Key Benefits:
(Summit 40th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of the Nangurang Self-Government Zone of 14 May 2007 to consider the adoption of Decree No. 143 of 16 May 2007 of the People's Government Order No. 143 of the Newangur Self-Autonomous Region, which came into force on 1 July 2007) Article 1, in order to preserve the legitimate rights and interests of the enterprise, enhance the oversight of the burden of the enterprise and promote economic and social development, establishes this approach in the light of the relevant laws, regulations and regulations. Article II refers to the corporate burden referred to in this approach to the violation of the laws, regulations, regulations and regulations by the executive organs, including those exercising administrative functions under the law, as well as the relevant provisions of the State and self-government zones, which require that the enterprise provide or adapt to the provision of human, material, financial or other unlawful obligations to be performed by the enterprise. Article 3. The corporate burden monitoring exercise is governed by a unified leadership, a hierarchy of responsibility, and by a combination of self-recovery and oversight inspections. Article 4 The economic trade management of the people at the district level, together with the inspection, finance, prices, auditing and etc., provides guidance on business burden monitoring, organizes coordination, establish a system of regular oversight inspections and undertakes specific oversight inspections when appropriate. The executive organs at all levels should conduct self-respect for corporate burdens and report on self-setting to the Government of the people at this level. Any unit or individual has the right to report and complain about the enterprise burden. The reporting, the unit of the complaint or the individual should be subject to the investigation in the relevant sectors, such as the factual description, the denial or obstruction of the investigation, and the non-response of retaliation, the complainant. The media support public opinion oversight of the corporate burden. Article 6. Business considers that normative documents create an enterprise burden that can be remedied at the request of the rule of law working body of the designating body or the review body. Article 7. Execution of administrative fees involving enterprises, government funds, government pooled agencies should be evaluated at the appropriate time and the need for implementation and presence should be reported on the approval of fees projects, standard agencies. Approval of administrative fees, government funds, government pooled agencies should be carried out on a regular basis, with assessment of approved administrative expenses, government funds, government pooled funds, and timely clearance; and the need for continued implementation or approval of the basis for the cancellation of implementation, should be withdrawn in a timely manner; the circumstances that have changed when the implementation is approved should be revised in a timely manner. Evaluations, clean-up results should be made public to society. Citizens, legal persons and other organizations may make observations and recommendations to the authorized organs or executive organs involved in the administration of enterprises, the Government Fund, the Governmental Fund. Article 8. Enterprises have the right to request clarifications from the charge-raising project, standards or, depending on the grounds of the objection, the charge agency rejects the statement or does not provide a legal basis, the enterprise has the right to refuse payment and may facilitate access to sectors such as economic trade, finance, prices. Article 9. In the course of the administrative licence process, the enterprise has the right to refuse, and may report, complaints to the relevant sectors, in accordance with the provisions of the law, administrative regulations and regulations. The executive branch shall not conduct a multi-sectoral, multi-tier duplication of testing, testing, quarantine, and, in addition to legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions, shall not be charged to the enterprise. Recurrent charges must not be used for testing, testing, quarantine. Article 10. The activities of the executive organs for inspection, appraisal, evaluation, grading, upgrading, etc. should be based on legal, regulatory or state-of-government provisions. Activities such as inspection, appraisal, evaluation, grading, upgrading and upgrading of enterprises should be organized in an integrated manner and should not be carried out in a multisectoral, multi-tier manner. In carrying out inspections by the executive branch of enterprises, law enforcement officials should communicate the basis and the contents of the inspections and present law enforcement documents. The enforcement of inspection shall not impede the normal production of business activities of the enterprise, nor shall the receipt or receipt of the property of the enterprise be obtained from other interests. Enterprises should be supportive of monitoring inspections carried out by law and should not be unreasonably denied. Article 12 The executive branch entrusts other organizations with administrative matters, which are covered by the executive branch, with the exception of laws, regulations and regulations. The executive branch shall not intervene in matters relating to the right of an enterprise to choose the services of social intermediary organizations. Article 13 provides for mandatory training of business personnel by executive organs and must be based on laws, regulations or regulations; laws, regulations or regulations do not provide for the collection of training costs, and training agencies may not require businesses or those involved in training to pay for training. The non-mandatory training of business personnel must be adhered to voluntary principles; the need to collect training costs should be charged in accordance with approved fee-charging projects and standards, in accordance with the authority and procedures established by national and self-government zones. Various types of training for business personnel must be organized in an integrated manner, without a multisectoral, multi-tier duplication; no duplication of training, repeated issuances, repeated charges must be carried out without the use of training documents, certifications, etc. Article 14. (i) To require businesses to provide human, material and financial resources free of charge or low prices; (ii) To require companies to provide security for others; (iii) Force the acquisition of designated commodities or equipment, facilities; (iv) Enforcing enterprises to accept services such as compensation, counselling, commercial insurance; (v) Reimbursement or sharing of costs for enterprises; (vi) The provision of sponsorship, financing or contributions by enterprises; (vii) Provide borrowing or mattressing funds to enterprises; (viii) The conversion of public interest obligations to the enterprise, or the transfer of public goods from administrative organs to business activities; (ix) Enforcing businesses to publish advertisements in designated media, provide reimbursable news and purchase newspapers, magazines, books, information, audio and video products, and to contribute to the preparation of photographs, Yearbooks, wholesets, posters, etc.; (x) Enforcing businesses to participate in social groups such as the Institute, the Association, the Research Chamber; (xi) Enforcing businesses to participate in exhibitions, press conferences, seminars or to engage enterprises in various studies; (xii) Other actions to increase corporate burdens. The enterprise has the right to reject the acts set out in the preceding paragraph. Article 15. Sectors such as economic trade, inspection, finance, prices, audit, etc. at the district level should be established and improved to monitor reporting, complaints systems, and to publish corporate burden surveillance reports, complaints telephones and boxes (to the website). Article 16 departments that have received reports, complaints should be made in writing or inadmissible; reports, complaints that do not fall under the jurisdiction of this sector should be transferred from within 3 days of receipt of reports, complaints and informed of reports, complaints. Complaints that may be resolved through administrative review or administrative proceedings should be informed of the applicant's application for administrative review or administrative proceedings in accordance with the law. Article 17 Departments that receive reports, complaints should be processed within 30 days of the date of receipt and sent to the reporting, the complainant. For special reasons, an extension may be extended by the heads of this sector, but the extension period shall not exceed 10 days. Significant reports, the treatment of complaints cases should be made public to society. Article 18 reports, the complainant's satisfaction with the treatment of the results may apply for review from within 15 days of the receipt of the outcome to the Government of the people at the disposal body or its superior administrative authority; the review body shall take a review decision within 30 days of receipt of the request for review and inform the author in writing. The executive branch of article 19 found that the subordinate administrative body was wrong in dealing with reports, complaints and could be dealt with directly or by an administrative organ responsible. Article 16 of this approach provides for “3 days”, 5 days” during the processing of complaints, referring to the day of work, without holidays. The laws, regulations, regulations and regulations provide otherwise for the handling of competences and procedures. Article 21, the executive branch and its staff, in violation of the provisions of this approach, are redirected by a superior body or by an inspectorate, to administratively dispose of the responsible person directly responsible and other direct responsibilities; to make the loss to the enterprise, shall be compensated by law; to constitute an offence and to hold criminal responsibility in accordance with the law. In violation of the provisions of this approach, the circumstances are minor and are dealt with by the unit: (i) A written check and apologize to the enterprise; (ii) Sustained statements; (iii) To inform criticism; (iv) Remove the responsible person from the law enforcement service; (v) Other modalities provided for by law, regulations and regulations. Section II of Economic trade, inspection, finance, prices, audit and staff members violate the provisions of this approach, with one of the following acts to be administratively disposed of by the unit or the inspectorate to the competent and other direct responsible personnel directly responsible: (i) The use of oversight responsibilities for profiting; (ii) To cover or condon an increase in corporate burdens; (iii) Reports, delays in the handling of complaints, diversion or non-compliance by law; (iv) Disclosure of reports, relevant information from the complainant, leading to reports and complaints against retaliation; (v) Other acts that violate the oversight function. Article 23 oversees the burden of individual business and businessmen and implements this approach. Article 24 |
