Key Benefits:
(Act No. 5 of 29 November 2005 of the People's Government Order No. 5 of the Grand State, which came into force on 1 January 2006) The Government of the Higong State has decided to amend the Regulations on the Management of Administrative Norms in the City of Hiroshima as follows: i. Article 2 amends as follows: the administrative normative document referred to in this provision means that the Government and its functional departments and laws, regulations and regulations authorize organizations competent to administer the functions of public affairs, in accordance with the laws, regulations, regulations and the orders of the superior government, decisions are formulated and issued in accordance with the statutory powers and procedures, relating to the rights, obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, are applied repeatedly within a certain period of time and are generally binding in the areas under the jurisdiction. Administrative normative documents are divided into governmental normative and sectoral normative documents. The administrative normative documents issued by the municipalities, the Governments of each region on their own behalf are normative documents of the Government; the functions of the Government, laws, regulations authorize organizations that are responsible for the management of the functions of public affairs (hereinafter referred to as sectors) are sectoral normative documents. The addition of a provision as Article 3: The internal management system of the Government and its departments, including the rights of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, such as personnel, administration, extermination, financial management, internal rules of service that are not directly affected, requests and reports to the superior administrative bodies, administrative decisions on specific matters and other non-universal documents are not applicable. Article 3 has been replaced with article IV and has been amended to apply this provision for activities such as the development, review, publication, filing and filing of administrative normative documents in the city, the district government and various sectors. The provisions refer to the formulation, modification and repeal of administrative normative documents. Add a Article as Article 5: The following bodies shall not establish administrative normative documents: (i) Interim institutions; (ii) Proceedings coordinating bodies established to complete a specific mandate; (iii) The establishment of institutions in the sector. V. Increase a article as article 6: In violation of this provision, the issuance of administrative normative documents has been null and void and citizens, legal persons or other organizations have the right to refuse implementation. Article IV was replaced with Article 7 and amended to: enact administrative normative documents that would not violate the provisions of the Constitution, laws, regulations and regulations; not be incompatible with the orders, decisions of the superior administrative organs; nor should it go beyond the statutory terms of reference of the subject. The content already specified in laws, regulations and regulations does not in principle duplicate administrative normative documents. Article 5 was replaced with article 8. Paragraphs Page Articles 9 and 7 were replaced with Article 10 and amended to read as follows: administrative normative documents were generally made in the form of provisions. In addition to the complexity of the content, no chapter, section. The name of the administrative normative document generally states as “the provision”, “the approach”, “rule”, “rule”, “rules”, “consideration”, “Recommendations”, “Recommendations” and “please”. General use of “mandatory”, “how”, “rules” for the content of entities. The names of administrative normative documents do not affect their nature. Article 11: The drafting of administrative normative documents should conduct a study on the need and feasibility for the development of administrative normative documents and conduct studies on issues to be addressed in administrative normative documents, the main systems to be established or the main measures to be envisaged. Article 8 has been replaced with Article 12, and has been revised to draft administrative normative documents that should be heard by citizens, legal persons or other organizations. The drafting sector heard the views that could be taken either in writing or in the form of a colloquium, analytic, hearing. In addition, article 13: Civil, legal or other organizations make observations and recommendations on the content of the draft administrative normative document, the drafting sector should study the treatment and give feedback to citizens, legal persons or other organizations that have made observations or recommendations, as set out in the draft note. Article 13, article 9 was replaced with article 14, paragraph 1, which reads as follows: Government normative documents could be drafted by the Government concerned or by governmental institutions of the rule of law. The drafting body for administrative normative documents should fully seek the views of other relevant departments, institutions other than governmental rule of law bodies. It was considered necessary to be co-drafted by more than two departments and agencies. The drafting sector should coordinate with the relevant departments, agencies that have made important disagreements with the content of the draft administrative normative documents. Coordination and treatment of important disagreements should be reflected in the drafting note. Articles 15, 11 had been replaced with 16 and had been amended to read as follows: sectoral normative documents or governmental normative documents drafted by sectoral organizations should be reviewed and amended by sectoral rule of law bodies and, after the adoption of a collective discussion by the sectoral leadership. The review of the rule of law institutions in the sector should be set out in the drafting note. Article 12 was replaced with Article 17, paragraph 1, by amending the Government's normative document drafted by sectoral organizations, which had resulted in the delivery of the draft, and by submitting the Government's consideration. A copy of the governmental normative documents considered by the Government shall be sent to the Government's rule of law bodies prior to the official publication. Article 18: Administrative normative documents should provide for an effective period. The period of effectiveness shall not exceed five years from the date of publication of administrative normative documents. The effectiveness of administrative normative documents is automatically terminated at the end of the period of effectiveness. In the six months prior to the effective expiration of the administrative normative document, the development of the sector's view that the document needs to be continued, should be assessed on the implementation of administrative normative documents and be revised in accordance with the assessment. The Government's normative document is assessed by the original drafting department or by the Government's rule of law body. The revised administrative normative document is a new administrative normative document. Sectoral normative documents should be reviewed in accordance with the requirements set out in this article. The original article 13 should be replaced with Article 19, paragraph 1 as follows: Article XIX, former article 14, read article 20. The former article 15 has been replaced with article 21, and has been amended to read as follows: when the sectoral normative documents are delivered, the referral sector should submit the following material to the Government's rule of law bodies: (i) Communications to be delivered; (ii) Substances of normative documents in the sector (a written and electronic text); (iii) A description of sectoral normative documents (including the purpose of developing sectoral normative documents, the basis, coordination of key elements and important differences, views of sectoral rule of law bodies); (iv) Relevant information sought (including the scope of the consultation, the analysis of the recovery opinion, the adoption of observations and their descriptions); (v) The laws, regulations, regulations and national policies based on the drafting of sectoral normative documents; (vi) Other relevant materials. Article 16 was replaced with article 22 and amended to read as follows: the application for the transfer of normative documents in line with article 21 of the present article should be accepted and returned to the Government's rule of law institutions. The submissions were not in accordance with article 21 of the present article, and the Government's rule of law bodies could request the referral of the relevant material within the specified period. The time for the Government's rule of law bodies to be admitted is calculated from the date of the replenishment of the material. Articles 22, 17, which were replaced with 23, paragraph 2, 3 were amended to read as follows: the controversy was larger, complicated or involved other major complex issues, which could not be reviewed within the period specified above and, with the approval of the Head of State Rule of Law Bodies, could extend ten working days and the reasons for the extension should be communicated in writing to the trial sector. The Government's rule of law body does not provide a written review of views within the prescribed time frame as a review agreement. Article 22, paragraph 2, and article 23, of the present article shall be subject to the provisions of article 12, paragraph 2, and article 23. The circumstances referred to in the previous paragraph are of urgent nature: (i) The occurrence of natural disasters, endemic diseases or other unforeseen events that endanger public safety at large; (ii) Execution of emergency orders and decisions by superior authorities. Twenty-four, article 18, paragraph 1, should be replaced with article 25 and amended to read as follows: Incompatible with article 9, article 10, the Government's rule of law bodies, while reviewing their consent, should make additional comments. Twenty-five, first article 18, paragraph 2, was replaced with article 26 and amended to read one of the following cases where the sectoral normative documents were delivered, and the Government's rule of law bodies should make observations that were not agreed, supplemented or suspended, returning to the trial sector: (i) In violation of article 7, paragraph 8, of this provision; (ii) The basic conditions for developing sectoral normative documents are not ripe; (iii) The main content of the provisions of the sectoral normative document was largely controversial and the delivery sector was not sufficiently consulted or consulted with the relevant departments, agencies. The Government's rule of law bodies should hear the views of the referral sector, in accordance with the preceding paragraph, that they are not agreed, supplemented or suspended. Twenty-sixth, former article 19 was replaced with article 27. Article 27, former article 20, was replaced with article 28 and revised to read as follows: The delivery sector should be treated in accordance with the review of the Government's rule of law bodies in the form of a sectoral normative document. Twenty-eighth and twenty-first articles were replaced with article 29 and were amended to challenge the review of the Government's rule of law bodies by the referral sector within ten working days from the date of the written review of the Government's rule of law bodies, explaining the reasons for the Government's coordination. Twenty-ninth, increase of a article as article 31: Administrative normative documents should be made available to society. The administrative normative documents that have not been issued to social unity are null and void and cannot be used as a basis for the administration. Article 33 was replaced with article 31 and amended to read as follows: The text of the administrative normative document published by the Hiroshima is the standard text. Administrative normative documents issued in the Universal State Congress should also be made available in the public information network and other public media. Article 20 was replaced with article 32 and amended to read as follows: The publication of sectoral normative documents developed by municipal government departments should be signed by the main heads of departments; sectoral normative documents developed jointly by the two sectors are signed by the heads of departments. After the signing of the main heads of the sector, the Government's rule of law, which had been reviewed, should be checked; the Government's rule of law bodies that had been reviewed were sent to the Executive Office of the Government. In accordance with article 34 of this provision, administrative normative documents developed by the municipalities and their departments that require the immediate publication of implementation may be issued either through the Government's Public Information Network and other public media, but are subsequently issued in accordance with the provisions of this article and article 31 of this provision. In addition, a unified system for the publication of administrative normative documents developed by the regional governments and their sectors is governed by the sectoral government. Article 23, former article 24, was replaced with article 34. Three quarters, former article 25, were replaced with article 35 and amended to read as follows: the right to interpretation of administrative normative documents is a government or sector that formulates the administrative normative document. The original chapter of chapter V was amended to read as follows: Three sixty-sixth, former article 26 had been replaced with article 36 and had been amended to read as follows: Government normative documents developed by the Government of the District should be sent to the municipal rule of law institutions within 15 days of the date of publication. The original article 27 was replaced with article 37 and was amended to read as follows: (i) Communication of requests; (ii) Formal text of administrative normative documents or decision to repeal administrative normative documents (a written and electronic text); (iii) A description of administrative normative documents; (iv) Develop laws, regulations, regulations and national policies based on administrative normative documents; (v) The certified material published publicly; (vi) Other material that needs to be submitted. Article 38, former article 28, was replaced with article 38 and amended to review the legitimacy of the regulatory documents of the territorial Government in the case. In violation of Article 7, Article 8 of the present article, the territorial Government's normative documents are submitted to the Government's decision by the municipal rule of law body for proposals to withdraw or reorder. Article 39 was deleted. Article 40, former article 33, was replaced with article 39 and amended to read as follows: Governments at all levels and their departments should regularly clean up their administrative normative documents, subject to actual changes, as well as legal, regulatory and national policy adjustments, and promptly revise or repeal the published administrative normative documents. Clearing the Government's normative documents, which are responsible for the drafting sector, may also be the responsibility of the Government's rule of law institutions. The former drafting sector or the Government's rule of law institutions should submit proposals for the treatment of normative documents of the Government in accordance with clearance. Article 40 was replaced by article 41 and amended to oversee the development and management of administrative normative documents of the municipal government, the district government. Regional Government rule of law agencies are responsible for monitoring the development and management of administrative normative documents of the Government and the Government of the town. The rule of law in the sector is responsible for monitoring the development and management of administrative normative documents in this sector. Paragraphs Page (i) The Government's rule of law institutions can make the document null and void to society without review by the Government's rule of law institutions; (ii) In relation to the normative documents of the non-referred local government, the municipal rule of law institutions may make proposals to the municipal authorities for the removal or correction of orders; (iii) In violation of this provision, the development of administrative normative documents, in a case of serious adverse consequences and negative impacts or damage to the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations as a result of the implementation of null and void administrative normative documents, may be brought to the attention of the relevant authorities, such as the inspectorate, to hold administrative responsibilities of their principals and those directly responsible under the law; (iv) The Government's rule of law should be required not to be sent to trial or to issue administrative normative documents in accordance with this provision; the denial of correction could be brought to the administrative responsibility of the principal heads of State and those responsible, such as the inspectorate, by law. Article 43, former article 33, was replaced with article 42 and amended to read as follows: citizens, legal persons or other organizations were of the opinion that administrative normative documents were not in accordance with this provision and could make recommendations for review to the Government's rule of law bodies. The Government's rule of law institutions should review and respond to citizens, legal persons or other organizations that have made recommendations for review. Article 44, article 34, was replaced with article 43 and was amended to read as follows: Government rule of law bodies do not perform administrative normative documentation review duties and have serious social consequences, and the executive responsibility of the inspectorate principals and those directly responsible. Article 4XV, former article 35, was replaced with article 44 and amended to implement the provisions in the light of the development and management of administrative normative documents at the district level and its sectors, the town and the street offices. Fourteen, thirty-sixth and forty-fifth. This decision has been implemented effective 1 January 2006. The regulations governing administrative normative documentation in the city of Hiroshima are released in accordance with the relevant amendments to this decision. Annex: Management of administrative normative documents in the city of Hiroshima (Amendment 2005) Chapter I General Article 1, in order to strengthen the management of administrative normative documents in my city, ensure the harmonization of the rule of law, in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations, such as the People's Congress and the People's Government Act, at all levels of the People's Republic of China. Article 2 refers to administrative normative documents referred to in this article, which refer to the laws, regulations, regulations and orders of the Government and its functional departments and laws, regulations and regulations that govern the functions of public affairs, and determine that, in accordance with the statutory powers and procedures, the formulation and public issuance of documents involving the rights, obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, the repeated application of documents of a universal nature in the area under the jurisdiction. Administrative normative documents are divided into governmental normative and sectoral normative documents. The administrative normative documents issued by the municipalities, the Governments of each region on their own behalf are normative documents of the Government; the functions of the Government, laws, regulations authorize organizations that are responsible for the management of the functions of public affairs (hereinafter referred to as sectors) are sectoral normative documents. Article 3 Governments and their internal management systems, including the rights of citizens, legal persons and other organizations such as personnel, administration, external affairs and financial management, internal rules of public service that do not directly affect the obligations, requests and reports to the superior administrative organs, administrative decisions taken on specific matters and other non-universal documents, do not apply to this provision. Article IV The provisions refer to the formulation, modification and repeal of administrative normative documents. The following bodies shall not establish administrative normative documents: (i) Interim institutions; (ii) Proceedings coordinating bodies established to complete a specific mandate; (iii) The establishment of institutions in the sector. Article 6. In violation of this provision, the issuance of administrative normative documents has been null and void and citizens, legal persons or other organizations have the right to refuse implementation. Article 7 establishes administrative normative documents that shall not be in violation of constitutional, legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions; shall not be in contravention of the orders, decisions of the superior administrative organs; nor shall it go beyond the statutory terms of reference of the subject. The content already specified in laws, regulations and regulations does not in principle duplicate administrative normative documents. Article 8 establishes administrative normative documents that may not be granted administrative licences, shall not set administrative charges and shall not impose administrative penalties and administrative coercive measures. Article 9. Administrative normative documents should be in line with the principles of simplification, harmonization and effectiveness, which should be accurate, concise and should be clear, specific and operational. Article 10 Administrative normative documents are generally expressed in the form of provisions. In addition to the complexity of the content, no chapter, section. The name of the administrative normative document generally states as “the provision”, “the approach”, “rule”, “rule”, “rules”, “consideration”, “Recommendations”, “Recommendations” and “please”. General use of “mandatory”, “how”, “rules” for the content of entities. The names of administrative normative documents do not affect their nature. Drafting The drafting of administrative normative documents should conduct a study on the need and feasibility of developing administrative normative documents and conduct studies on issues to be addressed in administrative normative documents, the main system to be established or the main measures to be specified. Article 12 Drafting administrative normative documents and the views of citizens, legal persons or other organizations should be heard. The drafting sector heard the views that could be taken either in writing or in the form of a colloquium, analytic, hearing. Article 13. Civil, legal or other organizations shall make observations and recommendations on the content of the draft administrative normative document, and the drafting sector shall study the treatment, give feedback to citizens, legal persons or other organizations that have made observations or recommendations, as set out in the draft note. The normative documents of the Government may be drafted by the relevant branches of government or by governmental institutions of the rule of law. Sectoral normative documents are specifically drafted by the relevant operational body or by the rule of law body. The drafting of administrative normative documents could invite relevant experts, organizations to participate, or experts, organizations to draft them. Drafting units of administrative normative documents should fully seek the views of other relevant departments, institutions other than governmental rule of law bodies. It was considered necessary to be co-drafted by more than two departments and agencies. The drafting sector should coordinate with the relevant departments, agencies that have made important disagreements with the content of the draft administrative normative documents. Coordination and treatment of important disagreements should be reflected in the drafting note. Article 16, sectoral normative documents or governmental normative documents drafted by sectoral organizations, should be reviewed and amended by sectoral rule of law bodies and, after the adoption of a collective discussion by the sectoral leadership. The review of the rule of law institutions in the sector should be set out in the drafting note. Article 17 A copy of the governmental normative documents considered by the Government shall be sent to the Government's rule of law bodies prior to the official publication. The Government's normative paper, drafted by the Government's rule of law body, was sent to the trial by leading the Government's rule of law body to discuss the adoption of the post-part Government deliberations. Article 18 The period of effectiveness shall not exceed five years from the date of publication of administrative normative documents. The effectiveness of administrative normative documents is automatically terminated at the end of the period of effectiveness. In the six months prior to the effective expiration of the administrative normative document, the development of the sector's view that the document needs to be continued, should be assessed on the implementation of administrative normative documents and be revised in accordance with the assessment. The Government's normative document is assessed by the original drafting department or by the Government's rule of law body. The revised administrative normative document is a new administrative normative document. Sectoral normative documents should be reviewed in accordance with the requirements set out in this article. Chapter III Review of sectoral normative documents Article 19 Sectoral normative documents should be sent to the Government's rule of law bodies prior to publication, after the adoption of a sectoral leadership discussion under article 16 of this Article. Nor shall the sectoral normative documents that have not been reviewed by the Government's rule of law bodies be issued. Article 20 Transmissions of sectoral normative documents reviewed by the Government's rule of law bodies should be signed by the main heads of the drafting sector; the drafting of a joint drafting by several departments should be signed by the principal heads of each sector and be sent to the host sector. Article 21, when the sectoral normative documents are delivered, the authorities should submit the following materials to the Government's rule of law bodies: (i) Communications to be delivered; (ii) Substances of normative documents in the sector (a written and electronic text); (iii) A description of sectoral normative documents (including the purpose of developing sectoral normative documents, the basis, coordination of key elements and important differences, views of sectoral rule of law bodies); (iv) Relevant information sought (including the scope of the consultation, the analysis of the recovery opinion, the adoption of observations and their descriptions); (v) The laws, regulations, regulations and national policies based on the drafting of sectoral normative documents; (vi) Other relevant materials. Article 2, which is in line with article 21 of the present article, provides for the referral of normative documents in the sector, and the Government's rule of law institutions shall receive and receive restitution. The submissions were not in accordance with article 21 of the present article, and the Government's rule of law bodies could request the referral of the relevant material within the specified period. The time for the Government's rule of law bodies to be admitted is calculated from the date of the replenishment of the material. Article 23 of the Government's rule of law institutions shall be reviewed within ten working days of the date of receipt and shall communicate the views in writing to the prosecution. The controversy is greater, complex, or involves other major complex issues, which cannot be reviewed within the time period specified in the preceding paragraph and, with the approval of the heads of the Government's rule of law, may extend ten working days and shall communicate the reasons for the extension period in writing. The Government's rule of law body does not provide a written review of views within the prescribed time frame as a review agreement. Article 24 requires the prompt development of administrative normative documents that are subject to the provisions of article 12, paragraph 2, and Article 23 of the present article. The circumstances referred to in the previous paragraph are of urgent nature: (i) The occurrence of natural disasters, endemic diseases or other unforeseen events that endanger public safety at large; (ii) Execution of emergency orders and decisions by superior authorities. Article 25 shall make a review of the consent of the Government's rule of law bodies with regard to the presentation of normative documents in line with this provision. Incompatible with article 9, article 10, the Government's rule of law bodies, while reviewing their consent, should make additional comments. Article 26 was sent in one of the following cases, and the Government's rule of law institutions should make opinions that were not agreed, supplemented or suspended, and return to the prosecution sector: (i) In violation of article 7, paragraph 8, of this provision; (ii) The basic conditions for developing sectoral normative documents are not ripe; (iii) The main content of the provisions of the sectoral normative document was largely controversial and the delivery sector was not sufficiently consulted or consulted with the relevant departments, agencies. The Government's rule of law bodies should hear the views of the referral sector, in accordance with the preceding paragraph, that they are not agreed, supplemented or suspended. Article 27 establishes a special chapter for sectoral normative documentation review. The written review by the Government's rule of law bodies should be accompanied by the exclusive chapter of the sectoral normative document review. Article 28 should be dealt with by the referral to the sectoral normative document in accordance with the review of the Government's rule of law institutions. Article 29, which was contested by the authorities' review of the rule of law institutions, could be challenged in writing within ten working days of the date of the written review of the Government's rule of law bodies, on the grounds of which the Government was coordinated. Chapter IV Publication and interpretation Article 33 The administrative normative documents that have not been issued to social unity are null and void and cannot be used as a basis for the administration. Article 31 of the Charter of the Municipal Government and the uniform publication of sectoral normative documents developed by the municipal government are the State's Greater State. The text of the administrative normative document published by the Hiroshima is the standard text. Administrative normative documents issued in the Universal State Congress should also be made available in the public information network and other public media. Article 32 regulates the municipal government and, after the adoption of the municipal government, is issued by the Executive Office of the Municipal Government. The publication of sectoral normative documents developed by municipal government departments should be signed by the main heads of departments; sectoral normative documents developed jointly by the two sectors are signed by the heads of departments. After the signing of the main heads of the sector, the Government's rule of law, which had been reviewed, should be checked; the Government's rule of law bodies that had been reviewed were sent to the Executive Office of the Government. In accordance with article 34 of this provision, administrative normative documents developed by the municipalities and their departments that require the immediate publication of implementation may be issued either through the Government's Public Information Network and other public media, but are subsequently issued in accordance with the provisions of this article and article 31 of this provision. The uniform issuance of administrative normative documents developed by the territorial Government and its sectors is governed by the regional government. Article XIV Norms of administrative normative documents should generally be implemented after thirty days of the date of public publication. However, it would not be immediately followed by public issuances that would impede the implementation of administrative normative documents and could be carried out from the date of public publication. Article XV's interpretation of administrative normative documents is a government or sector that formulates the administrative normative document. Chapter V Article XVI Government normative documents should be sent within fifteen days of the date of publication to the municipal rule of law institutions. Article 337 (i) Communication of requests; (ii) Formal text of administrative normative documents or decision to repeal administrative normative documents (a written and electronic text); (iii) A description of administrative normative documents; (iv) Develop laws, regulations, regulations and national policies based on administrative normative documents; (v) The certified material published publicly; (vi) Other material that needs to be submitted. Article 338 governs the review of the legitimacy of the legal documents of the territorial Government. In violation of Article 7, Article 8 of the present article, the territorial Government's normative documents are submitted to the Government's decision by the municipal rule of law body for proposals to withdraw or reorder. Chapter VI Oversight and responsibility Article 39 Governments and their sectors should regularly clean up their administrative normative documents, modify or repeal the published administrative normative documents, in accordance with actual changes, as well as legal, regulatory and national policy adjustments. Clearing the Government's normative documents, which are responsible for the drafting sector, may also be the responsibility of the Government's rule of law institutions. The former drafting sector or the Government's rule of law institutions should submit proposals for the treatment of normative documents of the Government in accordance with clearance. Article 40 of the municipal rule of law institutions are responsible for monitoring the development and management of administrative normative documents of the municipal government and the territorial Government. Regional Government rule of law agencies are responsible for monitoring the development and management of administrative normative documents of the Government and the Government of the town. The rule of law in the sector is responsible for monitoring the development and management of administrative normative documents in this sector. Article 40 oversees the development and management of administrative normative documents by the Government's rule of law bodies, which are based on different circumstances: (i) The Government's rule of law institutions can make the document null and void to society without review by the Government's rule of law institutions; (ii) In relation to the normative documents of the non-referred local government, the municipal rule of law institutions may make proposals to the municipal authorities for the removal or correction of orders; (iii) In violation of this provision, the development of administrative normative documents, in a case of serious adverse consequences and negative impacts or damage to the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations as a result of the implementation of null and void administrative normative documents, may be brought to the attention of the relevant authorities, such as the inspectorate, to hold administrative responsibilities of their principals and those directly responsible under the law; (iv) The Government's rule of law should be required not to be sent to trial or to issue administrative normative documents in accordance with this provision; the denial of correction could be brought to the administrative responsibility of the principal heads of State and those responsible, such as the inspectorate, by law. Article 42, civil, legal or other organizations consider that administrative normative documents are not in accordance with this provision and may make recommendations for review to the Government's rule of law institutions. The Government's rule of law institutions should review and respond to citizens, legal persons or other organizations that have made recommendations for review. Article 43 of the Government's rule of law bodies do not carry out administrative normative documentation review functions, resulting in serious social consequences, and are subject to the administrative responsibility of the inspectorate to the principal heads of State and those directly responsible. Chapter VII Article 44 provides for the development and management of administrative normative documents at the district level and its sectoral, town and street offices. Article 42 The Normative Documents Depositary of the Hiroshima City was also repealed. |
