Key Benefits:
(The 9th ordinary meeting of the Government of the People of the Republic of 19 June 2003 considered the adoption of Decree No. 154 of 23 June 2003 of the Order of the Government of the People's Republic of China, which came into force on 1 July 2003) The Government of the city has decided to amend the Modalities for the Modalities in the Restitutional City. The second amendment reads as follows: In addition to the highway under article IV of this approach, the management of other highway vehicle traffic costs is not applicable.” Article IV amends as follows: “A motor vehicle shall pay a bridging fee in accordance with article 5 of this approach, through the following road blocks in the main urban area: (i) To commend the garbage, the mile bridge, the melting of the arsenal, and the guarantor of Macao; (ii) Glasma, Lee poles and gigacite; (iii) The bar block of the arsenal to the tunnel; (iv) Conferences and tunnels; (v) A high-quality road (hereinafter referred to as a highway on the trajectory line) consisting of a front, a secondary fee road and a gateway consisting of a gateway consisting of a gateway to a parent's home, a child's yard, a militar, and a bridge (including a bridge to the family); (vi) The way and bridges that have been built within the main city area following the implementation of this approach.” Article 5 adds paragraph 1 as paragraph 3: “A motor vehicle with no pay for the year of movement of the road block is on a highway line, paying the vehicle movement rate in a manner and standard prescribed by municipal price authorities, municipal transport administration authorities”. Article 8, paragraph 1, was amended to read: “The criteria for the annual fees for the passage of the road bridge and the subsurface, which are jointly studied by the municipal price authorities in conjunction with the city's financial sector, and subsequently implemented by the Government of the city. Of these, the annual fee for road bridges can be charged at a highway on the ground and prohibiting two of the highway on the shoreline.” V. Article 9 amends to read: “The annual fee mark for the road bridge is co-ordinated by the municipal administration authorities to produce the ax highway cost card, which is the responsibility of the city's Highway operator, and is distributed by the public security transport administration. The annual fee mark for the motor vehicle should be accompanied by the vehicle, and the annual fee mark for other motor vehicles should be posted on the right corner of the front ventilation glass. In this regard, mobile vehicles that pay the annual cost of road access to the high-line highway road bridges should be accompanied by a high-camped road cost card for the identification and cost of movement at the time of entering and entering the highway. Article 10 amends as follows: “The road bridges are paid on a daily basis. The sub-prime receipt of the road bridge should be properly maintained for the identification.” Article 11 adds to paragraph 2 and 3: “The facility shall maintain facilities in accordance with the relevant technical norms and ensure the normal functioning of the facility. The maintenance of urban road bridges should be subject to the supervision, guidance and guidance of municipal administrative authorities; the maintenance of roads should be monitored and directed by municipal transport administration authorities. The principals of the road block operated by lease are not subject to the relevant technical norms and requirements for the maintenance of the road bridge facility, while the administrative authorities maintain their obligation not to fulfil their maintenance obligations, which are carried out by the municipal administration authorities or the municipal transport administration authorities, and their costs are deducted from the rental or commissioning costs.” Article 13, paragraph 1, was amended to read: “The annual fee mark for the road bridge was lost. The annual fee mark for the movement of the road blocks was damaged by, inter alia, transportation accidents, and the vehicle owners should submit written requests and proof of the receipt of the motor vehicle pass and the annual fee for the road bridges to the municipal administration authorities. Article IX, article 16, paragraph 1, was amended to read: “In violation of the provisions of this approach, the municipal administration inspected by the municipal administration authorities or the municipal administration inspectorate entrusted by them, in accordance with the nature and circumstances of the offence, and in accordance with the following provisions: (i) No payment of the annual fees for the passage of the road bridges, as required. Recruiting them and paying less than $50 million for the year of the day-to-day road bridge from the date of late; (ii) The payment of the royalties to the road bridge shall be subject to a fine of up to $50 million; (iii) Referral, intrusive, courier, or using a false road block marking, which shall be added to the same type of vehicle shall pay a fine of more than two times the annual fee standard; (iv) Re borrowing, intrusing, releasing, or using a counterfeited road block receipt, which is responsible for the payment of a fine of more than 1,000 dollars; (v) Removal of the annual fee mark for the movement of the road bridges as prescribed by the provisions; denial of correctional fines of $20; (vi) The annual fee mark or the receipt of the royalties without the road bridge is forced to impose a fine of 200 dollars through the fee station; (vii) In the absence of inspection of the municipal administration, a driver may be charged to the designated location to be processed and, after the completion of the processing.” Article 21 adds a paragraph to section IV: “Final period of movement of motor vehicles in the second half of 2003 within the North Kyi area, by 31 July 2003 by motor vehicle owners, and the corresponding annual fee for road bridge traffic”. This decision was implemented effective 1 July 2003. The management scheme for the movement of road bridges in the main city of Zhenmin was released in accordance with this decision. Annex: Management scheme for the movement of road bridges in the main urban city (as amended in 2003) (Act No. 135 of 18 June 2002 of the Order of the People's Government of Kingston, amended by the Decision of the Government of the People's Republic of China of 23 June 2003 on the revision of the management scheme for the settlement of the road bridges in the main city of the city) Article I, in order to fully perform the transport functions of the urban roads in the main urban areas of my city, improve the urban roads and improve the urban development environment, develop this approach in accordance with the provisions of the State Department's Urban Road Management Regulations and the Regulations on the Management of the Rejuven Municipal Engineering Facilities. Article 2 In addition to the high-quality road under article IV of this approach, the management of other highway vehicle traffic costs is not applicable. The management and related coordination of the royalties for road bridges in the main urban areas is the responsibility of the municipal administration authorities. Sectors such as public security, transport, construction, prices and finance should be co-ordinated with the municipal administration authorities in the management of the royalties for road bridges in the main city. Article IV. Mobile vehicles, through the following road blocks in the main urban area, shall pay the road blocks in accordance with article 5 of this scheme: (i) To commend the garbage, the mile bridge, the melting of the arsenal, and the guarantor of Macao; (ii) Summer, Lee poles and the gigacite; (iii) The bar block of the arsenal to the tunnel; (iv) Conferences and tunnels; (v) A high-quality road (hereinafter referred to as a highway on the trajectory line) consisting of a front, a secondary fee road and a gateway consisting of a gateway consisting of a gateway to a parent's home, a child's yard, a militar, and a bridge (including a bridge to the family); (vi) The way and bridges that have been built within the main urban areas following the implementation of this approach. Article 5 registers motor vehicles in the main urban area, paying a one-time fee for road blocks, in accordance with Article 7 of this scheme and in accordance with the standard set out in Article 8. When a motor vehicle is registered outside the main urban area into the main city area, a bridging fee is paid in accordance with the collections provided for in article 10 of this approach and the standards published in accordance with Article 8 and a one-time payment of the road bridge traffic rate. The motor vehicles that do not pay the annual rate of movement of the road block are moving at a highway line, paying the vehicle movement rate in a manner and standard prescribed by municipal price authorities, municipal transport administration authorities. Article 6. The cost of access to the road block is charged with administrative expenses, which are fully paid to the city-level treasury and are managed on both income and expenditure lines. The annual fee for road bridges was commissioned by the city's financial sector and will be published by the name of the receiving bank. The travel rate is charged by the municipal administration authorities. A portion of the entry into the town can be entrusted with a highway fee station. Article 7. New vehicle arrivals, field vehicle relocations should pay the annual fee on the basis of the remaining time and fees for the year prior to the process. The period of payment for the next year's road bridge is still being implemented in accordance with the preceding paragraph. Public safety transport management must verify the payment of the annual fee for road bridges when it comes to procedures such as the annual trial of motor vehicles, the arrival of new vehicles, the use of vehicles and the relocation of field vehicles. Module vehicles that do not pay the annual fee for the road bridge shall not be processed. Article 8 Standards for the annual fees and travel of the road bridges are presented by the municipal price authorities in conjunction with the city's fiscal sector, which is followed by the approval and publication of the Government. Of these, the annual fee for road bridges can be charged at a highway on the ground and prohibiting two of the highway on the ground. The annual fees for the movement of the road bridge and the passage of the road bridges are charged with the use of administrative fee collections produced by the municipal financial sector. The annual fee collection for the vehicle's road block was collected by the vehicle's vehicle' number, type of road blocks. Article 9 The annual fee mark for the motor vehicle should be accompanied by the vehicle, and the annual fee mark for other motor vehicles should be posted on the right corner of the front ventilation glass. Of these, mobile vehicles that pay the annual fee of the Highway Road Bridge should be accompanied by the vehicle to carry the Highway Highway Card for the identification and movement of the highway. Article 10 Receives for road bridges should be properly maintained in order to test. Article 11. Costs for road bridges are charged primarily to cover rental costs for the road bridge, maintenance costs for the road bridge and the costs associated with road bridges. The road bridge facility should be maintained in accordance with the relevant technical norms, maintaining facilities and ensuring the proper functioning of the facility. The maintenance of urban road bridges should be subject to the supervision, guidance and guidance of municipal administrative authorities; the maintenance of roads should be monitored and directed by municipal transport administration authorities. The principals of the road block operated by lease are not subject to the relevant technical norms and requirements for the maintenance of the road bridge facility, while the administrative authorities maintain their obligation to maintain their maintenance, which is performed by the municipal administrative authorities or the municipal transport administration authorities, and their costs are deducted from the rental or commissioning fees. Within the area of Article 12, the following vehicles are exempted from the payment of the road blocks: (i) The vehicles used by foreign consular offices themselves; (ii) Military vehicles, police vehicles, firefighting vehicles, engineering trucks, sanitation-specific vehicles and public handcuffs. The vehicles (other than military vehicles) which are exempted from the payment of the road blocks shall be transferred to the municipal administrative authorities for the exemption. Article 13 The annual fee mark for the movement of the road blocks was damaged by, inter alia, transportation accidents, and the vehicle owners should submit written requests and proof of the receipt of the motor vehicle route pass and the annual fee for the road bridge to the municipal administrative authorities. Losss of the road bridge are lost and their losses are borne by the vehicle owner. Article XIV prohibits the payment of the annual fee mark and road bridges for the movement, the use of the falsification of the road bridge and the receipt of the road bridge. Article 15. Municipal administrative authorities should conduct a inspection of the payment of road blocks for vehicles and parking parks in the main urban area, vehicle stations, terminals. No unit or individual shall be denied inspection. Article 16, in violation of the provisions of this approach, is monitored by the municipal administration authorities or by the municipal administration authorities, in accordance with the nature and circumstances of the offence, and in accordance with the following provisions: (i) No payment of the annual fees for the passage of the road bridges, as required. Recruiting them and paying less than $50 million for the year of the day-to-day road bridge from the date of late; (ii) The payment of the royalties to the road bridge shall be subject to a fine of more than 100 dollars; (iii) Referral, intrusive, courier, or using a false road block marking, which shall be added to the same type of vehicle shall pay a fine of more than two times the annual fee standard; (iv) Re borrowing, intrusing, releasing, or using a counterfeited road block receipt, which is responsible for the payment of a fine of more than 1,000 dollars; (v) Removal of the annual fee mark for the movement of the road bridges as prescribed by the provisions; denial of correctional fines of $20; (vi) The annual fee mark or the receipt of the royalties without the road bridge is forced to impose a fine of 200 dollars through the fee station; (vii) In the absence of inspection of the municipal administration, the driver may be charged to the designated location to be processed and, after the completion of the process, the party can leave. In violation of this approach, it is prohibited by the establishment of a fee station to collect a road bridge fee and to punish the relevant authorities in accordance with the provisions of the relevant laws, regulations and regulations. Article 17 rejects, impedes the enforcement of public functions by municipal administration law enforcement officials, punishes the public security sector, is suspected of committing crimes and transferred to the judiciary. Article 18. Specific administrative acts by the parties against the executive branch may be applied by law for administrative review or administrative proceedings. Article 19 governs the execution of official duties by law enforcement officials in the administration of the city, which should be uniformed and brought together a unified administrative law enforcement mark, regulating law enforcement and administration of the law. Article 20, Municipal, Public Security Traffic Managers play a role in malfunctioning their duties by taking the vehicle's private road bridges into account or distributing fees, which are disposed of by their units or at the top level of administrative authorities; suspected crimes are transferred to the judiciary. Article 21, this approach has been implemented effective 1 July 2002. The fees for the movement of motor vehicles that were published in this city are not consistent with this approach. In the second half of 2002, the motor vehicle owner was paid by 30 September 2002 and received a corresponding annual fee mark for the road bridge. During the second half of 2003 hours of movement of motor vehicles in the north horticulture area, the motor vehicle owner was paid by 31 July 2003 and received a corresponding annual fee mark for the road bridge movement. |
