Advanced Search

Interim Measures For Administrative Enforcement Evaluation In Harbin

Original Language Title: 哈尔滨市行政执法评议考核暂行办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Summit 10th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Haskohama on 8 August 2007 to consider the adoption of the Decree No. 165 of 13 August 2007 on the People's Government Order No. 165 of 13 August 2007 (effective 15 September 2007)

Article I, in order to regulate and strengthen the administrative law enforcement appraisal process, promotes the administration of the executive branch to fully implement the administrative law enforcement responsibilities in accordance with the relevant provisions, and develop this approach in the light of the actual practice of the city.
Article II refers to the evaluation and examination of administrative law enforcement by the Government of the city, district, district (community), and the Government of the people of the Republic, the executive law enforcement authorities, and the administrative law enforcement authorities, as well as the administration of law enforcement by their executive law enforcement officials.
Article 3
The executive law enforcement authorities at the municipal level are governed by the executive law enforcement agencies in this sector (including organizations and dispatching agencies mandated by law) and their administrative law enforcement officers (hereinafter referred to as review candidates).
Article IV. The laws, regulations and regulations governing the direct administration of the people's government are granted to the organization of the executive law enforcement authority, which shall be reviewed by the Government and apply to the provisions of this approach relating to the administration of justice.
The law, legislation and regulations governing the administration of the executive law enforcement sector, which is governed by the Government of the city, district, district and district (market) are subject to review by the sector and apply to the provisions of this approach relating to the administration of law enforcement authorities.
The Government of the city, district, and district (market) considers that, where necessary, it may conduct a review of the laws, regulations governing the administration of the executive branch at this level, and organizations that have granted administrative law enforcement authority.
Article 5
Specific organizations responsible for the rule of law at the municipal level are responsible for the implementation of the administrative law review of the subject of the review.
Article 6. Administrative law enforcement reviews shall uphold the principles of openness, equity and justice.
Article 7. The Government of the people who are responsible for the overall work of this administrative region should make the completion of the annual review of the objective of the administrative law enforcement year as an important indicator to incorporate into the annual work objectives of the current people's Government, and the results of the administrative law enforcement review shall be translated into the corresponding value established in the management of the integrated objectives.
Article 8. The main holder of the archaeological review unit is the first responsible for the administration of justice in the unit, the overall responsibility for the completion of the administrative law enforcement review objective; the responsibility of other heads of the archaeological units for the completion of the executive review of the nuclear objective within the scope of the administration of justice; the principal holder of the executive law enforcement agencies affiliated to the archaeological units, which is directly responsible for the completion of the executive review of the objective of the evaluation of the administration of justice in the institution; and the responsibility of law enforcement officials in accordance with the law enforcement positions for the completion of the specific executive review of the nuclear responsibility.
Article 9. Main elements of the EXPR are:
(i) The qualifications of the subject matter of administrative law enforcement;
(ii) Administrative law enforcement is in compliance with the law enforcement authority;
(iii) The correctness of the application of the law enforcement basis;
(iv) The legality of administrative law enforcement procedures;
(v) The legitimacy and appropriateness of the content of administrative law enforcement decisions;
(vi) Implementation of statutory obligations;
(vii) Administrative review and administrative proceedings of specific administrative acts;
(viii) The quality of the case;
(ix) Other elements related to administrative law enforcement.
Article 10
The PRRA shall be based on the annual evaluation of the objective of the administrative law enforcement under the Government of the communes, the specific objectives of the superior administrative law enforcement sector and the region, the annual focus of the system shall be developed for the purpose of the review of the nuclear objective by the Government or the executive law enforcement of the sector, and shall be reviewed by 20 March each year by the evaluation of the region by the archipelag or the sector.
Article 11. Administrative law enforcement review appraisals are combined with the regular review appraisal and the end-of-year review.
The Government's rule of law sector conducts daily oversight of the review of the objective of the evaluation of the subject matter of the review of the archaeological units, the administrative law enforcement branch, and conducts inspections on a regular or non-regular basis, respectively, with the establishment of the archaeological nuclear unit and the administrative review of the archives of the subject matter of the review, such as documenting the daily evaluation of the examination of the nuclear status and conducting an end-of-year administrative review on the basis of the contents of the archives.
Article 12
(i) Apprise or hear reports of administrative law enforcement;
(ii) On-site inspection, screening or review of relevant documents, information and administrative law enforcement files, files;
(iii) Legal quality testing of persons responsible and administrative law enforcement personnel;
(iv) Organizing demonstrable visits, thematic surveys, press coverage follow-up surveys and receive administrative law enforcement complaints;
(v) An external review of administrative law enforcement in the administrative law enforcement sector, including through the convening of a comparative panel on administration, the establishment of a public opinion column on the website of the executive branch, the issuance of administrative law enforcement review cards, the opening of an administrative law enforcement review telephone, the commission of an intermediary's investigation;
(vi) To seek advice from specialized oversight departments, such as inspection, audit, and the People's Court, the Public Prosecutor's Office on administrative law enforcement;
(vii) Examination of other modalities identified by the archaeological bodies.
The administrative law enforcement sector may determine the specific modalities for the conduct of administrative law review of the subject matter of the evaluation, in accordance with the law enforcement characteristics of this sector.
Article 13. The end-of-administered administrative law review is based on the difference between the value of the score, the mark and the three files.
The results of the administrative law enforcement review of the archaeological units should be published in newspapers, government websites and government bulletins.
The results of the administrative law enforcement review of the subject of the review shall be published in the sector in due form.
Article 14. The results of the administrative law enforcement review shall serve as an important basis for the evaluation of the overall work of the administrative law enforcement branch and the final evaluation of the personnel responsible and administrative law enforcement officers.
Article 15. Appreciation of the archaeological units that have been rated as excellent in the administrative law enforcement review, in accordance with the relevant provisions by the Government of the urban, district, district (market) and in accordance with the relevant provisions, and in respect of individuals who have been highlighted in administrative law enforcement or have achieved significant performance in administrative law enforcement efforts, the executive law enforcement practitioners can be granted.
Article 16 Administrative law enforcement officers who have not met in administrative law enforcement review missions shall not be granted other Honours within one year and have been trained for two months; and administrative law enforcement officers who have not met the mark for the last two years shall be removed from administrative law enforcement positions.
The year-end evaluation shall not be chosen as a good civil servant in the evaluation of administrative law enforcement.
Article 17 shall be complemented by the review of the conduct of the evaluation of the conduct of the examination of the nuclear inspection conducted by the archaeological body, to listen carefully and to correct the problems in a timely manner, and to make written observations to the review body on the results of the examination.
Article 18 Examination of the problems identified by the archaeological body in the conduct of the examination, which can be corrected in a timely manner, should provide views on immediate alterations or changes in the duration of the time period; and that violations or inappropriate administrative law enforcement should be addressed in accordance with the relevant provisions of administrative law enforcement oversight.
Article 19 is vested in the evaluation of the evaluation of the conduct of the evaluation of the evaluation of the evaluation of the conduct of the administrative law, which is criticized by the archaeological body and may, depending on the circumstances, recommend that the organ with the administrative disposition be given administrative treatment to the responsible person:
(i) To reject or not cooperate with the examination;
(ii) Concluding or providing false material;
(iii) The use of unjustifiable means to influence external review;
(iv) Failure to correct problems;
(v) Violations of other relevant provisions of this approach.
Article 20, the People's Government and the municipal administration enforcement sector may develop specific implementation approaches in accordance with this approach.
Article 21