Administrative Enforcement Of The Fault Responsibility Investigation In Tangshan City Approach

Original Language Title: 唐山市行政执法过错责任追究办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Administrative enforcement of the fault responsibility investigation in Tangshan City approach

    (December 24, 2013, Tangshan City people's Government Executive meeting of the 7th through December 31, 2013, Tangshan City, the people's Government of the 6th release from March 1, 2014) Chapter I General provisions

    First to standardize the administrative law enforcement, prevention and correction of administrative law enforcement mistakes, protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, in accordance with the measures for the administrative enforcement of the fault responsibility investigation in Hebei province, combined with the city's actual, these measures are formulated.

Second administrative law enforcement in these measures, including administrative sanctions, administrative license, the administrative enforcement, administrative collection and administrative decisions, administrative confirmations, executive pay, as well as laws, regulations, rules and regulations of the other administrative law enforcement activities.

This approach by said administrative law enforcement fault, is refers to levels Government, and County above Government belongs the administrative law enforcement sector and legal regulations authorized or law delegate of Organization (following referred to administrative law enforcement organ) and administrative law enforcement personnel in administrative law enforcement activities in the, for deliberately or fault not perform, and illegal perform or improper perform statutory duties, led citizens, and corporate and other organization of lawful rights and interests of by damage, caused bad consequences, by statutory program confirmed should held administrative responsibility of behavior.

    The fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement in these measures refers to administrative law enforcement organs and the behavior of administrative enforcement by law enforcement personnel, in accordance with the provisions of the investigation, identify responsibility, dealing with activities.

    Article III administrative law enforcement organs at all levels within the administrative area of the city and the Chief law enforcement officers of the fault responsibility investigation, these measures shall apply.

Fourth administrative enforcement of the fault responsibility investigation should be objective and fair, seeking truth from facts, mistakes must be corrected, the wrong responsibility, the principle of combining education with punishment.

    Fault liability of administrative law enforcement investigation, the facts are clear and irrefutable evidence and accurate, proper treatment, procedure, and complete the procedures.

Fifth people's Governments above the county level shall exercise unified leadership fault responsibility investigation of administrative enforcement work within their respective administrative areas.

Administrative law enforcement departments of the people's Governments above the county level and their respective administrative fault responsibility investigation of law enforcement agencies.

The fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs of the Office of Legislative Affairs responsible for the level of Government and departmental accountability for the liability of enforcing specific work, carry out the following functions:

(A) receive complaints on administrative law enforcement mistakes, report of preliminary investigation or investigation;

(B) evidence from relevant organizations and researchers, access to file data;

(C) review found administrative law enforcement liability for fault for administrative law enforcement accountability recommendations;

(D) supervise the implementation of administrative law enforcement certificate of liability;

(V) handling shall be monitored by authorities, personnel appointment and removal, judicial organs to deal with the transfer of the case;

(F) refuses to accept the handling of administrative law enforcement fault liability to government applications for review or administrative law enforcement departments;

(VII) to lower administrative authority to supervise and inspect the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement work;

(H) the lower fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement authority for the coordination between jurisdictions, liability and other disputes;

(I) the administrative law enforcement fault responsibility investigation on statistical matters;

    (J) the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs responsible for other duties.

    Sixth in accordance with laws and regulations and these rules shall be monitored by authorities, personnel appointment and removal of bodies, as well as higher administrative authorities of cases dealt with by the supervisory bodies, personnel or by the administrative organs in accordance with legal rights and responsibilities, in accordance with the People's Republic of China Law on administrative supervision, the People's Republic of China Law on civil service, regulations on the punishment of civil servants of administrative organs and other relevant laws, regulations and other provisions.

    Article administrative law enforcement organs at all levels should establish and improve the system of responsibility for administrative enforcement of the supporting and regulating the activities of law enforcement, strengthening the oversight mechanisms, improve the training of law enforcement personnel and management, prevent and reduce the occurrence of the administrative law enforcement fault.

    Article eighth administrative law enforcement organs at all levels should strengthen the construction of administrative law-enforcement information, and gradually establish a digitization of administrative law enforcement officers law enforcement files, law enforcement credit information as well as important places of electronic video surveillance facilities, providing technology for reducing fault behavior and found that administrative law enforcement protection.

    Nineth administrative law enforcement organs at all levels should take administrative enforcement of the fault responsibility investigation as administrative law enforcement responsibility, administration assessment of the main content and objectives the executive accountability, an important basis for leading groups achievements assessment and annual evaluation of the civil service.

    Chapter II scope of responsibility

Tenth in enforcement activities, administrative law enforcement organs and administrative law enforcement personnel have one of the following shall be recognized as administrative fault, administrative enforcement of those liability:

(A) without statutory basis or beyond the statutory functions and powers;

(B) the applicable law according to the error;

(C) the facts are unclear, evidence is insufficient;

(D) violation of legal procedures;

(E) law enforcement acts obviously wrong;

(Vi) do not perform their statutory duties;

    (VII) other circumstances that warrant the administrative enforcement of those liability.

11th confirmed by the following State administrative law enforcement organs and their administrative enforcement of violations committed by law enforcement personnel, shall be recognized as administrative law enforcement mistakes, held responsibility for mistakes:

(A) the parent and the people's congresses at the corresponding levels and their standing committees at the detection and confirmation of the administrative law enforcement supervision violations;

(B) the Court of the judgment or order be revoked with effect, change, identify illegal violations, ordered to perform the statutory duties of the administrative law enforcement; court Executive Officer, persons directly responsible for violation of administrative discipline, and transferred to the administrative law-enforcement organs dealing with violations of administrative enforcement;

(C) the people's Procuratorate the prosecution expressed that crimes are minor, without sentences or be exempted from punishment in accordance with criminal law, administrative violations of administrative law enforcement should be made;

(D) the administrative reconsideration of administrative reconsideration organs decided to withdraw, change and confirm the illegal acts of administrative enforcement; a legal working body of administrative reconsideration organs in accordance with the People's Republic of China administration reconsideration law in recommendations of the 38th of the rules, that it should be held responsible for violations of administrative law enforcement;

(E) administrative law enforcement authorities in the acceptance of citizens, legal persons and other organizations administrative law enforcement complaints, the report found and identified violations of administrative law enforcement;

(Vi) administrative law enforcement organs in the performance of duties of supervision and inspection of administrative enforcement activities and qualify the violations of administrative law enforcement;

(G) the monitoring, auditing and other specialized oversight body in administrative supervision, audit, such as special supervision, detection and confirmation should be legally transferred to the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs dealing with violations of administrative enforcement;

    (VIII) other fault should be identified as administrative enforcement of violations of administrative law enforcement.

    Chapter III liability and responsibility distinction

12th administrative liability is divided into direct responsibility, supervisory responsibility.

    Two types of responsibility set out in the preceding paragraph, at the same time with two or more liability cases, should specifically distinguish it from the main responsibility, secondary liability, or equal responsibility.

13th one administrative fault of administrative enforcement of law enforcement agencies, as the authorities directly responsible authorities assume full liability.

Two or more administrative common fault of administrative enforcement of law enforcement agencies, should be determined by the competent authorities shall assume primary responsibility for other authorities bear secondary responsibility. Administrative law enforcement organs for the implementation of higher administrative authority decision, command, an error occurs as a result of administrative law enforcement mistakes, should be making the wrong decisions or orders of superior administrative department bears the liability.

Administrative law-enforcement organs found the mistake decisions and orders of the superior administrative departments, without correction to the superior views, or to perform obviously illegal decisions and orders, it shall bear corresponding responsibility.

Superior administrative authority revoke or alter a subordinate administrative organs of administrative enforcement of law, executive law enforcement fault, fault liability of administrative law enforcement organs at higher levels.

    As the subject of administrative law enforcement organization authorized by applicable by reference to the foregoing provisions of administrative law enforcement organs.

14th distinction between liability and accountability should be based on the hosting of the administrative law enforcement fault people, checker and approver, the nature of the administrative law enforcement fault behavior and in different aspects and the role of law enforcement behavior, full and objective analysis.

    Referred to in the preceding paragraph the undertaker, which refers to the concrete implementation of the administrative act staff reviewer, including heads of executive organs, in charge of the leadership, as well as the exercise of audit authority in accordance with the regulations of other reviewers approve people, including the heads of administrative organs for issuing administrative decisions, as well as approval of the provision, or the other person approved by the authorized person.

15th undertaker has one of the following, as the persons directly responsible party shall bear liability for:

(A) the fault of a person exercising law enforcement the right to executive law enforcement;

(B) examining and approving, implementing administrative actions without authorization, resulting in administrative law enforcement fault;

(C) conceal evidence, concealing the facts or providing false information, leading reviewer and approver decision wrong, resulting in administrative law enforcement fault;

(D) without changing the assessment and approval of content, resulting in administrative law enforcement fault;

    (E) without due cause fails to perform the statutory duties.

16th reviewer has one of the following, as the persons directly responsible party shall bear liability for:

(A) without approval of the undertaker action or unauthorized people, directly implement the administrative enforcement of law, executive law enforcement fault;

    (B) conceals facts, concealing evidence or present false situation, approved by decision wrong, resulting in administrative law enforcement fault;

The 17th approved by any of the following circumstances shall be treated as directly responsible who bears the liability:

(A) without the contractor's action and the reviewer, administrative enforcement decisions made directly, resulting in administrative law enforcement fault;

    (B) does not accept or change the undertaker, reviewer opinions from administrative enforcement at fault.

18th undertaker made his mistakes their comments, reviewer and approver should be found and not found or has not been corrected after it was discovered, resulting in administrative law enforcement mistakes, Undertaker, checker and approver to bear the liability.

    Reviewer does not accept or change the undertaker opinions, approved by the approver, resulting in administrative law enforcement mistakes, the reviewers directly responsible, approved to bear any responsibility.

    19th two, or two or more persons jointly commit acts of administrative enforcement, resulting in administrative law enforcement mistakes, sponsors should bear the primary responsibility, others bear secondary responsibility fails to distinguish between primary and secondary liability, the share direct responsibility.

    20th through collective discussion and decision making behavior of administrative enforcement, should be discussed by the Chair of the Executive Heads of law enforcement agencies bear the primary responsibility, other leaders participating in the discussion and the specific bear secondary responsibility for law enforcement personnel, adhere to the correct personnel opinions had not been adopted is not responsible.

Administrative reconsideration, the 21st decided to maintain the original specific administrative act constitute an administrative fault, shall be borne by the original specific administrative law-enforcement agencies primary responsibility for administrative reconsideration organ bear secondary responsibility or responsibility.

    Administrative decision revoke or alter the original specific administrative act, caused by fault of administrative enforcement, responsibility shall be borne by the administrative reconsideration organ.

    22nd entrusted with the fault of Histogenesis of administrative law enforcement, should be borne by commissioned external responsibilities, specific law enforcement personnel entrusted with the Organization direct responsibility, entrusted with the Organization in charge of supervisory responsibility.

    Fourth chapter of accountability forms and application 23rd fault liability is divided into administrative processing of administrative law enforcement and administrative sanctions.

    Administrative processing and administrative sanctions can be individually or jointly.

24th administrative type as follows:

(A) the commandments conversation;

(B) order the written examination;

(C) shall be ordered to correct or rectify;

(D) notice of criticism;

(E) withholding certificate of administrative law enforcement, post training;

(F) revocation of administrative law enforcement documents;

(VII) transferred from the administrative law enforcement jobs;

(H) national, provincial regulations of other administrative categories.

Types of treatment prescribed in the preceding paragraph, either alone or jointly.

    Types of prescribed in the preceding paragraph are applicable to persons held liability for; the second, third, fourth applies to administrative law enforcement organs for the liability situation.

Administrative enforcement of the fault responsibility investigation established the 25th article, should work with the behavior of administrative enforcement facts, nature, extent, and plot fit.

The fault responsible for the administrative processing of administrative law enforcement, should be based on the nature and consequences of fault such as, do the following:

(A) a minor, little harmful consequences, commandments talk writing, order check and order the correct or rectify;

(B) the circumstances are relatively serious, harmful consequences is relatively large, give notice of criticism or withholding administrative law enforcement documents, post training;

(C) aggravated, resulting in major losses or serious social repercussions, revoked the administrative law enforcement documents, transferred from the administrative law-enforcement posts while administrative sanctions recommendation to the supervisory organs and personnel appointment and removal;

    Administrative handling of fault liability of administrative law enforcement organs, behavior of minor, order a written examination and shall be ordered to correct or rectify; fault behavior if the circumstances are serious, in the written examination, shall be ordered to correct or rectify at the same time, criticized. 26th the types of administrative sanctions, applicable provisions of the regulations on the punishment of civil servants of administrative organs.

Relating to post adjustment applicable to personnel appointment and removal of the relevant provisions.

    Authorized law enforcement and commissioned law enforcement officers of law enforcement organizations do not have civil servant status type of disposition, application and disposal provisions relevant to the organization.

27th fault liability of administrative law enforcement organs and those responsible for one of the following circumstances, shall be given a heavier responsibility:

(A) fails to perform or not to perform, illegal discharge of statutory duties, the plot of;

(B) the administrative law enforcement after the fault occurred, concealed or not taking effective measures, resulting in damage to expand;

(C) the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs ordered to correct or rectify, it refuses;

(D) the issue of perjury to the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs, or conceals, transfers, tampering, destruction of evidence, or refuse to provide evidence of the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs;

(V) appear more than twice within a year (including two) should be administrative enforcement of those acts of administrative enforcement of the same type of fault liability fault;

(Vi) the complainants, informants, investigate retaliation and related personnel;

    (VII) other circumstances that shall be given a heavier responsibility.

28th administrative liability of law enforcement authorities and those responsible for one of the following circumstances shall be given a lighter, reducing accountability:

(A) a minor, less harmful effect and an impact;

(B) active fault, timely reporting and to take measures to avoid loss or irreversible effects;

(C) the administrative relative person deliberately falsified or concealed important evidence of increases in administrative law enforcement fault;

    (D) other circumstances that may be lighter or mitigated over the responsibility.

29th fault liability of administrative law enforcement organs and those responsible for one of the following circumstances, shall not be held responsible:

(A) administrative law enforcement fault occurs due to force majeure;

(B) for legitimate reasons such as defence, emergency administrative fault occurs;

(C) administrative law enforcement fault plot obviously minor, administrative law-enforcement agencies and law enforcement officers found and corrected in a timely manner, caused no harmful consequences;

    (D) other circumstances that can not be prosecuted for administrative enforcement of liability. 30th administrative law enforcement organs according to law after approval of exploratory, experimental law enforcement fault behavior of administrative enforcement in the innovation process, not to pursue the liability of administrative law enforcement.

    However, it should be corrected in a timely manner.

    Chief law enforcement officers of the 31st article of law enforcement fault State compensation, the organ under compensatory obligations in the implementation of the compensation shall be in accordance with the People's Republic of China relevant provisions of the law on State compensation, to the relevant administrative law enforcement liability recover part or all of the damages.

    Fifth chapter responsibility and accountability for organ

32nd fault liability of administrative law enforcement by administrative fault responsibility investigation of law enforcement authorities at all levels.

The people's Governments above the county level shall be responsible for their administrative law enforcement departments and lower level people's Governments and the mistakes of law enforcement responsibility.

People's Government above the county level administrative law enforcement departments of administrative law enforcement organs and its law enforcement personnel, law enforcement organizations and law enforcement personnel commissioned by them and the mistakes of law enforcement responsibilities. Implementation of vertical management of administrative law-enforcement departments below the provincial level administrative organs and their law enforcement officers and subordinate administrative departments and the mistakes of law enforcement responsibility.

Vertical management of administrative law-enforcement organs of local people's Governments above the county level may be brought in to its parent bodies that the fault responsibility investigation of law enforcement's recommendation.

    The people's Governments above the county level shall consider necessary, can handle the lower level people's Governments and belongs to the Department responsible for enforcing the administrative law enforcement fault liability matters.

33rd fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs at all levels of the Office of Legislative Affairs is responsible for the administration of law enforcement fault responsibility determination of concrete work.

    The fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs at all levels, can also be set up by the heads of administrative organs or heads is the head by the rule of law, monitoring, personnel and other administrative law enforcement liability cognizance of the relevant bodies to participate in organizations, in charge of administrative law enforcement responsibility determination of fault.

Article 34th conclusions fault under administrative law enforcement responsibility, should be given administrative processing, fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs according to the management authority implementation should be given administrative sanctions or give position adjustment by the supervisory authority or the personnel appointment and removal according to the management authority to implement.

    A suspected crime, transferred to judicial organs for criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law.

    35th fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs should investigate the liability of administrative enforcement administrative law enforcement organs and administrative law enforcement personnel are not held accountable, superior fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement authority may order the case, or, in accordance with administrative privileges directly to case investigation.

    Article 36th fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs at higher levels think that subordinates the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs responsible for investigate the behavior of administrative enforcement, has a great impact in this area, the system can be investigated directly.

    Sixth chapter accountability procedures

    37th the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs in accordance with the article tenth and 11th under the circumstance of the administrative law enforcement behavior, responsible authorities and those responsible for filing a case, investigation, decision procedures for administrative enforcement of the fault responsibility investigation.

38th the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs of the people's Governments above the county level, legal work of the people's Governments above the county level bodies responsible for filing and special investigations, verifying the relevant facts, evidence.

    The fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs above the county level people's Government administrative departments and approved by the Department Head Office and identify someone to investigate, verify the facts and the evidence. 39th fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs in accordance with the way 11th section of administrative law enforcement behavior, you can turn to other State organs to review the written materials, directly identify administrative liability.

    Found insufficient evidence facts are not clear or written material, using survey methods should be reviewed. 40th administrative fault responsibility investigation of law enforcement agencies in the investigation, the investigation shall be at least two people, and produce to the investigating authorities of administrative law enforcement supervision and inspection documents.

Investigators in the performance of their duties may take the following measures:

(A) access to relevant materials, and access to administrative records and accounts, bills, vouchers and, if necessary, copy;

(B) asks the heads of law enforcement agencies, executive officers, administrative people, witnesses, and interrogation;

(C) administrative law enforcement organs on administrative law enforcement and administrative law enforcement officers an explanation and description of the problems involved;

(D) photography, audio, video, samples, such as collecting evidence;

(E) the commissioned body identification, assessment and testing;

(F) withhold or collect in accordance with the relevant provisions of administrative law enforcement documents;

(G) order the administrative law enforcement organs and administrative law enforcement personnel to stop illegal or improper administrative action.

Related administrative law enforcement organs and administrative law enforcement personnel shall cooperate on investigations, and may not refuse to give evidence, present false testimony or conceals, transfers, tampering and destruction of evidence.

Investigation shall make a written record.

    Investigators and investigations or administrative law enforcement organs and their law enforcement officer under investigation has an interest, should be avoided.

41st administrative review for law enforcement mistakes, should be reviewed in the 30th since the day of filing the end responsibility and made conclusions.

    Complex, the people's Government above the county level for the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs, approved by the head of the legal work of the Government; people's Government above the county level administrative law enforcement departments for administrative enforcement of the fault responsibility investigation organs, approved by the heads of departments, may extend the review period but extended time limit shall not exceed 20th. 42nd fault liability of administrative law enforcement organs and persons who have the right to make statements and to defend themselves.

Fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs should fully heed the duty and responsibility of the opinion, on its facts, proof, justification, should be reviewed; the facts, the evidence, justification, and should be adopted.

    Fault responsibility investigation organ shall not be the responsibility of administrative law enforcement organs, liability statement and defence of personnel and increased accountability.

Article 43rd investigation ended, the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs, depending on the circumstances, make the following responsibilities:

(A) should be the responsibility of the Chief acts of law enforcement fault shall be determined according to the seriousness of these measures and the third chapter, the relevant provisions of the fourth chapter, with clearly defined responsibilities and should respectively take specific administrative responsibility;

(B) the administrative law enforcement fault the truth cannot be established, fault or administrative enforcement action has met one of the circumstances prescribed in the article 29th of this approach should be determined not to pursue the administrative responsibility;

(C) the suspected crime for law enforcement mistakes, transferred to judicial organs for handling.

    Complex or serious administrative fault behavior might bear a heavier administrative responsibilities, the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs should be brainstorming, head of liability. 44th the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs in accordance with the measures responsibility of conclusions on the 43rd of the rules, making of the administrative enforcement of certificate of liability.

Of the administrative law enforcement certificate of liability shall include the following:

(A) the origin and basic facts of the case;

(B) the nature, circumstances and facts of the case, harm;

(C) the reasons for deciding whether or not to take administrative enforcement of liability;

(D) the recommendation of the personnel Division of responsibilities and accountability;

(E) the correct administrative law enforcement mistakes, elimination of harmful consequences of proposals.

By review of the certificate of liability of administrative law enforcement personnel, the review officer signature, the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs primarily responsible or competent principal approved and stamped with the seal of the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs.

    The fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs, should be made in administrative law enforcement liability recognized in the 7th, the Chief law enforcement Executive of the certificate of liability for fault responsibility investigation organ, and sent to the relevant responsible authorities or responsible person. 45th according to administrative law enforcement liability findings should be given administrative processing, administrative enforcement of the fault responsibility investigation organ shall make a decision of administrative handling of the book.

The administrative written decision shall set out the following matters:

(A) the person's name, company, job title;

(B) the facts and evidence in administrative enforcement of liability;

(C) administrative processing type and the basis;

(D) refuses to accept a decision of administrative handling of relief and time limits;

(E) an administrative organ and the date of the decision.

The administrative written decision should be stamped with the seal of the administrative authorities.

Make a decision of administrative handling of the authorities and the administrative law enforcement mistakes are made when the responsibility is the same with the institution, administrative decisions and administrative law enforcement liability determination can be made.

The administrative process of decision making, should be delivered within 5th responsible authorities or responsible person. Recommendations given administrative sanctions or give those responsible for post adjustment, as well as other administrative responsibility, after the making of the administrative decision shall be declared or notified in a timely manner.

    When necessary, it can also sanction decisions or position adjustment after the decision was made in a joint declaration or notification. 46th under administrative law enforcement liability findings should be given administrative sanctions or give position adjustment, the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs should be made of the sanction proposals.

The sanction proposal should contain the following items:

(A) the person's name, company, job title;

(B) the facts and evidence in administrative enforcement of liability;

(C) administrative sanctions or give position adjustment recommendations;

(D) the authority to make recommendations and dates.

    The sanction proposal should cover the sanction recommendations made by the seal of the authority.

    47th fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs should be made in administrative law enforcement liability recognized in the 7th, the sanction proposal, together with the certificate of administrative liability and the copies of materials, together with the jurisdiction of the supervisory organ or the personnel appointment and removal.

    48th supervisory organs, personnel appointment and removal under the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs on the administrative sanction proposals for investigation and the results copied to the administrative enforcement of the fault responsibility investigation authorities.

49th article administrative law enforcement fault responsibility people refuses to administrative law enforcement fault responsibility finds, or refuses to administrative processing decided of, can since know responsibility finds results or processing decided of day up 15th within to original processing organ application review, review decided should in 15th within made; on review results refuses to of, can since received review decided of day up 15th within to original processing organ of Shang a level organ proposed complaints; also can not by review, since know responsibility finds results or processing decided of day up 30th within directly proposed complaints.

Fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs at a higher level that next level administrative decisions of the fault responsibility investigation of law enforcement organs is not appropriate, you can instruct the administrative law enforcement under the fault responsibility investigation authority to alter or revoke, if necessary, can also be directly made for amendment or cancellation of the decision. During the review and appeals, and do not stop execution of the decision.

Accepting applications for review and it deems it necessary to suspend, execution stops.

    Not satisfied with the decision of the administrative law enforcement liability of administrative sanctions, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the regulation on the punishment of civil servants of the Executive to apply for a review or appeal.

    Seventh chapter implementation and monitoring

    50th fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs should be made on the certificate of administrative liability and the administrative decision and the administrative sanctions for inspecting and supervising the implementation of the proposals. 51st article administrative law enforcement fault once finds, about administrative law enforcement organ and law enforcement personnel should will rectification situation informed administrative law enforcement fault responsibility held organ; not itself corrected of, by this level government legal work institutions or superior administrative law enforcement sector legal work institutions notification its deadline corrected; late not corrected of, by this level Government or superior administrative law enforcement sector approved Hou made revoked, and change administrative law enforcement behavior or ordered again made specific administrative behavior of decided, give informed criticism,

    And persons directly in charge of administrative sanctions.

    52nd higher administrative authorities should be to subordinate administrative organs to implement the fault responsibility investigation system of administrative law enforcement supervision and inspection of the situation, to identify and correct problems in a timely manner, to ensure implementation of the fault responsibility investigation system of administrative law enforcement.

53rd fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs in accordance with the measures article 11th case identified fault liability, shall report the situation to relevant State organs or notification.

    According to the complaint, report, news media and other clues found administrative law enforcement fault, the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement administrative law enforcement organs should be the liability cognizance and handle the result of feedback from complainants, informants or news media.

    54th and belongs to the people's Governments above the county level between the various administrative departments above county level people's Governments and judicial organs at the same level should be established between the fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement notification mechanism.

55th fault responsibility investigation of administrative law enforcement organs and personnel appointment and removal and control branches of the fault responsibility investigation in administrative law enforcement work in any of the following circumstances, criticized and rectification are serious, charge and other personnel directly responsible shall be given administrative sanctions; a suspected crime, transferred to judicial organs for handling:

(A) with the intent to hide the mistakes of law enforcement actions, or find fault behavior without filing administrative law enforcement accountability;

(B) liability for deliberately aggravating or mitigation of responsibility;

    (C) shall be transferred to judicial organs for criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law and not transferred.

    The eighth chapter supplementary articles

    56th in each zone, management area and other government agencies under the jurisdiction of regional administrative law enforcement fault responsibility investigation in accordance with these rules.

    57th County (municipal and district) administrative law enforcement departments of the Government, municipal government, may make administrative enforcement of the fault responsibility investigation in accordance with the measures implemented. 58th article this way come into force on March 1, 2014.