Advanced Search

Provisions On Administration Of Administrative Normative Document In Urumqi

Original Language Title: 乌鲁木齐市行政规范性文件管理规定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Adopted at the 37th ordinary meeting of the Government of Uruz on 8 May 2006, No. 76 of the Decree No. 76 of 5 July 2006 on the People's Government Order No. 76 of 5 July 2006 No. 76 of 10 August 2006)

Article I, in order to strengthen the management of administrative normative documents, preserve the rule of law and establish this provision in line with the relevant laws, regulations.
Article 2
Article III refers to administrative normative documents referred to in this Article, which are consistent with the laws, regulations, regulations and orders of the Government and its working sector, the competent body, in accordance with the law, regulations and regulations, and the superior government, and determines that the publication is based on statutory powers and procedures, covering the rights, obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, has been applied repeatedly over a period of time and is generally binding in the areas under the jurisdiction.
Administrative normative documents include governmental normative and sectoral normative documents.
Article IV and its internal management system, including the rights of citizens, legal persons and other organizations such as personnel, administration, extermination and financial management, internal rules of public service that do not directly affect the rights of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, requests and reports to the superior administrative organs, administrative decisions taken on specific matters and other non-binding documents, do not apply to this provision.
Article 5 The development of administrative normative documents should be consistent with the principles of simplification, harmonization and effectiveness, and the terms should be regulated, concise and accurate and should be clear, specific and operational.
The development of administrative normative documents should be conducted in accordance with procedures such as research, consultation, coordination of differences, legal review, consideration of decisions, accompanying agencies, signatures, publication.
Article 7.
Article 8 below shall not establish administrative normative documents:
(i) Interim administration;
(ii) Non-permanent proceedings coordinating bodies;
(iii) Establishment of institutions in the sector;
(iv) Government service providers.
Article 9 establishes administrative normative documents that shall not be in violation of constitutional, legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions; shall not be in contravention of the orders, decisions of the superior administrative organs; nor shall it go beyond the statutory terms of reference of this administrative body.
Article 10
(i) Administrative licence matters;
(ii) Administrative penalties;
(iii) Administrative coercive measures;
(iv) Administrative charges;
(v) Other matters to be regulated by law, regulations and regulations.
Article 11. The content of the laws, regulations and regulations have been clearly defined and administrative normative documents are not in principle repeated.
Article 12 Norms of administrative normative documents are generally expressed in the form of a provision that is, inter alia, complicated by content.
The drafting of administrative normative documents should conduct a study on the need and feasibility of developing administrative normative documents and conduct studies on issues to be addressed in administrative normative documents, the main system to be established or the main measures to be specified; and, where necessary, the participation of relevant departments and experts, scholars could be invited to participate in the arguments.
Article 14. The drafting of administrative normative documents should hear the views of citizens, legal persons or other relevant organizations.
The drafting sector heard the views that could be taken either in writing or in the form of a colloquium, analytic, hearing.
Article 15. Civil, legal or other organizations shall make observations and recommendations on the content of the draft administrative normative document, and the drafting sector shall study the treatment, give feedback to citizens, legal persons or other organizations that have made observations or recommendations, as set out in the draft note.
The content of administrative normative documents involves other departments, institutional management functions, and the drafting sector should fully seek the views of the relevant departments, agencies.
The relevant departments, agencies have made important differences with regard to the content of the draft administrative normative documents, which should be coordinated by the drafting sector and include coordination and treatment in the notes to the draft.
Article 17
Article 18
(i) Submission of administrative normative documents;
(ii) A description of administrative normative documents (including the development of purpose, basis, coordination of key elements and important differences, views of sectoral rule of law bodies);
(iii) Relevant information sought (including the scope of the consultation, the analysis of feedback, the adoption of observations and their descriptions);
(iv) Drafting laws, regulations, and national policies based on administrative normative documents;
(v) Other relevant materials.
Article 19
(i) Whether the content is reasonable and appropriate;
(ii) Would go beyond statutory competence;
(iii) Are incompatible with the laws, regulations, regulations and national policies;
(iv) Have coordination and interface with relevant normative documents;
(v) specifying whether operational;
(vi) Whether the views of the relevant bodies, organizations and managers are sought;
(vii) Coordination and treatment of differences.
Article 20
(i) The content is incompatible with the law, legislation, regulations or national policies;
(ii) The main content of the provisions of the draft articles on the delivery of normative documents is more controversial and the drafting cell has not been fully consulted with the relevant departments;
(iii) The failure of the rule of law institutions to review the normative documents sent;
(iv) Not submitted according to the prescribed procedures;
(v) No relevant material is reported pursuant to article 18 of the present article.
The Government's administrative normative documents drafted by sectoral organizations are problematic, and the Government's rule of law institutions should be treated in the course of the year's legally responsible executive review.
Article 21 The administrative normative documents that have not been issued to social unity are null and void and cannot be used as a basis for the administration.
Article 2 establishes organs to publish administrative normative documents to society, including through radio, television, networks, newspapers, in accordance with public information provisions.
Article 23 of the administrative normative document should normally be carried out after 30 days of the date of publication, but it would not be implemented immediately after the publication would impede the implementation of administrative normative documents and could be carried out from the date of publication.
Article 24 should provide for an effective period. The effective period shall not exceed five years from the date of publication of administrative normative documents. The effectiveness of administrative normative documents is automatically terminated at the end of the period of effectiveness.
Article 25
The revised administrative normative document is a new administrative normative document.
Article 26 Civil, legal or other organizations have the right to access administrative normative documents that have been published. The executive normative documentation body should provide administrative normative documents issued by this organ for free access by the public.
Article 27 shall be submitted in accordance with the following provisions:
(i) The administrative normative documents developed by the People's Government of the Region (Parliament) are presented by the designating body to the Government of the city;
(ii) Administrative normative documents developed by the Government of the People's Republic, established by law, to the people's Government of the institution;
(iii) The administrative normative documentation developed by the Government of the People's Republic, which is a member of the Government, is presented by the executive branch and is reproduced in the top-level administrative authorities. The normative documents developed jointly by the two or more sectors are sent by the host agency;
(iv) Administrative normative documents developed by vertically-led administrative organs such as customs, finance, tax, foreign exchange management, business, quality technology supervision, etc., are presented to the top-level authorities, while transmitting to the Government of the people at this level. The law, legislation and regulations provide otherwise, from their provisions.
Article 28 should be sent within 10 days of the date of publication.
Article 29 provides for the issuance of administrative normative documents and shall be submitted to the official text of the Hann, the formulation of a description of five copies, the relevant basis, or one material.
The presentation of administrative normative documents should be accompanied by an electronic version of administrative normative documents.
Article 33
(i) Administrative normative documents go beyond the statutory authority of the body, incompatible with the law, regulations, regulations or rules, or inappropriate content, proposing changes and accountability for the period of time being rectified; and are not later rectified, reporting to the Government of the people at this level to withdraw and inform criticism;
(ii) There is a contradiction between the administrative normative documents developed by different organs, which should be coordinated, coordinated and inconsistent, the submission of comments and the decision of the current people's Government;
(iii) Administrative normative documents are in violation of the procedures or technically problematic and are responsible for the development of the institutional deadline.
The review found that administrative normative documents were in conflict with or inappropriate, and that the continuation of implementation could result in serious consequences and that the rule of law of the competent organ should take a decision to suspend the implementation of the administrative normative document component or all of its contents before the reform of the body.
Article 31 of the rule of law of the competent organ shall suspend the review, transfer to the competent organ and inform the organ of the administrative normative document.
Article 32, civil, legal or other organizations have found that administrative normative documents are incompatible with the law, regulations, regulations or regulations, or that there is a contradiction between administrative normative documents, which may make written proposals to the rule of law organs of the enacting body or the competent organ.
The rule of law working body of the organ or the competent organ shall be verified and processed in accordance with the prescribed procedures.
The rule of law of the competent organ of the Tribunal shall, within 30 days of receipt of the material listed in article 29 of the present provision, provide a review of the administrative normative documents sent and inform the design body in writing.
The rule of law working body of the competent organ suggested a change of opinion, which should be reformulated by the competent organ within 15 days of the date of receipt of the notification and in writing responses to the results.
The right to interpretation of administrative normative documents falls within the Government or sector that establishes the administrative normative document.
The interpretation of the Government's administrative normative documents should be made by the organization's drafting of the draft interpretation, which was published after the review of the approval by the organ.
The interpretation of sectoral administrative normative documents is made by the sectoral rule of law bodies in reference to the normative documentation review process, which is published by the sectoral leadership after the adoption of a collective discussion.
Article XV Governments and their sectors should regularly clean up their administrative normative documents, modify or repeal administrative normative documents that have been published in a timely manner, in accordance with changing circumstances, as well as changes in laws, regulations, regulations and national policies.
Article XVI of the municipal rule of law institutions are responsible for monitoring the development and documentation of administrative normative documents in the area of the work of the Government of the People's Government.
Article 37