Advanced Search

Tianjin City, Tianjin Municipal People's Government On The Revision Of The Decisions Of The Management Of Public Security Technology To Prevent

Original Language Title: 天津市人民政府关于修改《天津市公共安全技术防范管理办法》的决定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Adopted by the 30th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of the city of Zenin on 21 June 2004 No. 55 of 30 June 2004 by Decree No. 55 of 30 June 2004 No. 55 of the Order of the People's Government of the Republic of Zenzi, issued as of 1 July 2004)

The Government of the city has decided to amend the Safeguarding of Public Security Technologies in the city of Zinz (No. 37 of the 2001 People's Government Order) as follows:
Article 6 was amended to read: “The production of technic products must be in compliance with national standards, industry standards or local standards, without the criteria mentioned above, and must be established and reported to the municipal quality technical supervision sector.
Article 7, paragraph 8, was deleted.
Two additional articles were added after Article 8: “Prohibiting the production, sale of technical defence products that are not in compliance with national technical standards.
The design, installation and use of technic systems that do not meet technical standards is prohibited.”
“Energy producing technic products shall be available to the public security authorities within 30 days of the start of the business.”
Articles 9, 10, 11 and 12 were deleted.
V. Amendments to Article 13 shall be made as follows:
Articles 14, 15 shall be deleted.
Two articles were added after article 15: “Instructions for the technic system should be made available to the public security authorities for the systematic design of maps and relevant information. A review of the opinion was made by the public security authorities on the basis of the findings of the design of programmes and experts. The installation unit shall not be constructed without the consent of the public safety authority.
Prior to the use of the technic system, the mechanical units should apply to the public security authorities for the safe technical preventive examination. Unless experienced receipt or inspection is not eligible for use.”
“The application for the use of inspection teams in the TCTS should provide the following materials:
(i) Prequalification reports and technical information related to the mechanical system that are equipped with the mechanical units;
(ii) More than 30 days of probationary operation;
(iii) The staffing of the technic system unit with the availability of the personnel of the technician system;
(iv) Technician systems with legal effect test qualified reports.”
Article 16 was amended to read: “The design programmes of the TCTS should implement national standards, industry standards or local standards. The design programme should be based on technical arguments by the experts concerned, which can serve as a basis for the review and inspection of the technology defence system by public security authorities.”
Article 17 should be amended to read as follows: “The Public Security Agency shall make a written decision within 20 days of the date of application for the use of inspection requests for the mechanical system, the technician shall inform the applicant”.
Amendments to article 18 to “production, sale of technic products, design, installation, use of technic systems should be subject to oversight by public security authorities”.
Article 20 was amended to read: “The production and marketing units of technic products, the design, installation, maintenance units of the technic system prohibit the employment of persons who have no identity documents or who have been criminalized for intentional crimes”.
Article 22 was amended to read: “In violation of article 7, paragraph 2, article 8, article 9, article 10 of the present approach, the public security authority is subject to a fine of up to one million yen; there is a violation of the proceeds of the offence; a fine of up to 3,000 dollars for the head concerned.”
Article 23 was amended to read: “In violation of article 15, article 16, article 17 of this approach, public security authorities may be warned or fined up to 1,000 dollars, and the respective heads may be fined up to $200,000.”
Article 24 was amended to read: “The staff members of public security organs, in violation of article 13 of this approach, abuse of authority, negligence, provocative fraud in the management of public safety technologies, do not constitute an offence and are subject to administrative disposition by law.”
The relevant provisions are adjusted accordingly.
This decision has been implemented effective 1 July 2004.
The Safeguarding Approach to Public Security in the city of Zinz was re-published in accordance with the relevant amendments to the present decision.

Annex: Methods for the prevention of public safety technologies in the city of Zinz (Amendment (2004))
(Adopted on 28 February 2001 by the Government of the city on 30 June 2004 in accordance with the Decision of the Government of the city on Modification of the Safeguarding Approach to Public Security in the city of Zanzi city)
Article 1. To strengthen public safety technology protection, to protect public and private property and to prevent and combat violations of the law, and to develop this approach in line with the relevant provisions of the State.
Article II refers to scientific and technical instruments such as the use of public safety technology preventive products (hereinafter referred to as technic products), public safety technology preventive systems (hereinafter referred to as TC-protection systems) to prevent and suppress criminal acts and to maintain public safety activities.
This approach refers to specialized products that are included in the national security technology preventive product catalogue for the prevention of robbery, the burgety, the fire, and the prevention of State, collective and personal property and physical integrity.
This approach refers to a public safety prevention system, which is aimed at safeguarding public safety, for the integrated use of technic products and related science and technology, management approaches.
Article 3. This approach applies to public safety technology preventive activities within the city's administration.
Article IV. Public security authorities are the executive authority for the preventive management of public safety technologies in this city. Regional, district public security agencies are responsible for the management of public safety technology in this administration. The public safety authority conducts industrial oversight of the quality of public safety technologies and receives operational guidance from the quality technical supervision sector.
The relevant executive authorities, such as construction, business, import and export quarantine tests, assist public security authorities in the prevention of public safety technology within their respective responsibilities.
Article 5: The following key units and heads of departments should take public safety technology preventive measures:
(i) Production, storage and storage of weapons, ammunition;
(ii) Storage sites such as acute poisoning, radioactive items, drug control or bacteria;
(iii) To concentrate on the location of national secret information, archives, information and computer software;
(iv) The operation and concentration of precious metals or jewellery, such as gold, silver;
(v) Connects and units that produce value securities;
(vi) The place of operation of financial institutions, the treasury, the shipment of bank vehicles or other concentration in the storage of large cash;
(vii) Departments such as electricity, telecommunications, water supply, heating, radio and television;
(viii) collections of important scientific, economic and material values, such as museums, exhibitions, books, places or places of office;
(ix) Airports, vehicle stations, terminals or other places requiring safety inspections;
(x) Major business sites;
(xi) The presence of national research institutions or units such as the testing of scientific research production;
(xii) In accordance with the relevant provisions of the State and the city, other priority units and heads of the public safety technology preventive measures should be taken.
The production of technic products must be in compliance with national standards, industry standards or local standards, without the criteria mentioned above, and must establish enterprise standards and report to the municipal quality technology monitoring sector.
Article 7 prohibits the production and sale of technic products that are not in compliance with national technical standards.
The design, installation and use of technic systems that do not meet technical standards is prohibited.
Article 8. Enterprises that produce technic products should be available to public security authorities within 30 days of the start of the business.
Article 9 units involved in the design, installation and maintenance of the technic system should be available to the public security authorities within 30 days of the start of the business.
Article 10 needs to be equipped with a technic system to be reviewed by the systematic design of maps and relevant information. A review of the opinion was made by public security authorities in accordance with the findings of the design of programmes and experts. The installation unit shall not be constructed without the consent of the public safety authority.
Prior to the use of the technic system, the mechanical units should apply to the public security authorities for the safe technical preventive examination. Unless experienced receipt or inspection is not eligible for use.
Article 11. The following materials should be made available for the use of the TCTS:
(i) Prequalification reports and technical information related to the mechanical system that are equipped with the mechanical units;
(ii) More than 30 days of probationary operation;
(iii) The staffing of the technic system unit with the availability of the personnel of the technician system;
(iv) Technician systems with legal effect test qualified reports.
The design programmes of the technic system should implement national standards, industry standards or local standards. The design programme should be based on technical arguments by the experts concerned, which can serve as a basis for the review and inspection of the technology defence system by public security authorities.
Article 13. Public security authorities shall make written decisions within 20 days of the date of application and inform the applicant.
Article XIV Production, sale of technic products and the design, installation and use of technic systems should be inspected by public security authorities.
Article 15. The safety and technical characteristics of technic products, technic systems, the production, sale, design, installation, maintenance and use of units shall be conservative and shall be limited to the least-scale and registered.
Article 16 Production and marketing units of technician products, design, installation, maintenance units of technic systems, prohibits the hiring of persons who are undocumented or who have been criminally punished for intentional offences.
Article 17 units that adopt public safety technology preventive measures should establish systems for the use and protection of technic products, technic systems, and ensure reliable and regular operation of technic products and systems.
Article 18, in violation of article 7, paragraph 2, article 8, article 9 and article 10 of this approach, is being corrected by a public security authority, which may be warned or fined by the amount of 1 million dollars, with the proceeds of the violation, with a fine of up to 30,000 dollars, and a fine of 1000 dollars for the relevant head.
Article 19, in violation of article 15, article 16 and article 17 of this scheme, public security authorities may warn or fine up to 1000; the holder may be fined by €200.
In violation of article 13 of this approach, staff members of public security agencies have abused their functions in the management of public safety technologies, neglected and favoured private fraud, which is not yet a crime and are subject to administrative disposition by law.
Article 21, this approach has been implemented effective 1 July 2004.