Advanced Search

Tianjin Quality Management Approach

Original Language Title: 天津市耕地质量管理办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(Adopted at the 100th ordinary meeting of the Government of the People of the city of zinz on 13 August 2007 No. 122 of the Order of the People's Government of 30 August 2007 (Act No. 122 of 1 October 2007)

Chapter I General
Article 1 provides for the protection of cropland resources, the improvement of the quality of arable land and the safeguarding of sustainable agricultural development, in accordance with the laws, regulations and regulations of the People's Republic of China Agriculture Act, the Basic Farm Protection Regulation (No. 257 of the Department of State Order) to develop this approach in conjunction with the current city.
Article 2, which refers to arable land that meets certain basic land standards and often undertakes arable land (including new drips, recreational lands, ventilation, grassland trajectorys; and land with fruit or other trees to plant crops).
The quality of arable land referred to in this approach refers to the degree of strength of arable land and the environment, the level of facilities and the appropriateness of agricultural crops.
Article 3 is subject to this approach by owners, users and administrators of arable land within the city's administration.
Article IV Quality management of arable land should be guided by a comprehensive planning, rational use, a combination of nutrients and a rigorous protection approach to protect and improve the quality of arable land.
Article 5 The occupancy of arable land should be better or equal to the quality of cultivated land.
The Land Administration and the Agricultural Administration are responsible for the protection and management of arable land.
Article 6. Land administration authorities and agricultural administration authorities should be made available to society in a timely manner information on the management of arable land, such as cropping and the quality of arable land.
Chapter II Oversight and management
Article 7. Specific work is carried out by the management body responsible for soil fertility monitoring.
The sectors such as development reform, finance, land tenure, planning and environmental protection are managed accordingly in accordance with their respective responsibilities.
Article 8. Governments at all levels should incorporate the quality and management of arable land into national economic and social development plans and organize implementation.
The main heads of the commune and commune governments should effectively perform arsenal protection responsibilities, implement the quality, quantity protection goals and tasks of arable land.
Article 9. Governments at all levels should organize regular censuses on the quality of arable land and the dissemination of arable land quality information.
The arsenal quality census is vested by the Agricultural Administration authorities, which are tasked with the specific work carried out by the management body responsible for soil fertility monitoring.
Article 10 Governments at all levels should arrange specific funding for census and management of the quality of arable land, in accordance with the quality of land.
Article 11. The Government of the commune should establish a land quality management file, as required by the municipal and district agricultural administration authorities, which sets out the quality of the cropland in the land contract (lead) contracts, specifying the content and requirements for the quality of the land.
Chapter III Quality monitoring
Article 12
The standard of quality of arable land in this city is determined to be implemented in accordance with the relevant national standards and regulations. Specifically, the management approach was developed by the municipal agricultural administration authorities and the municipal soil fertility monitoring authority was responsible for organizing implementation.
The level of quality of arable land is determined as a basis for improving or reducing the quality of arable land.
The level of quality should be re-identified when cultivated land is discontinued or transferred.
Article 13 Surfertilization monitoring bodies should monitor the quality of arable land and report the results to the same-level agricultural administrative authorities.
Agricultural administrative authorities should publish a report on the quality of arable land based on the results of the dynamic monitoring of the quality of arable land and provide appropriate land-use protection measures for agricultural producers.
After the completion of the newly reclaimed arriculture and the national investment rehabilitation process, the quality of arable land should be collected by the district-level agricultural administrative authorities, land administration authorities, financial departments and project authorities.
Article 15 is not suitable for the cultivation of cropland crops, and is transferred to non-food crop planted land by the agricultural administrative authorities following the approval of the same-level people's government by law.
The cultivation of food crops is prohibited by non-food crop cultivation.
Article 16 disputes arising from the quality of the land, the parties may apply for the identification of the municipal soil fertility monitoring authority.
Article 17
The municipal and district agricultural administrations should guide the adaptation of cultivated land users in accordance with the type of low-born land and to build a stable farmland.
Chapter IV Use and protection
Article 18 Surveillance Regulators are responsible for organizing the implementation of the quality of arable land, carrying out technical outreach activities such as fertilization, rehabilitation of low- and medium-term land and water irrigation, and providing technical guidance and services to cultivated land users.
Article 19 Cropowners should strengthen the quality of arable land and take effective measures to increase inputs for the quality of arable land and to progressively increase the quality of arable land.
Article 20 users of arable land should be used in a reasonable manner to promote the quality of arable land by using reasonable means of farming.
Article 21 users of arable land should take a scientific fertilization approach, with reasonable fertilization based on the principle of balanced fertility, integrated use and increased organic fertilizers.
Article 2 encourages the efficient use of arable land by farmers. The management of soil fertilizer surveillance at all levels should provide technical guidance and services for improving the efficiency of cropland use.
Article 23 Production and sale of fertilizer products should meet national or industrial standards and be registered by the agricultural administrative authorities in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State.
Unregistered fertilizer products without agricultural administrative authorities shall not be used for agricultural production.
Article 24. Urban garbage used for fertilizers should be consistent with national or local control standards.
The provision of fertilizers, pesticides, urban garbage and cement to agricultural producers may cause contamination in arable land is prohibited.
Article 25 prohibits the release of unmarked sewage from any unit or person to arrigated land or agricultural systems.
Croplan users shall not use unmarked irrigated land.
Article 26 users of arable land should promptly remove wastes such as plastics that are not easy to demobilize and prevent contamination of arable land.
Article 27 users of arable land should protect the arsenal. The plant and plant varieties, such as the cultivation of grasslandes, which are severely affected by farming, should be observed. Relevant planting norms are developed and published by municipal agricultural administration authorities.
Article 28 prohibits the use of:
(i) The use of cultivated land;
(ii) To destroy the arsenal;
(iii) dumping, storage and disposal of waste;
(iv) Other damage to the quality of farming.
Chapter V
Article 29 makes the following contribution to the protection of the quality of arable land, and the Government of the urban and district communities should grant recognition and incentives:
(i) A significant achievement in the management of the quality of the cropland and in the protection process;
(ii) Improving the quality of arable land;
(iii) Procedural, denouncing and halting major damage to the quality of cropland.
Article 33, in violation of this approach, has resulted in a decrease in the quality of arable land, with penalties imposed by the agricultural administrative authorities in accordance with the following provisions:
(i) The use of arsenal or plundered land in violation of the law, resulting in a decrease in the quality of the arable land, warnings that the deadline is being changed; and refusal to renovate, with a fine of up to 1 million dollars per acre.
(ii) Restructuring, re-establishing the status quo due to the destruction of the arsenal or plantation of the arsenal of the arable arsenal; rejecting it; and paying more than 100 ktonnes per acreen; and fine below US$ 2000.
(iii) The dumping, releasing and disposal of waste in arable land, which endangers the elimination of waste, warnings that the deadline is being changed and the damage caused by the refusal to change and to impose a fine of up to $50 million.
(iv) No timely removal of plastics that would not be easy to degradate, warning of cropland users and change of time, and a fine of up to $50 per acre is not required.
In violation of article 15, paragraph 2, of this approach, the cultivation of crop crops in non-food cropland areas is rectified by the agricultural administrative authorities; the period of time has not been reproduced, and the agricultural administrative authorities can destroy their planted crop and crop products.
Violations of this approach involve the terms of reference of other sectors, and the agricultural administration should be transferred to the relevant authorities. The authorities concerned should be processed in a timely manner and will deal with the results's timely feedback to the agricultural administrative authorities.
Article 33 violates this approach, and the legal provisions have been made with clear penalties, from their provisions.
Article 34 protects the quality of arsenal, abuse of authority, provocative fraud, influences the quality protection and management of arable land by its units or the relevant sectors, and criminalizes the law.
Annex VI
Article 55 of this approach is implemented effective 1 October 2007.