Head of interim measures for the performance evaluation of Central enterprises (revised 2009)
(October 21, 2003 8th Minister of State-owned assets supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council Office review on December 30, 2006, State-owned assets supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council, Director of Office for the 46th time amended on December 28, 2009, Director of the State-owned assets supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council the 84th Committee meetings 2nd revision on December 28, 2009, State-owned assets supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council released 22nd come into force on January 1, 2010)
Chapter I General provisions
First for the effective discharge of responsibilities of investor of State-owned assets and protect the owner's rights, implementation of national assets keeping value added responsibility, and establish effective incentive and restraint mechanisms, in accordance with the People's Republic of China State-owned assets law, interim regulations on State-owned assets supervision and administration of enterprises and other relevant laws and regulations, these measures are formulated.
Article assessment in these measures refers to the heads of enterprises under the Central Government, the State Council authorized by the State-owned assets supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (hereinafter referred to as the SASAC) to fulfil the responsibilities of investor capital contribution from the State Enterprise (hereinafter enterprise) of the following persons:
(A) General Manager of State-owned enterprises (President), Vice President (VP), Treasurer;
(B) the Chairman, Deputy Chairman, Director of the State-owned company, include State-owned management of party Committee's General Manager (CEO), Vice President (Vice President), Treasurer;
(C) representatives of State-owned equity in State-owned capital controlled companies as Chairman, Vice Chairman, directors, include State-owned management of party Committee's General Manager (CEO), Vice President (Vice President), Treasurer.
Third head of enterprise operating performance and combined with the term evaluation, the results of the annual appraisal evaluation and process evaluation, examination results and rewards linked to the unity of the examination system.
The fourth annual performance evaluation and term of performance evaluation by SASAC Director or his or her authorized representatives and business leaders signed responsibility approach to operating performance.
Fifth heads of enterprise performance evaluation should be guided by the following principles:
(A) according to the value of State-owned assets and maximizing shareholder value, and the requirements of sustainable development, business performance of Heads of enterprises according to law.
(B) according to the different sectors, asset management of different levels and different characteristics such as main business and seeking truth from facts, open and fair, classification of scientific evaluation. (C) in accordance with the responsibilities and interests of an enterprise integration requirements, establish enterprises performance appraisal system with the combination of incentive and constraint mechanism, namely, performance, compensation, performance, pay down under, and serves as an important basis for their appointment and removal.
Establish scientific and reasonable, traceability of the responsibility system of assets operation.
(D) in accordance with the requirements of the scientific Outlook on development, promote enterprise strategy and value creation, innovation, resource conservation, environmental protection and security level, and constantly enhance the enterprise's core competitiveness and sustainable development.
(E) full implementation of responsibility in accordance with the requirements, encourage enterprises to establish and improve staff performance appraisal system, enhance the enterprise control and execution to ensure that national assets keeping value added layers of responsibility to implement.
Chapter II annual performance evaluation
Sixth annual performance evaluation to calendar years for the assessment period.
Article seventh annual business performance responsibility include the following:
(A) the company name, job title, and name of both parties;
(B) assessment and indicators;
(C) the assessment and reward and punishment;
(D) the modification, rescission and termination of responsibility;
(E) other matters require.
Eighth annual performance indicators including basic indexes and indexes.
(A) basic indicators include total profits and economic value added index. 1. Total profit refers to the total authorized Enterprise profit of consolidated financial statements.
Gross profit can be combined with the approved current absorb potential losses for previous years, and the deduction made by selling businesses the main industry of the assets of non-recurrent revenue. 2.
Economic value added refers to the approved corporate net operating income less the balance of capital costs (appraisal rules, see annex 1).
(B) classification according to industry characteristics by SASAC, Enterprise "short Board", comprehensive consideration of the enterprise management level, technology innovation investment and risk control ability and other factors, specific indicators specified in the guarantee.
Article Nineth military enterprises and major national policy-related operations and other special enterprise basic indexes and indexes, plus policy operation effected, specific targets and determining the weight of responsibility.
Article tenth research company basic indicators and disaggregated indicators highlight technical innovation inputs and outputs, specific targets and determining the weight of responsibility.
11th annual business performance guarantee signed in accordance with the following procedure: (A) submit annual performance evaluation objectives recommendation. Last quarter of each year, heads of enterprises under SASAC annual performance evaluation requirements and business development planning and management, control the domestic and international advanced level, the next year completing performance evaluation of objective proposals and assessment recommendations and necessary documentation submitted to the Commission.
Assessment assessment objectives in principle, the proposed value is not less than the previous year indicators actual values or index actually completed the first three years the average of the values. (B) approved the annual performance evaluation target values. Commission in accordance with "the same industry and the same scale" principle, combined with the macro-economic situation, enterprises of the industry cycle, actual operating conditions of enterprises annual performance evaluation objectives recommended by the heads of audit and examination objectives and relevant content with the corporate communication to determine the value.
Where the total annual profit goal target value is lower than the previous year value and the actual value of the average, final examination results are in principle not allowed to enter a level (the cyclical decline in the industry compared with other companies in the same industry leading level of the enterprise).
(C) by the SASAC Director or his or her authorized representative signed with the heads of enterprise annual business performance responsibility.
12th SASAC annual results responsibility implement dynamic monitor of the implementation. (A) the annual results of responsibility after the signing, head of corporate responsibility for implementation must be submitted every six months the Commission, with a copy to presence of the company's Supervisory Board.
SASAC dynamic tracking of the implementation of responsibility. (B) the establishment of major work safety accidents, environmental pollution and quality accidents, major economic losses, major legal disputes, major investment and financing and asset restructuring, and other important reports system.
Enterprise at which this happens, business leaders should be immediately reported to the State-owned assets supervision, also accredited to report of the Supervisory Board of the enterprise.
13th annual results responsibility assessment completed in accordance with the following procedure:
(A) before the end of April every year, heads of enterprises based on the audited accounts for the financial data, annual performance evaluation on implementation of goals were analyzed, and annual summary report submitted to the Commission, with a copy to presence of the company's Supervisory Board.
(B) basis of SASAC audited audited financial report on the accounts of and reviewed statistical data, combined with annual summary reports of Heads of enterprises and listen to views on the enterprise's annual evaluation, head of the Supervisory Board, head of enterprise annual performance evaluation targets of evaluation (scoring rules is contained in annex 2), heads of enterprises annual performance evaluation and rewards and punishments. (C) the SASAC will eventually confirm enterprises annual performance evaluation feedback from business leaders with rewards and punishments and the enterprise.
Disagrees with the views on the assessment and reward of Heads of enterprises, can be reflected to the SASAC.
Chapter III term performance evaluation
Performance evaluation of 14th term to a three-year assessment period.
15th term business performance responsibility include the following:
(A) the company name, job title, and name of both parties;
(B) assessment and indicators;
(C) the assessment and reward and punishment;
(D) the modification, rescission and termination of responsibility;
(E) other matters require.
16th term of performance indicators including basic indicators and indexes.
(A) basic indicators include the national average growth rate of capital appreciation and income. 1. Refers to checking the final increment rate of State-owned capital deduction objective factors (approved by the Commission) after the State-owned capital and interests with the assessment of State-owned capital at beginning of period and interest rates. Calculated as: the term of the product of the annual appreciation rate of State-owned capital.
Annual appreciation rate of State-owned capital to SASAC confirmed results shall prevail. 2. Term of average income growth rate refers to the average three-year business growth.
Calculation formula is:
(Editor's Note: this formula see manuscript)
(B) classification according to industry characteristics by SASAC, considering technological innovation ability, resource conservation and the level of environmental protection, sustainable development and the core competitive ability and other factors determine specific targets identified in the responsibility.
Article 17th military enterprises and major national policy-related operations and other special enterprise basic indexes and indexes, plus policy operation effected, specific targets and determining the weight of responsibility.
Signed 18th term business performance guarantee in accordance with the following procedure: (A) submit performance evaluation objectives the mandate proposed value. Beginning of the assessment period, heads of enterprises in accordance with performance evaluation of State-owned assets supervision term requirements and business development planning and management, control the domestic and international advanced level, performance evaluation objectives the mandate proposed recommendations and assessment recommendations and necessary documentation submitted to the Commission.
Assessment objectives in principle, the proposed value is not less than the previous term of evaluation indicators actual values, or not less than the target value and the actual value of the average. (B) the authorized performance evaluation target values.
Commission in accordance with "the same industry and the same scale" principle, combined with the macro-economic situation, enterprises of the industry development and effective operation of the enterprise, enterprise performance evaluation objectives the mandate recommended by the heads of audit and examination objectives and relevant content with the corporate communication to determine the value.
(C) by the SASAC Director or his or her authorized representative signed responsibility term business performance with business leaders.
19th State-owned performance responsibility for the implementation of the mandate on implementation of annual tracking and dynamic monitoring.
20th term business performance responsibility assessment completed in accordance with the following procedure:
(A) checking final, head of enterprise for term of completion of performance evaluation objectives were analyzed, and a summary analysis report submitted to the Commission, with a copy to presence of the company's Supervisory Board.
(Ii) SASAC according to term within by audit and by audit of enterprise financial accounts report and by review of statistics data, combined enterprise head term business performance summary analysis report and heard Board of supervisors on Enterprise head of term evaluation views, on Enterprise head term business performance assessment target of completed situation for integrated assessment (scoring rules see annex 3), formed Enterprise head term business performance assessment and rewards and punishments views. (C) the SASAC will eventually confirm terms of Heads of enterprises performance evaluation feedback from business leaders with rewards and punishments and the enterprise.
Disagrees with the views on the assessment and reward of Heads of enterprises, can be reflected to the SASAC.
The fourth chapter of rewards and punishment
21st in accordance with performance evaluation scores of Heads of enterprises, annual performance evaluation and performance evaluation term end results are divided into a, b, c, d, e, five levels, to complete a full assessment values (except for economic value added index) for the c-class upgrade.
22nd annual performance evaluation of the Committee based on the results and tenure rewards and punishments imposed on enterprises performance evaluation results, and results and performance evaluation as an important basis for appointment of Heads of enterprises.
Article 23rd business leaders awards include annual performance, rewards and incentive and long-term incentive term. 24th annual salaries of Heads of enterprises divided into base salary and performance pay in two parts. Performance pay linked to results of the annual appraisal. Performance = performance pay salary base salary multiples of x performance.
Calculation formula is:
When the assessment results for the e-class, and performance pay is 0;
When d is results, performance pay in accordance with the "pay for performance base x (test score-d level starting score)/(c-level starting score-d-level starting score)" OK, performance 0-1 times in performance pay between base salary;
When the assessment results to c level, performance pay in accordance with the "pay for performance base x (1+0.5x (assessment grade-c-level starting score)/(b-level starting score-c-level starting score))" OK, pay for performance 1 time between performance pay base salaries to 1.5 times the performance base;
When the examination results for b-class, and performance pay in accordance with the "pay for performance base x (1.5+0.5x (assessment grade-b level starting score)/(a level starting score-b level starting score))" OK, performance pay at 1.5 times between performance performance of base salary to twice times base salary;
When the result is a level, performance pay in accordance with the "pay for performance base x (2+ (test score-a-level starting score)/(marks-a level starting score for five class a))" OK, performance pay twice times the performance between base salary and performance 3 times base salary.
But for the total profit below the previous year's business, regardless of their test results at any level, its multiple performance pay should be lower than the previous year.
25th examined as the main person in charge, the allocation coefficient is 1, examined the remaining coefficient by the enterprise according to the person in charge of the assessment results, determined at between 0.6-0.9, SASAC filed before implementation. 26th 60% of performance pay in cash in the current period at the end of the annual appraisal; other 40% under the term examination results and other factors, after the end of the term examination deferred cash.
For the outgoing legal representative should also be based on the economic responsibility audit results to determine performance pay cash deferral option. 27th term business performance results for a-, b-and c-level business leaders, scheduled to deliver deferred pay for performance.
According to the examination results improved, economic value added, and so on, giving business owners the incentive or the mandate of medium-and long-term incentives.
28th term performance evaluation result for the d-class and e-class enterprises, according to the assessment score deduction of deferred pay for performance.
Specific deduction of pay for performance is:
Performance = term accumulation of deferred salary deduction of deferred pay for performance x (c-level starting score-Gross)/c-level starting score.
29th article does not complete his term performance evaluation goals or outstanding annual performance evaluation target for two consecutive years, and no significant objective reasons, adjustments to the business leaders. Article 30th for outstanding performance and innovation, improve management efficiency, energy saving and emission reduction achieved outstanding achievements, special award of the given term (see annex 4 of the implementing rules).
To assume control of major structural adjustments and make outstanding achievements, plus incentives given to annual evaluation. 31st article talk to heads of enterprise performance evaluation system.
For the results of the annual appraisal for the d-class and e-class, a major production safety accidents and major environmental pollution accident, serious irregularities and major operational risks of enterprises, approved by the SASAC Director Office meetings, by the SASAC performance assessment leadership team talks with heads of enterprises, help companies analyze and improve your work.
Articles 32nd to full of poor the performance of enterprises, reduced performance evaluation score (scoring rules in annex 2).
33rd article Enterprise violation People's Republic of China accounting method, and enterprise accounting guidelines, about legal regulations regulations, false, and concealed financial status of, SASAC according to specific plot give downgraded or buckle points processing, and corresponding withholding Enterprise statutory representative people and the related head of performance salary, and term incentive or medium-and long-term incentive; plot serious of, give disciplinary or on Enterprise head for adjustment; suspected crime of, law transferred judicial organ processing. 34th article Enterprise statutory representative people and the related head violation national legal regulations and provides, led to major decision errors, and major security and quality accident, and major pollution accident, and major disciplinary and legal disputes case, to enterprise caused major bad effect or caused State-owned assets loss of, SASAC according to specific plot give downgraded or buckle points processing, and corresponding withholding its performance salary, and term incentive or medium-and long-term incentive; plot serious of, give disciplinary or on Enterprise head for adjustment
; A suspected crime, law transferred to judicial organs for handling.
The fifth chapter supplementary articles
35th during the assessment period for enterprise assets, head of restructuring, the main change, SAC can change relevant elements of the performance guarantee under the circumstances.
36th State-owned enterprises, State-owned companies and State-owned capital controlled company party Committee (party) Secretary, Deputy Secretary, Standing Committee member (party member), Secretary of the discipline Inspection Commission (discipline inspection team leader) appraisal and reward and punishment in accordance with these rules. 37th state capital joint stock companies, mergers and bankruptcies of enterprises managed by the Party Committee of State-owned enterprises, and its performance evaluation in accordance with the measures implemented.
Specific performance evaluation issues identified in the performance guarantee.
State-owned company of the 38th article that meets the following conditions, SAC authorized the Board to the performance assessment of senior managers:
(A) improving the corporate governance structure;
(B) the integrity of the performance evaluation system;
(C) external more than half of all members of the Board of Directors;
(D) all the members of the remuneration and appraisal Committee held by outside directors.
Commission in accordance with the relevant regulations and regulatory documents, guidance and monitoring of performance assessment of the Board.
39th of all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the State-owned assets supervision and administration bodies, district municipalities, prefecture-level head of the State-owned assets supervision and administration of State-funded enterprises performance evaluation, can be performed in accordance with the measures.
40th article explaining these measures by the SASAC.
41st these measures come into force on January 1, 2010.
Annex 1: economic value added appraisal rules
First, the definition and calculation formula of economic value added
Economic value added is the net operating profit after tax less the balance of capital costs.
Calculation formula:
Economic value added = net operating profit after taxes-capital-cost = net operating profit adjusted for capital x average cost of capital rate
NET operating profit after tax = net profit + (+ research and development expenses interest expense adjustment-non-recurrent income adjustment x50%) x (1-25%)
Adjusted capital average = average total owners ' equity + average liabilities-interest-free liabilities-average construction
Second, accounting adjustments the project description
(A) interest expense refers to the company's financial statements in "financial expenses" under "interest expense". (B) research and development expenses adjustment refers to the company's financial statements in "management fees" under "research and development" and the current research and development expenditure recognised as an intangible asset.
For access to national strategies resources, exploration and investment cost of larger enterprises, recognized by the SASAC, table showing the cost of the "exploration" as a research and development costs to adjust in a certain proportion (in principle no more than 50%) to be added back.
(Iii) non-recurrent revenue adjustments include: 1.
Sell business assets benefits: reduction has substantial control over the income from owning stock (not including income from secondary market to increase its stake after reduction) and group (excluding investment group of companies) transfer belong within the main business and assets, income or profit total Group 10% per cent of the income from assets of non-listed companies. 2.
Industry assets non-current assets other than transfer Enterprise (excluding investment enterprise group) the transfer of ownership (property) earnings and assets (including land) transfer. 3.
Other non-recurring income: independent of the main business development asset replacement income subsidy income, non-regular activities.
(Four) interest-free flow liabilities is refers to enterprise financial report in the "meet notes", and "meet accounts payable", and "pre collection items", and "should make tax", and "meet interest", and "other should payment" and "other flow liabilities"; for for bear national task, reasons caused "special should payment", and "special reserves Fund" balance larger of, Visual with interest-free flow liabilities deduction.
(E) construction in progress refers to financial statements comply with the main requirements of "construction".
Three, the cost of capital rate determination
(A) the capital cost of Central enterprises in principle set at 5.5%.
(B) national policy task is heavier and less assets General enterprises, cost of capital rate for 4.1%.
(C) asset-liability ratio in 75% per cent of industrial enterprises and more than 80% of non-industrial enterprises, cost of capital rate floating 0.5%.
(D) after cost of capital rate, unchanged for three years.
Four important adjustment, other matters
One of the following situations occurs, major impact on the economic value added assessment of SASAC, as appropriate, adjust:
(A) major policy changes;
(B) the serious natural disasters and other force majeure factors;
(C) adjusted corporate restructuring, listing and incomparable factors;
(D) the SASAC approved the corporate restructuring and other items.
Annex 2: annual performance evaluation scoring rules
An annual performance evaluation, and General points
Annual performance evaluation score = (total profit targets scoring classification indicator economic value added index + score +) x + bonus-performance degree of difficulty operating points
Annual performance evaluation of the above indicators, an indicator (not including economic value added index) does not meet the basic points, then the normal scoring, while others are only basic, all index scores are no longer operational difficulty.
Second, annual performance evaluation index scores
(A) the total profit targets scoring. Total profit index of 30 points. When the target value completed business leaders, with 30 points. The index score based on the reference value.
Actually completing reference value refers to the previous year and completed three years before the actual value on average lower in value. 1. Total profit assessment target values are not below the base value, the complete value each exceeding the target of 3%, plus 1 minute, add 6 points.
Complete value per lower than the target of 3%, deducted 1 points, up 6 points deducted. 2.
Total profit objective value is lower than the baseline value, the index points according to the following rules: (1) target values lower than the benchmark 20% (included) of less than complete value each exceeding the target of 3%, plus 1 minute, add 5 points.
Complete value per lower than the target of 3%, deducted 1 points, up 6 points deducted. (2) target value is lower than the reference value 20%-50%, completed every target values 3%, 1 points, up 4.
Complete value per lower than the target of 3%, deducted 1 points, up 6 points deducted. (3) target values lower than the benchmark 50% (or more), complete the value each exceeding the target of 3%, plus 1 minute, add 3 points.
Complete value per lower than the target of 3%, deducted 1 points, up 6 points deducted. 3.
Total profit objective value is negative, the loss portion of completed value counted, profit-making part of the normal calculation exceed assessment goals, add 3 points; loss but are still in the red, assessment scores do not exceed the limit of class c; to profit assessment score does not exceed the class b limits.
(B) economic value added index score. Economic value added index is divided into 40 points. Business leaders target value, the basic score of 40 points. The index score based on the reference value.
Actually completing reference value refers to the previous year and completed three years before the actual value on average lower in value. 1. Economic value added assessment target values are not below the base value, the complete value exceeding the target values (absolute value) 2%, add 1, add 8 points.
Each completed value below the target value (absolute value) 3% deducted 1 points, up 8 points deduction. 2. When the target value is lower than the reference value economic added value evaluation, completed every target values (absolute value) 3%, add 1, add 8 points.
Each completed value below the target value (absolute value) 3% deducted 1 points, up 8 points deduction. 3.
Economic value added assessment values near zero, scoring to give special treatment.
(C) classification index score. Classification indicator 2 should be identified.
Classification index points and points of upper and lower limits for the index 20%.
(D) the index reached the excellent level of the target value, target value of Heads of enterprises, directly out of the indicator.
Third, the reward points
(A) the reward points.
Assume control of national structural adjustment and made outstanding achievements in business, according to the relevant provisions as the tasks of SASAC plus 0.5-2.
(B) evaluation points. 1.
Loss of significant assets in the enterprises, production safety accidents, pollution incidents, SASAC demoted, penalized in accordance with the relevant provisions. 2.
Corporate violation occurred or existed financial mismanagement and other problems, State-owned assets supervision pursuant to the relevant provisions depending on the seriousness of 0.5-2 points is deducted. 3.
Enterprise staff performance appraisal system is not perfect, not group deputies, Department heads, heads of subordinate enterprises performance evaluation, where appropriate, a reduction of 0.1-1. 4. Excluding restructuring and accounting adjustments and other objective factors, profit targets and complete difference of over 50%, and corresponding deductions according to the degree of difference of 0.1-2 points.
This article from other articles.
Four, operating difficulty
According to degree of difficulty operating total assets, revenue, total profit, return on equity, employee average number, economic value added factors such as weight, classification determines.
Annex 3: term of performance evaluation scoring rules
, Term of integrated performance evaluation scoring
Term performance evaluation score = (State-owned capital value index score + score + average income growth rate indicators index score) x + degree of difficulty for a period of three years the results of the annual performance evaluation indicator-check points
In term of performance evaluation indicators mentioned above, if a particular indicator does not meet the basic points, then the normal scoring, while others are only basic, all index scores are no longer operational difficulty.
Second, the term business performance index score
(A) the rate of State-owned capital preservation and appreciation index score. State-owned capital value index is divided into 40 points. Business leaders target value, the basic score of 40 points. The index score based on the reference value.
Reference value refers to the previous term actual value and the former one-term assessment objectives value and actual value of average lower values. 1. Assessment value of State-owned capital preservation and appreciation rate not below the base value, the complete value each exceeding the target of 0.4%, add 1, add 8 points. Complete below target values is greater than 100%, each below the target value of 0.4%, deducted 0.5 points, up 4 points deduction; complete value is lower than 100%, each below the target of 0.4%, deducted 1 points, up 8 points deduction.
This indicator reached the excellent level assessment values, target values directly out. 2.
State-owned capital value appraisal target value is lower than the baseline value, the index points according to the following rules: (1) target values lower than the benchmark 30% (included) of less than complete value each exceeding the target of 0.4%, plus 1 minute, add 7 points.
Complete value below the target but higher than 100%, each below the target of 0.4%, deducted 0.5 points, up 4 points deduction; complete value is lower than 100%, each below the target of 0.4%, deducted 1 points, up 8 points deduction. (2) target value is lower than the reference value 30%-50%, 0.4% each completed value exceeding the target values, plus 1 minute, add 6 points.
Complete value below the target but higher than 100%, each below the target of 0.4%, deducted 0.5 points, up 4 points deduction; complete value is lower than 100%, each below the target of 0.4%, deducted 1 points, up 8 points deduction.
(3) target values lower than the benchmark 50% (or more), complete the value each exceeding the target of 0.4%, plus 1 minute, add 5 points.
Complete value below the target but higher than 100%, each below the target of 0.4%, deducted 0.5 points, up 4 points deduction; complete value is lower than 100%, each below the target of 0.4%, deducted 1 points, up 8 points deduction.
(4) target values below the reference value, but is an industry leading level of the index plus CAP can be adjusted to 8 points. 3. State-owned capital value appraisal target value is lower than 100%, completed over target values shall not be extra points.
Complete value is lower than the target value, per below 0.4% and deducted 1 points, up 8 points deduction.
(B) the average income growth rate indicator score. Average income growth rate indicators are divided into 20 points. When the target value completed business leaders, 20 points. The index score based on the reference value.
Reference value refers to the previous term actual value and the former one-term assessment objectives value and actual value of average lower values. 1. Average income growth rate assessment target values are not below the base value, the complete value each exceeding the target of 1%, 1 points, up 4. Complete value per lower than the target of 1%, deducted 1 points, up 4 points deducted.
This indicator reached the excellent level assessment values, target values directly out. 2.
Average income growth rate objective value is lower than the baseline value, the index points according to the following rules: (1) target values lower than the benchmark 30% (included) of less than complete value each exceeding the target of 1%, plus 1 minute, add 3 points.
Complete value per lower than the target of 1%, deducted 1 points, up 4 points deducted. (2) target value is lower than the reference value 30%-50%, 1% each completed value exceeding the target values, add 1, add 2 points.
Complete value per lower than the target of 1%, deducted 1 points, up 4 points deducted. (3) target values lower than the benchmark 50% (or more), complete the value each exceeding the target of 1%, 1 points, up 1.
Complete value per lower than the target of 1%, deducted 1 points, up 4 points deducted.
(4) target values below the reference value, but is an industry leading level of the index plus CAP can be adjusted to 4 points. 3. Average income growth rate objective value is a negative number, complete the value exceeding the target values shall not be extra points.
Complete value is lower than the target value, per below 1% and deducted 1 points, up 4 points deducted.
(C) classification index score. Classification indicator 2 should be identified.
Classification index points and points of upper and lower limits for the index 20%.
Classification index reached the advanced level of the target value, target value directly out.
(D) the term three-year annual performance evaluation index scores. Term of three years the results of the annual performance evaluation index of basic is 20 points.
Heads of enterprises within three years of the annual performance assessment results each time you have a grade 8 points; every time b-7.335 points; each was a c-class have 6.667; 6 points for each win a grade d or below.
Third, the evaluation points
(A) outstanding energy saving examination objectives, where appropriate, a reduction of 0.1-2 points. (B) excluding restructuring, structural adjustments and accounting adjustments, the after effects basic index difference between target and actual values of more than 8%, and corresponding deductions according to the degree of difference of 0.1-2 points.
Not subject to other provisions of this paragraph.
Four, operating difficulty
According to degree of difficulty operating last year in the term of total assets, revenue, total profit, return on equity and the average number of factors such as weight, economic value added, category identified.
Annex 4: term of special award rules
First, prize
SASAC in term evaluation, established term of special awards, including "outstanding performance award", "Science and technology award for innovative enterprises", "management progress Enterprise award" and "energy conservation excellence Enterprise award".
Two, the winning conditions and evaluation methods
(A) the term examination results for a-level and where the annual evaluation in term three a-level or two a grade, a b-class enterprise, awarded the "outstanding achievement award".
(B) the enterprise meets the following conditions, awarded the "Innovation Award": 1.
In term of national science and technology progress or technological invention award above, and is mainly responsible for the project. 2.
Has made a major breakthrough in the international standard-setting.
(C) asset-liability ratio control within reasonable limits (75% industrial enterprises, industrial enterprises in non-80%) and also meet one of the following conditions of enterprises, awarded the "management progress Enterprise award" to award places according to the circumstances: 1.
Benefits increase dramatically. Total corporate profit growth rate ranked in the mandate to award basis, calculated as: term term last year in total profit/total profits x100% a year earlier.
In accordance with the term of the previous year with earnings of more than 500 million Yuan and 500 million Yuan (inclusive) were evaluated in both categories. 2.
Profitability improved significantly. Corporate return on equity increased to term ranking for selection based on calculated as: tenure last year return on equity ROE before the end of a term.
In accordance with the term of net assets at the end of the previous year to more than 8 billion yuan and less than 8 billion yuan (inclusive) were evaluated in both categories. 3.
The ability to create value is excellent. To economic value added growth rate ranking for term selection basis, is calculated as: the last year of the term/term of economic value added economic value added in the previous year.
In accordance with the term of the previous year-end total assets of more than 10 billion yuan and 10 billion yuan (inclusive) were evaluated in both categories. 4.
Profitability increasing outstanding achievements.
A year earlier, for a term of operation of loss-making enterprises, in term of selection based on losses in efficiency ranking, calculated as: the last year of the term total profits total profit a year earlier of a term.
(D) the enterprise meets the following conditions, awarded the "excellent enterprise award of energy saving": 1.
End of the term, main unit product energy consumption and pollutant emission levels reach the best levels of the domestic industry, close to or reached the international advanced level. 2.
Term of Office, the comprehensive energy consumption per unit decreased rate, total emissions of major pollutants reduced rates on top of Central enterprises. 3.
Term, a substantial investment in energy saving and emission reduction, made significant breakthroughs in energy saving technology innovation, in promoting industry-wide, the whole society has made outstanding contributions to the energy saving and emission reduction.
Third, incentives At the end of each term, Commission to assess the above awards, and the winners were commended.
