Key Benefits:
(Summit No. 128 of 8 May 2003 of the People's Government Order No. 128 of 8 May 2003) The name was amended to read as the “Strategic housing security management approach”. Article I, “To strengthen the management of dangerous homes in my city, to secure residence and use of security, to promote the efficient use of homes and to amend the construction of the Urban Hazardous Housing Management Provisions” as “to strengthen the management of homes, to secure the safe use of homes, to preserve the public interest of the society, in accordance with national legislation, legislation and relevant provisions in the provinces, municipalities”. The former Article 2, “The approach applies to the various homes and subsidiary buildings in the city's administration area”, was amended to read “the various houses and subsidiary buildings that have been constructed within the city's administration area (other than those of the villagers on collective land), whose homes, users, operators and their owners, shall be subject to this approach”. Article 3 of the new Article “Final security management should be implemented in accordance with the law, on a regular basis, in a manner that ensures the principle of security”. V. Deleting former Article 3 “the hazardous houses referred to in this approach” means a decommissioned land that cannot guarantee residence and the use of safe houses”. Article 6 was converted to article IV, paragraph 1, as amended by the Urban Housing Authority as the administrative authority for the safe management of the entire city. Paragraph 2 amends the management of houses in the area of “the municipalities” or the designated sector responsible for the management of houses in the Territory, and is operationally guided by the Municipal Housing Authority. In the area of high-technical industrial development, the management of housing in the Territory is responsible for the management of houses within the Territory, within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Housing Authority. In addition, the relevant sectors such as planning, construction, urban administration, public safety, business and firefighting should be managed in accordance with their respective responsibilities. New “Article II General Provisions”. Two new articles, as Articles 5 and 6: (i) “owners, users and operators shall be responsible for the security of the use of the relevant homes, discovering that damage is sustained in a timely manner, guaranteeing the stability of the housing structure and the normal use of equipment facilities”. (ii) “Services sold in accordance with the National Housing Restructuring Policy, prior to the establishment of the Commission, their original property units shall be responsible for the security management of homes and to organize maintenance and governance. After the establishment of the Commission of the Entrepreneurship, the Commission is responsible for the safe management of homes. The original article 5 “shall be escorted and properly used by the house without unauthorized changes in the nature, structure or overload use of the house, without denying, blocking the maintenance and safety inspections of the house” as a “shall house shall not change the nature of the use of the house without any intentional change in the manner in which it is required, and shall be reported to the planning sector for approval. They relate to changes in the main structure of the house or a marked increase in the number of houses, which should be accompanied by security permits in the territorial housing security management. With regard to urban management, fire management, and in accordance with the relevant provisions, “the owners, users should be escorted and used in the home, without the consent of the owner or operator of the house, the change in the structure of the subject matter of the house or the apparent increase in the number of houses, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the handling of the renovation management” and “owners, the owner, the owner should be escorted and the right to use the house, the denial, obstruction of the security of the house, and the active collaboration with the relevant authorities in the maintenance and governance of Article 8, Article 8. Article 10 (i) “Article 9 establishes large-scale facilities, such as signalta, advertising brands, in house buildings, and all of the facilities shall enter into written agreements with owners or operators to clarify the rights, obligations and responsibilities of both parties. It is a clear increase in the number of houses, and all the facilities should apply for the safe identification of their homes and can be installed upon approval by the territorial housing security management. In relation to urban management, planning, fire management, in accordance with the relevant provisions. (ii) “Article 10 prohibits acts that affect the safety of homes: The Security Council, at the top of the roof, at the open level, has been able to establish buildings or constructs; The second is placing overload items at roofs, indoors and in the positive wing; The three-protected power and stress equipment within the residential room; Other acts that endanger the security of the house.” (iii) “Article 11 houses, owners, users, operators and small-zone companies have the obligation to monitor the demolition of homes and to report to the Territory's housing safety management without security requirements”. xi. New “chapter III, Home Safety Review”. Article 12 and article IV were converted into Article 12, deleteing the words “including escrowers, State-authorized houses and their affiliates” and “strengers and operators” and “strengers” after “households” delete “and subsidiary buildings” and add “delivery” to “ensure their normal use and security” to “ensure the safe use of homes”. Article XIII, former article 27, paragraph 1, read articles 13 and 14. In the two paragraphs, the “householding sector” was replaced with the words “at all districts” (markets), in the area of housing security”, in paragraph 1, the word “relevantly” was replaced with “occupied towns” and “households” were added to “and their subsidiary facilities” after “households” and the deletion of the words “in disaster weather seasons, housing owners should be organized to conduct focused inspections, governance, ensure physical, property security” and “incidents and property security”. The owner or the user of the house shall be treated in accordance with the matters set out in the letter of credit to the house.” In paragraph 2, after “established”, delete the words “and improve the risk”, “the archives” should be replaced with “secure”, delete the words “timely” and add the “reservation of old-risk homes archives”, and “to put an end to and punish violations”. In addition, article 16, “The City Housing Authority is responsible for the quality of the institution for the security of the entire city's house”. Article 15, paragraph 7, was converted to article 18. In this regard, the “Final Household Housing Safety Identification Agency” was amended to read “Recognition of Urban Housing Safety” and “the city area” should be replaced with “the city area” and “the district and suburbs, mined areas” to “the district” and “minal areas”. Paragraphs Page The words “some” were replaced with “specific”, and “operational” were replaced with “qualification”. Delete article 9, “Every house owner, the user and the neighbouring units or individuals of the house, discovering that all, used and neighbouring houses are at risk and endanger the safety of the person, the property shall apply to the identification body at the house for the safety of the house”. Article 10, Deleting the original Article, “The housing sector finds that units within the Territory are housed ... require the identification of the ministry”. Articles 19 to 21 are added. (i) “Article 19 has one of the following conditions, and the owner and the user must apply for the safety of the house: Removal of the main structure of the house or a marked increase in the number of houses; The extension or re-engineering of the positive wing; The old house at risk is inherent in the third; The original home of the fourth to the public recreational place; The fifth Housing Safety Administration issued a letter of concealment and should be clearly identified. (ii) “The inappropriate use of the 20-pronged houseowners, the use of houses considered by the user to be neighbouring endangers the security of their homes or considers that the construction work is being carried out may undermine the self-ownership and may apply for the safety of homes”. (iii) “Article 21 quantification bodies may accept administrative, judicial bodies commissioning a safe identification of homes”. Articles 20, 11 and 12 were merged. In this regard, “Request for housing security accreditation” adds to “relevant documents” and (i) the words “the applicant's name, age, work unit and place of residence, the name of the legal person or other organization and the name, place of the legal representative”. “other” should be replaced with “relevant”, and the last paragraph deleted “Technical”. Articles 21 and 13 were converted into article 23. This (i) adds “or entrusts” after “application”. Article 22, former article 14, becomes article 24. It abolished “CJ13-86”. Twenty-third, former article 15 became article 25. The words “shall be attended by more than two experts” were amended to read “the need for more than two persons with housing security accreditation as an identifiant”. Twenty-four, former article 16 was turned into article 26. In this regard, the “identification body” added “Final security” before the deletion of the designation by the housing sector, which should be dispatched to assist the survey. The original article 18 was turned into article 28. In subparagraphs (i) (ii), the “building” was added to “one-sizen”. Articles 27, 20, 20 and 22 were merged into article 30. In this regard, the “identification body shall communicate the identification instrument to the applicant, the owner” within the time of the security clearance of the house to the identification of the applicant and the owner” as “and send to the identification applicant three days” and “the identification body must dispatch a letter of dangerous homes in a timely manner” as “and inform the territorial housing security management in a brief manner” and delete the words “should produce a letter of non-risk homes”. Articles 27, 24, 25 and 26 were merged into article 32. In this regard, “the identification body may collect the cost of housing security recognition and the fee rate shall be modified by the application of the standard of implementation approved by the HLCM after approval”. The word “preparation” was replaced with the word “transmission”. Delete “the identification of dangerous homes and the identification of fees is borne by all the owners of the house; the identification of non-risk homes is borne by the applicant. The housing sector has designated the identification of hazardous houses and the identification of fees is borne by the owner; the identification of non-risk homes, the identification of the fees is borne by the housing sector” and “; the conclusion is inconsistency and the re-identification of the fees is borne by the identification body”. Article 28, article 28, read article 33. In this case, “hazardous houses” add to “call houses or houses”. Twenty-ninth, an increase in article 35, “The sale of houses to individuals under the National Housing Restructuring Policy, the occurrence of concealments or the identification of dangerous homes, and the original property units or owners shall organize governance”. Article 30, former article 29 was converted to article 30. There was an increase in the number of “intrusive” after “public houses”. Article 31 was turned into article 39. Delete “the nature of use” and two “and legally responsible civil liability”. Article 32, former article 31, was replaced with article 38. In this regard, the proportion of “a” has been revised as “the principle set”. Article 33, article 32, read article 34. The term “risk houses” was amended to read “Reservations of homes or hazardous housing identification instruments”. “Efficient management of dangerous homes” was deleted. Three quarters, former article 33, were converted into article 37. Delete “risk” in “households for all” and in paragraph 2, delete “one-time”. Article 40 was changed from XV to article 40. The words “shall not be used” are “shall be used immediately and in accordance with the requirements of the identification instrument”. Article 41, “Every unit, individual shall not be allowed to rent or use the certified property as a whole and shall be removed as a whole”. The original article 35 was changed to article 42. Delete the words “shall not be pre-emptive, delayed”. Article 338, former article 37, “The transfer of the judiciary to justice by law” was amended to read “in violation of articles 33, 33, 16 and 39 of this approach, the owner, the owner of the house, the user's refusal to assume responsibility for governance or not to be subject to the required governance, by the Territory's housing security management to account for the period of time, and to impose a fine of more than three thousand dollars. The parties refused to implement the decision, causing the collapse of homes and damaging the security of the person's property, should be held in accordance with the law with civil liability, suspected of committing crimes, transferred to the judiciary” and “in violation of article 40, article 41 of this approach, the refusal to suspend the rental or use of dangerous homes, and the immediate suspension or suspension of use by the territorial housing security management. The non-commerciality is subject to a fine of more than one thousand dollars for all house owners and a fine of up to one million dollars for the operation. The security of the person's property shall be subject to civil liability under the law; the alleged offence shall be transferred to the judiciary”, as articles 50, 51. Article 339, deletion of former article 38, “Refusing, impeding the identification of institutions and punishing the public security sector in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Law on the Safety and Security of the People's Republic of China”. Article 40, former article 39 was turned into article 53. The words “intrusion of sentence” were amended to “crime”. Article 41, article 41, read article 54. In this regard, the housing sector has been revised as “household security management”, “intrusing the sentence” as a “received offence”, and “to hold criminal responsibility” as “removal”. Articles 4 to 49 were added as articles 44 to 49. (i) “Article 444, in violation of article 7 of this approach, does not obtain a security permit for the security of the territorial housing administration, unauthorized changes in the structure of the subject matter of the house or a marked increase in the number of houses, which are warned by the territorial housing security management to provide for the rehabilitation of the status quo. A fine of more than one thousand yen was imposed on non-commerciality, imposing a fine of more than one million yen on the operational nature, including a fine of more than three million dollars for the proceeds of the offence. (ii) “Article XV, in violation of article 9 of this approach, unauthorized construction of large-scale facilities in house buildings without the approval of the Territory's housing security management, by a time-bound arrangement for all facilities in the Territory's housing security management, which is certified by the housing security of tenure that is not in accordance with security conditions. Until such time, the non-operational nature is fined by a fine of more than one thousand yen, in addition to the fact that it is responsible for its recovery.” (iii) “Article 46, in violation of article 10 of this approach, is warned by the Territory's housing security authorities to remove or clean the parties' deadlines; that the removal or cleaning of the costs is still pending, and that the removal or clearance costs are borne by the parties. The non-operational nature is subject to a fine of more than one thousand dollars, with a fine of up to one million dollars for the operation. (iv) “Article 47, in violation of article 15 of this approach, provides for the refusal to accept security inspections, which are warned by the security management of the Territory's homes and may be fined by more than one thousand dollars”. (v) “Article 48, in violation of article 16 of this approach, article 17 provides for the identification of persons who have not authorized the conduct of a security certificate for the conduct of a house or who have not obtained a certificate of eligibility for housing safety, shall be subject to the responsibility of the municipal property administration authorities to cease the identification and may impose a fine of up to one million dollars”. (vi) “Article 49, in violation of article 19 of this approach, stipulates that the security of the house shall be subject to a denial of the application, and shall be subject to a fine of up to three thousand dollars. The loss was caused by compensation by the responsible person under the law. The alleged offence was transferred to the judiciary”. Article 42, Deleting the risk management of public buildings such as rural schools, hospitals, is implemented in the light of this approach. Article 44, article 43, was replaced with article 55, read “on the date of publication” with “25 June 1730”. |
