Advanced Search

Wuxi Major Administrative Decision-Making Procedures

Original Language Title: 无锡市重大行政决策程序规定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Article 1, in order to regulate major administrative decision-making practices, improve the quality and efficiency of decision-making and, in accordance with the administrative procedures of the province of Giangus, develop this provision in the light of the actual practice of the city.

Article 2

Decision-making processes such as draft local legislation, government regulations, the development of normative documents and responses to emergencies are implemented in accordance with the provisions of the relevant legislation.

Article III refers to the decisions taken by the Government, in accordance with its statutory mandate, to the extent to which the economic and social development of the current administrative region is concerned, as well as the interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations are closely related:

(i) Preparation of national economic and social development planning, important regional planning and earmarked planning and financial budgets;

(ii) Major measures for institutional reform;

(iii) Develop major measures in the areas of public services, market regulation, social management and environmental protection;

(iv) Identify and adjust important administrative fees and important commodities, services prices for government pricing;

(v) Decide on major investment projects and the disposal of major State assets;

(vi) Other important matters requiring government decision-making.

Article IV Governments should establish major administrative decision-making mechanisms that combine public participation, expert perceptions, risk assessment, legitimacy review and collective discussion decisions and implement legal decision-making, scientific decision-making and democratic decision-making.

Article 5 Governments should strengthen the normativeization of major administrative decision-making, improve the rules of the major administrative decision-making process, make public and significant administrative decision-making information in accordance with the law, and incorporate the implementation of the rules of the major administrative decision-making process into the annual performance appraisal and the legal administrative appraisal system.

The Office of the Government of Article 6 is responsible for the organization, coordination, guidance and oversight of major administrative decisions.

The offices of decision-making matters, the Government's rule of law, development reform, finance, administrative inspections, etc., are working in accordance with their respective responsibilities on important administrative decisions.

Article 7. The Office of the Government shall form a directory of major administrative decision-making matters, with the development reform, finance, administrative inspection, and the Government's rule of law, in accordance with the specificities and quantification criteria set out in Article 3 of this Article, to be published after approval by the same Government.

The directory of major administrative decision-making matters should be adjusted accordingly in accordance with the preceding paragraph, in accordance with economic and social development.

Article 8 Governments need to make decisions on matters within the directory of major administrative decision-making matters, and should initiate decision-making processes in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) Significant administrative decision-making matters raised by the executive head of the Government may be directly referred to the institution of the decision-making process;

(ii) Recommendations on major administrative decision-making matters raised by the Head of Government, which are invited to commence with the approval of the Government's executive head;

(iii) Recommendations on major administrative decision-making matters by the Government's work sector, as well as by the lower-level Government, to be initiated with the approval of the Head of the Government and the approval of the executive head of the Government;

(iv) Recommendations on major administrative decision-making matters, including through recommendations, proposals, etc., were adopted by a large representative of the Human Rights Council, which were considered necessary for significant administrative decision-making, initiated by the Head of Government, with the approval of the executive head of the Government;

(v) Significant matters generally reflecting the need for government decision-making by citizens, legal persons or other organizations, which are to be initiated by the Office of the Government with the relevant departments, with the approval of the Head of Government and the approval of the Government's executive head.

Article 9. The offices of decision-making matters shall prepare draft major administrative decision-making programmes in accordance with the time and requirements specified.

The draft major administrative decision-making programme should contain elements such as decision-making goals, methods of measures, time steps, decision-making organs, funding budgets.

Article 10 shall, in addition to matters that are not public under the law, carry out the decision-making process.

A draft major administrative decision-making programme was made available to society for public advice.

The draft decision-making programme would need to be heard further, and the UNOPS could be carried out through a colloquium, questionnaire surveys.

The time period for public consultation shall not be less than 20 days.

Article 11. Major administrative decision-making matters are one of the following cases:

(i) The public interest of society;

(ii) The public of society has significant differences in the draft major administrative decision-making programmes;

(iii) Legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions should be held.

The decision-making office should publish the hearings and select the participants for the hearings, including through voluntary presentations, targeted selection options, to ensure that the participants are represented.

Significant administrative decision-making hearings should be held in public unless the law is not public.

Article 12. The professional and technical nature of major administrative decision-making matters, and the sub-office of decision-making matters should organize expert opinions and form expert testimony reports.

The expert argument may be carried out by expert accreditation meetings, expert personal opinions or other appropriate means.

Article 13 The POE shall conduct a risk assessment of major administrative decision-making matters, in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) Risk assessment of social stability in relation to possible societal contradictions, group incidents or other destabilizing factors;

(ii) Environmental risk assessment of potential environmental impacts;

(iii) Economic risk assessment of the level of inputs, affordability and cost-effectiveness of financial funds;

(iv) Assessment of other potential risks.

Article 14.

Article 15. The institution of decision-making matters shall classify, collate, decide on the adoption and modify the draft major administrative decision-making programme; and, if not adopted, justify the reasons, in appropriate ways.

Article 16 makes a significant change in the draft major administrative decision-making programme, and the offices of the decision-making matters should be heard again on the basis of the need for amendments.

The draft major administrative decision-making programme differs widely, and the offices of decision-making matters should be coordinated; there should be no agreement on the coordination of information and the processing of views reported to the Government.

Article 18 The POE shall form a draft major administrative decision-making programme to be submitted to the Government to discuss decisions, in accordance with the collective discussions at this office.

Major administrative decision-making matters require more programme comparative studies, and the decision-making branch should develop more than two options and propose pro-active views and reasons.

Article 19

(i) To draw the Government's invitation to discuss decisions;

(ii) Draft major administrative decision-making programmes and drafting notes;

(iii) The basis for the development of a draft major administrative decision-making programme;

(iv) Reports of hearings, expert argument reports, risk assessment reports and legitimacy, integrity and evidence;

(v) To seek comments and relevant recommendations and their clarifications;

(vi) Other submissions.

The delivery of the material is incomplete and the Government's Office should request that the office of the decision-making matters be completed.

Article 20 of the Government's Office should transfer the relevant material to the review of legality by the same-level government rule of law bodies, in accordance with the relevant elements of the draft major administrative decision-making programme, and, where necessary, should also be transferred to the development reform, finance, development, administrative inspection.

Article 21, the Government's rule of law body should provide a review of legality on:

(i) Whether there is a violation of laws, regulations, regulations and international conventions to which my country is a party;

(ii) Would go beyond the statutory competence of the policymaking organs;

(iii) Whether significant administrative decision-making procedures are violated;

(iv) Have coordination with other relevant policies and regulations;

(v) Whether effective guarantees are given to the interests of the rights that may be impaired by major administrative decisions;

(vi) The Government's rule of law body considers other matters to be examined.

Sections such as development reform, finance, development and administrative inspection should provide summary opinions in accordance with their respective responsibilities, or be subject to a central review by the Office of the Government with the sectors of development reform, finance, development, administrative inspection.

Article 23 Review of legality and conduct of the proceedings should be completed within 15 working days; the complexity of the situation could extend the duration of the review and extend the period not exceeding 10 working days.

Article 24 Review of legality or the draft executive decision-making programme, which is clear to the opinion of the Commission, require further research, with the consent of the Government holder, the Office of the Government shall return to the additional arguments from the UNOPS.

The draft major administrative decision-making programme, which was reviewed by the Head of Government, was decided by the executive head of the Government to submit to the Standing Committee of the Government or to discuss it in plenary meetings; the executive heads of the Government may decide directly to submit to the Standing Committee of the Government or to discuss the plenary.

Article 26, on the basis of collective discussions, is based on the decision taken by the executive head of the Government to agree, agree, modify, defer or revisit.

The discussions and decisions of the draft major administrative decision-making programmes should be recorded in the Standing Committee of Government or in plenary meetings.

Major administrative decision-making matters need to be submitted for approval by the same party, the executive branch at the senior level, or to the same-level people's representative General Assembly and its Standing Committee deliberations, and the Government shall be governed by the provisions.

After significant administrative decision-making, the Office of the Government shall be made available to society within 20 days of the date of the decision, through the media, such as the Government's portal, unless the law is not public.

Article 28 should be implemented in a comprehensive, timely and accurate manner by policymaking organs.

Major administrative decision-making is motivated by force majeure or objective changes, leading to the full or partial failure of decision-making goals, and the decision-making organs should take immediate remedial measures and report to decision-making organs.

Article 29 requires significant adjustments in major administrative decision-making, which shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure set out in this article.

Major administrative decision-making may result in significant losses, either when the executive head of the Government or the head of the government entrusted by the executive head of the Government may make a real-time adjustment and make a statement to the Standing Committee or to the plenary.

Article 33 Governments and the relevant sectors should conduct inspections of the implementation of major administrative decisions through the follow-up of investigations, the hearings of public opinion, the conduct of inspections.

The representatives, parliamentarians, the media and the relevant civil, legal or other organizations may monitor the implementation of major administrative decisions and make recommendations to Governments, decision-making bodies or decision-making organs.

Article 31 shall assess the implementation of major administrative decisions and form an assessment report.

Upon assessment, major administrative decisions should cease implementation, suspension or make significant adjustments, and decision-making organs should report to the Government immediately and take effective measures to avoid or reduce the potential losses and adverse impacts.

In violation of this provision, one of the following cases in the major administrative decision-making process led to a failure of decision-making and the grave consequences, which are governed by the law by its own units or by the superior authorities to the competent and other direct responsible personnel directly responsible; and criminal responsibility is held in accordance with the law:

(i) No significant administrative decision-making process, as prescribed;

(ii) Provision of false material;

(iii) The draft major administrative decision-making programme is in violation of the law;

(iv) Timely decision-making should be taken in accordance with the law, but long overdue;

(v) Other circumstances that lead to a failure of major administrative decisions and serious consequences.

Implementation and supervision of major administrative decisions such as the Government's work sector, the Government of the town and the street offices are carried out in the light of the provisions.

Article 34 of the present article provides for implementation effective 1 January 2016.