Key Benefits:
(Summit No. 207 of 25 July 2003 by the Government of the Overseas Territories) Article I, in order to strengthen urban management, is based on the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Punishment Act and a letter from the State Department of Rule of Law on a pilot project on a relatively centralized administrative sanctions regime in South Bissau, in conjunction with the current city's practice. Article 2. This provision applies to integrated urban management efforts in the context of the city's calendar, city, creativity, trameteries, and the development of new technologies. Article III is responsible for the integrated enforcement of the urban administration in the city, which is responsible for the organization of the implementation of this provision and for the harmonization of movement control, the organization of city-wide and major law enforcement activities. In accordance with the division of responsibilities, the Regional Urban Management Administration is responsible for specific law enforcement efforts within the Territory, and law enforcement operations are governed by the leadership of the Urban Administration Administration. The Urban Management Police Team, in collaboration with the Urban Administration Administration Administration Administration Administration, is working on integrated urban management. Article IV covers the scope of law enforcement by integrated law enforcement authorities: (i) The exercise of administrative sanctions under the laws, regulations and regulations governing the management of sanitation in the city and the removal of buildings or facilities that are not in compliance with urban profiling standards, sanitation standards; (ii) The exercise of the administrative penalties provided for in the laws, regulations and regulations governing the management of urban environmental protection, for the pollution of social life noise, for construction of noise pollution, and for administrative penalties for the contamination of dietary services and the environment of sewerage; (iii) The exercise of the right to administrative penalties for untreated traders under the laws, regulations and regulations governing the administration of business; (iv) The exercise of the right to administrative penalties for the intrusion of roads under the laws, regulations and regulations governing the management of public safety transport; (v) The exercise of the right to administrative sanctions under the relevant laws, regulations and regulations governing urban greenization, planning, public administration, human protection, housing management, construction management, and the development of demolition management; (vi) Other matters concerning the Government of the city. Article 5 After the relative concentration of administrative penalties, the competent administrative authorities shall not exercise the administrative penalties that have been centrally exercised by integrated law enforcement agencies; the administrative sanctions decisions are still in place. Article 6. Integrated law enforcement agencies should introduce administrative law enforcement responsibilities, law enforcement appraisals and the law enforcement system, establish a system for regular exchange by law enforcement officials of the rotation system, monitor the inspection system and increase administrative law enforcement. Article 7. Integrated enforcement agencies in the city and district should establish telephones and make them public. The offence reported to citizens, legal persons or other organizations should be covered by the law; it should be communicated to the author within the scope of the responsibility. Article 8. Integrated law enforcement agencies should establish information networking and collaborative meetings systems with relevant administrative authorities to coordinate key issues in integrated law enforcement. Article 9. In the course of law enforcement, integrated law enforcement agencies have found that they are responsible for the administrative authorities concerned and should be informed or transferred in a timely manner to the relevant administrations; in the management process, the relevant administrative authorities have found that the functions of the integrated law enforcement organs should be communicated or transferred to the IAC. An integrated law enforcement body or the relevant administrative authorities shall not be permitted to transfer without justification and shall notify the transfer authority within 5 days of the date of the decision. Article 10. The executive authorities shall inform the integrated law enforcement authorities within five working days of matters relating to the approval of licences, the management of matters requiring integrated law enforcement authorities to exercise administrative sanctions. The administrative sanctions decisions taken by integrated law enforcement agencies should be communicated within five working days to the relevant administrative authorities. Article 11. Integrated law enforcement agencies should uphold the principle of combining punishment with education and promote the self-respect of citizens, legal persons or other organizations. An executive sanction decision by the integrated law enforcement authorities should be clear, substantiated, legally based and consistent with the statutory procedures, and administrative penalties are not imposed for minor and timely redress of the violation. Article 12 Staff members of integrated law enforcement agencies must be uniformed in the execution of their official duties, with a uniform law enforcement mark, which must not be less than 2 in the investigation of the offences committed by law enforcement officials and must present administrative law enforcement documents indicating the basis and grounds for law enforcement. Article 13 law enforcement officials have found violations and should be responsible for changing the situation, where they cannot be altered, ordering their deadlines and denying them the tools and goods used by law. Article 14. Law enforcement officials must register the property subject to suspension, list of which shall be kept in good custody by the parties in the form of the latter's signature, and timely reporting to the relevant head, which shall be treated in accordance with the law. The loss of the rescinded property shall be compensated by law. Article 15. Violations of the Office of Integrated Law Enforcement require technical recognition by the relevant administrative authorities or by the relevant technical accreditation bodies. Article 16 imposes penalties on integrated law enforcement agencies and must be used to harmonize the monetary orders issued by the financial sector. When law enforcement officials collect a fine at the time, they must be given the parties with a “relevant collection of fines” without a fine collection and the parties have the right to refuse payment of fines. A fine collected by law enforcement officials should be transferred from within two days of the date of the collection of a fine to an integrated law enforcement body; the Integrated Law Enforcement Authority should pay a fine within two days to the banks designated by the financial sector. Article 17 provides for administrative penalties made by integrated law enforcement agencies in the area, which shall be reported to be filed within three working days on the basis of the type of case. Article 18. The parties' decisions on administrative penalties imposed by integrated law enforcement agencies in the district may apply for administrative review to the Government of the District or to the integrated law enforcement authorities in the city; the parties' decisions on administrative sanctions imposed by the integrated enforcement authorities in the city may apply to the Government for administrative review and the parties may initiate administrative proceedings directly to the People's Court. The parties did not apply for reconsideration, nor had they been prosecuted before the People's Court and failed to comply with administrative sanctions decisions, which were applied by the organs that had made the penalties. Article 19 Integrated urban law enforcement agencies have found that integrated district law enforcement authorities should not be able to detect violations, and should be responsible for their conduct of investigations or for direct investigation by the city's integrated law enforcement agencies and for the administrative responsibility of the responsible person. Article 20 Administrative enforcement of the integrated law enforcement organs should be subject to the supervision of the Government of the people at this level, the rule of law body, who believe that law enforcement acts are in violation of the law and have the right to lodge complaints, prosecution to the inspectorate or to the rule of law body. Article 21, law enforcement officials should be prosecuted in good faith, integrity and integrity, criminal responsibility under the law for acts of negligence, abuse of authority, favouring private fraud, and not constituting crimes, and administrative disposition by law. Article 2 states (market) are implemented in the light of this provision. Article 23 |
