Key Benefits:
(Adopted by the 64th Standing Committee of the People's Government of San Francisco on 23 May 2006 No. 153 of the Decree No. 153 of 16 June 2006 on the Government of the San Francisco People's Republic of 16 June 2006 for publication of implementation effective 1 August 2006) Chapter I General Article 1, in order to enhance oversight of major dangerous sources, prevent accidents and guarantee the safety of the people's life and property, develop this approach in line with the People's Republic of China's Safety Production Act, the Regulations on the Safety and Production of Broaden Province. Article 2 Article 3 of this approach refers to the long-term or temporary production, removal, use or storage of hazardous items, and the quantity of hazardous items equal to or exceed the pre-emptive production devices, facilities or places. Article IV provides for the safe production supervision of the Government of the People's Government in the city, the district (market) and is responsible for the integrated supervision of the major hazardous sources of the productive units. The relevant sectors with the responsibility to monitor safe production, such as public safety, firefighting, quality, transport, are governed by the supervision of major hazardous sources of production units, in accordance with their respective responsibilities. Article 5 contains the production units of major dangerous sources, whose main heads are fully responsible for the management and monitoring of the major hazardous sources of the unit. Article 6 conceals the occurrence of accidents by major dangerous sources and the violation of the production of business units in the area of safe production, any unit or individual has the right to report to the safe production management and the relevant sectors with the responsibility for the safe production of productive management. For units and individuals that have made a prominent contribution in the management of major hazardous sources, the Governments of the urban, district (market) or the relevant sectors should be rewarded. Chapter II Registration, assessment and filing Article 7. The productive units shall be guided by the relevant provisions of the existing National Standard of the People's Republic of China (GB18218-2000) and the National Security Productive Monitoring Administration, to determine the following production devices, facilities or premises of this unit, which are a major source of risk, shall be registered and a major hazard management file should be established. (i) Skills (cash tanks); (ii) The treasury (columnes); (iii) Production sites; (iv) stress pipelines; (v) Stolen; (vi) stress containers; (vii) coal mines (exploitation); (viii) The extraction of metal non-metallic areas; (ix) At the end of the mine. Article 8 (i) Assessment of major hazardous sources; (ii) Major safety management systems for dangerous sources; (iii) Programme for the safe management and monitoring of major hazardous sources; (iv) Monitoring schedules for major hazardous sources; (v) Priorities for emergency response and performance programmes for major hazardous sources; (vi) Statement of major dangerous sources. Article 9 Production operators should conduct a security assessment of the major hazardous source organizations of this unit at least three years. The State provides otherwise for the duration of the assessment. The security assessment could be carried out by the producing business unit to organize a security assessment mission with national qualifications, or by an intermediary with national qualifications, which should be presented in the assessment report on major hazardous sources after the completion of its work. The report on major hazardous sources should be accurate, complete and recommend measures that are practical and objective and impartial. Article 10 reports on major hazardous sources should include the following: (i) The main basis for the security assessment; (ii) Basic circumstances of major dangerous sources; (iii) Risk, harmful determinants; (iv) Possible types and severity of accidents; (v) Major dangerous source levels; (vi) Measures to prevent accidents; (vii) Evaluation of emergency relief advance cases; (viii) Evaluation findings and recommendations. Article 11. The report on major sources of energy security should be sent to the city's safe production management for the report of the report on major hazardous sources; the district (communes) and sector-owned production units should be sent to the district (communes), the zone security assessment report. Article 12 Changes in production processes, materials, processes, equipment, protective measures and environmental factors related to major hazardous sources, or changes in national legislation, regulations and standards, the productive units should re-evaluate major hazardous sources and report the report on major hazardous sources safety assessment reports on the timely delivery of safe production monitoring management clearances. Article 13 Production operators should complete the Statement of Major Hazardous Sources by 31 March each year to report on safe production monitoring management clearance. With regard to the new major dangerous sources, the productive units should send a safe production monitoring management request in a timely manner; the production units should report in a timely manner the write-offs of the security production oversight management. Article XIV, in accordance with the most serious consequences of potential accidents in the context of the types and energy of major dangerous sources, is divided into four levels: (i) A major source of risk at the level of the event of a particular major accident; (ii) Sub-prime high-risk sources: likely to result in major accidents; (iii) A major risk source at three levels: potential major accidents; (iv) Four major dangerous sources: potential general accidents. The specific hierarchy of major dangerous sources determines implementation in accordance with national standards. Article 15. Districts (markets), sector safety and production monitoring authorities should report on a timely, second and third-level major hazardous source to the management of the municipal safety production monitoring in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State. Chapter III Management and monitoring Article 16 Production operators should establish a major hazardous source safety management body to establish a regulatory regime for the sound management of major dangerous sources, implement a system of responsibility for the safe management and control of major dangerous sources, specifying the responsibility of all sectors and associated personnel for the day-to-day security management and monitoring of major dangerous sources, and develop a major risk management and monitoring programme. Article 17: The decision-making body or key holder of the productive business unit and the investigator of the individual operation shall ensure that inputs are made to the safe management and monitoring of the funds required. Article 18 Article 19 Article 20 shall establish clear safety alert signs on the ground of major dangerous sources and strengthen controls over major dangerous sources and the safety management of the equipment, facilities. Article 21 Production operators should conduct regular testing of the parameters of processes in major hazardous sources, hazardous substances, regular testing, testing of important equipment, facilities and testing and testing records. Article 2 Article 23 has a significant risk to the existence of accidents, and the production of business units must be immediately rectified; practical security measures must be taken to prevent accidents and report on the safe production monitoring management in a timely manner. Article 24 Production operators should develop major risk response relief advance cases and report on safe production monitoring management clearance. The pre-disaster response should include the following: (i) The basic situation of major dangerous sources and the surrounding environmental profiles; (ii) The personnel of emergency agencies and their responsibilities; (iii) Risk defence and evaluation; (iv) Emergency equipment and facilities; (v) Assessment and resources of emergency capacity; (vi) Emergency response, alerts, communication channels; (vii) The accident response process and the action programme; (viii) Recovery and process after an accident; (ix) Training and performance. Article 25 Production units shall develop performance programmes and performance-implementation plans in accordance with emergency relief scenarios, each year carry out liverage or simulation exercises and inform safe productive management by 10 hours of performance. Chapter IV Oversight and inspection Article 26 Management of safe production monitoring should establish a major risk control system and information management system, implement sub-regional controls on major dangerous sources and manage the dynamics of information. Article 27, Safety and Productive Regulators should conduct regular inspections of major hazardous sources. Oversight inspections include: (i) Follow-up on national legislation, regulations, and standards; (ii) Implementation of measures to prevent accidents in production; (iii) Registration of major dangerous sources; (iv) Safety assessment, detection, monitoring and control of major dangerous sources; (v) Maintenance, maintenance and regular detection of major hazardous source equipment; (vi) The location of major dangerous sources on-site safety alert signs; (vii) Safety training of practitioners; (viii) Construction and staffing of emergency relief organizations; (ix) Emergency relief advance and performance; (x) Emergency relief equipment, equipment staffing and maintenance; (xi) Daily management of major dangerous sources; (xii) Other matters under laws, regulations and regulations. In the supervision of the inspection, the security productive management found that a major dangerous source had an accident and should be responsible for the immediate exclusion of the productive units. It is not possible to guarantee security prior to the exclusion or the exclusion process, and it should be responsible for the withdrawal of the manufacturer from hazardous areas to the operation, the temporary suspension, suspension or cessation of use, and, after the exclusion, the security productive management review its consent and the resumption of production and use. Article 29 of the Safety and Productive Regulatory Authority and the relevant departments with the responsibility to oversee the management of safe production should be synergized, intertwined and facilitated the effective management and monitoring of major hazardous sources by productive operators. Chapter V Legal responsibility Article 33, where a major source of risk exists and is one of the following acts, has been converted by a security production supervision management order to be responsible for the period of time; a failure to be renovated, the suspension of the production sector and a fine of up to 20,000 yen; a crime constitutes an offence and a criminal liability under the law: (i) No record of the registration of major dangerous sources; (ii) No security assessment of major dangerous sources as required; (iii) No monitoring of major dangerous sources; (iv) No pre-empts for emergency relief for major dangerous sources have been developed. Article 31 violates one of the following acts, laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, which are regulated by law by the safe production supervision management; laws, regulations and regulations do not provide for a period of time to be converted by the security production supervision management; and a fine of up to €50 million, which is not later rectified: (i) The absence of a real report on major dangerous sources; (ii) No training of practitioners in safety education and technology; (iii) The relevant units and personnel are not informed in writing by the provision of emergency response measures for potential accidents by major dangerous sources; (iv) There is no clear safety alert marking on the ground of major dangerous sources; (v) No regular maintenance, maintenance and regular testing of major hazardous source equipment, facilities; (vi) To refuse to accept safe production supervision by the management of oversight under the law. Article 32, decision-making bodies, leading heads, individual operators have not guaranteed the safe management and detection of the necessary equipment, facilities and financial inputs, resulting in a lack of security conditions for production, based on the changes in the period of legal, regulatory order, such as the People's Republic of China Security Production Act, and the provision of the necessary funds; unprocessarily corrected, responsible for the suspension of production units. Article XXIII, decision-making bodies, leading heads, individual operators and investors do not seriously perform the major hazardous source safety management and detection responsibilities, leading to safe production accidents, which do not constitute a crime, and those responsible are punished in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations, such as the People's Republic of China Act on Safety of Production; constitutes a crime and hold criminal responsibility under the law. Article 34 of the Safety and Production Monitoring Management Service staff are subject to negligence, malfeasance, provocative fraud or abuse of authority, resulting in the management of major dangerous sources, resulting in accidents and administrative disposition by law; and criminal liability by law. Article 33, paragraph 15, refers to the number of hazardous material provisions for a certain or particular category of hazardous substances, which, if the number of hazardous substances in a production device, facility or place is equal to or exceeds that number, is defined as a major source of risk. Article 36 of this approach is implemented effective 1 August 2006. |
