~10 (Summit 10th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of the city of Halkohama, 13 August 2012) considered the adoption of Order No. 7 of 19 August 2012 on the date of publication of the People's Government Order No.

Article 1, in order to further regulate the conduct of business administration, protect the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises, optimize the economic development environment, promote enterprise development, and develop this provision in the light of the relevant provisions of both countries and provinces.

Article 2

Article 3. The administrative law enforcement sector should establish the approval system and the rules of work relating to administrative law enforcement activities, identify administrative enforcement processes, improve the record of business enforcement and incorporate administrative law enforcement responsibilities.

Article IV. The administrative law enforcement branch shall dedicate the authority, approval procedures for the processing of administrative law enforcement activities in this sector, be reviewed at the same level and implemented after approval by the same Government.

Administrative law enforcement officials are involved in administrative law enforcement activities, and the approval process should be carried out in accordance with the required authorization and approval procedures.

Article 5 Administrative law enforcement authorities should establish oversight telephones and open administrative law enforcement reviews, complaints, reporting columns on sectoral websites.

The administrative law enforcement sector should receive complaints, reports of administrative law enforcement involving entrepreneurship and will deal with the results of prompt feedback and reporting.

Article 6. The executive law enforcement sector enters into the implementation of administrative law enforcement by enterprises and administrative law enforcement officials may not be less than two.

Administrative law enforcement officers should first produce administrative law enforcement documents.

Article 7 provides for routine administrative enforcement inspections involving legal, regulatory or regulatory provisions and the deployment of superior administrative authorities, and the administrative law enforcement sector should develop a workplan for routine administrative enforcement inspections into enterprises in a quarterly period of time, with the approval of the principal executive law enforcement authorities, and report on the approval of the executive law enforcement authorities in March, June, September and December each year a routine administrative enforcement inspection workplan for the next quarter of the year.

The routine administrative law enforcement inspection workplan includes elements such as the basis, content, targets, frequency and timing of inspections. Administrative law enforcement inspections should be carried out in strict compliance with the reporting inspection workplan and must not change the contents, scope and time of the inspection.

The Administration's routine administrative enforcement inspection plans for enterprises in the development area should be informed of the Development Zone Management Committee.

Article 8. Administrative law enforcement agencies should make submissions within five working days of the end of the enforcement inspection, including the targeting and content of routine administrative enforcement inspections of enterprises, time and basis, law enforcement and disposition of results, and to report back to the executive law enforcement body.

Article IX, in addition to the routine administrative enforcement inspection of enterprises, requires immediate administrative enforcement inspections of offences such as safe production, the sale of false food medicines, environmental pollution, and administrative enforcement inspections carried out on a temporary basis by the executive authorities and the municipalities, districts, districts and territories (communes), and administrative law enforcement officers should implement administrative law enforcement inspections, with the consent of the executive law enforcement authorities, as well as referrals to the executive law enforcement authorities within 5 days, indicating the law enforcement and treatment of views.

The administrative law enforcement authorities have special requirements for the approval of the authority, procedures for the administrative enforcement of the enterprise and are implemented in accordance with article IV of this provision.

Article 10. The executive law enforcement services receive complaints reports that require administrative enforcement inspections of enterprises and should be approved by the main executive heads of the administration.

Article 11. The administrative law enforcement sector has a written inspection condition for the enterprise and should implement administrative enforcement inspections in writing, as required.

Article 12 Administrative law enforcement authorities carry out administrative enforcement inspections of the same enterprise or other joint administrative enforcement inspections, which are led by the Office for the Improvement of the Environment of Economic Development.

The administrative law enforcement sector should record the implementation of administrative law enforcement inspections by enterprises and the results of their processing, and be archived by administrative law enforcement officials after their signature and accountable for the results of the inspection.

Article 14 does not duplicate administrative law enforcement inspections of the same enterprise, in addition to laws, regulations and regulations.

In addition to the provisions of laws, regulations and regulations, the administrative law enforcement authorities and their enforcement officials shall not conduct a sample of raw materials, products or commodities operating in enterprises. A sample of products by law should be carried out in accordance with the statutory procedures, norms or standards. The same product shall not be repeated.

In addition to the laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, the execution of a sample exercise shall be subject to the purchase of the sampled samples at the cost price and shall not be charged with the inspection fees and any other costs incurred by the extractive units.

Article 15. Administrative law enforcement inspections by administrative law enforcement officials against enterprises shall not interfere with the normal production of business activity and shall not be seen as the main head of the enterprise.

When administrative law enforcement inspections are carried out by administrative law enforcement officials against businesses, feedback on administrative law enforcement inspections is needed to the main corporate head, which should be approved by the main executive heads of the executive branch.

Article 16, in addition to the inspection provided for in article 9, the executive law enforcement and its administrative law enforcement officials shall not be subject to administrative law enforcement inspections by enterprises by one week before the State's statutory section.

Article 17: The Office for the Improvement of the Environment of Economic Development has established a modest registration of administrative law enforcement inspections in enterprises, documenting the inspection of administrative law enforcement, personnel, time, scope, etc., and entry of administrative law enforcement officers into the enterprise should be registered and signed.

Administrative law enforcement officers should have records of administrative law enforcement inspections when implementing administrative law enforcement inspections by enterprises, and administrative law enforcement officials should carefully complete administrative law enforcement inspections and be confirmed by administrative law enforcement officials and by the object of the inspection.

Article 18, in addition to the provisions of laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, does not apply to businesses for an annual test.

The administrative law enforcement sector conducts annual inspections of enterprises without requiring businesses to provide material and accounts that are not relevant to the annual test.

The administrative law enforcement sector should explore the establishment of a web-based annual screening and the progressive implementation of the online annual inspection. The duration of annual inspections could be extended and the period of time should be extended.

Article 19 heads of law enforcement agencies in the executive branch should regularly review the administrative law enforcement inspection records of administrative law enforcement officials, and administrative law enforcement agencies regularly check the records of administrative law enforcement inspections.

The administrative law enforcement sector should provide a summary of the Department's administrative law enforcement inspections in every quarter and form a report to improve the economic development environment office.

Article 20, in addition to the safe production, sale of false food medicines, environmental pollution or other severe disruption of market economic order, endangers public safety, physical health, life property security, and public interest, shall be punished by administrative penalties, shall be imposed on businesses for the first time being subject to subjective and minor offences and in a timely manner, without causing consequences, and the administrative authorities should give warning, education in writing, and give the letter of restatement a deadline for renovating businesses within the prescribed time period without administrative punishment.

Article 21, Administrative law enforcement officials found that there was a serious violation of the enterprise in administrative law enforcement inspections, or that enterprises should impose administrative penalties on the subject, content, basis, criteria, implementation time, administrative law enforcement agencies, etc., when approved by the executive heads.

The administrative law enforcement sector, which is mandated by the right to liberty, should strictly enforce administrative sanctions in accordance with the discretionary standards of administrative sanctions issued by this sector. With regard to significant penalties, the same-ranking Government rule of law should be reported as required.

The administrative law enforcement authorities have special requirements for the approval of administrative penalties and procedures for enterprises, in accordance with article IV of this provision.

Article 2 should establish a system of collective discussions on major administrative sanctions cases, which should be implemented after the sectoral leadership of collective meetings.

Article 23, Administrative law enforcement, for the same enterprise, shall not impose administrative penalties for more than two fines.

The administrative penalties imposed by the administrative law enforcement authorities for the imposition of fines on enterprises shall not be reduced, distracted by the amount of fines and increased penalties.

Article 24 does not allow the administrative law enforcement authorities and their administrative law enforcement officials to collect evidence without undue means, such as inducement, fraud, coercion, violence, and thus impose administrative sanctions on enterprises.

Article 25. When administrative penalties are imposed by the administrative law enforcement authorities for corporate offences, business corrections should be promoted and the re-engineering of business materials into administrative law enforcement files; businesses are still not rectified and administrative law enforcement authorities should be checked by law.

Article 26 The administrative law enforcement sector should conduct a summary of the administrative penalties of this sector every half year and form a report to improve the economic development environment office and the Government's rule of law.

Article 27 provides for corporate charges by the administrative law enforcement branch, which shall be communicated in advance to the charges project, the fees standard, the time limit, the place of payment.

Administrative law enforcement officials should present a “feasing permit, a qualification certificate” to complete the Business Revenue Register card and, within 15 working days of the charge, repayment to the executive price authority.

Article 28 provides training and qualifications for business workers already participating in specialized operations, occupational qualifications and vocational skills organized by qualified training institutions, and administrative law enforcement does not require replication of business workers.

Article 29 does not impose a fine, a chargeable indicator to the administrative law enforcement authorities at all levels.

The administrative law enforcement branch shall not impose a fine, a chargeable indicator to administrative law enforcement officials, and shall not link a fine, fee to the administrative law enforcement officer's examination of nuclear, economic and social interests.

The administrative law enforcement authorities shall not authorize or entrust organizations that are incompatible with legal qualifications or individuals with inspection, fees and punishment.

Article 33

(i) Forced, present, implied that the enterprise purchases the designated commodities or accepts the designated services;

(ii) Entrepreneurship and contribution to enterprise Lacion;

(iii) Forced, briefed, implied the participation of businesses in meetings, training, study, inspection, evaluation and evaluation of various types of commercial insurance and fees;

(iv) Forced, introduced, implied that the enterprise is placed on the press, purchase books and publish advertisements;

(v) Enforcing, presenting, implying the participation of enterprises in organizations such as the Institute, the Association, the Research Chamber;

(vi) Revenue criteria, repeat charges, over-scale charges and arranging fees;

(vii) In violation of provisions for the commission of seizures, facilities or property, accounts, seizures, freezing deposits, remittances;

(viii) Other violations against the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises.

Article 31 empowers business law enforcement officials not to carry out administrative enforcement inspections, fees, penalties and increased corporate burdens, and may lodge complaints, reports to the administrative law enforcement authorities, to improve the economic development environment office.

Upon enquiry, the Office for the Improvement of the Environment of the Economic Development Organization (EPAD) is valid for complaints, reporting reflecting the situation, and should be responsible for the immediate transformation of the relevant administrative law enforcement authorities. In violation of political discipline, the referral to the inspection department is addressed. Complaints, reports of violations of administrative law are difficult to determine and refer to the Government's rule of law.

The Office for the Improvement of the Economic Development Environment should return complaints, reporting cases to the victims and reportingers in a timely manner.

Article 32 Improvements in the economic development environment offices, the Government's rule of law sector, the inspection sector should strengthen information communication with the media, and the provision of administrative law enforcement in the media should be investigated in a timely manner and will address the results to feedback to the media.

The administrative law enforcement sector should support and cooperate with the media in investigating and reporting cases involving administrative law enforcement.

Article 33 shall not disclose cases such as complaints, information on the identity of the person. The administrative law enforcement branch and its staff shall not be able to combat reprisals against the complaints, the reporting person.

Complaints, reporters against reprisals have been confirmed and administratively disposed of by the administrative law enforcement officers.

Article 34, executive law enforcement, should conduct oversight of the system's administrative law enforcement and correct violations in a timely manner.

The Ministry of the Environment of Economic Development and the Government's rule of law sector should enhance the exchange of relevant information, such as the administration of justice, and conduct specific inspections of administrative law enforcement.

Article XV. The Government of the communes, districts and counties (markets) has established an administrative law enforcement sector-related enterprise evaluation mechanism, which is regularly evaluated by the Office for the Improvement of the Economic Development Environment, the Government Rule of Law and the business union. The evaluation results were made public in society and included in the objectives and performance appraisals of the administrative law enforcement sector.

Improving the economic development environment, the Government's rule of law sector and the Chamber of Commerce and Industry have regularly designated administrative law enforcement authorities to deal with violations, misconduct, violations and other related issues related to the handling of complaints of violations.

Article 36 sets up incentives by the Government of the city for the prosecution of companies and individuals that conduct violations of this provision by the law enforcement authorities and their administrative law enforcement officials.

In violation of this provision, the executive law enforcement and its law enforcement officials are responsible for administrative accountability for the heads of the administrative law enforcement branch and those responsible, in accordance with the administrative accountability provisions of the city of Hara.

Article 338, the administrative law enforcement branch and its law enforcement officials, in relation to safe production, the sale of false food medicines, environmental pollution or other grave disruptions to the economic order of the market, endangering public safety, physical health, life and property security, and should be kept in accordance with the law, resulting in serious consequences, and hold administrative responsibility for sector managers and direct responsibilities.

Article 39 provides for implementation from the date of publication.