Key Benefits:
(Adopted by the 14th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Hygiy on 19 January 2004 No. 73 of 12 February 2004 by the Order of the Government of the Hygiene People, which was issued as from 1 April 2004) The Honoural Government has decided to amend the Education Financing Facility in Hono Province as follows: i. Adjustment of Article 2 to Article 3 and amends to read: “The provision of education referred to in this approach means financial allocations for education, the addition of urban education fees, the addition of local education and other channels to raise funds under the law.” Article 5 was amended to read: “The Government of the people at all levels should dedicate a proportion of the funds allocated for the maintenance of primary and secondary schools every year.” iii. Amend Article 6 as follows: “The people at all levels should organize a proportion of the pro-poor funding to support the development of education in poor areas, mainly for improvement of primary school conditions in rural areas”. Article 7 was amended to read: “The urban education fees are supplemented by 3 per cent of value-added taxes, consumption taxes and operating taxes, and are levyed in production volumes, out-of-pocket joint ventures, intra- and external cooperation, and sole-source businesses. Local education adds to 1 per cent of value-added taxes, consumption taxes and operating taxes, and engages in a semi-harvest in the production of cigarettes, out-of-pocket joint ventures, external cooperation, exclusive-source businesses. V. Amendments to Article 8 are as follows: “The cost of urban education is accompanied by local tax authorities. The fees for urban education are added to the use of earmarked instruments for the harmonization of local tax offices in the provinces; the collection of government funds with local education plus the use of the provincial financial sector. Article 9 was amended to read: “The cost of urban education plus local education shall be paid in conjunction with the payment of value-added taxes, consumption taxes and operating taxes.” Delete Articles 10, 11, 12 and 13. Article 14 was amended to read: “The local education is charged in conjunction with the collection of urban education fees, donated into the local State's treasury and incorporated into local budget management and repayments to the same-level education administration. An additional requirement for urban education costs is made by the same fiscal sector through budgetary expenditure arrangements; additional requirements for local education are charged with the same financial sector through the fund budget expenditure arrangement.” Delete article 15. Article 16 should be amended to read: “The urban education costs are added to local education and are used to improve school attendance at primary and secondary schools and shall not be allocated to the top education cause”. Article 17 should be amended to read: “The people at the district level should ensure that the proportion of funds allocated for rural education is less than 50 per cent, but not including teachers' wages, when funding for rural education is arranged for rural education. Delete article 18. Article 20 was amended to read: “In violation of article 9 of this approach, the local tax authorities are responsible for the period of time and receive a five-year lag of lags on a daily basis; and a fine of up to $300,000 is still outstanding”. Article 21 was deleted. In addition, individual language changes were made and the revised text series was adjusted accordingly. The present decision reissued for the implementation of the Education Financing Management Scheme in Honours Province, effective 1 April 2004. Annex: Methods for the management of the financing of education in Hindu province (Amendment (2004)) (Act No. 20 of 16 May 1996 of the People's Government of Honduran Province, pursuant to Decision No. 20 of 12 February 2004 on the revision of the Education Financing Management Scheme in Honours Province) Article 1, in order to develop the cause of education, guarantees the stability and annual growth of the sources of education, which is based on the Education Act of the People's Republic of China, the Law on Education of the People's Republic of China, the Law on Education of the People's Republic of China and the relevant laws, regulations and regulations. Article 2 units and individuals within the territorial administration should be subject to this approach. Article 3 of this approach refers to financial allocations for education, urban education costs, local education additions and other sources raised by law. Article IV. Governments at all levels should establish institutions that finance the financing of education through financial allocations and multiple other channels, to increase funding for education on a year-by-year basis, to harmonize the cause of education with economic and social development. Expenditures for education at all levels of the people's Government are separate in the financial budget, in accordance with the principle of convergence of rights and financial rights. Article 5 Governments at all levels should dedicate a proportion of each year to improve primary and secondary school conditions, from the funding allocated for urban maintenance. Article 6. Governments at all levels should organize a proportion of education in poverty-reduction funding to support the development of poor areas, mainly for improving primary and secondary school conditions in rural areas. Article 7. Urban education costs are supplemented by 3 per cent of value-added taxes, consumption taxes and operating taxes, and are levyed in production volumes, out-of-pocket joint ventures, intra- and external cooperation, and exclusive businesses. Local education is levyed by 1 per cent of value-added taxes, consumption taxes and operating taxes, and is engaged in a semi-harvest in production volumes, with external joint ventures, external cooperation, and foreign-owned enterprises being exempted. Article 8 The cost of urban education adds to the use of earmarked instruments for the uniform printing of local tax offices in the province; the collection of government funds with local education plus the use of the provincial fiscal sector. Article 9. The addition of urban education fees and local education should be paid in conjunction with the payment of value-added taxes, consumer taxes and operating taxes. Article 10. Local education is charged in conjunction with the collection of urban education fees, donated into the local treasury, incorporated into local budget management, and consigned to the secondary education administration. An additional requirement for urban education costs is provided by the same financial sector through budgetary expenditure arrangements; additional requirements for local education are charged with the same financial sector through the fund budget expenditure arrangement. Article 11. Urban education costs are added to local and local education for improvement of primary and secondary school conditions and cannot be allocated to the top education cause. Article 12. The Government of the communes should ensure that the proportion of funds allocated to rural education is less than 50 per cent, but not including teachers' salaries, when funding is allocated for rural education. The executive branch of Article 13 shall establish a sound financial system and an audit system, dedicated to management, regularly publish income and expenditure on a regular basis to the financial sector in the payment of accounting statements and end-of-year accounts. The sectors such as education, finance, tax, audit, inspection and agriculture conduct oversight inspections of the financing, management and use of education, in accordance with their respective responsibilities. Article 14. In violation of article 9 of this scheme, the local tax authorities are responsible for the period of time and receive a five-year lag of lags on a day-to-day basis, with a fine of up to $300,000. Article 15. In the context of the financing, management and use of education, in favour of private fraud, corruption, negligence, abuse of power, is not an offence and administrative disposition is granted to the competent and other direct responsible persons directly responsible. Article 16 is implemented effective 1 July 1996. |
