Advanced Search

Liaoning Province, Major Production Safety Accident Hidden Danger Treatment

Original Language Title: 辽宁省重特大生产安全事故隐患排查治理办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Adopted at the 69th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Greateren Province on 5 January 2007, No. 205 of 5 February 2007 of the Order of the Government of the Greateren Province, which was launched effective 1 March 2007)

Article 1 provides for the timely and effective discharge of the concealment of major and specialized production security accidents (hereinafter referred to as the hidden cause of a security accident) to prevent the occurrence of heavy production security accidents, to guarantee the lives and property security of the people, and to develop this approach in line with the provisions of the People's Republic of China Security Production Act and the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.
Article II of this approach refers to situations of insecurity and shortcomings that may lead to serious accidents. Specific classification criteria are implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of States and provinces.
Article 3. This approach applies to the exclusiveization, governance and oversight management of security accidents in my provincial administrations. The law, legislation and regulations provide otherwise, from their provisions.
Article IV, municipalities, districts (including district, subsectors) is responsible for the safe production supervision management sector (hereinafter referred to as the safe production control management) and implements integrated oversight management of major production safety accidents in this administrative area.
The executive branch, such as coal, public security, construction, transport and quality technical supervision, has, within their respective responsibilities, exercised oversight over the management of the heavy production safety accident.
Article 5 Governments at all levels should strengthen the predominant governance of the major production of safe accidents in the current administration area and address in a timely manner the major problems that are inherent in the governance of the heavy production of safe accidents and prevent the occurrence of security accidents.
Governments of the urban, district and ethnic communities should include the predominant security accident in the management of governance oversight in the context of safe production objective management.
Article 6. The main heads of the productive units have the following responsibilities with regard to the identification and governance of a security accident in which the unit is heavily produced:
(i) Establish, maintain a system of identification and governance responsibility for major production safety accidents;
(ii) Organizing the development and implementation of the heavy production security accident in this unit, which is hidden by emergency relief advances;
(iii) Accreditation, inspection of the unit's heavy exposure to safe accidents, governance efforts and timely elimination of the concealment of heavy production safety accidents;
(iv) Other responsibilities under laws, regulations.
Article 7. The production of business units may result in heavy production safety accidents due to external factors, and immediate reporting should be given to local safety production monitoring authorities and other relevant sectors. Following reports received from the security productive management and other relevant departments, effective measures should be taken in accordance with their respective responsibilities to eliminate the hidden situation in a timely manner.
Article 8. The productive business unit should enhance the daily sequencing of the incident in this unit. The identification of spoilers should be immediately excluded; effective safety prevention and control measures should be taken for reasons such as urban planning or production of technology, processes and design.
The company should organize a monthly accident involving the relevant coal safety manager, engineering technicians and workers.
Article 9 is difficult to identify and immediately exclude accidents and the production of business units shall organize expert assessments in a timely manner, in accordance with the provisions of the provincial accident cover assessment, and to prepare a report of the incident impact assessment.
The assessment reports should include the following:
(i) Types, hierarchys of accidents;
(ii) Scope and extent of impact;
(iii) Regulatory measures against accidents;
(iv) Governance approaches and funds required;
(v) Period of governance.
Article 10, which is assessed as having been hidden by major production safety accidents, shall be registered, constructed and, in accordance with the assessment report, a security accident for heavy production.
Governance programmes should include the following key elements:
(i) The duration and objectives of governance;
(ii) Governance measures;
(iii) Accountability institutions and personnel, funds and material security;
(iv) Emergency relief advances.
Article 11. The productive units shall report on the assessment reports and governance programmes to the local security production monitoring authorities and other relevant sectors within 20 days of the discovery of the hidden impact of heavy production safety accidents. The assessment reports and governance programmes, which are unique to major production safety accidents, should be reported to the provincial security production monitoring management and other relevant provincial departments. The production unit conceals the existence of heavy production safety accidents that cannot conceal, be false or delay.
The mining company shall, in the first week of each quarter, identify the concealment and conduct of major security production in accordance with the administrative regulations of the Department of State, write a written report to the Government of more than one of the counties responsible for the management of the safe production of coal mines, the coal mine safety inspectorate. The report should be signed by the main head of the coal mining enterprise.
Article 12 Management and other relevant departments should organize expert arguments from within 15 days of the receipt of the assessment report and the governance programme to identify relevant units within the hidden impact of the heavy production of safe accidents and to provide governance letters to the responsible units concerned. The responsible units should be managed in accordance with the letter of governance and the governance programme to conceal the loss of security accidents in heavy production. Governance funds are raised by the responsible units concerned.
The delegation of governance should include the basic conditions, categories and tiers, governance requirements and governance deadlines, governance responsibilities and responsibilities, governance control measures, oversight units and their responsibilities.
In the context of the governance of heavy production security accidents, precautionary, monitoring measures should be taken and the development of accident emergencies to prevent significant, specialized production security accidents and minimize the loss of accidents.
The heavy production of security accidents, which are hidden by governance or in governance, cannot guarantee security, and the safe production supervision management and other relevant departments should be responsible for temporary suspension or cessation of use; and the exclusion of heavy production security accidents, may resume production operations and use.
Contrary enterprises have major security features and behaviours under the administrative regulations of the Department of State, which should immediately cease production and exclude hidden shocks.
Article 14. The management of safe production monitoring and other relevant sectors should organize the receipt following the conclusion of a major production security accident. Experience has identified that the accident has been eliminated and should take a decision to close the governance of the major production security accident. No elimination should be made in accordance with the law's decision to stop the production, suspension or cessation of use; after the cessation of production, the suspension of the operation shall not have security conditions and shall be closed by law.
In accordance with the relevant provisions of the State, the productive units should be entrusted with the evaluation of governance effectiveness by an intermediary established by law.
The company that is responsible for the suspension of the veteran should develop a rehabilitation programme, which should be reviewed by the main heads of the coal mining industry in accordance with the criteria for the re-entry of the security accident in heavy production. The company of coal may submit a written recovery request to more than the people of the district in charge of the management of the safe production of coal. The submission should include the contents, projects and self-assessment results of the re-engineering programme and be signed by the main heads of the coal mining industry.
Article 15 Production operators should establish clear safety alert signs in production and related facilities, equipment that are hidden by heavy production of safe accidents.
Article 16 Governments at all levels should organize regular inspections of the predominant governance of major production accidents in the present administration. It was found that the security accident of heavy production was hidden and should be immediately removed by a body responsible for a security accident involving heavy production; it was difficult to immediately exclude and be governed by the laws, regulations.
Article 17: The municipality, the Government of the People of the District and its relevant authorities may, in accordance with the law, take urgent measures such as temporary suspension, suspension or cessation of use, while reporting on the Government of the High-level People or the relevant authorities, beyond its jurisdiction or scope of responsibility, to report immediately to the Government of the High-level People with jurisdiction or to the Government concerned;
Article 18 Governments at all levels should arrange the corresponding funds in their annual budgets for the management of large-scale accidents in public facilities, insolvency State enterprises, and ineligible units.
The heavy production of security accidents is hidden by governance funds and no unit or individual may be intrusive or diverted.
Article 19 Management of safe production monitoring should use the form of announcements, briefings, press conferences, etc., to make regular public to society about the hidden production of security accidents in this administrative area and to receive social oversight.
Article 20, any unit or person is entitled to report to the security production supervision management or other relevant departments. After the security production supervision management or other relevant departments received reports of accidents, investigations should be organized immediately in accordance with the division of duties and incentives for reporting efficacy. Specific incentives are developed by provincial security production monitoring authorities with provincial finances.
Article 21
(i) No assessment of the concealment of a security accident for heavy production, as required;
(ii) Constraints, false reports or delays in the presence of heavy production safety accidents;
(iii) There is no regulation of security accidents involving heavy production;
(iv) There is no evaluation of the effectiveness of governance, as required.
The administrative penalties set out in the preceding paragraph are determined by the security production supervision management; the relevant laws, regulations, regulations and administrative penalties are otherwise provided.
Administrative penalties must not be repeated for the same offence.
Article 2, paragraph 2, Article 13, paragraph 3, of this approach is punishable by the provisions of the State Department's relevant administrative regulations.
Article 23, Safety and Production Monitoring Management and other relevant sector staff members violate the provisions of this approach by providing administrative disposal by one of the following acts, either by the unit or by the superior authorities; and by law, criminal responsibility:
(i) The receipt of the report of the Secretary-General on the concealment of security accidents and the governance programme have not been validated by the required expert and issued a letter of governance;
(ii) Governance with regard to major production safety accidents should organize receipts;
(iii) There is no timely investigation of the offence of a serious production security accident;
(iv) There are other acts of negligence, abuse of authority, favouring private fraud.
Article 24