Key Benefits:
(Summit No. 75th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Southern Province, held on 4 January 2006 to consider the adoption of the Decree No. 203 of 1 March 2006 of the People's Government Order No. 203 of 1 March 2006 for the period 1 April 2006) Article 1 provides an objective, accurate and timely control of the role of pollutant sources in environmental protection and prevents contamination accidents and develops this approach in accordance with environmental protection laws, regulations and regulations. Article 2 of this approach states that the source of pollution is automatically monitored and consists of the Automated Monitoring and Monitoring Centre. Including water, the atmosphere and the unavailability of sources of pollution. Automated monitoring equipment is an integral part of the pollution control facility, including the instruments used to monitor, monitor releases of pollutants on the site of contaminated sources, the operation of the contaminated governance facility and data-gathering mechanisms. The Monitoring Centre refers to the link of the Environmental Protection Administration to automated monitoring equipment through communications transmission routes, for example, computer software and equipment for the automated control of contaminated sources. Article 3. The executive authority for environmental protection at the district level is responsible for the management of the automated control of contaminated sources in the present administration. Other relevant sectors of the population at the district level should be managed in collaboration with the self-controlled management of contaminated sources in line with their respective responsibilities. Article IV. The provincial executive authorities for environmental protection should develop an automated control planning for all provincial pollutant sources, based on environmental protection needs, and establish an autonomous control network of contaminated sources throughout the province. The executive authorities of the municipalities, districts (markets) for environmental protection are planning for the automatic monitoring of the management of contaminated sources in the present administration, based on the provincial pollution sources, and the development of an automated control programme for the construction of contaminated sources in the current administration. In one of the following cases, the slanders must build, install automated monitoring equipment and its accompanying facilities, as required by the environmental protection administrative authorities: (i) possession of pollutants such as cigarettes, oxid and nitrogen oxides to the atmosphere, with evaporation of more than 20 tons of coal; (ii) The possession of pollutants, such as cigarette, oxid, nitrogen oxide, which are organized to the atmosphere, amounting to evaporation of industrial stole and solid waste burning stoves of more than 20 tons of flammable coal; (iii) More than 1,000 tons of wastewater containing two types of pollutant; (iv) Half of 100 tons of wastewater containing a type of pollutant or pyrethroid; (v) Other sources of pollution that affect public interest, in accordance with the provisions of environmental protection legislation, need to be regulated. Article 6 incorporates the sources of pollution of the automated monitoring of construction planning, which must be regulated by the relevant standards, technical requirements established by environmental protection administrative authorities. The installation of atmospheric automated surveillance equipment should be accompanied by a model or sampling point in accordance with the regulations governing the retention of permanent pre-emptions. Unless the gendarmerie has completed the construction, installation of automated monitoring equipment and its accompanying facilities, in accordance with the time frame established by the provincial environmental protection administrative authorities. Article 7. New construction, alteration, expansion and technology rehabilitation projects should be based on the requirements of the approved environmental impact evaluation document, the installation of automated monitoring equipment and its accompanying facilities, and, as part of the environmental protection facility, designed, parallel construction and operationalization with the major works. The source of pollution generated prior to the implementation of this approach shall require the installation of automated monitoring equipment and its accompanying facilities, in accordance with the time period specified by the provincial authorities for environmental protection. Article 8. Economists should report on the installation of technical programmes to environmental protection administrative authorities. Article 9. The installation of an automated control equipment must be handled by the data collection, transmission agreements and technical standards issued by the provincial environmental protection administrative authorities, as required by the automated monitoring data transmission agreements and technical standards, as well as by the interface between data transmission and monitoring of the interface, and to ensure the effective networking of networks with the environmental protection administrative authorities. Analytical methods and templates used by instruments should be consistent with the relevant national provisions. Article 10. The financial sector organizes a proportion of funds from nutrients for the operation and demonstration area (projects) of the automated control of pollutant sources, with a specific approach being developed by provincial finances with provincial environmental protection administrative authorities. Funds for the construction, alteration, expansion of projects and the construction of automated control equipment by sources of pollution from new and old-age projects are mobilized in full by construction units. The source of pollution prior to the operation of this approach is raised by the genocidal; there is a difficulty in raising funds for the construction of the automated monitoring equipment, which may apply to environmental protection administrative authorities for subsidies in specific funding for environmental protection. Specialized funding grants for environmental protection must be earmarked, and no breaks, standstills, crowds and misappropriation. Article 11. Upon the installation of probationary tests by the polluter of the automated control equipment, the gendarmerie shall immediately communicate the equipment to the management platform for remote monitoring data management with the environmental protection administrative authorities and test the 30-day operation. In 30 days after the completion of the probationary operation, the gendarmerie shall apply to the environmental protection administrative authorities. Article 12, new construction, alteration, expansion projects and automated inspection equipment and accompanying facilities for new-flagging projects, are accepted by the environmental protection administrative authorities that have approved the project's environmental impact evaluation document. The source of pollution generated prior to the operation of this approach, its automated monitoring equipment and the accompanying facilities, is responsible for environmental protection administrative authorities. Article 13 (i) Automated monitoring of the inspection of equipment, the identification application form, the summary of the project, the accounts of the project and the inspection of the equipment; (ii) An automated monitoring summary of 30 days of the operation of the equipment, automated monitoring of technical material such as probationary, school qualification, testing; (iii) Automated control management system for the operation of equipment; (iv) Other relevant information consistent with the requirements and requirements of the receiving technology; (v) A contract for the management of automated monitoring equipment is entrusted to the socialization management unit. Article XIV re-establishs a system password by the environmental protection administrative authorities following the automatic inspection of equipment or the probationary test. Article 15. Monitoring data on automated monitoring equipment after experience (school tests) is qualified as one of the basis for environmental management and drainage. Article 16 Environmental protection administrative authorities conduct on-site inspections of automated monitoring equipment on a regular or non-recurrent basis, and organize environmental monitoring bodies to conduct comparative monitoring tests for automated monitoring equipment. No less than two times a year may be found in normal production conditions. The polluter or the socialization operation should be processed in a timely manner when the polluter automatically monitors the operation of the equipment. Article 17 The executive authorities for environmental protection should be retroactive within 7 days of the date of receipt of the report, which is considered to be agreed. The polluter is automatically inspected by the activation of the equipment or the reactivation of two months after it is required to re-establish the school by the environmental monitoring body in accordance with the relevant technical provisions. After the automated inspection of equipment and the replacement of components, the source of pollution is subject to manual demarcation. In cases where automatic control equipment ceased to operate or resulting in irregular operations due to force majeure and precipitation, the gendarmerie should report on environmental protection administrative authorities within 24 hours and report on the causes and equipment in writing. Article 18 Impunity must be delegated to the management of the operation of the automated control equipment of the contaminated source to be administered by the socialized operators that have obtained the operational management certificate under the law. The operating costs of the automated control of contaminated sources are financed by financial arrangements. Article 19 Operators and the Socialization Management Unit shall enter into operational management contracts that clarify their rights and obligations and guarantee the normal operation of automatic control equipment. Article 20 assumes the unit of socialization management, which is determined by the provincial environmental protection administrative authorities through tendering, for the selection of the gendarmerie. Article 21 shall guarantee the normal operation of automated monitoring equipment, in accordance with contractual obligations, without unauthorized movement, removal, replacement and automatic control equipment. Economies must guarantee the conditions of the housing, water, electricity and gas required for the proper operation of automated monitoring equipment. In violation of this approach, the pre-implementation of the scheme has not been completed by a specified period of time or without the installation of automated monitoring equipment and its accompanying facilities, which are converted by the administrative authorities responsible for environmental protection at the district level, with a fine of up to 10,000 dollars. Article 23, in violation of this approach, does not install automated monitoring equipment and its accompanying facilities for new construction, alteration, expansion and technology rehabilitation projects, or do not have experience, or are not qualified, the subject works are officially produced or used, and the environmental protection authorities that approve the project environmental impact evaluation document are responsible for halting the production or use of the major works in accordance with the Regulations on the Construction of the Environmental Protection Management of the Construction Project, may be liable to a fine of up to 10,000 dollars. Article 24, in violation of this approach, contains one of the following acts, being dealt with by the administrative authorities of the environmental protection at the district level, in accordance with article 2, paragraph 2. (i) The intentional unustainable use of pollutant emissions automated surveillance equipment, or unauthorized removal, severance and destruction of hydrochlorofluoropollutant emissions automated control equipment, with emissions exceeding the prescribed standards, without approval by the Environmental Protection Administration; (ii) Unustainably use automated surveillance equipment for atmospheric pollutant emissions or unauthorized removal, sequestration and destruction of automated surveillance equipment for atmospheric pollutant emissions without approval by the Environmental Protection Administration; (iii) Unless authorized by the Environmental Protection Administration, the release of environmental noise exceeds the prescribed criteria by dismantling, seizing, destroying the quest for automatic control of emissions of environmental noise. In accordance with article 48 of the Water Pollution Control Act and article 41 of the Water Pollution Control Act, the former paragraph (i) is responsible for the recovery of normal use or the re-establishment of the period of time and for fines up to 100,000 dollars; in accordance with article 46 of the Act on Atmospheric Pollution Control, the suspension of the offence, the revision of the period of time period is subject to a fine of up to 500,000 dollars, and in accordance with the provisions of article 50 (ii) of the Act on Environmental Pollution. Article 25 does not authorize the use of earmarked funds for environmental protection to build automated monitoring equipment, and is overdue, and no specific funding for the use of environmental protection cannot be applied within ten years and is addressed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Financial Offences Punishment Regulations. Article 26 Socialized operations management units, in violation of relevant environmental management laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, are subject to correction by the executive authorities of environmental protection; in serious circumstances, the provincial environmental protection administrative authorities have reported to request the national environmental administration authorities to remove the self-monitoring operation management qualifications. Article 27 protects the abuse of power by environmental protection supervisors, insecure, in favour of private fraud, and is subject to administrative disposition by their offices or by the competent authorities at the superior level; constitutes an offence punishable by law. The twenty-eighth approach was implemented effective 1 April 2006. |
