Key Benefits:
(The 16th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Turkmen Republic of 6 June 2005 considered the adoption of Decree No. 99 of 7 June 2005 No. 99 of the Decree No. 99 of the Government of the Plurinational State of the Territory, which came into force on 1 September 2005) Article 1 establishes procedures for regulating the normative documents of the executive organs at all levels, guaranteeing the quality of normative documents and promoting the administration of the law, in accordance with the laws, regulations and regulations of the People's Representatives of the People at the local level of the People's Congress and at the local level of the People's Government of the People's Republic of China, the Regulations and Rules. The following executive organs shall, in accordance with their statutory competence, establish documents that are generally binding on citizens, legal persons and other organizations (hereinafter referred to as normative documents) and shall comply with this provision: (i) The municipalities and districts, the people's governments and their offices; (ii) Committees, offices and offices of the municipalities and districts, the zones of the Government; (iii) communes, the people of the town. This provision applies to the development of normative documents by organizations that conduct administrative administration in accordance with laws, regulations and regulations. This provision is not applicable to the executive body to establish an internal system of work, management system, etc. Article III, in addition to the provisions of laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, does not establish normative documents by the agency of the executive branch, the internal structure and the temporary body. Article IV (i) The principle of harmonization of the rule of law; (ii) To establish principles in accordance with the legislative authority and procedures; (iii) Principles of competence and responsibility; (iv) Maintenance of the principle of legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations; (v) Guarantee the principle of the exercise by the executive branch of its functions under the law. Article 5 The content of normative documents is to be used for the implementation of the top-level law and the normative documents of the superior administration, whose name is “implementation”. Normative documents can be formulated in the form of the provisions or in the form of the paragraphs. The name of normative documents is “the provision”, the approach”, “rules”, and is generally expressed in the form of provisions. Article 6 establishes normative documents that should be in compliance with the provisions of the public correspondence of the executive branch and be conducted in accordance with the procedures of research, consultation, coordination of differences, legality review, approval of decisions, issuance of publications. As a result of major disaster events, public safety and major public interest, urgent orders and decisions to implement superior administrative bodies, the need for the immediate development of normative documents could be simplified with the approval of the main heads of the design bodies. Article 7. The content of normative documents should be clear, specific and operational and not incompatible with legal, regulatory, regulatory and national approaches, policies. Normative documents should regulate administrative behaviour in a scientific manner in line with the requirements for changing government functions. Article 8 shall not create the following elements in normative documents, in addition to the legal basis or otherwise provided by States: (i) Administrative licence matters; (ii) Administrative penalties; (iii) Administrative coercive measures; (iv) Administrative charges; (v) Other matters to be regulated by law, regulations, regulations or superior administrative bodies. Article 9 Government normative documents are specifically drafted by a Government department or by a number of departments, or are drafted or organized by its rule of law institutions. Sectoral normative documents are drafted by a body established within the sector or drafted by its rule of law bodies. The content of normative documents involves two or more sectoral mandates, which should be co-drafted by two or more sectors; joint drafting, generally by one sector and by other sectors. Article 10. Drafting normative documents should conduct research on the need and feasibility of the development of normative documents and conduct research on issues to be addressed in normative documents, the main systems to be established or the main measures to be set. Expert hearings, hearings, if necessary, should be held. The drafting of normative documents should seek the views of the relevant organs, organizations and managers. Civil, legal or other organizations are advised of the content of the draft normative document and the drafting sector should be addressed. The relevant bodies have made important differences with regard to the content of the draft normative document, which should be coordinated by the drafting sector; coordination is incomplete, reporting to the same-level people's governments for coordination or decision. Article 12 (i) A public letter for review; (ii) Draft normative document; (iii) Drafting notes (including the purpose of developing normative documents, the basis, the coordination of key elements and important differences); (iv) Relevant material for consultation; (v) Legal, regulatory, and national approaches, policies based on the drafting of normative documents; (vi) Other references. The publication of normative documents by other administrative bodies requires the provision of information, taking into account the provisions of the preceding paragraph. Article 13 The drafting of normative documents and the establishment of the rule of law institutions are responsible for providing legitimacy for the material provided by this organ. The review shall include the following: (i) Whether there is a need and feasibility for development; (ii) Does not go beyond the establishment of the statutory terms of reference of organs; (iii) In conformity with article IV, Article 7, Article 8 of the present article; (iv) Have coordination and interface with relevant normative documents; (v) Whether the views of the relevant organs, organizations and managers are sought; (vi) Whether there is coordination of important differences; (vii) Other needs to be reviewed. Article 14. The rule of law institutions may modify the draft normative document requested for review and seek the views of the parties. The rule of law bodies may be coordinated in the course of the revision process, or they are invited to decide by the normative documentation body. The draft normative document is not in accordance with Article 12, Article 13, which provides that the organ or its rule of law bodies may return it to the drafting sector or require a change in the drafting sector and a subsequent request for review. The draft normative document has been reviewed by the rule of law bodies in accordance with article 12, paragraph 13, of the present article, and is submitted by the rule of law body to the organ for approval of normative documents. The publication of normative documents should be signed by the principal executive head. Article 16 (i) Letters from the review; (ii) Text of normative documents; (iii) A description of normative documents; (iv) The enactment of laws, regulations, regulations, orders and decisions based on normative documents; (v) Other relevant information based on the development of normative documents. Article 17 Government rule of law institutions shall complete the review within 10 working days and shall notify the departments that have developed normative documents in writing of the review observations. After the review of the Government's rule of law bodies, the departments that have developed normative documents should carefully study the views expressed. The Government's rule of law institutions should be informed in writing about the fact that the main opinion cannot be adopted. Article 19 In violation of this provision, the executive branch may withdraw or impose its own removal. Nor may it be issued without a review by the same Government's rule of law body. The Government's rule of law bodies have found normative documents issued without their review, which may be brought to the Government of the people at this level to withdraw and to make a public announcement of the document. The Government's rule of law bodies can check the issuance of normative documents by the same level of government. Article 20 Normative documents should be made available to society and the manner in which the publication should be accessible to citizens, legal persons and other organizations. Article 21 should be implemented after 30 days of the date of publication, but due to the need to guarantee national security, the major public interest, or to the fact that no immediate application would impede legal, regulatory, regulatory and national approaches, and policy implementation could be carried out from the date of public publication. The second article shall be published in accordance with the provisions of the ADB normative document. Article 23. The right to interpretation of normative documents is exercised by normative document-making bodies. Article 24 The normative document development organs and executive bodies should conduct regular assessments of the implementation of normative documents and, in accordance with actual changes, legal, regulatory and national approaches, policy adjustments, promptly revise or repeal the published normative documents. Article 25 |
