(Adopted by Decree No. 138 of 24 May 2012 on the Royal Government of the People's Republic of China, No. 138 of 1 July 2012)

Article 1 promotes scientific and technological progress and economic development, in accordance with relevant legislation such as the People's Republic of China Patents Act, the Gangong Province Patents Regulations, in order to encourage and mobilize the positiveness created by this city unit and individual inventions, to develop this approach in the light of the practicality of the city.

Article 2. The municipal government has established the first municipal patent award (hereinafter referred to as a patent award) to encourage units and individuals that make a prominent contribution to the economic and social development of the city.

The patent awards were established as follows:

(i) Removal of municipal patent awards, award of excellence in the market;

(ii) Endowment of the post-community design award, the introduction of the post-market-based excellence award;

(iii) Endowment of the award for the award of the renegotiator (the designr).

The award of the first-clock patent award, the award of the award of the award of the award of the predominant patents from the invention of patents and new types of practical patents.

The patent awards are evaluated once a year. Each award imposes a limit of four awards for the first municipal patent award and no more than eight projects for the treasury of patent awards; no more than 2 projects for the first-class design of awards shall be taken into account; no more than 4 projects shall be designed for the post-primary occupancy; and no more than 10 applicants for the award of excellence (the design).

Recommendation, evaluation and award awards for patent awards should be guided by the principles of openness, equity, impartiality and impartiality without interference by any organization and individual.

Article IV.

Article 5. The Municipal Government has established a patent awards evaluation committee (hereinafter referred to as the evaluation committee), which is responsible for the evaluation of the patent awards. The evaluation board consists of experts, scholars from the relevant parties, who are nominated by the municipal patent administration authorities and who are appointed after the approval of the municipal government.

The Office of the Evaluation Committee is located in the municipal patent administration authority responsible for evaluating the Committee's daily work.

Article 6. The Evaluation Committee has established a number of professional evaluation teams responsible for the initial evaluation of patent awards within the various professional contexts.

The evaluation committees should organize specialized evaluation teams to develop specific evaluation criteria based on the characteristics of each professional nature.

Article 7 declares patents of patent awards that must be owned by the present municipal units and individuals or implemented in the city, without a patent rights dispute, the invention (the designator) eligibility dispute, the patent right to be invalid and the patent of the national, provincial and municipal patent awards has not been obtained.

Inventors (designed) who have declared the opening of the city's best patent inventors (the designer) awards must also have the place of origin or work in the city.

Article 8 Pattern Award criteria:

(i) Approval criteria for the approval of the award for the award of the opening of the award for the award of the award of the award for the award of the award of the award for the award of the award for the award of the award of the patents in the municipality: The high level of patent technology, innovative or technically significant breakthroughs play a prominent role in promoting technological progress in this area, in line with the direction of industrial development, when implementation has achieved significant or potential economic benefits or social benefits, and the effectiveness of the author's application and protection.

(ii) The award criteria for the award for the award for the award of the post-communication award, the award for the design of the award for excellence in the predominant city; The patent was designed in the form, case, colour, or in combination with a unique and practical nature; the performance of the patent had been marked by economic benefits or social benefits; and the use and protection of the author was significantly effective.

(iii) Approval criteria for the award of the award of the award for the award of the predominant patent institute (the designor) which has made an important contribution in the patent technology programme, making significant technological innovations in the resolution of key technical and technological challenges or as a number of patented inventors ( designers) or major inventors (designeders); their patents have generated significant or potential economic benefits or social benefits after their implementation.

Article 9. The patent owner or the patent implementing unit, the patent inventor and the organ, the business unit, the city-wide association may declare or recommend the candidate for the patent award. The procedures for declaring or recommending patent awards for election projects and candidates are implemented in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) The declarationor or the recommended unit is required to complete the declaration in the harmonized format and, in accordance with article 10, article 11 of the present methodology, to provide relevant effective and authentic material, to be sent to the designated administrative authorities of the district in question, to the competent municipal authorities or to the city-wide association of the sex industry.

(ii) The Office of the Evaluation Committee, following the signing of the recommendations by the patent administration authorities of each district, the competent authorities of the municipality and the Association of the Market-wide, in accordance with the terms of the declaration and the criteria for the award.

Article 10 declares the release of the first municipal patent award, the award of the award for the award of the award for the award of the award for the award of the award for the award of the award for the award of excellence in the first place, and shall submit the following material:

(i) The publication of the award of the award of the award of the Endangered Municipal patent award;

(ii) A patent certificate and a notice of a patent;

(iii) The validity of the patent;

(iv) Data on market access for special products;

(v) The application of economic benefits and social benefits to patents;

(vi) In-kind, model or photograph of the design of patent products;

(vii) The author is not a patent owner and provides a document that enjoys the right to legal enforcement of the patent;

(viii) Other material required.

Article 11 declares the award of the award of the award of the award of the holder (the designator) of the predominant patent, and shall submit the following materials:

(i) The publication of the award of the award of the award of the Endangered Municipal patent award;

(ii) An effective identity document and proof of service for himself;

(iii) A copy of the patent certificate relating to himself;

(iv) The application of economic benefits and social benefits to patents;

(v) Other material required.

Article 12. The Office of the Evaluation Committee conducts a review of the evaluation projects and candidates, in accordance with conditions for submission to the Panel's various professional evaluation teams, which are submitted by the various professional evaluation teams for the evaluation of awards, awards and awards, and for the evaluation committee.

Article 13. The Evaluation Committee conducts an integrated evaluation based on the evaluation opinion of the Panel of Professional Evaluation, making awards, awards and awards for evaluation resolutions, which are approved by the municipal government.

Article 14.

The awards should be submitted to the Office of the Evaluation Committee and the relevant documentation. Upon review by the Office of the Evaluation Committee, the Municipal Government was requested to award awards to the awardee.

Article 15. The patent awards are awarded by the Municipal Government. Awards, awards and awards were published in the Official Journal of the Government of the Challenge.

Article 16 awards for patent awards and the provision for evaluation are included in the budget for the fiscal year.

Article 17 project units that have obtained patent awards should be rewarded by less than 30 per cent of the award of patents for projects (the designers), and individuals who make substantive contributions to the patent project by less than 20 per cent.

Article 18 Inventors who have obtained a patent award project (the designator), the unit should place the award and the related performance in its own archives and may serve as one of the basis for the conduct of the examination, promotion, evaluation of job claims, and the appointment of technical posts.

The evaluation of the patent awards is subject to social supervision and the introduction of a public indicative system. Prior to the approval of the IPR's evaluation resolution, social statements should be made, units and individuals contested, which could be presented to the Evaluation Committee's Office during the published appeal period. The Evaluation Commission's office should be reviewed in a timely manner and the review of the results report to the Evaluation Committee, which will be reviewed by the Evaluation Committee.

Article 20 provides that units or individuals are not justified by reason of the patent awards, which are cancelled by the municipal patent administrative authorities following the approval of the municipal government, the recovery certificate and awards and the removal of the qualifications of the unit or the individual for almost two patent awards.

Article 21, which provides false data, material and assists others in decepting patent awards, is criticized by the municipal patent administration authorities; in the event of serious dismissal of their recommended qualifications; and in the case of the competent person responsible for direct responsibility and other direct responsibilities, administrative disposition by the relevant sector is provided by law.

Article 2

Article 23 may establish enforcement rules in accordance with this approach.

Article 24 The Pattern Awards of the Municipal People's Government, issued on 1 April 2005, were also repealed.