Advanced Search

Tianjin Administrative Enforcement Of Interim Measures For The Supervision And Management

Original Language Title: 天津市行政执法监督平台管理暂行办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Chapter I General

Article 1 provides for the regulation of the use and management of administrative law enforcement monitoring platforms, the strengthening of administrative law enforcement activities, in accordance with laws, regulations, regulations, regulations, regulations, regulations, regulations, regulations and regulations, such as the People's Congress of the People's Representatives at the local level of the People's Republic of China, the Public Regulations of the Government of the People's Republic of China on Information of the People's Republic of China (Act No. 492), the Administrative Enforcement Monitoring of the city of Zhenmin (No. 9 of 2014).

Article 2

Article 3. This approach refers to the administrative law enforcement oversight platform, which refers to the network platform system for administrative law enforcement oversight, through information-based means by the municipalities and district governments.

Article IV sets, use and management of information from the administrative enforcement monitoring platform should be guided by the principles of impartiality, openness, comprehensiveness, timeliness and accuracy.

Article 5 The territorial Government has led the management of the administrative enforcement oversight platform in the district.

Article 6. The municipal rule of law institutions are responsible for the specific management of the municipal administrative law enforcement oversight platform, which provides guidance and oversight for the management of the district administrative enforcement oversight platform, and conducts administrative law enforcement oversight in accordance with the law.

The District Government's Rule of Law Agency is responsible for the organization of the specific management of the administrative law enforcement monitoring platform in this district, with district monitoring authorities using the administrative law enforcement oversight platform.

The rule of law institutions at the municipal level are using the administrative law enforcement oversight platform to carry out administrative law enforcement oversight in this sector, the system.

Article 7. The administration of municipal administrations should ensure the proper functioning of the administrative law enforcement oversight platform and the maintenance of the municipal administration enforcement oversight platform; work with the municipal authorities in charge of the development of software and hardware, systems upgrading, etc.; and guide the operation and maintenance of the district administrative enforcement oversight platform for specific sectors identified by the people of the district.

Article 8. The financial, industrial and informationization, auditing and other sectors are closely safeguarded by the administrative law enforcement oversight platform according to the division of duties.

Article 9. Administrative law enforcement agencies at all levels should record and be integrated into the administrative law enforcement oversight platform.

Article 10 provides for the management of information systems by administrative law enforcement officials and the use of administrative law enforcement monitoring platforms to carry out administrative law enforcement documentation management, training examinations, supervision of the examination.

Chapter II

Article 11

(i) The subject of administrative law enforcement;

(ii) Administrative law enforcement basis;

(iii) Administrative law enforcement matters;

(iv) Administrative law enforcement processes and standards;

(v) Administrative inspection plans and standards;

(vi) Basic information by administrative law enforcement officials;

(vii) The administrative law enforcement oversight platform should be pooled with other basic information.

Article 12

The integration and modification of basic information is subject to approval by the same level of government rule of law institutions. Administrative law enforcement authorities at all levels should make requests for change within 15 days of change in basic information.

Article 13 Administrative law enforcement information pooled by the administrative law enforcement monitoring platform should include information generated by executive law enforcement agencies at all levels and their law enforcement officials in the implementation of administrative law enforcement.

Article 14.

Administrative law enforcement information that has been categorized to the administrative enforcement oversight platform shall not be subject to change. Changes should be made in writing by the subordinate executive law enforcement agencies to the same level of government rule of law bodies, subject to the agreement of the same Government's rule of law institutions.

Article 15. Administrative law enforcement agencies at all levels should, in real time, incorporate administrative inspection-related information into the administrative law enforcement oversight platform, which should be pooled within three working days after completion of administrative inspections.

Article 16 should, in practice, incorporate information generated in the course of implementation of administrative law enforcement acts into the administrative law enforcement oversight platform;

Article 17 Administrative law enforcement monitoring platforms are pooled by citizens, legal persons and other organizations to information on administrative law enforcement complaints against violations of their legitimate rights and interests in administrative law enforcement.

Article 18 The various sources of information should be classified in accordance with normative requirements, to ensure the quality of the data collected and to be responsible for the legitimacy, accuracy and authenticity of the data classified.

Chapter III Information use

The rule of law institutions at all levels of the people's Government and its sector can incorporate administrative law enforcement monitoring platforms into the basic information, administrative law enforcement information and administrative law enforcement complaints information as a direct basis for the conduct of administrative law enforcement oversight.

The following information should be made available to society through the administrative law enforcement oversight platform:

(i) The subject of administrative law enforcement;

(ii) Administrative law enforcement basis;

(iii) Administrative law enforcement matters;

(iv) Administrative law enforcement processes and standards;

(v) The qualifications of administrative law enforcement personnel;

(vi) Other public information should be made available to society in accordance with the law.

The municipal and district government rule of law institutions can make public administrative law enforcement oversight information available through administrative law enforcement oversight platforms.

Article 21

Information on the use of administrative law enforcement monitoring platforms is implemented in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) The municipal rule-of-law institutions can use information gathered by the entire municipal administrative enforcement oversight platform;

(ii) The district government rule of law institutions can use information gathered by the administrative law enforcement monitoring platform in the district;

(iii) Administrative law enforcement agencies at all levels can use the system-wide information on the integration of administrative enforcement oversight platforms and may use other information in accordance with the competencies established by municipal and district government rule of law institutions.

Information on other administrative law enforcement monitoring platforms needs to be used beyond the authority and should be reviewed by the municipal and district government rule of law institutions.

Article 23 establishes an administrative law enforcement statistical analysis system. The municipal rule of law institutions should report regularly to the Government of the city statistical analysis of information on the municipal administration enforcement monitoring platform.

Regional government rule of law institutions should report statistical analysis of information on the administrative law enforcement platforms in the districts on a regular basis to the people of the region and to the municipal authorities.

Article 24

Chapter IV

Article 25

Article 26 Administrative law enforcement oversight platforms establish a level-level early warning point based on basic information and establish a time frame for early warning.

Article 27 of the administrative law enforcement monitoring platform is not in compliance with the requirements, and the administrative law enforcement oversight platform launchs an early warning and is monitored by the rule of law institutions that conduct administrative law enforcement.

At the level of early warning is not dealt with at the specified time frame, the administrative enforcement oversight platform initiated a secondary early warning, which is monitored by municipal or district government rule of law institutions.

The district government rule of law institutions do not deal with a secondary early warning by a prescribed time frame, and the administrative law enforcement monitoring platform launched a three-tier early warning, which is monitored by the municipal authorities' rule of law institutions.

Article 28, the rule of law institutions at all levels of administrative law enforcement shall use the administrative law enforcement oversight platform to monitor and review the rule of law by providing a warrant for the suspension of the production, suspension of licences and licences, fines that may be required by law or confiscation of administrative penalties equivalent to that amount or other major, complex administrative enforcement decisions. The municipal and district government rule of law institutions should conduct monitoring of the review of significant cases by executive law enforcement agencies at all levels through administrative law enforcement oversight platforms.

In accordance with the focus of administrative law enforcement oversight, the municipal rule of law institutions have developed a sample monitoring workplan for the entire municipal administration enforcement oversight platform, through a review of information such as administrative law enforcement files and administrative inspections through the administrative law enforcement oversight platform.

The district government rule of law bodies monitor the workplan based on a sample of administrative law enforcement oversight platforms across the city, in the light of the practical work of the districts, draw on information such as administrative law enforcement and administrative inspections through administrative law enforcement oversight platforms, deal with administrative law issues identified, and send a sample of monitoring findings to municipal rule of law institutions in a timely manner.

Article 31 provides regular oversight of the implementation of the administrative law enforcement system by all levels of administration. The issues identified are dealt with by law by law by drawing on administrative law enforcement training by law enforcement officials, the examination of law enforcement documents, the processing of law enforcement cases.

Article 31 states that the rule of law institutions of the municipalities and district governments should use the administrative law enforcement monitoring platform to organize a wide range of public participation events such as the open day of the administrative law enforcement oversight platform, which can be reported by the public through a network of representatives of the public participating in the activities of the administrative enforcement oversight platform. Public representatives draw administrative law enforcement files from the administrative law enforcement monitoring platform, and the municipal and district government rule of law institutions conduct oversight reviews of the extracted administrative law enforcement files, and the results of the review will be made public to society through the administrative law enforcement monitoring platform.

Article 32 provides information on administrative law enforcement complaints compiled by the administrative law enforcement monitoring platform, which is dealt with by the municipal or district government rule of law bodies in accordance with the provisions of the administrative enforcement supervision of the city of Nusaz and the Administrative Law Enforcement Complaints (No. 3 of the 1998 Municipal People's Government Order) and will be incorporated into the administrative law enforcement oversight platform.

Article XIII establishes a reference function for administrative law enforcement to administrative law enforcement information.

The executive law enforcement agencies at all levels have automatically generated administrative law enforcement information requests after completing the information on administrative law enforcement decisions.

Administrative law enforcement authorities at all levels should communicate administrative law enforcement information at a level where the administrative law enforcement information is available to the relative custodian of the administrative law enforcement, with the exception of administrative law enforcement information that is confidential by law.

Accountability

In violation of this approach, the executive law enforcement authorities have one of the following cases, criticized by the current people's Government, accountability by the duty-free body for the principal and direct responsibilities, in violation of administrative discipline, by the inspector in accordance with the relevant provisions, and transferred to the judiciary for alleged crimes:

(i) No information on the administrative law enforcement oversight platform is requested as required;

(ii) The wrongness, omission and negative impact of the information of the administrative law enforcement monitoring platform;

(iii) Harmonization of information on the administrative enforcement oversight platform;

(iv) Disclosure or disclosure of information on administrative law enforcement oversight platforms in violation of the provisions;

(v) The management or use of administrative law enforcement monitoring platforms that are not completed or feedback from the Government of the High-level People;

(vi) Commercial activities using information from administrative law enforcement monitoring platforms;

(vii) Violations of administrative law enforcement monitoring information generated by the provision of public non-resident units to be administered, statistical analysis;

(viii) Other acts that are not required to collect or use information from the administrative enforcement monitoring platform.

Article XV. Administrative law enforcement agencies and their administrative law enforcement officials violate or inappropriately implement administrative law enforcement, which is governed by the provisions of the Exemptive Authority, the inspectorate and the Government's rule of law, in accordance with the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Monitoring Act, the Zenin City Administrative Accountability (No. 8 of the 2005 People's Government Order) and the Act on the Law of Exclusive Enforcement (No. 73 of the People's Government Order No. 73 of 1997).

Annex VI

Article 36 of this approach refers to administrative law enforcement bodies, which are governed by the law, as well as to organizations authorized or entrusted with the exercise of administrative law enforcement functions.

Article 37 of this approach is implemented effective 1 June 2015.