Advanced Search

Ministry Of Science And Technology, On The Amendment Of The Decision Of The Implementing Rules Of Regulation On National Awards For Science And Technology

Original Language Title: 科学技术部关于修改《国家科学技术奖励条例实施细则》的决定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Ministry of science and technology, on the amendment of the decision of the implementing rules of regulation on national awards for science and technology

    (December 23, 2008 to 13th release since February 1, 2009, the Department of science and technology) national science and technology awards for the further work, guarantee the quality of State scientific and technological Awards judging, Ministry of science and technology announced on December 24, 1999, December 27, 2004 amendment to the implementing rules of regulation on national awards for science and technology (Ministry of science and technology, 9th) as follows: In chapter one, the sixth "objection handling" provisions of section as a separate chapter, as the fifth chapter, the sequence number of other chapters will be rescheduled. The fourth chapter, "" amended to read "recommended and accepted." The seventh chapter "award" is amended as "approve and award".

    The sixth chapter "supervision and objection handling" adjusted to the eighth chapter, and modified to "supervision and punishment." II, and third article modified for: "national science and technology award work in-depth implement implementation science development views and ' respect labor, and respect knowledge, and talent, and respect created ' of approach, encourages solidarity collaboration, and joint research, encourages independent innovation, encourages climbing science and technology peak, promote scientific research, and technology development and economic, and social development close combined, promote technology results to reality productivity into, promote national innovation system construction, create encourages innovation of environment, efforts created and training world first-class scientists, and Leading talent and innovative talents of science and technology, accelerated through science and education and the talent and the implementation of sustainable development strategies, promoting the construction of innovation-oriented country.

    ” Three, fourth is amended as: "the referral, assessment and award of the State Science and technology awards, follow the principle of openness, fairness, impartiality, scientific assessment mechanism, is not subject to any organization or individual of illegal interference.

    ”

    Section IV, 13th, 20th and 31st of the second item in the "over one year" changed to "three years". Five, 26th is amended as: "the first paragraph of section 11th (iv) called the ' major projects ', refers to the major comprehensive infrastructure engineering, science and technology, engineering, defence engineering and technological innovation projects.

    ” Six, 30th is amended as: "the first prize of national science and technology progress award individual awards, no more than 15 people, award No more than 10; second prize individual award No more than 10 people, award No more than 7; single award Grand Prize, no more than 50 people, award No more than 30.

    ” Seven, the 44th article is revised as follows: "national science and Technology Award Committee member is unable to attend the meeting, which may affect the review when the normal, by the review group members or experts designated by the Ministry of science and technology review qualifications instead and enjoyed the same rights as other members. Candidates nominated by the jury Secretary-General and approved by the Chairman of the Review Committee.

    ”

    50th article eight, delete. Nine, 53rd is revised as follows: "where there is intellectual property rights, as well as complete units, complete personnel disputes and is in litigation, arbitration or administrative decisions, administrative review procedures, in front of the dispute may not be recommended for national science and technology award.

    ”

    Ten, delete in 54th "and is directly related to the physical and social security, the public interest". Plenary, 56th is amended as: "assessed did not award the State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress Prize candidates, candidates, if once again recommended related technical content for the project shall be carried out once a year.

    ” 12, 59th is revised as follows: "consistent with rewards for 15th and recommended and references in these rules shall be recommended to the award Office within the time stated in books and related materials. Office responsible for form references the award review. Recommended by the review did not meet the required material, referees or inadmissible and returned to the recommended units.

    ” 13, an article shall be added as article 61st: "candidates, the candidates and their projects are found to exist shall not recommend the circumstances as prescribed in these rules, are not submitted for review.

    ” 14, an article shall be added as article 62nd: "candidates, candidates and reward announcement after accepting the Office requested the review of the project, by the recommended units (applicant) submitted in writing to the Awards Office. Upon approval of an exit review, further related technical content recommendations to national science and technology award, shall be carried out every other year.

    ” Section XV, adjust the 73rd to the 63rd, and modify the second paragraph as follows: "any units or individuals to the State Science and technology award, the candidate and the project's innovative, advanced, practical and recommended disputed the authenticity of the material shall be accepted projects published within 60 days from the date of award are submitted to the Office, if inadmissible.

    ”

    Article 16, delete the 74th. Section 17, adjust the 77th to the 66th, and modified to "incentives Office upon receipt of objection material should be reviewed, objections to compliance and can provide sufficient evidence, is admissible.

    ” 18, adjust the 78th to 68, and amended as: "involving candidates, candidates complete the project innovative, advanced, practical and references the authenticity of the objection by the Awards Office is responsible for coordinating, recommended by the relevant units or reference assistance. Featured employer or recommendations after receiving the objections notified, you should verify the objection within the specified time material and investigation, verification of the submitted to the Awards Office.

    If necessary, the award Office can organize members and experts to investigate and put forward opinions. Involving candidates, the candidate and the sort of dissent by recommending or referee is responsible for coordinating, put forward initial comments submitted to the Awards Office.

    Objection handling involving cross-sectoral, coordinated by the Awards Office, recommendation or reference assistance, their handlers refer to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

    Recommended units or referees after receiving the objection material, in a dissent notice is not made within the stipulated time investigated, verified reports and coordination of opinions, the projects are not submitted for review. Objections related to national defence, national security project, handled by the departments concerned, and incentive offices the processing result.

    ” 19, an article shall be added as the 73rd article: "the initial evaluation can take the quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods. Awards Office is responsible for the development of quantitative evaluation indexes system of the State Science and technology awards.

    ” 20, an article shall be added as article 76th: "if necessary, the award Office organizes the State Science and technology awards-related reviews Organization member of the selection of candidates, the candidates and their project site visits.

    ”

    21, adjust the 62nd to 77th and "evaluation results" is amended as "results". Under article 22, the 66th is adjusted to the 79th, and first amendment in the first paragraph as follows: "(a) the evaluation carried out in or Conference for networking accreditation review, secret limits voting to produce evaluation results.

    ” 23, an article shall be added as article 81st: "the Office should be published on the website and other media through preliminary evaluation and review of national natural science award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress Prize candidates, the candidate and the project. Confidential items related to national defence, national security, and announced in the proper range.

    ” 24, an article shall be added as the 86th said: "national natural science award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress award annually awards the project no more than 400. Among them, each award Grand Prize project no more than 3 items, first prize rewarding the total number does not exceed the award of the project 15%.

    ” Section 25, adjust the 71st to 91st, and be amended as: "Science and technology reward regular supervision and inspection Oversight Committee for review, review activities in violation of rewards for units and individuals and the relevant provisions of these rules, it can be suggested that appropriate treatment.

    ” 26, an article shall be added as article 92nd: "through plagiarism and made other scientific and technological achievements, deception, or other unfair means to make a State Science and technology awards to the units and individuals, has not yet been awarded, by the Awards Office to cancel its eligible that year; has been awarded, by the State Science and Technology Award Committee, approved by the Ministry of science and technology to the State Council after the reward to recover bonuses and inform the public. In serious cases, cancel it within a certain period or life is recommended eligible for State Science and technology awards. Also, it is recommended that their unit or Department appropriate disciplinary action.

    ” 27, and increased a article as 93rd article: "recommended units and recommended people provides false data, and material, assist was recommended units and personal cheat national science and technology award of, by science and Technology Department be informed criticism; plot serious of, suspended or canceled its recommended qualification; on has directly responsibility of competent personnel and other directly responsibility personnel, recommends its where units or competent sector give corresponding of disposition.

    ” 28, an article shall be added as article 94th: "experts involved in national science and technology award in accreditation activities in violation of review codes of conduct and related provisions, the correction is given by Ministry of science and technology, respectively, recorded negative reputation, warning, criticism, engaged or disqualified lifting treatment and can recommend their unit or Department appropriate disciplinary action.

    ” 29, an article shall be added as article 95th: "participation in the national science and technology award in review evaluate the Organization's activities in the fraud, or engages in, by the Ministry of science and technology or the competent authorities shall be subject to appropriate disciplinary action.

    ” 30, an article shall be added as article 96th: "advocacy of national science and technology awards should be objective, accurate, and shall not be exaggerated, the vague claims of misleading the public.

    Application of awarded achievements must not harm the interests of the State, social security and the people's health. Violation of the provisions of the preceding paragraph, have serious consequences, shall be subject to appropriate treatment.

    ”

    In addition, the provision made corresponding adjustments in the order, a modification of the individual words.

    This decision shall take effect on February 1, 2009.

    Implementing rules of the regulation on national awards for science and technology make corresponding changes in accordance with this decision, republished.

   Attachment: regulation on national awards for science and technology rules (as amended in 2008)

    (Published on December 24, 1999, Ministry of science and technology the 1th, December 27, 2004, Ministry of science and technology, the 9th on amendments to the regulation on national awards for science and technology of the detailed rules for the implementation of the decision of the first amendment, on December 23, 2008, Ministry of science and technology made the 13th on amendments to the regulation on national awards for science and technology of the second revision of the detailed rules for the implementation of decisions)

    Chapter I General provisions

    Working first in order to make the national awards for science and technology, guarantee the quality of State scientific and technological Awards judging, in accordance with the regulation on national awards for science and technology (hereinafter referred to as rewards), these rules are formulated.

    The second article of the rules applicable to State Supreme science and technology award, the State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress Award and the People's Republic of China International Science and technology cooperation Award (hereinafter referred to as the international science and technology cooperation Award), recommended, reviews, awards and other activities. Third article national science and technology award work in-depth implement implementation science development views and "respect labor, and respect knowledge, and talent, and respect created" of approach, encourages solidarity collaboration, and joint research, encourages independent innovation, encourages climbing science and technology peak, promote scientific research, and technology development and economic, and social development close combined, promote technology results to reality productivity into, promote national innovation system construction, create encourages innovation of environment, efforts created and training world first-class scientists, and

    Leading talent and innovative talents of science and technology, accelerated through science and education and the talent and the implementation of sustainable development strategies, promoting the construction of innovation-oriented country.

    The fourth recommendation of the State Science and technology awards, reviews, and awards, follow the principle of openness, fairness, impartiality, scientific assessment mechanism, is not subject to any organization or individual of illegal interference.

    Fifth national award of science and technology in scientific discovery, technological inventions and promote the progress of science and technology, has made outstanding contributions to creative citizens or organizations, citizens, organizations and award the same project sorted by contribution.

    Engaged only in the scientific research and technological development projects management and support services staff may not be as candidate of the State Science and technology awards.

    Sixth National Science and technology awards are granted by the State honors citizens or organizations, award certificates is not as direct basis for determining ownership of scientific and technological achievements.

    Seventh National Science and Technology Award Committee is responsible for the State Science and technology award of the macro-management and direction. Ministry of science and technology is responsible for the Organization of the State Science and technology award.

    National Science and Technology Awards Office (hereinafter the award Office) is responsible for the daily work.

    Chapter II scope of rewards and evaluation criteria

    First State Supreme science and technology award

    Eighth article award Ordinance eighth article first paragraph (a) by said "in contemporary science and technology frontier made major breakthrough or in science and technology development in the has excellence achievements", is refers to candidates in based research, and application based research aspects made series or special major found, rich and expand has subject of theory, caused the subject or related subject field of breakthrough development, for both at home and abroad peer by recognized, on Science and technology development and social progress made has special major of contribution. Nineth article award Ordinance eighth article first paragraph (ii) by said "in science and technology innovation, and science and technology results into and high-tech industrialization in the, created huge economic or social benefits", is refers to candidates in science and technology activities in the, especially in high-tech field made series or special major technology invention, and to market for oriented, active promoted technology results into, achieved industrialization, caused the field technology of across development, promote has industry structure of change, created has huge of economic or social benefits,

    To promote economic and social development and made a particularly significant contribution to protecting national security.

    Tenth State Supreme science and technology award candidates should love the motherland, have good moral, and remains active in the forefront of contemporary science and technology, engaged in scientific research or technology development efforts.

    Section II State Natural Science Award

    11th incentive regulations Nineth article (a) referred to "the consequence of not found or has not been clarified", refers to the natural sciences has found that for the first time proposed, or the scientific theory at home and abroad for the first time to clarify, and the major works published for the first time.

    12th rewards Nineth article (b), the term "has great scientific value" means: (a) the finding in science theory, theory of creative or innovative research methods, means and (b) of great significance for promoting the development, or has important implications for economic construction and social development.

    13th article award Ordinance Nineth article second paragraph (three) by said "get both at home and abroad natural science recognized", is refers to main works has in both at home and abroad public issued of academic publications Shang published or as academic monographs published three years above, its important science conclusion has for both at home and abroad peer in important international academic conference, and public issued of academic publications, especially important academic publications and academic monographs by positive reference or application.

    14th national natural science award candidates should be the author of the related scientific and technological treatises, and have one of the following conditions:

    (A) the overall academic thought and research programmes;

    (B) found that important scientific phenomena, characteristics and laws, and of scientific theories and doctrines;

    (C) the proposed research methods and tools, solve a key academic problems or experimental difficulties, as well as an important basis for the systematic collection and analysis of data. 15th National Science Award first, second individual award No more than 5 people, except for the Grand Prize.

    Award program the specific number of awards by the State Natural Science Award Committee review, defined by the State Science and Technology Award Committee.

    16th national natural science award levels based on scientific discoveries made by integrated assessment, evaluation criteria are as follows:

    (A) the breakthroughs in science, found that natural phenomenon, revealing the scientific law, raised academic or research is recognized and widely quoted by academic circles at home and abroad, promoting the development of the subject or related subjects, or have a significant impact on economic development, social development, can be rated as first prize.

    (B) made important progress in science, found that natural phenomenon, revealing the scientific law, raised academic perspective or its methods of research is recognized and referenced by academic circles at home and abroad, promoting the development of the subject or its branches, or have important effects on economic development, social development, can be rated as second prize.

    For original innovation, and of particular scientific value, in the natural sciences sector has a significant impact at home and abroad a great scientific discoveries can be named the Grand Prize.

    Section III the State technological invention award

    17th awards the tenth article of the rules mentioned in the first paragraph of the products include a variety of instruments, equipment, appliances, tools, spare parts and new biological variety; process include industry, agriculture, medical and health and national security, technology and methods in the field of materials including new material using a variety of techniques such as system refers to the technology products, processes and materials.

    State technological invention award award is not solely dependent on individual experience and skills, know-how and technology that cannot be repeated.

    18th rewards the tenth paragraph (a), the term "former invention or has not been made public," refers to the technology invented for the first at home and abroad, or while at home and abroad have been the major technology has not yet been made in the various domestic and international publications, the media and other channels of public information published or made public, has been in public use since.

    19th article award Ordinance tenth article second paragraph (ii) by said "has advanced and creative", is refers to the items technology invention and both at home and abroad has has similar technology phase compared, its technology thought, and technology principle or technology method has innovation, technology Shang has substantive of features and significantly of progress, main performance (characters), and technology economic index, and science and technology level and promote science and technology progress of role and meaning, aspects integrated is better than similar technology.

    20th awards the tenth article of the Ordinance (c), the term "implemented significant economic or social benefits" refers to the mature technology invention and application for more than three years, and achieved good results.

    21st State technological invention award candidates should be the invention of all or part of creative technologies independently of the content of human. State technological invention award, first prize and second prize item awarded no more than 6 people, except for the Grand Prize.

    Special projects number of awards by the national invention Prize Committee review, defined by the State Science and Technology Award Committee.

    22nd State technological invention award grades based on the technology of synthetical evaluation of inventions, criteria are as follows:

    (A) is a significant technological invention of the first at home and abroad, technical idea is unique, has significant technical innovations, technical and economic indexes reached the advanced level of technology, promote technical progress in related fields, has created significant economic or social benefits can be awarded as first prize.

    (B) the significant technological invention is first at home and abroad, novel technical ideas, mainly on technical innovation of large, technical-economic indicators have reached the advanced level of similar technology, to promote technological progress in this field, and has produced significant economic or social benefits can be awarded second prize.

    On original innovation stands out, the main technical and economic indicators significantly superior to competing technologies or products at home and abroad, and made significant economic and social benefit of particular technological invention, awarded the Grand Prize.

    The fourth national science and technology progress award

    23rd Awards the 11th article of the Ordinance (a) referred to "technology development projects", refers to the scientific research and technological development activities, complete the product that has great practical value in the market, technologies, processes, materials, design and biological variety and its application.

    24th rewards for the 11th article (b), the term "social projects", refers to the standards, metrology, information technology, science and technology archives, popularization of science and technology and other basic work of science and technology and environmental protection, medical and health, investigation and rational use of natural resources, disaster monitoring and prediction and control of social welfare made significant achievements in careers in science and technology and its application.

    25th rewards for the 11th article (c), the term "national security project", refers to the construction of the army, defense research, national security, and related activities, and in a certain period only for Defense, national security, and to promote the modernization of national defense, strengthen national defense strength and scientific and technological achievements that are important to protect national security.

    Article 26th rewards for the 11th article (iv), the term "major projects", is a major comprehensive infrastructure engineering, science and technology, engineering, defence engineering and technological innovation projects. 27th National Science and technology progress award of major engineering award granting organization.

    Completed major projects in scientific discovery and technological invention of citizens, in line with the rewards and the conditions prescribed in these rules, national natural science awards, technological invention award may be recommended.

    28th National Science and technology progress award, candidates shall meet one of the following conditions:

    (A) in the design of projects in the overall technical programmes make an important contribution;

    (B) made in the key technologies and problem solving major technical innovation;

    (C) make a creative contribution in the process of transformation and the application;

    (D) make an important contribution in the area of high-tech industrialization.

    29th national science and technology progress Prize candidates should be in terms of research, development, production, application and promotion process to provide technology, equipment and personnel conditions, on completion of the project to organizing, managing and coordinating role of the main unit.

    Government departments at all levels shall not be as a candidate for national science and technology progress award.

    30th national science and technology progress award individual awards, no more than 15 people, award No more than 10; second prize individual award No more than 10 people, award No more than 7; single award Grand Prize, no more than 50 people, award No more than 30.

    National Science and technology progress award of 31st article candidate or candidates the completed project shall generally conform to the following conditions:

    (A) technology innovation sex highlight: in technology Shang has important of innovation, especially in high-tech field for independent innovation, formed has industry of led technology and brand products, or application high-tech on traditional industry for equipment and transformation, through technology innovation, upgrade traditional industry, increased industry of technology content, improve products added value; technology difficulty larger, solution has industry development in the of hot, and difficulties and key problem; General technology and technology economic index reached has industry of leading level.

    (B) economic or social benefits: developed by the project after three years of a large-scale application, generated a great deal of economic or social benefits realized market value or the value of technology innovation, for economic development, social development and national security, has made a great contribution.

    (C) promoting scientific and technological progress effect: high conversion degree of project, has driven strong demonstration, and diffusion capacity, promote the upgrading of the industrial structure adjustment and optimization, and product upgrading, has a great role in the development of the industry.

    32nd national science and technology progress award according to candidate or candidates to complete the projects for integrated assessment, evaluation criteria are as follows:

    (A) technological development class:

    Have a significant innovation in key technologies and system integration, technical difficulty, and overall skill level and the main technical and economic indicators have reached the international similar technology or products of advanced level, market competitive, high degree of transformation, has created major economic, technological advances and upgrading of the industrial structure of the industry has a major role, can be rated as first prize;

    Have greater innovation in key technologies and system integration, technical difficulty, and overall skill level and the main technical and economic indicators have reached the international similar technology or product level, market competitive, higher levels of achievements, creating great economic and technological progress and readjustment of the industrial structure of the industry has a great significance, can be rated as second prize.

    (B) public project categories:

    Have a significant innovation in key technologies and system integration, technical difficulty, and overall skill level and the main technical and economic indicators have reached the international similar technology or product of the advanced level, and is widely used in the industry, has made significant social benefit, is of great importance to technology development and social progress, can be rated as first prize;

    Have greater innovation in key technologies and system integration, technical difficulty, overall technological level of similar technologies or products and technical and economic indicators have reached the international level in the industry a greater range of applications, has made great social benefits, have great significance on Science and technology development and social progress, can be rated as second prize.

    (C) national security project category:

    Have a significant innovation in key technologies and system integration technology is difficult, overall technology has reached the international advanced level of technology or products, application is very outstanding, has a major effect on the building of national defense and national security, can be rated as first prize;

    Have greater innovation in key technologies and system integration, technical difficulty, overall technology reached the international level of technologies or products, outstanding results, have large effects on national defense and national security, can be rated as second prize.

    (D) major project categories:

    Solidarity collaboration, and joint research, in key technology, and system integrated and system management aspects has major innovation, technology difficulty and engineering complex degree big, General technology, and main technology economic index reached international similar project of advanced level, made has major of economic or social benefits, on promoted this field of technology development has major meaning, on economic construction, and social development and national security has major strategy meaning of, can named first prize;

    Solidarity collaboration, and joint research, in key technology, and system integrated and system management aspects has larger innovation, technology difficulty and engineering complex degree larger, General technology, and main technology economic index reached international similar project of level, made has larger of economic or social benefits, on promoted this field of technology development has larger meaning, on economic construction, and social development and national security has strategy meaning of, can named second prize.

    Technology innovation special economic or social benefits, and particularly, promote industry technology progress particularly significant projects, can be named the Grand Prize.

    Fifth International Science and technology cooperation award

    33rd Awards referred to in section 12th "foreigners or foreign organizations" refers to bilateral or multilateral international science and technology cooperation in the science and technology of China made an important contribution to the cause of foreign scientists, engineers, technology managers and scientific and technological research, development, management, and so on.

    34th was awarded international science and technology cooperation award of a foreigner or organization shall meet one of the following conditions:

    (A) in cooperation with Chinese citizens or organizations to research, development and achieved major scientific and technological achievements, have an important role in promoting China's economic and social development and achieved remarkable economic and social benefits.

    (B) in the Chinese citizens or organizations that teach advanced science and technology, major technology development proposals and countermeasures, fostering science and technology or managerial personnel has made an important contribution to promoting the development of science and technology of China, and has made significant social or economic benefits.

    (C) in China and other countries or international organizations make important contributions to the scientific and technological exchanges and cooperation, and China's science and technology has an important role in promoting development.

    35th International Science and technology cooperation prize is awarded annually an amount not exceeding 10.

    Chapter review organization

    36th State Science and Technology Award Committee's main duties are:

    (A) employ experts in national science and Technology Award Committee;

    (B) the audited results of the national science and Technology Award Committee;

    (C) on the recommendation of the State Science and technology awards oversee, review and objection handling;

    (D) improving national science and technology awards to provide policy advice and recommendations;

    (V) research, national science and technology award in the emergence of other major issues. 37th 15-20 members of the State Science and Technology Award Committee. Chairman held by Minister of science and technology, Deputy Chairman of Secretary 1 to 2 people, 1. Members of the State Science and Technology Award Committee by science and technology, education, economy and other fields composed of well-known experts, scholars and administrators.

    Membership proposed by the Ministry of science and technology, approved by the State Council.
Implementation of appointment system of the national science and Technology Award Committee, for a term of 3 years.

    38th National Science and Technology Award Committee set up under the national top science and technology award, the State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention award, the State Science and technology progress Award and the international science and technology cooperation award, national science and Technology Award Committee.

    Its main functions are:

    (A) review work in charge of the State Science and technology awards;

    (B) report the results to the national science and Technology Awards Committee;

    (C) related issues arising in the evaluation of national science and technology award for processing;

    (D) provide advice on improving the State Science and technology awards. 39th State Science and technology awards Review Committee Chairman respectively and 1 Secretary, Vice Chairman of 2 to 4 people, 1 person, several Committee members. Candidates for the recommendations to the national science and Technology Award Committee by the Ministry of science and technology.

    Secretary-General Director by the Awards Office.

    Members of the State Science and Technology Award Committee to implement appointment, for a term of 3 years, no more than two consecutive terms.

    The 40th State technological invention award, national science and technology progress Award Committee set up a dedicated project team, is responsible for defence, national security and other confidential project review, and the results reported to the Review Committee.

    41st article according to the needs assessment, the State Science and technology award, the Review Committee may establish certain evaluation group, candidates of the State Science and technology awards and project evaluation, evaluation results corresponding to the State Science and Technology Award Committee. 42nd the assessment team leader and 1, Deputy Head of 1 to 3 people, several Committee members, Director General by the corresponding member of the national science and Technology Award Committee.

    Appointment for members of the review group be a qualification, qualified by the Ministry of science and technology. Members of the review group, according to the State Science and technology awards recommended by the Awards Office of the details, from the eligible candidates proposed, examined by the Committee Secretary-General, reported to the Chairman of the Review Committee for approval.

    Evaluation team members each year a certain percentage of rotation.

    Article 43rd may entrust the relevant departments of the Ministry of science and technology assistance for those involving defence and national security the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress award sets of related work. 44th state science and technology awards Review Committee member is unable to attend the meeting, when assessing may affect the normal, by the review group members or experts designated by the Ministry of science and technology review qualifications instead and enjoyed the same rights as other members.

    Candidates nominated by the jury Secretary-General and approved by the Chairman of the Review Committee.

    45th national science and Technology Award Committee and review panel members and staff should be related to the candidates and the technical content of the project completed by the candidates and review in strict secrecy.

    The fourth chapter recommendation and acceptance

    46th bonus section 15th of the first paragraph (a), (b), (c) the recommended units listed in the recommendation, which authorities are responsible for science and technology.

    47th Awards section 15th of the first paragraph (d), the term "unit" refers to the designated by the Ministry of science and technology, meet the recommended requirements of institutions directly under the State Council, the relevant departments of the Central and other specific organs, enterprises and social organizations.

    48th Awards section 15th of the first paragraph (d), the term "scientific and technical experts" refers to the national top science and technology award, academician of the Chinese Academy of engineering. 49th State Science and technology awards recommended quotas system.

    The recommended unit assigned within the limits of the Office when the reward is recommended. National top science and technology award of recommended 1 per person per year (items) are familiar with major State Science and technology awards.

    Academician of Chinese Academy of Engineering's annual 3 or more persons jointly recommended 1 (items) are familiar with major State Science and technology awards.

    Recommended Unit recommended the State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress award Grand Prize, shall, before recommending approval of 5 or more familiar with the project Fellows agreed.

    50th State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress award Grand Prize featured units, references, should be in accordance with the conditions laid down in these rules strictly control candidates, the number of candidates. Featured units, referrals of the 51st state science and technology awards of the candidate, the candidate shall obtain the consent of the candidate and the candidates agreed, and fill in the harmonized format produced by the Awards Office of the references, provide the necessary certificates or evaluation materials.

    Recommended books and related materials to be complete, true and reliable. 52nd recommended units, recommended that the experts and scholars to participate in the review could affect the fairness of review may require his withdrawal, and written reasons when recommended and related supporting materials.

    Each withdrawal made by a number of experts to recommend no more than 3 people.

    53rd all existing intellectual property rights, as well as complete units, complete personnel disputes and is in litigation, arbitration or administrative decisions, administrative review procedures, in front of the dispute may not be recommended for national science and technology award.

    54th stipulated by laws and administrative regulations must obtain a license-related projects, such as new varieties of animals and plants, such as foods, pharmaceuticals, genetic engineering technologies and products, without obtaining prior to the approval of the competent administrative authority shall not recommend to participate in national science and technology award.

    55th article of the same technical content may not be repeated in the same year took part the State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress Awards judging.

    Not assessed in the 56th awarding of State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress Prize candidates, candidates, if once again recommended related technical content for the project shall be carried out once a year.

    57th Chinese citizens or organizations abroad in foreign institutions in China and Chinese citizens, individually or in collaboration will be a major scientific and technological achievements, in line with the incentive regulation and the conditions laid down in these rules, and the outcome of the main academic thought, technique and research work done by Chinese citizens or organizations and, and related intellectual property rights, and may be recommended for national science and technology award candidates or candidate organizations.

    The 58th article of scientific and technological progress, economic construction, social development and national security is of special importance or significant impact of scientific and technological achievements, recommends the national awards for science and technology at the right time. 59th in line with awards section 15th of the Ordinance and recommended and references in these rules shall be recommended to the award Office within the time stated in books and related materials. Office responsible for form references the award review.

    Recommended by the review did not meet the required material, referees or inadmissible and returned to the recommended units. 60th Awards Office should be published on the website and other media through a review of national natural science award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress Prize candidates, the candidate and the project.

    Confidential items related to national defence, national security, and announced in the proper range.

    61st candidates, the candidates and their projects are found to exist shall not recommend the circumstances as prescribed in these rules, are not submitted for review. 62nd candidates, candidates and reward announcement after accepting the Office requested the review of the project, by the recommended units (applicant) submitted in writing to the Awards Office.

    Upon approval of an exit review, further related technical content recommendations to national science and technology award, shall be carried out every other year.

    The fifth chapter objection handling 63rd national science and technology awards to accept social supervision.

    The State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress Awards judging dissent from the work.

    Any unit or individual to the State Science and technology awards candidate, the candidate and the project's innovative, advanced, practical and recommended disputed the authenticity of the material shall be accepted projects published within 60 days from the date of award are submitted to the Office, if inadmissible.

    64th units or individuals shall provide a written objection objection material, and provide the necessary supporting documents. Units and individuals should show that the true identity of complaint. Personal objections, should sign the written objection material real name; objection on behalf of the unit, it should be stamped with the company seal.

    Anonymous objection is inadmissible.

    Challenging the 65th units and individuals are not allowed to submit dissenting material directly review organization or its members; members were provided with the objection material, shall be promptly referred to the award Office, shall not be submitted for assessment organization, and forwarded to other members.

    66th Awards Office upon receipt of objection material should be reviewed, objections to compliance and can provide sufficient evidence, is admissible.

    67th in order to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the dissident, reward, recommended units of the Office and its staff and referees, as well as other objections investigation, treatment of associated personnel shall keep confidential the identities of the dissidents; do need public, should seek the views of dissenters in advance. 68th deals completed by the candidate, the candidate projects and innovative, advanced, practical and references the authenticity of the objection by the Awards Office is responsible for coordinating, recommended by the relevant units or reference assistance. Featured employer or recommendations after receiving the objections notified, you should verify the objection within the specified time material and investigation, verification of the submitted to the Awards Office.

    If necessary, the award Office can organize members and experts to investigate and put forward opinions. Involving candidates, the candidate and the sort of dissent by recommending or referee is responsible for coordinating, put forward initial comments submitted to the Awards Office.

    Objection handling involving cross-sectoral, coordinated by the Awards Office, recommendation or reference assistance, their handlers refer to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

    Recommended units or referees after receiving the objection material, in a dissent notice is not made within the stipulated time investigated, verified reports and coordination of opinions, the projects are not submitted for review.

    Objections related to national defence, national security project, handled by the departments concerned, and incentive offices the processing result. 69th objection handling process, involving any party to the dispute shall cooperate, no prevarication and delay.

    Candidates, candidates provide relevant proof documents not within the time stipulated, would be recognized as objections; challenge units and individuals provide relevant proof documents not within the allotted time, deemed to have waived the objection.

    70th within 60 days from the date of objection objection admissible as disposed of, can be submitted to this year's review; within one year from the date the objection admissible as disposed of, can be submitted to the next annual review objection admissible as of one year after the date of processing and may be recommended.

    71st Awards Office should report to the relevant national technology Prize Committee objection to verify the situation and opinions of management, drew attention to the national science and Technology Award Committee decided, and will determine how informed dissenting opinions and recommendations, referrals.

    Awards Office shall promptly report to the awards for science and technology Oversight Committee objection handling.

    The sixth chapter review

    72nd on the examination in the form of references, for evaluation by the Awards Office to the appropriate review group. 73rd evaluation can take the form of combining quantitative and qualitative evaluation.

    Awards Office is responsible for the development of quantitative evaluation indexes system of the State Science and technology awards.

    74th in protecting national security and legal rights of the candidate, the candidate cases, award Office to invite overseas experts to the State Science and technology award, the candidate and the project review, and submit comments related to an accreditation body.

    75th through initial evaluation of the State Supreme science and technology award, the international science and technology cooperation award candidate, and pass the initial evaluation, and no objections or objections have been dealt with in the stipulated time of national natural science award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress Award and the project, submitted to the relevant national science and Technology Award Committee for review.

    The 76th when necessary, award Office organizes the State Science and technology awards-related reviews Organization member of the selection of candidates, the candidates and their project site visits.

    77th international science and technology cooperation Awards judging results should consult the relevant Chinese diplomatic and consular mission or the Agency's views.

    78th State Science and Technology Award Committee of the State Science and technology awards Review Committee review results are audited.

    79th review voting rules of the State Science and technology awards are as follows:

    (A) evaluation network assessment or review at the meeting, elected under the Division limit voting evaluation results.

    (B) reviews of national science and Technology Award Committee review, meetings, to vote by secret ballot to produce results. (C) national science and Technology Award Committee meeting to review results of the assessment committees for approval.

    Among them, the State Supreme science and technology award and the State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress Awards Grand Prize to vote by secret ballot shall be examined.

    (D) national science and Technology Award Committee and the assessment Committee, the review group review of voting should have two-thirds more than most (including two-thirds) attended, the voting result was valid.

    (E) national top science and technology award, the international science and technology cooperation award candidates, as well as the State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress award Grand Prize, first prize up to two-thirds per cent of the majority of the members present (including two-thirds).

    The State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress award second prize should consist of one-second per cent of the majority of the members present (excluding one-second).

    Imposed 80th National Science and technology award system, and review of candidates, candidates or project interested reviewers should avoid. 81st Awards Office should be published on the website and other media through preliminary evaluation and review of national natural science award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress Prize candidates, the candidate and the project.

    Confidential items related to national defence, national security, and announced in the proper range.

    The seventh chapter approval and award

    The 82nd's award-winning science and Technology Department of the State Science and Technology Award Committee candidate, project, and the level of resolution of the audit, the State Council for approval.

    83rd State Supreme science and technology award by the State Council to request the President to sign and issue certificates and bonuses. Amounting to 5 million Yuan State Supreme science and technology award bonuses.

    Proceeds of which 500,000 yuan from the award-winning personal, 4.5 million Yuan by award-winning person independent topic, used as research funding.

    The 84th State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention award, national science and technology advancement award is presented by the State Council certificates and bonuses.

    The State Natural Science Award, the State technological invention award, national science and technology progress prize amounts by the Ministry of science and technology, in conjunction with the Ministry of Finance announced separately.

    85th international science and technology cooperation award certificate issued by the State Council. The 86th national natural science award, the State technological invention Award and the State scientific and technological progress award annually awards the project no more than 400.

    Among them, each award Grand Prize project no more than 3 items, first prize rewarding the total number does not exceed the award of the project 15%.

    The eighth supervision and penalties

    87th National Awards for science and technology established by the Commission on Science and technology awards of Oversight Committee is in charge of State Science and technology awards recommended monitor, review and objection handling.

    Awards for science and technology Oversight Committee composed of candidates proposed by the Ministry of science and technology, national science and Technology Award Committee for approval. 88th national science and technology award Review Committee and Awards Office shall report regularly to the awards for science and technology Oversight Committee on the State Science and technology award recommendation, review and objection handling work.

    If necessary, the science and technology award supervision Committee may request special reports. 89th found State Science and technology awards to units and individuals of any review and objection handling problems, can contribute to the science and technology reward Oversight Committee reports and complaints.

    Materials concerned to receive reports or complaints shall be promptly referred to the awards for science and technology Oversight Committee. 90th national science and technology awards to implement review reputation system.

    Ministry of science and technology archives for experts participating in review activities to establish credibility, prestige records as proposals to Committee members and an important basis for review panel members.

    91st technology award of regular supervision and inspection Oversight Committee to review, review activities in violation of rewards for units and individuals and the relevant provisions of these rules, it can be suggested that appropriate treatment. 92nd through plagiarism and made other scientific and technological achievements, deception, or other unfair means to make a State Science and technology awards to the units and individuals, has not yet been awarded, by the Awards Office to cancel its eligible that year; has been awarded, by the State Science and Technology Award Committee, approved by the Ministry of science and technology to the State Council after the reward to recover bonuses and inform the public. In serious cases, cancel it within a certain period or life is recommended eligible for State Science and technology awards.

    Also, it is recommended that their unit or Department appropriate disciplinary action.

    93rd recommended units and recommended people to provide false data, materials, assistance was recommended to defraud a State Science and technology awards to units and individuals, criticized by the Ministry of science and technology in serious cases, suspend or cancel the recommended qualifications to persons who are directly in charge and other direct liable persons, it is recommended that their unit or Department appropriate disciplinary action.

    94th experts involved in national science and technology award in accreditation activities in violation of review codes of conduct and related provisions, the correction is given by Ministry of science and technology, respectively, recorded negative reputation, warning, criticism, engaged or disqualified lifting treatment and can recommend their unit or Department appropriate disciplinary action.

    95th national award of science and technology personnel in assessing the activities of the Organization in the fraud, or engages in, by the Ministry of science and technology or the competent authorities shall be subject to appropriate disciplinary action. 96th on the State Science and technology awards of publicity should be objective, accurate, and shall not be exaggerated, the vague claims of misleading the public.

    Application of awarded achievements must not harm the interests of the State, social security and the people's health.

    Violation of the provisions of the preceding paragraph, have serious consequences, shall be subject to appropriate treatment.

    The Nineth chapter supplementary articles

    97th article featured, review, award of national science and technology award in managing funds, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State. 98th these rules shall come into force on February 1, 2009.