Key Benefits:
(Adopted by the 94th Standing Committee of the People's Government of San Francisco on 17 January 2007, No. 200 of the People's Government Order No. 200 of 23 January 2007 and issued effective 1 March 2007) Chapter I General Article 1, in order to regulate and monitor administrative law enforcement activities, promotes the establishment of a clear liability, code of conduct, oversight of effective and robust administrative law enforcement systems and promote the establishment of the Rule of Law Government, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Department of State. Article 2 states that administrative law enforcement responsibilities are defined by law by executive law enforcement authorities as the subject of administrative law enforcement, defining administrative law enforcement responsibilities, regulating administrative law enforcement procedures, setting clear administrative law enforcement standards, carrying out an integrated system of administrative law enforcement review activities and implementing administrative law enforcement responsibilities, and providing a system of clarity, separation, implementation, evaluation and fulfilment of administrative law enforcement responsibilities. Article 3. The introduction of administrative law enforcement responsibilities should be guided by the Government's leadership, departmental responsibility, the harmonization of deployment, parent-level guidance, the overall advancement, focus, and the incremental and steady application of principles. Article IV should be implemented in order to enforce administrative law enforcement responsibilities by law enforcement actors, law enforcement based on a clear law-enforcement structure, law enforcement functions and standards, strict enforcement procedures, enforcement responsibilities, enforcement norms, law enforcement standards, enforcement standards and efficiency. Article 5 Organizations that are entrusted with law enforcement by the executive branch shall establish a corresponding system, guided by the delegated authority, in the light of the administrative law enforcement responsibility. Chapter II Organization of deployment Article 6 Sectors such as the rule of law, the preparation, personnel and inspection should be responsible for the implementation of the relevant work of the administrative law enforcement responsibility, in accordance with their respective responsibilities. Article 7. Implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities under the leadership of the executive law enforcement agencies of vertical management and dual management. There was no deployment in the superior sector and the introduction of administrative law enforcement responsibilities, taking into account the deployment of the people's Government. Article 8. Governments at all levels should establish administrative law enforcement accountability systems and make the implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities an important objective to incorporate the objectives of the Government of the people at this level in the management of the scope. Chapter III Article 9 The following vertically managed administrative law enforcement units in the province are governed by administrative law enforcement under the authority of the Government of the Provincial People and are published by the Government. The administrative law enforcement sector, which is administered with a dual administration, is governed by administrative law enforcement under the authority of the Government of the Provincial People, and is published by the Government of the Provincial Municipalities. When laws, regulations, regulations are enacted, modified or repealed, the executive law enforcement authorities should adjust the relevant law enforcement basis in a timely manner within 30 days. Article 10. The administrative law enforcement sector should regularly streamline the law enforcement basis, distributing the law enforcement functions in accordance with the configurations of law enforcement agencies and law enforcement positions in this sector, identify the responsibility for law enforcement and regulate law enforcement procedures and law enforcement standards. The administrative law enforcement authorities should make the compilations, such as the administrative law enforcement subject, administrative law enforcement, administrative law enforcement, administrative law enforcement, administrative law enforcement standards, administrative law enforcement procedures, monitoring reporting methods, and the setting of bulletins, triggers or accessories to society. Public information websites have been established and should be made available to society through the website. Article 11. The Government of the people at all levels shall enter into an administrative law enforcement letter with the executive law enforcement authorities at this level, as well as the executive law enforcement authorities at all levels. Article 12. The executive law enforcement branch should establish a system of qualifications and qualifications of the executive law enforcement agencies, the judicial system for the training of legal law enforcement officials, the legal regulations and the promotion of training systems, the administrative law enforcement system, administrative law enforcement procedures, administrative law enforcement vouchers, administrative law enforcement vetting system, administrative law enforcement hearings system, administrative law enforcement vetting system, administrative law enforcement vetting system, administrative law enforcement complaints and referral system, administrative review reporting, etc. Chapter IV The Government of the people at all levels and the executive law enforcement authorities should have a systematic examination of the implementation of the administrative law enforcement responsibility. The inspection of administrative law enforcement responsibility includes: (i) The development and implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities programmes; (ii) Defining law enforcement responsibilities by law; (iii) The establishment of the accompanying system; (iv) The conduct of a review of the conduct of the judicial review; (v) Implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities; (vi) The evaluation of administrative law enforcement and administrative law enforcement officials by the public; (vii) Other matters to be examined. Article 14. Modalities for inspection of administrative law enforcement responsibilities include: (i) On-site inspection, screening or review of documents, information and administrative law enforcement files, files; (ii) Convening a colloquium or conducting a questionnaire survey to all sectors of society; (iii) Legal quality testing of persons responsible and administrative law enforcement personnel; (iv) Organizing law enforcement inspections, thematic surveys or individual oversight; (v) Examination or hearing reports on the implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities and verification in the context of the situation at the time of the process; (vi) Other modalities identified by the inspection body. Article 15. Administrative law enforcement review shall be guided by the principles of openness, equity and justice. Governments at all levels and their administrative law enforcement authorities should establish a sound administrative law enforcement review appraisal nuclear mechanism to regulate the conduct of the evaluation. Article 16 is responsible for the review of administrative law enforcement in the respective sectors by all levels of the people's government and for the supervision and guidance of the Government's administrative law enforcement review. The executive law enforcement sector, which is administered with vertical administration, is reviewed by the superior sector and listens fully to the views of the people at this level. The administrative law enforcement component, which is administered with a dual administration, is reviewed by the superior and the people's governments, in accordance with their management responsibilities and division of labour. The executive law enforcement sector conducts a review of the administrative law enforcement efforts of the executive law enforcement agencies and administrative law enforcement officials. Article 17 The criteria, processes and results of the administrative law enforcement review examination are to be made public in a certain manner. Article 18 (i) The qualifications of the executive law-enforcement subject shall be met; (ii) The accuracy of the applicable law enforcement basis; (iii) Administrative law enforcement is in compliance with the law enforcement authority; (iv) The legality of administrative law enforcement procedures; (v) The legitimacy and appropriateness of the content of administrative law enforcement decisions; (vi) Quality of administrative law enforcement files; (vii) Administrative review and administrative proceedings of administrative law enforcement decisions; (viii) Other aspects of the examination. Article 19 Article 20 Generic content and standards are determined and implemented by the provincial people's Government; specialized content and standards are developed and reported by the provincial Government's administrative law enforcement authorities after the finalization of the Government of the current people; and the evaluation of the content and standards of the executive law enforcement sector, which is vertically managed and dually managed, are reported to be carried out by the parent sector. Article 21, the administrative law enforcement review appraisal is carried out in principle by hundreds of subsidiaries, with the results of the examination being divided into four cases of excellence, qualifications, basic qualifications and non-qualification. The concluding observations of the Administrative Law Enforcement Review (IPSAS) shall be made public in due form. The second article, the Administrative Law Enforcement Review Examination shall be carried out in conjunction with activities such as the administrative appraisal of the civil service, the annual civil service review, the performance assessment of the administrative law enforcement sector, the creation of a civilized unit, and the avoidance of evaluation. Article 23 should be used directly by the archaeological review of the results of the administrative law enforcement review examination in the course of a nuclear examination, post-responsibility examination, civil service vetting, and no longer duplicate the examination. Implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities Article 24 of the law enforcement sector is unlawful or inappropriate in the course of administrative law enforcement, and the Government of the people or its superior authorities may provide time-bound changes, briefings, criticisms, cancellation of evaluation than advanced qualifications in accordance with specific circumstances such as the magnitude of the consequences or the degree of impact. In one of the following cases, the Government of the People or its superior authorities may be responsible for the responsibility of the period of time; in the event of a serious nature, they may be briefed or removed from the processing of higher qualifications: (i) In administrative review and administrative proceedings, the reasons for administrative organs have resulted in the determination of violations or changes, the high rate of withdrawal; (ii) A low level of public satisfaction in external reviews; (iii) A negative response to the introduction of administrative law enforcement responsibilities and arrogance; (iv) Failure to establish and implement administrative law enforcement responsibilities or systems in accordance with this provision; (v) Uncoordinate, non-acceptance or misappropriation of vouchers; (vi) Other cases of criticism or cancellation of higher qualifications should be given. Article 26 Administrative law enforcement officials are unlawful or inappropriate in the course of administrative law enforcement, and their executive law enforcement services may be treated in accordance with the annual examination of nuclear cases, or in accordance with the pattern of error, the nature of the damage and the circumstances. Article 27, in violation of administrative discipline by the administrative responsible person, is governed by the law by the inspector or by the office of a non-exemptory authority, and is suspected to constitute an offence and transferred to the judiciary. Article 28 Governments and executive law enforcement services at all levels should build a sound administrative law enforcement incentive system and create incentives to recognize administrative law enforcement and administrative law enforcement officials highlighted in administrative law enforcement performance and to improve the quality and level of administrative law enforcement. Annex VI Article 29 |
