Key Benefits:
(Summit 7th ordinary meeting of the Government of the People of 12 May 2008 to consider the adoption of Decree No. 5 of 23 May 2008 No. 5 of the Order of the People's Government of the city of Zenin, which came into force on 1 July 2008) Chapter I General In order to regulate the Government's important decision-making, to establish scientific, democratic, legal and decision-making mechanisms to promote the development of the economic and social causes of my city, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the People's Congress and Local levels of the People's Government Act of the People's Republic of China and the Department of State's Comprehensive Progress Framework for the Implementation of the Law of the Judiciary (Statement [2004]10) in conjunction with the realities of the city. Article 2 Decision-making on major matters of the Government of the city and the various districts and the people of the counties is governed by this rule. Article 3. Decision-making on major matters by the Government of the city follows the principles of science, democracy and legitimacy. Administrative decisions that go beyond the statutory mandate or in contravention of the statutory procedures are null and void. Article 4 is responsible for the Government of the urban people and may wish to preside over the work of the Government. Decision-making on major matters by the Government of the city is subject to a plenary meeting of the municipal government or to a discussion of the decision. Article 5 (i) The preparation of the draft budget for the economic and social development planning, planning and finance of nationals of the city; (ii) The exploitation and ecological environmental protection of natural resources, such as land, mineral deposits, water flows, forests, mountains, beachs, marine areas; (iii) The city-wide economic downturn, industrial restructuring, market access conditions, relations with national economic life, national security industries and special industry management; (iv) Develop major policies for economic institutional reform, administrative institutional reform and financial institutional reform; (v) Urban overall planning, land-use master planning, recent urban construction planning, dedicated planning and implementation reports on urban overall planning; (vi) The disposal of major State assets administered by the Government of the city and the disposal of major State-owned assets of the city on behalf of the State carrying out its responsibilities; (vii) Major financial expenditures, large infrastructures invested in the city or municipal facilities projects and other major construction projects; (viii) Major measures in education, science and technology, culture, sports and health; (ix) Significant matters in rural and urban construction, civil affairs, public security, national religious affairs, administration of justice, public safety, labour and social security; (x) Significant matters in the construction of talent and talents throughout the city; (xi) Significant matters in the building and defence mobilization of the defence reserve force, and major matters in the protection of defence facilities; (xii) Major issues in the areas of disaster relief, population and family planning; (xiii) The development and adaptation of emergency response scenarios for major emergencies; (xiv) Significant matters in the building of democracy and the rule of law by the Government of the city; (xv) The establishment, withdrawal and division of functions by the municipality's government-owned sectors, key institutions; (xvi) Other important matters of full-scale, long-term impact or close to the public interest. Decision-making on major matters listed in the previous paragraph, or other matters, shall be implemented by the Mayor, the Deputy Mayor and the Secretary-General in accordance with the division of responsibilities. Personnel are exempted and processed by major emergencies, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State and the city. Recommendations for decision-making on major matters The following persons or institutions may make decisions on major matters to the Government of the city: (i) Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Secretary-General; (ii) The composition of the Government of the city; (iii) Separate institutions, ad hoc institutions and institutions of conduct in the municipality; (iv) Governments of all regions and counties; (v) Other organs, democratic parties or groups of people, business units, social groups and citizens. Article 7. Decision-making recommendations on major matters should be based on basic, strategic research and planning, plans for the economic and social development of nationals of the city, and the content of decisions on major matters should be clear, specific, scientific, practical and practical. Article 8 shall submit written proposals to the Government of the city for decision-making on major matters. The main elements of the proposal include issues to be addressed in decision-making on major matters, notes on the grounds of recommendations, legal and policy bases, programmes to address problems, feasibility analyses and other relevant materials. The Government of the city should conduct a study on key decision-making recommendations made by democratic parties, groups of people, business units, social groups and citizens and provide timely feedback. Article 9. Decision-making recommendations on major matters are included in the development agenda for the decision-making of the people of the city, subject to review by the following persons or bodies: (i) The authorities designated by the Government of the city to submit their views; (ii) The Secretary-General of the Government of the city requests the Mayor, the Deputy Mayor to make a coordinated opinion; (iii) The Mayor, the Mayor, entrusts the Deputy Mayor with the determination or be reviewed by the Mayor's office. Article 10. Matters for inclusion in the decision-making agenda of the people of the city are determined by the Mayor, the Deputy Mayor or the Mayor's office, and by their specific programming. The offices may be the constituent units of the Government of the city, the immediate body, the ad hoc body, or social forces such as the advisory body. Chapter III Article 11. The UNOPS shall, at the request of the decision-making objective, use scientific methods to develop detailed, complete and pragmatic decision-making programmes based on research. The question of requiring a multi-programme comparative study or the existence of disputes that cannot be agreed upon in consultation should be developed on the basis of different public, expert or sectoral claims. Article 12 In developing decision-making programmes on major matters, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees shall investigate and coordinate matters related to decision-making on major matters, with the cooperation and support of the relevant units and individuals. Following the initial formulation of the decision-making programme by the UNOPS, consultations with the relevant departments and units of the communes should be sought in accordance with the scope of the decision-making matters, which are still not agreed upon and are submitted to the Deputy Mayor of the Government of the commune. Administrative disputes that may arise in the course of decision-making on major matters should be presented by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNOPS) and be prepared in advance; significant, problematic issues related to the decision-making programme should be organized by the Office of the Ombudsman to present the views of the relevant departments, expert scholars and the public, or to the intermediary agencies such as research, advice, etc.; decisions on major matters involving public interest should be taken through the media, such as the press, radio television, government websites, to make public statements, hearings, videos, etc., to hear the views of the parties on the main aspects of the reform of the region. Article 14. The authorities of the Government of the city should review the following elements and make written observations: (i) Decision-making on major matters is in accordance with the legislative authority of the Government; (ii) Recommendations for decision-making on major matters and the formulation of programmes are in accordance with the statutory procedures; (iii) The conformity of decisions on major matters with legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions; (iv) Other needs to be reviewed. Article 15. The Agency has adjusted the original decision-making programme on the basis of an integrated analysis of views. After collective discussions, written reports were submitted to the Secretary-General of the Municipal Government. The report should contain a description of the institution and the responsible person, the coordination of the previous period and the evidence, the comparative analysis of the main programmes, the specific decision-making content, possible problems and responses in the implementation of decision-making matters, and provocative opinions. Article 16, when reviewing the report, the Secretary-General of the commune may take a written form or directly listen to the reports of the sub-offices, drawing the mayor, the Deputy Mayor or mayor's office to discuss the decision-making programme on major matters. Chapter IV Decisions on major matters The following matters are subject to a discussion at the plenary meeting of the Government of the city: (i) Draft report on the work of the Government to be undertaken by the People's Congress; (ii) Draft report on the implementation of the national economic and social development plan to be presented to the General Assembly on behalf of the people at this level with the new annual national plan for economic and social development; (iii) Report on the implementation of the previous annual financial budget submitted to the General Assembly for its consideration and on the draft annual financial budget; (iv) Other matters to be discussed in plenary meetings of the Government of the city. The following matters are subject to the discussion at the Standing Committee of the Municipal Government: (i) Draft bill submitted to the Standing Committee of the People at this level; (ii) Draft audit report on budget implementation and financial payments to the Standing Committee of the People at this level; (iii) To bring important matters to the plenary of the Government of the city; (iv) The important work of the Government of the city to improve the lives of rural and urban people; (v) Article 5 of this rule provides for important matters for the Government's decision-making; (vi) Other matters to be taken up by the Standing Committee of the People's Government. Article 19 Priorities for the Government of the city to discuss decisions on major matters, and in accordance with the needs of Mayor, Deputy Mayor and the Secretary-General, through the holding of colloquiums, are directly heard by democratic parties, groups of people, expert scholars. The Executive Office of the People's Government may organize expert scholars to provide advice on decision-making, as requested by the Government of the city. Article 20 The Government of the city convenes plenary meetings or meetings to discuss decisions on major matters, chaired by the Mayor or the Mayor. The Office of the Ombudsman explained the background of the formulation of the decision-making programme, the comparable programmes and their main content, the necessaryness and feasibility and the differences of views; the relevant authorities of the Government reported on the review of the decision-making programme on major matters; and the report of the State's rule of law bodies on the legal review of decisions on major matters. Participants should fully express their views when discussing decision-making programmes on major matters. Members of the city's Government may, for the reason, be unable to participate in the Conference by means of writing. Article 21, when the Government of the city convenes plenary meetings or meetings to discuss decision-making on major matters, it may, if necessary, invite the municipal people to attend meetings on behalf of the General Assembly Standing Committee or the Political Consultative Stakeholders or invite other experts or practitioners relevant to the decision-making programme on major matters to present their views and proposals. Article 2 Article 23, on the basis of a major decision-making programme discussed at the plenary meeting of the Government of the city or at the Standing Conference, may decide as follows: (i) Adoption; (ii) A final review of the decision of the Deputy Mayor or of the Deputy Mayor after the change in the individual content of the institution; (iii) Parts of the need for in-depth study to be submitted after the amendment to the next plenary meeting of the Government of the city or to the Standing Conference to discuss decisions; (iv) No adoption. Article 24 mayors have issued decisions, orders on behalf of the Municipal Government. Decision-making on major matters by the Government of the city is issued by the Mayor and may also be entrusted to the Deputy Mayor. Decision-making on major matters by the Government of the city is made available in the form of a decision, order by the Government of the city, in the Official Journal of the People's Government of the city of Narzin, the Daily Newslet, the Daily Homeless Network or other media. The law, administrative legislation and regulations are also provided for by them. Article 25 The Executive Office of the People's Government should be able to record the decision-making meetings on major matters and archive decision-making material on major matters. Article 26 The Government of the city has taken a decision on major matters, accepted the supervision of the Assembly and its Standing Committee and accepted the democratic oversight of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Meeting, Oxford City Commission. Chapter V Implementation and adaptation of decisions on major matters In the aftermath of the decision-making on major matters of the Government of the city, the implementation units of the decision-making on major matters should develop specific implementation programmes and inform the Government of the city. Article 28 Implementation units for decision-making on major matters should report regularly to the Government of the city on the implementation of decisions on major matters and the main issues in their implementation. As part of the year-wide work, every quarterly report on progress made in the implementation of the report was fully implemented at the end of the year, and the Government of the city's inspectorate had checked implementation every half a year; it was a time-bound or emergency response and should report on implementation in a timely manner in accordance with the special requirements of the Government of the city. Article 29 states that all relevant sectors and territories of the city's people's government should be taken into account in the implementation of the decisions of the city's Government on major matters, in order to cooperate and support the implementation of decision-making units on major matters within their respective responsibilities. Article 33 mayors, deputy mayors, the Secretary-General and other constituents of the Government of the city, coordinate the relevant work of the relevant authorities in the implementation of decision-making decisions on major matters, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, to deal with disputes arising in the implementation of decision-making decisions on major matters, and to address the larger question of controversy may be brought to the Mayor's office for the study. The implementation of decisions on major matters should be subject to oversight. The Government of the commune should strengthen its scrutiny of the implementation of decision-making on major matters, track and feedback implementation in a timely manner, identify new situations and issues that should be promptly investigated, assessed and report on the results of the investigation and assessment to the commune. In the course of the decision-making process, the implementation unit of the decision-making process identified situations and questions that might affect the adjustments in decision-making decisions and should report to the Government of the city in a timely manner. The Government of the city should convene a report of the Mayor's office to study the implementation units for decision-making on major matters, and may decide to submit to the plenary of the Government of the city or to the Standing Committee appropriate adjustments to the decisions taken. Article 33 has one of the following conditions, and the Government of the city can adjust its decision-making on the main matters of the past: (i) The basis for the decision-making on major matters has changed significantly; (ii) The conditions in which decisions on major matters have been taken have taken place; (iii) New developments and questions arising from decision-making on major matters; (iv) Other situations and questions that directly affect decision-making on major matters. Adjustments to decision-making decisions on major matters by the Government of the city apply to decisions on major matters. However, in emergency situations, where adjustments may result in significant losses to the national, collective, social and public interest, the Mayor may decide whether to be adjusted by the Mayor, or by a decision of the Deputy Mayor in the direction of the site, and to report thereon to the policymaking organs. The Government of the city should compensate for the loss of the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations arising from decisions on major matters. Chapter VI Legal responsibility Article 33 fractures and grave consequences arising from the decision-making by the Government of the city on major matters, and the administrative responsibility of the inspectorate in respect of the heads of the relevant departments and those responsible for direct responsibility, in accordance with the relevant provisions: (i) The fact that decision-making on major matters has significant access; (ii) The basis for making decisions on major matters wrong; (iii) Programmes that provide decision-making on major matters violate legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions; (iv) No decision-making is requested in accordance with the statutory authority or procedure; (v) Appreciation by the relevant bodies of misconduct and misconduct; (vi) Other cases leading to the decision-making of violations. The specific approach of erroneous accountability has been developed by the Municipal Government. Article 36 is held accountable for the failure of decision-making on matters of major concern to the Government of the city, as well as for the implementation of the provisions of the law, legislation and regulations. Chapter VII Article 37 prepares draft local legislation and establishes government regulations and other normative documents to be implemented in accordance with the draft local legislation and the regulations and other normative provisions of government (No. 58 of the 2002 People's Government Order No. 58) and the Administrative Normary Documents Management provisions of the city of Zzin (No. 125 of the 2007 Municipal People's Government Order). Article 338, which came into force on 1 July 2008. |
