Advanced Search

Anhui Provincial Administrative Authorities Of Normative Documents Record Monitoring

Original Language Title: 安徽省行政机关规范性文件备案监督办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Adopted by the 45th Standing Committee of the People's Government of Ankara on 15 November 2006 No. 196 of 1 December 2006 by Order No. 196 of the People's Government of Anguégué, which came into force on 1 January 2007)

Article 1, in order to enhance the oversight of normative documents of the executive organs, preserve the socialist rule and develop this approach in line with the provisions of the Law on People's Representatives at the local level of the People's Congress and at the local level of the People's Government of the People's Congress and the Regulations of the State Department of State.
Article 2
Article 3. The administrative organs referred to in this approach include:
(i) The Government of the people of the city, the district, and the town;
(ii) The work sector of the people of the district level;
(iii) Police stations established by law by the Government of the people at the district level;
(iv) Organizations that authorize the exercise of administrative functions by law, regulations, regulations and other normative documents.
The normative document referred to in this approach refers to the universally binding document developed by the executive organs in accordance with the provisions of laws, regulations and other superior laws, within their statutory competence, regulating administrative affairs, public publication and repeated application.
Article IV Normative documents should be sent within 15 days of the date of publication by the designating body to the top-level executive body (hereinafter referred to as a follow-up authority) in accordance with the following provisions:
(i) The normative documents developed by the Governments of the urban, district and communes (communes) and the communes (communes) are sent to the Government of the people at the highest level;
(ii) The normative documents developed by the Ministry of the Interior, Municipalities and the People's Government (markets, districts) to submit a petition to the Government of the current people;
(iii) The normative documents developed by the following vertical leadership work departments in the province, which are sent to the Government of the current people and to the authorities at the highest level;
(iv) The normative documentation developed by the Government of the people at the district level by a body established under the law, which is sent to the Government of the people that has established the office;
(v) Normative documents developed by organizations that are mandated to perform administrative functions by law, regulations, regulations and other normative documents, which are sent back to the Government of the people directly responsible for the organization or to the people's Government;
(vi) The normative documents developed by the executive organs administered by the people's government service are sent to the Government's work department for the management of the institution.
Normative documents developed jointly by the two sectors are sent by the host sector to the Government of the current people; normative documents developed jointly by the Government of the High-level People's Government and the Government of the lower-level people are sent to the Government of the Bench.
Normative documents developed by the Government of the people at the district level should also be sent to the Standing Committee of the People's Representatives of the People's Republic of China, in accordance with the provisions of the Standing Committee on Oversight Act.
Article 5. The rule of law institutions of the competent monitoring body are specifically responsible for the registration and review of normative documents. The competent oversight bodies should provide the necessary conditions for the rule of law bodies to deal with normative documents and, in accordance with the laws, regulations and national provisions, to progressively achieve the normative management of the process.
Article 6 develops normative documents for the submission of requests by organs, which should be submitted to the reports, the paper and electronic texts of normative documents and notes.
A description of normative documents should include the basis, purpose, description of the main elements of normative documents, and the review of the institutions of the rule of law.
The format of the normative documents reserve instrument was developed by the provincial Government's rule of law institutions.
Article 7. Normative documents for the filing of a request, in conformity with articles 3 and 6 of the present methodology, are registered by the rule of law institutions of the Prosecution; are not provided for in Article 3 and are not registered; suspension of the registration of a request in accordance with Article 3 but not in accordance with Article 6 provisions, and informs the development of an organ to be added to the record and be completed and the registration of the case.
Article 8
Article 9. The rule of law institutions of the competent monitoring body shall review the following matters within 30 days of the date of receipt of the normative document:
(i) Whether it transcends competence, limits or deprives citizens, legal persons and other organizations of their legitimate rights, or increases the obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations;
(ii) Will be incompatible with legal, regulatory, regulatory and normative documents of the superior administration;
(iii) Whether the provisions on the same matter are consistent with the normative documents developed by the work sector of the people of which the Government belongs, the work sector of the superior people and the normative documents developed by the lower-level people's Government;
(iv) Nor does the normative document involve more than two sectoral responsibilities or in close cooperation with other sectors, whether the organ is in place to fully seek the views of other sectors in accordance with the provisions of Article 12 of the normative document of the administrative organ of the Anguéaça (Avocation No. 149) of the People's Government Order No. 149) or whether it violates other statutory procedures;
(v) Whether the provisions of normative documents are appropriate.
The situation is complex and cannot be reviewed within the prescribed time frame, with the approval of by the head of the rule of law of the competent body of the competent judicial body, the extension period up to 15 days.
In reviewing normative documents by the rule of law organs of the competent monitoring body, it is necessary to develop an institutional note or supplemental material that should be described or supplemented within a specified period of time; and to seek advice from the lower-level people's Government or the relevant departments concerned, the authorities that have been consulted should respond in accordance with the requirements.
Article 11 has been reviewed, normative documents go beyond competence, violate the legal, regulatory, regulatory and superior administrative organs' normative documents or provide inappropriateness, and are dealt with by the law-making body of the competent monitoring body, which may propose time-bound amendments, suspension of implementation, self-removation, etc., and establish organs that do not comply with the advice of the rule of law organs of the competent monitoring body, and that the rule of law organs of the prosecutor's authority may provide for the approval of the review body or referral to the authority of the organ.
Article 12 has been reviewed to harmonize the provisions of the same matter between normative documents developed by the working sector of the Government of the High-level People, the work sector of the Government of the High-level People and normative documents developed by the Government of the People at the lower level, in coordination with the rule of law institutions of the competent monitoring body; coordination cannot be agreed, and the decision of the supervisory body to deal with the submissions.
Article 13 should be established by the rule of law institutions that deal with the status of submission to the supervisory body within 15 days of receipt of the views or decision.
Article XIV State organs, social groups, business organizations and citizens are of the view that normative documents go beyond their competence or that they violate the provisions of the laws, regulations, regulations and the normative documents of the superior administrative organs, may submit written review recommendations to the supervisory body in accordance with article IV of this approach.
The normative document review recommended that the name of the document requested for review, the formulation of organs, the issuance of letters, the timing of the submission and the matters, the grounds and the names of the applicant be included.
Article 15. The rule of law organs of the competent monitoring body shall review normative documents within 30 days of the receipt of the recommendations of the review and address them in accordance with the provisions of articles 11, 12 of the present methodology, while informing the applicant.
In keeping with this approach, the recommendations for the review of normative documents that are not accepted by this body should be communicated to the relevant authorities.
Article 16 The rule of law institutions of the competent monitoring body should review the development and documentation of normative documents. The inspectorate shall cooperate with relevant information, as requested, on the books and the text of normative documents.
Article 17 shall be established by the organs of the rule of law that shall be communicated to the supervisory body of normative documents established in the previous year by the end of January.
The rule of law institutions of the competent monitoring body should report on the oversight of the previous year's normative documents to the competent oversight bodies and the superior rule of law bodies by the end of March of each year.
The supervisory body should communicate the normative documentation case on an annual basis and make the monitoring of the normative documents available to society public.
Article 18 establishes that, in violation of this approach, one of the following acts shall notify the rule of law organs of the competent organ responsible for the development of organs and other persons directly responsible for the administration of justice by law.
(i) Not to be sent or without the timely submission of the normative documentation file;
(ii) No information, refusal to cooperate or conceal the real situation when the rule of law of the competent monitoring body examines the development and documentation of normative documents;
(iii) Discussions or decisions on the treatment of the rule of law institutions of the competent monitoring body or the competent monitoring body to deny implementation and delay implementation.
Article 19, without a written normative document, violates the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, causes serious consequences, and the rule of law of the competent body responsible for the development of organs and other persons directly responsible for the administration of justice by law.
Article 20, the rule of law organs of the competent monitoring body and their staff members, in violation of the provisions of this approach, shall not perform the functions of registration and review of the normative documents, be accountable to the supervisory body or to the superior rule of law bodies; and refuse to change and provide administrative disposal in accordance with the law.
Article 21
The period set out in article 2 of this approach is calculated on a working day without a statutory holiday.
Article 23 of this approach is implemented effective 1 January 2007. The Permanent People's Government of Ankara issued on 5 March 1996 the application of the normative documents in the Ablem province (No. [1996]14) was also repealed.