrative punishment in accordance with the provisions of the laws, regulations and regulations governing the management of the city and sanitation.

Article 8.

Article 9. In accordance with the provisions of the laws, regulations and regulations governing the management of municipal engineering facilities, the exercise of administrative penalties for offences other than the design, construction, inspection, maintenance, maintenance and maintenance of municipal works facilities.

Article 10, in accordance with the provisions of the laws, regulations and regulations governing urban planning, exercises administrative penalties for offences that affect urban planning, in contravention of roads, squares, greenfields, high-pressed power corridors, pressured gateways, and use of public booths, chargings, windows and occupiers, etc.

Article 11 exercises administrative penalties for the simplication of social life and for the burning of substances producing toxic fumes and malicious gases in population concentration areas, in accordance with the provisions of laws, regulations and regulations governing the management of environmental protection.

Article 12 exercises the administrative penalties for unlawful acts in the area of property management, in accordance with the provisions of laws, regulations and regulations governing property management.

Article 13 exercises administrative penalties for violations of dumping and dumping of garbage in urban areas in accordance with the provisions of laws, regulations and regulations governing water management.

Article 14.

Article 15. The exercise of the administrative penalties for offences that have been discontinued in places where the motor vehicle is not provided for by law, regulations and regulations governing the management of public safety transport.

Article 16, in violation of urban planning regulations, has been established to prevent public safety, public health, urban transport and urban landscapes from being incompatible with urban profiling standards, and the building, construction of environmental sanitation standards should be forced to be dismantled by law, and the Integrated Law Enforcement Authority of Urban Administration in accordance with the provisions of the National People's Republic of China Administrative Force.

Article 17: The Integrated Law Enforcement Authority for Urban Management should establish a system of reporting of violations and report offences against citizens, legal persons or other organizations that are confidential to the reportingers, within the scope of their duties, and the Integrated Law Enforcement Authority for Urban Administration in the city, district and urban areas should be promptly checked; In addition to the scope of responsibility, the Integrated Law Enforcement Bureau for Urban Management should be transferred to the relevant management. The Integrated Law Enforcement Bureau for Urban Management should inform the reportingers of the identification or transfer of cases.

Article 18 Administrative law enforcement officials in urban management have found that the offence should be subject to correctional or deadlines; tools and goods that may be seized in accordance with the provisions of the law, regulations and regulations against the denial of an offence.

In implementing administrative penalties by the Integrated Urban Administration of the city, the unlawful circumstances are minor and promptly corrected, without causing the consequences of the damage, without administrative sanctions.

An act of the party is in violation of the provisions of more than two laws, regulations and regulations, and should be fined, and the Integrated Law Enforcement Authority of the Urban and District Administration may impose administrative penalties for the application of the heavy penalty provisions and shall not be consolidated or repeated.

Article 20, Integrated Municipal Administration of Urban Management, in monitoring inspection activities, found violations beyond the scope of responsibility, should be transferred to the management concerned and provided the necessary evidence or material.

There is no justification for the management concerned and no refusal to accept cases transferred by the Integrated Law Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management and, after the decision is taken, to communicate the Integrated Law Enforcement Authority of Urban Management in a timely manner.

Article 21, the Integrated Urban Management Service of the Municipalities is sharing information on administrative penalties and administrative permits related to urban management relative to the concentration of administrative penalties.

The administrative licence decisions taken by the relevant administrations, such as urban sanitation, greenification, construction, planning and land resources, environmental protection, housing, water, business and public safety, should be sent within five working days to the Integrated Law Enforcement Authority for Urban Management.

In the absence of a legal performance by the executive branch of the city, the Integrated Urban Administration Bureau has found that the relevant administrations should be informed in a timely manner or reported to the Government of the city.

The administrative penalties decisions taken by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management in the city, district urban areas should be sent within five working days to the relevant executive branch and to the Integrated Urban Management Service in accordance with the type of case. The relevant administrations have found inappropriate penalties imposed by the Integrated Urban Administration Authority, which should receive feedback within five working days to the Integrated Law Enforcement Bureau for Urban Management, which has not been corrected by the Integrated Urban Administration Authority, and the relevant administration can bring to the same level the Government to monitor the corrections.

Article 2 Violations of the Integrated Law Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management, requiring the parties to fill the relevant procedures, shall be communicated to the relevant administrative departments in a timely manner after the investigation and to the parties to bring the relevant procedures into place. The loss needs to be compensated by the Integrated Law Enforcement Bureau to inform the parties of their compensation.

In the course of law enforcement, the Integrated Administration of Urban Management has found that the relevant administrative authorities should be informed in a timely manner when they do not carry out their duties under the law.

Article 23 of the Integrated Urban Administration Authority has the authority to monitor the enforcement activities of the Integrated Urban Administration Office in the three districts, finding that the offences should be investigated and that they should not be investigated, and found to be wrong and that it could be responsible for the alteration or direct redress and accountability of the responsible person.

The Integrated Urban Administration Bureau organizes major administrative enforcement activities across the city and handles sudden-on sexual offences, with the participation of the law enforcement team of the Integrated Urban Management Service in the three districts.

Article 24, when the Integrated Administration of Urban Management imposes administrative penalties in accordance with the provisions of the National People's Republic of China Administrative Punishment Act, administrative sanctions decisions shall be taken within 15 days of the discovery of the offence and the complexity of the case requires the approval of the principal authority, but the extension period shall not exceed 30 working days.

Article 25 shall not be less than 2 members of the executive branch in the administration of the city, subject to uniform law enforcement symbols, administrative law enforcement documents produced by the self-government and administrative sanctions in accordance with the procedures set out in the National People's Republic of China Administrative Punishment Act.

Article 26 Decisions taken by citizens, legal persons or other organizations with regard to administrative penalties by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management require hearings, which may be applied by the Integrated Urban Administration Administration Authority, in accordance with the law, to organize hearings with the relevant administration.

Article 27 rejects, prevents administrative law enforcement officials in urban administration from carrying out their duties under the law and employs methods of violence, threats, and punishs the public security authorities in accordance with the Regulations on the Safety and Security of the People's Republic of China, which constitute criminal responsibility under the law.

The Integrated Urban Administration Bureau of Municipal and Regional Urban Management should introduce administrative law enforcement responsibilities and public review of the nuclear system, establish uniform training for administrative law enforcement officials, harmonize the conduct of inspections and rotating positions, improve the political integrity and operational levels of administrative law enforcement officials and ensure strict enforcement, compliance with public law enforcement and civilized law enforcement.

Article 29 Administrative law enforcement officials in urban management should be subject to justice. In cases of abuse of power, negligence, provocative fraud, misbriefing, administrative disposition by the authorities in question, in accordance with the authority of management, and criminal accountability under the law is severely constituted.

Article 33 The administrative penalties imposed by the parties against the Integrated Law Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management may be applied by law for administrative review or directly to the People's Court.

Article 31 of this approach is implemented effective 16 August 2004.