Advanced Search

Seismic Fortification Measures For The Administration Of Xiamen Construction Projects (Amended 2004)

Original Language Title: 厦门市建设工程抗震设防管理办法(2004年修正本)

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Act No. 58 of 3 June 1997 of the People's Government Order No. 58 of the House of Commons on 28 June 2004, as amended by Decision No. 111 of the People's Government Order No. 111 of 28 June 2004)

Article I, in order to strengthen the management of construction work against shocks, to defend and mitigate earthquakes, and to develop this approach in line with relevant national provisions.
Article 2 works within this city's administration area are subject to this approach.
Article 3. The Municipal Construction Committee is the competent authority for the construction of work to combat the construction of fires in the city (hereinafter referred to as the municipal construction authority) and is responsible for the supervision of the efforts of this city to combat the establishment of a defence. Sector-building authorities are responsible for the management of anti-attack management within their responsibilities.
The Municipal earthquake Authority of the House is responsible for overseeing the management, seismic monitoring and the promotion of education for disaster risk reduction in the city's construction of anti-attack standards and the safety evaluation of the building site.
Managements such as planning, municipalities, land tenure are responsible for the management of shocks in accordance with their respective responsibilities.
Article IV prevents the use of shocks and combines a holistic approach. The construction of work resistance plans should be incorporated into the national plan for economic and social development and be organized.
Article 5
Resistance planning is developed jointly by the city-building authorities with the relevant sectors, such as earthquakes, and is approved by the Government of the city following a comprehensive balance between the urban planning authorities.
Article 6. The work that may occur in the event of earthquake shall not be constructed in densely populated areas, and construction shall be relocated in conjunction with urban areas.
Article 7, new construction, alteration and expansion works must be resisted, and work that is not in line with anti-attack standards must not be built.
Article 8. General industrial and civilian construction works can be used directly as a defence standard as shown in the China earthquakes (1990) in line with the gravity of the project.
Article 9. Important transport, energy, communications works should conduct seismic safety evaluations in engineering construction sites when conducting feasibility studies. The work-building of seismic safety evaluation reports must be validated by the seismic sector and can serve as the basis for a study on the feasibility of approval of projects in the relevant sectors.
The unit responsible for seismic safety evaluation must be in possession of a certificate of eligibility for seismic safety evaluation for the construction of the site by the seismic sector.
Article 10. The construction of the construction map design review shall be carried out with a review of the prevention of shocks and a defence certificate against the following engineering organizations:
(i) Work that may result in serious secondary disasters;
(ii) Major urban life line works such as water supply, electricity, gas and communications hubs;
(iii) Other works that can be complicated by resistance shocks.
Article 11. Surveys, design units shall be designed in accordance with the State-mandated guidelines for the design of anti- shocks, and shall be responsible for the corresponding resistance to the design of quality.
Article 12. The construction unit shall be strictly based on paper construction, subject to the regulations and norms relating to construction and shall not be subject to any unauthorized change in the defence measures against shocks.
In the course of the implementation of the institution, the construction of a treasury unit should be able to carry out the work-resistant defence measures.
Article 13. When the quality of the work is monitored by the Engineering Quality Monitoring Service, the measures taken to combat the construction of the works are examined.
Article 14. The urban construction authorities shall strengthen the oversight of construction work against the construction of fires and shall be entitled to check the construction site at any time.
The construction units should be in line with the supervision of construction works against construction.
Article 15. Construction works should be included in the identification project when they are completed.
Article 16 uses new technologies, new materials and new structures that must be identified in accordance with the relevant provisions, in line with the requirement of resistance.
Article 17 shall not destroy the housing structure in the course of the use, renovation and rehabilitation of homes.
The following construction work must be carried out against shocks:
(i) The existence of preventive and defence standards on the basis of anti-stereotypical resistance or, notwithstanding, resistance;
(ii) Resistance has been established, but a reduction in the ability to combat shocks due to the rehabilitation, renovation, installation of replacement equipment or changing the nature of use;
(iii) Natural disasters, such as devastating earthquakes, floods, cyclones or other natural disasters, which may lead to severe damage to the resilience of shocks;
(iv) Other work to combat shocks is needed.
Temporary buildings could not be identified.
Article 19, which was identified as not in compliance with the requirement of anti-attack protection, is the responsibility of the owner to fight the shocks. The owner shall entrust the original design unit or the design unit in line with the requirement of qualifications with a programme of resistance and shall be implemented by eligible construction map review bodies.
Article 20, which has been identified as failing to meet the demand for resistance and has no inherent value, should be included in the urban adaptation plan or the enterprise development upgrading plan without further compromising.
The housing included in the rehabilitation plan shall limit its use and duration.
Article 21 Combats the identification of shocks by qualified units. Anti-attacking is inherently designed and assumed by the construction units with a corresponding level of qualifications.
In the aftermath of the devastating earthquake, the municipal construction authorities should organize the rehabilitation of construction projects.
Article 23 is one of the following acts, which is rectified by the municipal authorities' orders of responsibility, provides a warning or imposition of a fine of up to 30,000 dollars for the unlawful units; and imposes a fine of more than 1,000 dollars for the offender in breach of the law.
(i) The construction of a fire defence review, as prescribed;
(ii) Removal or elimination of anti-attack measures;
(iii) With regard to housing that has been included in urban rehabilitation plans that cannot meet the demands of shocks, without limiting their use and the time frame for use;
(iv) In the course of the use, renovation and rehabilitation of homes, the destruction of the housing structure and the impact on the ability of homes to fight shocks;
(v) There is no provision for the identification of shocks, resistance to shocks and denial of remedies.
Article 24 does not provide for the conduct of a safe seismic evaluation of the construction of the building site, which is modified by the Order of the Municipal earthquake, giving warning or imposing a fine of up to 20,000 dollars.
The evaluation report was not valid and was fined by the Urban earthquake Authority for more than 5,000 dollars.
In the oversight of anti-attacking work, the Government's relevant management staff are toys negligence, abuse of authority, provocative fraud and are administratively disposed of by their offices or superior authorities, which constitute a crime and are criminally criminalized by the judiciary.
Article 26