Advanced Search

Huainan City, Major Administrative Decision-Making Procedures

Original Language Title: 淮南市重大行政决策程序规定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Major administrative decision-making processes in the city of South Africa

(Adopted by Decree No. 133 of 10 July 2012 by the Government of the Turkmen Republic of Uruguay, No. 133 of 1 September 2012)

Chapter I General

In order to regulate major administrative decision-making, it is clear that major administrative decision-making responsibilities are responsible for ensuring the quality of major administrative decision-making, reducing the error of major administrative decision-making, and in line with the relevant laws, regulations, regulations and the Department of State's Comprehensive Promotion of the Framework for the Implementation of the Law, in conjunction with the current city's actual formulation of this provision.

Article 2 However, there is no exception to major administrative decisions on suddenness or emergency response.

The major administrative decisions referred to in this Article refer to the following matters that the Government has taken concerning the close relationship between economic and social development in the region and the people's interests:

(i) Draft local legislation, government regulations or important normative documents;

(ii) Develop major policy measures for economic and social development and prepare national economic and social development planning, annual plans;

(iii) Preparation of financial advances and major financial arrangements;

(iv) Develop a variety of overall planning, important regional planning and specific planning;

(v) Major Government investment projects;

(vi) The reform of the administrative system and the major measures in the restructuring of national and collective enterprises;

(vii) The development and adaptation of important commodities, services prices for government pricing;

(viii) Develop major activities programmes;

(ix) Other relationships are based, holistic, strategic, long-term, and require significant matters of government decision-making.

Article IV

(i) The principle of decision-making in accordance with the law. In accordance with the statutory competence and procedures, the right fulfilment of the statutory responsibilities;

(ii) Principles of democratic decision-making. To reflect the public's minds, to combine public participation, expert perceptions and decisions by executive organs, to explore accurately the risks and levels of social stability, to minimize destabilizing factors and to fully reflect and reflect the fundamental interests of the population at large;

(iii) Principles of scientific decision-making. Respect for objective regulation, based on local realities, the use of scientific approaches, the integration of realities and forward-looking approaches, the prevention and adaptation of social stability risks and the promotion of the overall coordination of sustainable development in the economy.

Article 5

Major administrative decisions should be made public by law, including through Government websites, government bulletins, media. However, there are exceptions to matters involving State secrets.

Chapter II Programme preparation

Article 7. The Government shall determine, prior to making significant administrative decisions, the specific responsibility of the policymaking organs for the pre-periods such as research, programme drafting and validation.

Article 8. In the previous period, the decision-making organs shall seek the views of other relevant departments, such as the Government's rule of law, policy studies, maintenance of stability, and, if necessary, may entrust experts, professional service institutions or other organizations with corresponding qualifications with professional work.

A decision-making body should conduct in-depth research and complete and accurate knowledge of the relevant circumstances required for decision-making, and take a wide range of forms of public observations and proposals to form a decision-making research report.

Article 9. The decision-making organs shall provide decision-making options based on the nature and characteristics of decision-making matters. The issue of the need for multi-programme comparative studies or the existence of disputed consultations remain unanimous and should be based on different public, expert or sectoral claims for more than two decision-making options.

In developing decision-making options by decision-making bodies, the following shall not be the case:

(i) The information collected is real or outdated;

(ii) Loss of the necessary information;

(iii) To conceal and distort the true situation;

(iv) Disclosure requires confidential information.

Article 10 The decision-making organs should provide adequate justification for decision-making options; decision-making on resource allocation should be cost-benefit analysis, which can be quantified.

Article 11. The decision-making organs shall organize expert evaluation teams or legal evaluation bodies to evaluate decision-making options and form an integrated evaluation opinion.

The expert evaluation team shall be composed of more than three experts who are representative and authoritative in this professional area. Applying experts to other rights such as the right to be informed, the right to express opinions, the right to receive payment of services, the right to participate in the evaluation expert should respect the rules of work, make a rigorous evaluation finding and be responsible for the evaluation.

Article 12. Significant administrative decision-making matters that are directly related to the people's public interest, involve a wide range of issues that can trigger social stability must be carried out by the decision-making bodies in accordance with the procedures set out therein.

In addition to non-public matters under the law, the decision-making organs should publish the draft major administrative decision-making programmes to society and seek public advice.

The draft major administrative decision-making programme should include the following matters:

(i) Draft and its note;

(ii) Means, modalities and time for public submissions;

(iii) Communications addresses, telephones, faxes and e-mail.

Following the publication of the draft major administrative decision-making programme, the decision-making bodies should widely listen to the views and proposals of the public and the various communities, including through seminars, consultations, open hearings, etc., based on the scope and extent of the impact of major administrative decisions on the public. The scope of public participation and the choice of representatives should ensure that the views of the affected public are equitably expressed.

The institution of decision-making should classify the public's views and proposals for major administrative decision-making, which should be adopted by the public; there should be no reason for adoption. Public advice and adoption should be made available to society.

Article 15. Major administrative decision-making is one of the following cases, and hearings should be held:

(i) The public's major interests;

(ii) The public has significant differences in decision-making programmes;

(iii) It may affect social stability;

(iv) Legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions should be heard.

Chapter III Consideration of decisions

Major administrative decision-making should be decided by the Standing Committee of the Government or by the plenary (hereinafter referred to as “the Conference”), and no alternative decisions such as invitations or individual requests.

Article 17 presents major administrative decision-making topics for consideration by the Conference, which are determined by the main heads of Government.

Prior to the consideration of the session, the decision-making option shall be subject to approval by the Head of Government.

Article 18

(i) Policy options and narratives;

(ii) An integrated evaluation of the expert evaluation team;

(iii) Consolidated information on the views of the authorities and the public;

(iv) The same or similar projects in the country and abroad should be reported;

(v) Relevant legal, regulatory, and national policy provisions, in particular prohibitive provisions;

(vi) Cost-benefit analysis needs to be carried out, accompanied by analytical reports;

(vii) There is a need for a social stabilization risk assessment, accompanied by an assessment report.

The information should be delivered in accordance with the time and requests provided for by the Conference.

Consideration of major administrative decision-making programmes by the Conference shall be subject to the following provisions:

(i) More than half of the composition may be held;

(ii) The decision-making body provided a statement of the programme of decision-making to the Conference and responded to queries from its constituents;

(iii) The heads of management focus their views and make recommendations for decision-making;

(iv) Comments by other participants;

(v) Final remarks by the main Government heads.

Article 20, on behalf of the principal holder of the Government, exercises decision-making power on important administrative decision-making matters.

The main heads of Government may agree, agree, modify, hold or reconsider decisions on matters under consideration.

The principal heads of Government should generally decide on the basis of the views of the majority of the constituents or may decide on the basis of the views of a small number of constituents or on an integrated basis, but the reasons should be explained.

The Office of the Government is responsible for the record of major administrative decision-making meetings.

The proceedings should include the following key elements:

(i) The basic circumstances of the meeting, such as the time, place, the moderator, the participant, the absentee, the seat and the person, the invited expert;

(ii) Policy matters and main issues;

(iii) The review process and the views of the composition of the Conference;

(iv) Comments from other participants;

(v) Major disagreements;

(vi) Decisions of the main Government heads.

Members of the second article shall strictly observe the discipline of the Conference and shall be conservative in matters that are undetermined and decided not to be made public and in the discussion of the Conference.

Major administrative decision-making matters are required by law for approval by the superior Government or for the consideration of the decision by the Committee, the People's Congress and its Standing Committee, and shall be approved or brought to the same party, the People's Congress and its Standing Committee.

Chapter IV

Article 24 Governments should carry out work tasks and responsibilities to clarify decision-making implementing agencies and work requirements.

Article 25 The decision-making organs should fully, in a timely and right manner follow up on major administrative decisions and should not be pre-emptive and delayed.

The decision-makers should report on the implementation of major administrative decisions to the current level of government in a timely manner.

In the course of the implementation of the decision-making bodies, it was found that the objective conditions on which major administrative decisions were based had changed had led to a full or partial failure to achieve decision-making goals and should be reported in a timely manner to the current level of government and to make recommendations to discontinue implementation, suspension or revision of decision-making.

Article 26, in accordance with the implementation requirements of major administrative decision-making, shall conduct an implementation assessment by the policymaking organs and report on the evaluation findings to the current Government.

Article 27 agencies responsible for the supervision and conduct of nuclear work should take steps to follow up on inspections, to promote acronyms, to ensure the proper implementation of decision-making programmes and to report to the Government in a timely manner on the conduct of the work of the Office and the evaluation.

Article 28, civil, legal or other organizations believe that significant administrative decision-making should cease implementation or amendment, may challenge or recommend to Governments or decision-making bodies that make decisions.

Major executive decision-making and its implementation are monitored by law by representatives of the United Nations, parliamentarians.

Article 29 Governments may make decisions to continue, cease implementation, suspension or amend decision-making programmes, based on recommendations made by the implementing agencies or civil, legal and other organizations. In emergencies, the main heads of Government may decide directly, but the case should be recorded.

The Government should take effective measures to avoid or minimize losses and to preserve social stability.

Chapter V Legal responsibility

Article 33 violates this provision by the decision-making organs, resulting in a misappropriation of government decision-making and the corresponding disposition of the responsible person in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Service Act of the People's Republic of China and the Civil Service Disposal Regulations of the Administration.

In violation of this provision, the Thirty-first Government has resulted in a misappropriation of major administrative decision-making and is responsible for its heads and those responsible directly.

In violation of this provision, the decision-making authority has led to a lack of comprehensive, timely and correct implementation of major administrative decisions and is accountable to its heads and other direct responsibilities under the law.

Article 33 Authorized experts, professional service institutions, non-performance of contractual agreements, or violations of the rules of work in major administrative decision-making processes, or in violation of legal, regulatory, regulatory and national provisions, shall be dismissed by law and shall be held accountable in accordance with the law.

Annex VI

Article 34, the Government's work sector, the commune government and the law, legislation and regulations that authorize the exercise of administrative functions, and procedures for making major administrative decisions are taken in the light of this provision.

Article 33 XV provides for implementation effective 1 September 2012.