Advanced Search

Major Administrative Punishment Decision, Zibo City, Filing Methods

Original Language Title: 淄博市重大行政处罚决定备案办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Act No. 55 of 22 December 2005 No. 55 of the People's Government Order No. 55 of 22 December 2005)

Article 1 establishes this approach in the light of the Act on Administrative Punishment of the People's Republic of China.
Article 2
Article 3 of this approach refers to the following administrative penalties imposed by administrative penalties imposed by administrative penalties, in accordance with laws, regulations, regulations and regulations:
(i) The suspension of the work;
(ii) Removal of licences or licences;
(iii) A fine of more than €0.0 million.
Article IV, the Government of the People of the Region, the Rule of Law of the High Council (hereinafter referred to as the Principality) is responsible for the preparation of major administrative sanctions decisions on behalf of the Government.
The municipal authorities are responsible for the preparation of the municipal administrative sanctions enforcement authorities and the district-level people's Government, the High-Level Committee for the major administrative sanctions decisions, and the preparation of the district, the High-Level New District Authority for the implementation of the major administrative sanctions decisions of the district administration.
Article 5 Administrative penalties shall be submitted to the competent organ within 60 days of the date of the decision on significant administrative penalties, for the submission of the material such as the report on the status of the major administrative penalties, the administrative penalties decision, the major administrative penalties decision sheet. The format of the document was developed by the municipal authorities.
The executive branch shall apply for administrative review or administrative proceedings in respect of major administrative penalties decisions, and the administrative penalties shall be submitted to the competent organ within 15 days of the end of administrative review or administrative proceedings.
Major administrative penalties are determined jointly by more than two executive organs and are provided by the host authorities.
The following shall be reviewed after the request is received by the competent organ:
(i) Whether the subject of administrative sanctions is lawful;
(ii) The correctness of the application of laws, regulations and regulations;
(iii) Whether the facts are clear and whether the evidence is substantiated;
(iv) The legality of administrative sanctions procedures;
(v) Is administrative penalties appropriate.
Article 7.
(i) Administrative offences and circumstances are distorted or distorted compared to administrative penalties imposed by the parties;
(ii) In the same case, the administrative offences and circumstances of different parties are the same, but the administrative penalties are different;
(iii) In different cases governed by the same law, regulations and regulations, the administrative offences and circumstances of the parties are the same, but the administrative penalties are different;
(iv) Administrative penalties are not in accordance with legal, regulatory and legislative purposes.
Article 8 In the context of the request, the competent organ would need to receive copies of the administrative penalties and material relating to major administrative penalties, which should be sent to the administrative sanctions enforcement agencies for the release of the notice of significant administrative penalties.
The administrative sanctions enforcement body shall, within three days of the date of receipt of the letter of notification, make the case or the material supporting body. In the opinion of the competent authorities, the relevant departments should be consulted.
Article 9. The competent organ has found that significant administrative penalties determine violations or inappropriateness and are not required, and should be treated in accordance with the provisions relating to accountability, such as the administrative law enforcement error in the Province of San Suu Kyi and the administrative law enforcement documentation management approach in the city of Bobo.
Article 10