Key Benefits:
(Summit No. 124 of the People's Government Order No. 124 of 27 September 2003) Article 1 promotes the regulation of administrative law enforcement, in accordance with the law, to build codes of conduct, operational coordination, fair transparency and integrity, and to guarantee economic and social development, and to develop this approach in line with the relevant provisions of the State. Article 2 refers to administrative law enforcement responsibilities as described in the present approach, which refers to the system of work of executive organs (with legal, legislative and regulatory mandates, with the same) to deflect law enforcement responsibilities into the law enforcement agencies concerned, to each law enforcement position and to monitor, conduct nuclear and awards. Article 3. The executive organs at all levels of the province must establish and implement administrative law enforcement responsibilities in accordance with the relevant provisions and methods of the State. Article IV establishes and implements administrative law enforcement responsibilities and should be guided by the principles of competence, openness and justice, and should be responsible for clarity, law enforcement and error. Article 5 Execution of administrative law enforcement responsibilities under the leadership of the executive law enforcement department, led by the following vertical leadership in the province. Administrative enforcement responsibilities in the area of administration of justice are also subject to the guidance and supervision of the same-level people's governments, in the following vertically led municipalities, districts (markets, districts). The executive law enforcement authorities affiliated to the Government of the communes provide guidance and oversight on the administration of justice in the lower administration. Article 6 Institutions responsible for the rule of law at the level of the Government and the executive law enforcement sector (hereinafter referred to as the rule of law body) are responsible for the specific work of the executive law enforcement responsibilities under the leadership of the Government and this sector, with the primary responsibility: (i) Specific work by this body to establish and implement administrative law enforcement responsibilities; (ii) Guidance, supervision and supervision of administrative law enforcement responsibilities for the conduct of inspections, the conduct of inspections and the conduct of inspections; (iii) To organize awareness-raising, follow-up to the implementation of national regulations and methods relating to the administration of justice; (iv) Other work responsibilities relating to the administration of justice. Article 7. Article 8. The executive organs shall fully and accurately implement the relevant laws, regulations and regulations, in accordance with the provisions of the law, regulations, regulations, and the institutional structure and functional configuration of the organs. Article 9. The executive organs should establish the rule of law advocacy system, provide information on the laws, regulations and regulations, raise the legal perceptions of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, as well as the self-respect of law and the law. The executive organs should provide timely and accurate responses to the advice of citizens, legal persons and other organizations on administrative law enforcement issues. Article 10. The executive body should establish a system of training in the rule of law for administrative law enforcement officials and provide regular training to administrative law enforcement officials. Administrative law enforcement officers must be trained to obtain administrative law enforcement qualifications. Article 11 establishes normative documents by executive organs that must be consistent with the Constitution, laws, administrative regulations, decisions of the State Department, orders, national approaches and local legislation, government regulations and regulations in this province, and must be closely aligned with local practice, highlighting research and evidence and enhancing the operationality of normative documents. Normative documents developed by the executive organs should be sent to the top-level organs with review powers, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State and the province. Article 12. The executive organs shall be public in order to make public statements to the society on the basis of law enforcement, law enforcement, law enforcement procedures, telephone reporting and supervision by citizens, legal persons and other organizations. In relation to administrative licences, the conditions, procedures, deadlines for processing should be made public; the fees should be published. Article 13 governs administrative law enforcement, such as administrative licences, administrative sanctions, and must be carried out in strict accordance with the competence and procedures set forth in the law, regulations and regulations and shall not go beyond or abuse. Article 14. The executive body shall regulate the conduct of administrative licences, express responsibility, improve oversight and exercise administrative licensor under the law. The executive organs should exercise administrative licences that should be guided by the principles of openness, equity, justice, people, timeliness, reduction, simplification of procedures and efficiency. Article 15. The Government of the people at the district level has set up a centralized administrative licence facility, where the administrative law enforcement authorities should establish a service window to harmonize the application for administrative licences and take the administrative licence decisions; for special circumstances, it is not possible to enter the place, with the consent of the Government of the people at this level, it should determine whether a body within the sector or establish a service window to harmonize the application for administrative licences, and the provision of administrative licences. Article 16 shall strictly enforce the provisions on the separation of fine decisions from the collection of fines, and shall not impose a fine on administrative law enforcement agencies and administrative law enforcement officials, and shall not link the amount of the fine to the funding of administrative law enforcement agencies or the welfare of administrative law enforcement personnel, and shall not translate the statutory responsibility into a reimbursable service and shall not be retained, separated or converted into private punishment. Article 17 should take measures to implement the administrative review, administrative v. and administrative compensation system, to deal seriously with administrative review cases and administrative compensation cases and to participate in administrative proceedings in accordance with the law. The executive body should seriously implement the administrative review decisions or decisions and decisions that have legal effect. Article 18 The executive branch should establish a system of accountability for sound administrative law enforcement, in line with the practice of the organ, to conduct prompt investigations and prosecutions of law enforcement erroneous responsibilities of executive law enforcement officials in this organ. Article 19 (i) Be faithful to the Constitution, laws, regulations and regulations; (ii) Be faithfully and in strict compliance with the law, uphold the dignity of the law and the Government's image; (iii) Hearing popular opinions and defending the public interest and working for the people; (iv) Conservation of State secrets and preservation of the security, honour and interests of the State; (v) To be impartial and impartial; (vi) To act as a result of the performance of its functions, the treasury and the term civilization; (vii) Self-receptance of legal oversight, social oversight and other oversight. Article 20 (i) Distinction of expressions that undermine the reputation of the Government, organize or engage in activities against the Government; (ii) Toys negligence and to work wrongly; (iii) To combat reprisals against citizens, legal persons and other organizations that have filed complaints; (iv) Corruption, bribery or the use of authority for personal gain; (v) Abuse of powers, harassment of the population and violations of the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations; (vi) Disclosure of State secrets and violations of commercial secrets and personal privacy; (vii) Participation, support or cover offences; (viii) Participation in or participation in operating activities of profit; (ix) Other violations. Article 21 Governments of the population at the district level should conduct, as appropriate, an examination of the establishment and implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities by the respective executive law enforcement authorities, as well as monitoring the establishment and implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities by the Government of the lower-level population. The executive law enforcement sector, which is the following vertically led in the province, should conduct an examination of the establishment and implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities at the lower level. The executive branch shall conduct an annual review of the performance of administrative law enforcement functions by law enforcement agencies and administrative law enforcement officials. An examination of administrative law enforcement officers may be carried out in conjunction with civil servants. The specific programme for the conduct of the study is developed by the rule of law institutions of the archipelagos, which is followed by the approval of the heads of the present organ. After the approval of the archaeological programme, it should also be submitted to the law of the executive branch at the highest level. The main elements of article 22 for the evaluation of the administrative law enforcement sector include: (i) Organizational leadership for the implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities; (ii) Implementation of the administrative law enforcement responsibility regime; (iii) Distinction and implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities; (iv) Construction of the administrative law enforcement team; (v) Implementation of statutory duties; (vi) The accountability of administrative law enforcement; (vii) Other considerations identified by the archaeological body. The main elements of an administrative law enforcement officer's examination include legal quality, enforcement of statutory duties and integrity. Article 23 should uphold the principles of objectivity, impartiality, simplification and effectiveness. Article 24 (i) Hearing reports on the establishment and implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities in the archaeological sector; (ii) Access to information on the implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities by the archaeological authorities; (iii) A sample of administrative law enforcement files; (iv) The convening of a comparative panel on administration to seek the views of the various communities of society; (v) Conduct a legal quality assessment of the heads of the VIP and administrative law enforcement personnel; (vi) Other modalities identified by the archaeological body. Article 25 Article 26 The administrative law enforcement authorities should cooperate with the conduct of the conduct of the conduct of the conduct of the archaeological office, listen carefully and correct the problems in a timely manner. Article 27 should make good, qualified or non-qualified conclusions after the examination by the archaeological authorities of the nuclear sector. The archaeological findings are communicated by the archaeological body and are presented to the rule of law institutions at the highest level. Article 28 grants recognition and incentives by the archaeological authorities to the administrative law enforcement sector, which is rated as a good administrative law enforcement component in the administration of justice. Article 29 is one of the following cases in the executive branch, which is criticized by the superior administrative body and recommended by the rule of law organs of the executive branch that have the executive disposition of the first holder and the related head by law: (i) The establishment and implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities; (ii) There are serious violations in the administration of justice; (iii) The investigation of serious violations; (iv) Social communities reflect the poor image of their law enforcement; (v) Oversight inspections with respect to the conduct of the examination or at the superior level are not synchronized and false. Administrative law enforcement officials have one of the acts listed in article 20 of this approach, which is criticized by the organs of the State, the processing of induction training, or the recovery of their administrative law enforcement documents by administrative law enforcement agencies, the removal of their law enforcement qualifications, the circumstances of which are serious and administratively disposed of in accordance with the law, which constitutes an offence and is criminally liable by law. Article 31 provides that persons engaged in administrative law enforcement responsibilities conduct research or supervision of inspection work in the conduct of examination, supervision of inspection exercises favouring private fraud and misrepresentation, which should be criticized for education; in the event of serious circumstances, administrative disposition by law. Article 32 of this approach is implemented effective 1 November 2003. |
