Key Benefits:
(Adopted at the 5th ordinary meeting of the Government of the commune on 15 July 2008 for adoption by Order No. 135 of 5 August 2008 concerning the date of publication) In response to the 5th ordinary meeting of the Government of the city, the following amendments were made to the provisional approach to the allocation of administrative penalties relative to urban management: Article 3 amends to read: “The Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management is the executive organ of the municipal government to concentrate on the exercise of some of the administrative penalties in the area of urban management in my city and is responsible for the implementation of this approach. Its responsibilities are: (i) To concentrate on the exercise of the administrative penalties stipulated in the laws, regulations, regulations and regulations governing the management of business, urban facilities, urban greenization and some public safety traffic; (ii) Follow-up to the relevant laws, regulations and draft regulations relating to urban management that are relatively focused on administrative penalties; (iii) Conduct research, coordination and management of the right to administrative penalties for urban management across the city; (iv) Oversight, inspection of enforcement activities that are relatively concentrated in urban management across the city. The Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau for Urban Management in various districts is the executive branch of the district government to concentrate on the exercise of the administrative penalties set out in this approach. The Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management carries out operational oversight and guidance to the Integrated Administration of Urban Management. Article 5 amends as follows: “In violation of the provisions, construction of buildings, constructions at the two sides of the city's roads, construction of opens, preferences, doors, changes in buildings, by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of the Urban Administration of the Region, which is responsible for the cessation of the offence, the removal of the deadline, the late removal of the deadline, and the introduction of the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Management, to the approval of the Government of the urban population and the forced removal. Unauthorized changes, modifications or external features of approved requirements for the alteration of buildings are modified by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Regional Urban Management, which is subject to a fine of 500 square meters in accordance with the changes in the law or the condition of the repair of the area. Paragraph 3 (v) of Article 6 reads as follows: “The advertising card has damaged untimely refurbished, with a fine of $50 per square m2.” Article 6 (vi), VII, (8), IX, X), XI and XII) merged into Article 7: “In one of the following acts, the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority for Urban Management, in accordance with the management authority, is responsible for the period of time and penalties: (i) The establishment of a bathymetry facility in urban landscape lights, which is not established within the prescribed time period, shall be subject to fines of up to 500,000 dollars; (ii) Background lights are not subject to a prescribed time frame, with a fine of up to 500 dollars; (iii) Dismoval of a landscape light facility, which has not been rehabilitated within a specified period of time, with fines of up to 500 dollars; (iv) Psychological advertisements do not set a light facility, with fines of up to 1000 dollars, impairment or failure to renovate within the prescribed time frame and impose a fine of up to 500 dollars and renovate or forcibly remove them; (v) Without the required location, form, design of a request for the installation of a bathymetry facility, a fine of up to 500 dollars and a period of time being changed; (vi) A fine of up to 500 dollars for unauthorized alterations, movement and the dismantling of a bathymetry facility; (vii) Contrary to urban landscape light facilities, affecting the normal functioning of the landscape light facility, which is compensated for twice the value of the act, and a fine of 500 dollars; and, in exceptional circumstances, a criminal liability under the law.” Article 9: “In one of the following acts, the Integrated Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau of Urban Administration is responsible for the change of the duration of the period under the authority of management, and is fined for each square met by an advertisement of the area of jeopardy; inadvertently, forced removal by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Management or by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Sector Urban Management to request the approval of the Integrated Urban Administration Administration Administration Authority for the removal of the costs, either by the establishment of an outdoor advertising facility or by an individual: (i) Secrete advertisements from outsiders; (ii) The right to advertise outside the transferee; (iii) An outdoor advertising facility to be collected should be organized without experience or access to qualified inputs; (iv) The absence of regular security inspections and maintenance of outdoor advertising facilities, which affect the state of the city and endanger the security of others; (v) Inadequate replacement of polluted, damaged or obstructed expatriate advertisements in the municipality; (vi) Exclusive advertisements on the basis of the authorized location, form, specifications, etc.; (vii) The imposition of an ex posterbatory period without the granting of an extension permit and the removal of it by itself; (viii) There must be no removal due to urban construction and the need for social public interest.” Article 8 deletes subparagraph (x 13), subparagraph (xiv) as paragraph (XIX) as follows: “The transport of construction residues and garbage vehicles does not apply to environmental sanitation administrative authorities for quasi-transport procedures, for the purpose of obtaining a fine of more than 500 thousand dollars, for whom the driver is warned or sentenced to fines of up to 50 dollars, in accordance with approved lines, time, location transport and loads or escorts”. In addition, seven additional items were: (i) Urgently engaged in the operation of garbage services in urban life without the approval of the urban sanitation administrative authorities, giving warnings to stop operations; (ii) No construction of environmental sanitation in line with planning; (xv) To refuse to comply with the obligation to remove the snow, impose a fine of up to 10 square meters per day; fail to impose a fine of $8 per square m2 per square kilometre per day and to impose a deadline for clearance; (xvi) Unless loaded at designated locations, the responsible unit is fined by more than 500,000 dollars, imposing a fine of 50 kidnapped for the direct responsible person and responsible for the removal of the deadline; (17) Unclearing the ice trajectory on the ground due to the leakage of pipes, the removal of the deadline, the uncleared charges, the imposition of a fine of 20 square meters and the imposition of fines for the principal leadership of the responsible unit of 500,000 dollars; (xviii) Subsidides, slots and hazardous blends on the ice ice iceway; loading around the transport sites and facilities, garbage containers, public toilets or loading on trees, green sets and green areas; dumping of garbage, slanders, sewage; dumping of watersheds or dumping of ice ices; (xxi) In the event of recycling of life resources, the recovery of vehicles was not confirmed by the recyclingers of the city's re-entry resources, which were warned against the unification of the vehicle and could be fined under $50, depending on the circumstances.” Article 9 and Article 10. Article 11 Adjustments to article 15 (iv) and article 16 (vi). Article 12 deletes subparagraph (vi) and adds the following: (i) Urban public greenfields, windlands, road greening and residence greenfields, units attached to the Green Land Green Lands Design Programme without approval or approval of the approved design programme, which is responsible for halting construction, filling the process; works that have not been completed at the time or do not receive experience, and receive unqualified delivery, with a deadline for construction or completion of design standards. In Article 13, “in one of the following acts, the executive branch responsible for the management of the district urban administration and administrative sanctions” was amended to read: “Article 12 contains one of the following acts, the Integrated Administrative Law Enforcement Authority in the city, the city's urban administration, or its entrusted park management body, in accordance with the authority to manage, reorder and impose administrative sanctions”. Article 13: “In the context of parks, there are one of the following acts, to be responsibly corrected by city, district city administration integrated administrative law enforcement offices or by the parking administration entrusted by them in accordance with the authority of management, and to fine up to 50 dollars; damage to facilities, compensation for damages and fines of one to two times the cost of compensation: (i) No purchase of tickets into a charge park or a basement; (ii) The self-entry of motor vehicles; (iii) Incorporating animals into parks; (iv) In parallel with chewings, droves and incests; (v) The intentional manufacture of noise or begging, the collection of abundance; (vi) Accelerating, incesting and inclination at facilities in the park; (vii) To jump water, swimm and ice ice ice ice ices at non-designated sites; (viii) Damage fences, steps, lighting facilities, booths, holidays, simulations, dressings, etc.; (ix) Tobn, collect plant seeds and mark, pharmaceutical materials, wild fruits; (x) Fishing, dressing and other wildlife; (xi) To provoke comma, intimidate, hit animals or to throw food with an intentional animal; (xii) Exhibiting exhibitions, opening up a healthy site or organizing a variety of activities for recreation; (xiii) Other damage to park facilities, equipment and public order.” In Articles 12 and 14, “in violation of the provisions, there shall be a breach of the provisions by the Executive Directorate of Urban Administration to impose its deadlines on correction, compensation for economic losses or recovering the receivable costs, and a loss or three to five times the cost receivable” as follows: Article 15. Articles XIV and 16 were amended to read: “Article 19 violates the provisions of Article 19, the completion of the drainage works has not been experienced, or the identification of non-qualified inputs, by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Management, in accordance with the management authority, to stop the use and impose a fine of 1 to 5 per cent of the construction price”. Article 17 amends as follows: “Article 20 violates the provisions of Article 20, does not obtain the Urban Exclusive Water Licence or does not provide for drainage in accordance with the Urban Excise Licence, which is due to the management authority of the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, and imposes a fine of up to 3,000 dollars.” Articles 16 and 18 have been amended to read: “Article 21 violates the provisions of Article 21, exclusive drainage of water by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Management, which is responsible for the cessation of the offence, warning it or imposing a fine of up to 5,000 dollars”. Article 19 amends as follows: “Article 22 violates the provisions of article 22, unauthorized changes, occupations or transcends the scope of approval, occupation of urban drainage facilities by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, in accordance with the management authority, the period of time has been converted to fines of more than €200 million, resulting in damage to facilities, imposing a fine of 1 to 3 times the direct loss”. Article 23, adds that “[i]n water is suddenly increased or toxicly harmful, flammable substances into urban drainage facilities due to accident accidents are not reported on in a timely manner or without security measures, by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority for Urban Management, in accordance with the authority of management, fines of more than 200 dollars for 2000; damage to facilities and fines for direct losses of 1 to 3 times”. Article twenty-ninth, additional article 24: “In violation of the provision that the responsibilities for the maintenance of drainage facilities have not been repaired in a timely manner or have not been installed and rehabilitated drainage facilities for loss and damage within the prescribed time period, resulting in losses caused by accidents, which are compensated by the responsible unit and fined by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of the Urban Administration, in accordance with the management authority.” In violation of the provisions of article 26, the Executive Office of the Integrated Administration of Urban Management is responsible for changing the deadline, warning or imposing a fine of up to €200 million; and inflicting damage on facilities by a fine of 1 to 3 times the direct loss of value: (i) The construction without the consent of the city's vested water administrative authorities or the construction of protective measures; (ii) Be directly or indirectly linked to urban public drainage facilities; (iii) Emissions from construction of wastewater have resulted in unexclusive facilities.” Article 20 has been amended to read: “Article 17 has one of the following acts within urban road lighting facilities and is responsible for the cessation of violations by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority for Urban Management, in accordance with the management authority, for the period of time, restitution, compensation for economic losses and for fines of 1000 dollars: (i) Construction and storage of goods in line with road lighting facilities; (ii) The use of road lighting facilities to engage, rescind, set communications broadcast lines and other equipment; (iii) The loss of road lighting facilities, the absence of emergency protection measures or the reporting of road lighting facilities management units; (iv) Other acts that undermine the safety of road lighting facilities.” Article 18: “No approval has been made, the construction of road lighting facilities or the use of road lighting power sources in road lighting locations, and the use of road lighting power sources, by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Urban Administration in the city, district city management, in accordance with the authority of management, shall put an end to the violation, the period of time being changed, the compensation of economic losses and the fine of over 2,000 dollars”. Article 21 was amended to read: “Article 15, within urban roads, has one of the following acts, under the authority of the Integrated Administrative Law Enforcement Authority for Urban Management, which is responsible for the cessation of violations, the duration of restitution, compensation for economic losses and the fine of 1000 dollars: (i) Removal residues on the paved way, stoning, burning of items, electrical (hydro) welding and concrete and sandyalone operations; (ii) motor vehicles and livestock vehicles are moving or stopped in the paved way; (iii) The vehicle load trails the road blocks, or the brave of the vehicle in the non-designation route; (iv) Building permanent buildings and building blocks of road functions; (v) Cards on the pavement route; (vi) Other damage to roads and subsidiary facilities.” Articles 24, 22 were amended to read: “Article 16, within the framework of urban bridges and protected areas, has one of the following acts, which is governed by the executive authority of the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority for Urban Management in the city, area of urban administration, which is responsible for the cessation of the offence, the period of rehabilitation, compensation for economic losses, and fines of 1000 dollars: (i) The use of the bridging facilities; (ii) The brave and parking of motor vehicles on the bridge; (iii) Skills, composts and releases; (iv) The use of the bridging facilities to trigger and reload; (v) Explore sand, stones and soils; (vi) Construction of buildings and constructions that impede the normal use and maintenance of the bridge facilities; (vii) Deal operations that endanger the safety of the bridge; (viii) Other damage links and subsidiary facilities.” Articles 25, 23 and 23 were amended to read: “Article 25, within urban drainage facilities and protected areas, has one of the following acts, which is governed by the executive authority of the Integrated Administration of Urban Administration in the city, area of urban management, to put an end to the violation, without causing damage to the facility, imposing a fine of more than 200 dollars, resulting in damage to the facility; and to impose a fine of one to five times the direct loss: (i) dumping or release of garbage, residues, snow cover and flammable hazardous substances within urban drainage facilities; (ii) Seouling water pipes, blocking dams, blocking water, dismantling, moving and wearing urban drainage facilities; (iii) Stereotypes, lay-downs, advertising brands on drainage; (iv) Other damage to the normal operation of urban drainage facilities.” In articles 22 and 24, “any of the following acts and the refusal to comply with the penalties of the Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Management is to be removed by the Urban Administration Administration Administration's Executive Directorate to order the removal of its deadlines, to be dismantled within a period of time, and to be dismantled by the Municipal Administration of Urban Management Administrative Enforcement Bureau” as follows: “[a] one of the following acts, and to refuse to comply with the penalties decision, by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of the Urban Administration, which is responsible for the removal of its duration, the removal of the city's executive branch, or the removal of the city's administration. Article XVII. 28, delete articles 25, 26, 27 and 28. Articles 29 and 31 were amended to read: “The approach provides for amendments to the regulations and regulations based on the central exercise of the administrative sanctions regime, which are implemented by the Integrated Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management in accordance with the new provisions. This approach and other legislation and regulations relating to urban management do not provide for administrative penalties exercised by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, which may be entrusted by law by the relevant executive organs, and the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Management exercises administrative sanctions in the name of the commissioning authority. The Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management, in accordance with its work needs, can commission administrative sanctions against organizations that meet statutory conditions within the statutory authority. Authorized organizations, within the scope of their mandate, implement administrative penalties in the name of the Integrated Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management.” Thirty-first and thirty-first amendments are: “Integrated administrative law enforcement officials in urban management find violations and should be responsible for changing the situation, where they cannot be rectified, and should be responsible for the reform of their deadlines; the continued existence of an offence should be responsible for the immediate cessation of the offence or the recovery of the status quo; and the seizure of its tools and goods against the denial of an offence”. Article 39 was deleted. The Executive Directorate for Urban Management has been amended to read “Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau for Urban Management”. This decision is implemented since the date of publication. In line with this decision, the provisional approach to urban management is relatively focused on administrative penalties, which is released in the order of the provisions. Provisional approach to the relative concentration of administrative penalties in urban management (as amended in 2008) Chapter I General Article 1, in order to strengthen urban management, makes it clear that urban management is relatively focused on the specific content of administrative sanctions rights, in accordance with the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Punishment Act and relevant laws, regulations and regulations, to develop this approach in accordance with a letter from the State Department of Rule of Law regarding the relative concentration of administrative sanctions in the city of Grand Innin. Article II applies to urban management within the urban planning area of my city. Article III focuses on the exercise of some of the administrative penalties in the area of urban management and is responsible for the implementation of this approach, in line with the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Management. Its responsibilities are: (i) To concentrate on the exercise of the administrative penalties stipulated in the laws, regulations, regulations and regulations governing the management of business, urban facilities, urban greenization and some public safety traffic; (ii) Follow-up to the relevant laws, regulations and draft regulations relating to urban management that are relatively focused on administrative penalties; (iii) Conduct research, coordination and management of the right to administrative penalties for urban management across the city; (iv) Oversight, inspection of enforcement activities that are relatively concentrated in urban management across the city. The Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau for Urban Management in various districts is the executive branch of the district government to concentrate on the exercise of the administrative penalties set out in this approach. The Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management has operational oversight and guidance for the Integrated Administration of Urban Management. Article IV shall support and cooperate with the activities of the Integrated Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau, which concentrates on the exercise of administrative penalties. Chapter II Article 5 violates the provision that buildings, constructions are constructed on the road side of the city, along with the construction of opens, favours, doors to change the building, and that the Integrated Administration of Urban Management is responsible for the cessation of the offence, the removal of the deadline, the removal of which has not been removed, and that the Integrated Administration of Urban Management has been reported to the communes for their approval and the removal. Self-removal changes, modifications or external features of buildings that are not subject to approval requirements are corrected by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Regional Urban Management, which is subject to a fine of $500 per square mete. Article 6 is one of the following acts, which is being corrected and punished by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of the Urban Administration: (i) The establishment of temporary facilities at both the urban road and public sites, the storage of goods, with a fine of 200 dollars per square mete area; (ii) The construction and demolition of the streets is not perimetered or unprotected by the provision of a fine of 20 per month for each extension; the territorial, wastewater, the pulse of the fervent, and the construction of the demolition sites, with a fine of more than 500 thousand dollars; the premises are not removed by the provision for the removal of temporary buildings, constructions, cleaning of the compound, with a fine of more than 50 million dollars; (iii) Where the road market is not authorized, in scope and time, and imposes a fine of 1000 dollars for the start-up unit; (iv) A variety of facilities in urban areas are not maintained and updated, affecting the city's congestion and imposing a fine of more than 200 million dollars; (v) Advertising jeopardies that have not been renovated in a timely manner, with a fine of $50 per square m2. Article 7 consists of one of the following acts, by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, which is based on the authority of management, to change the deadline and to punish: (i) The establishment of a bathymetry facility in urban landscape lights, which is not established within the prescribed time period, shall be subject to fines of up to 500,000 dollars; (ii) Background lights are not subject to a prescribed time frame, with a fine of up to 500 dollars; (iii) Dismoval of a landscape light facility, which has not been rehabilitated within a specified period of time, with fines of up to 500 dollars; (iv) Psychological advertisements do not set a light facility, with fines of up to 1000 dollars, impairment or failure to renovate within the prescribed time frame and impose a fine of up to 500 dollars and renovate or forcibly remove them; (v) In the absence of a prescribed place, form, design of a request for the installation of a bathymetry facility, a fine of up to 500 dollars; (vi) A fine of up to 500 dollars for unauthorized alterations, movement and the dismantling of a bathymetry facility; (vii) Contrary to urban landscape lighting facilities, affecting the normal functioning of landscape lighting facilities, and in addition to compensation for two times the original value, and a fine of 500 dollars, in the event of serious circumstances, to hold criminal liability in accordance with the law. Article 8 is one of the following acts, which are being corrected by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Agency for Urban Management and punished: (i) Urban buildings, constructions and urban senshrines, inadvertents, insecureness, property rights have not been repaired in a timely manner, flour, cleaning and fined up to $50 million; (ii) In front of the street building, windows, platforms, protagonists and sub- corridors, the suspension of items that impede the city's vision and the laying of various facilities and trees, the treasury goods, with fines of up to $50; (iii) The parking area does not establish a clear line, mark, the vehicle standstill and imposes a fine of more than 500,000 ktonnes; (iv) The assessment point approved does not operate at the specified location or by unauthorized expansion of the area of occupancy, with a fine of up to €50; (v) The opening of open processing, maintenance, cleaning points on the two sides of the urban roads, with fines of more than 500,000 yen 2000; the naviolation of poultry, with a fine of 10 yen per person; the dying of livestock; and the imposition of a fine of up to $50 million per head (only); (vi) The types of vehicles operated on the road of cities are clear and each is fined by $201; (vii) Theft of fines of up to $50 million, for example, on the street commercial branding, windows, advertisements, vouchers, etc.; (viii) Instructions, branding, various language terms used in public places are inaccurate, non-healthy and non-standard, and fines of over $50 million; (ix) Excellently or over-scheduled large propitious statements, symbols, simulations and simproprieties that have not been removed in a timely manner, with a fine of up to €100 million; (x) In the form of paints, public facilities or trees, each is fined by $50 and has been given a fine of $10 per person for all types of publicity. Article 9 is one of the following acts: the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Administration, in accordance with the management authority, is responsible for changing the deadlines and imposing a fine of $2.0 per square m2 per area on the basis of advertising brands; the late inadvertently removed by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Management or reported by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Regional Urban Management to request the Integrated Urban Administration to approve the imposition of forced evictions, and the removal of the cost is borne by units or individuals who have established outdoor advertising facilities: (i) Secrete advertisements from outsiders; (ii) The right to advertise outside the transferee; (iii) An outdoor advertising facility to be collected should be organized without experience or access to qualified inputs; (iv) The absence of regular security inspections and maintenance of outdoor advertising facilities, which affect the state of the city and endanger the security of others; (v) Inadequate replacement of polluted, damaged or obstructed expatriate advertisements in the municipality; (vi) Exclusive advertisements on the basis of the authorized location, form, specifications, etc.; (vii) The imposition of an ex posterbatory period without the granting of an extension permit and the removal of it by itself; (viii) There was no removal due to urban construction and the need for public interest to dismantle outdoor advertisements. Article 10 is one of the following acts: (i) Urgently engage in the operation of garbage services in urban areas, without the approval of the city's urban sanitation administrative authorities, giving warnings to stop operations; (ii) No construction of environmental sanitation in line with planning; (iii) Without the consent of the urban sanitation administrative authorities to the unauthorized establishment of the garbage, the manure handling site, the deadline for the clean-up and the imposition of a fine of up to $20,000 for the responsible unit; (iv) Removal of environmental sanitation or changing the nature of its use by reprioritizing or restoring the nature of its use, imposing a fine of two times the cost of the facility; (v) Authorize the handling of toxic, hazardous wastes or their blend into the garbage of living, with a fine of up to 5,000 dollars for the responsible unit or the responsible person; (vi) Within the area of environmental sanitation or in operating places, fines are imposed on the responsible person for 500 dollars; and fines for the responsible person for the release of corrosion, flammable or poisonous substances in environmental sanitation; (vii) The imposition of a fine of more than 1,000 dollars for the responsible unit, which is not cleared by the provisions of regulation; (viii) In parallel with chewing, incest, cigarette, paper, packaging, etc., the responsible person is fined up to 50,000 dollars; (ix) Instruction of garbage, sland, wastewater, manure and arbitrary abandonment of the body of the animal, with a fine of €20 for the responsible person to be buried and burned; (x) The slander or other mixtures of livestock vehicles, which impose a fine on the responsible person; (xi) Indoor discharge of manure, the breadwinner was not cleared and fined by $20; (xii) The garbage is less than the day of the day of delivery, the time limit is imposed and the liability unit is fined by a fine of up to €200,000; (xiii) Construction of garbage, living garbage and the garage generated by the production operation, which is not due to the procedures of the zonal sanitation administration, withholding of self-exploitation procedures and imposing a fine of €200 million to the responsible unit; (xiv) The garbage generated by the production of garbage has not been loaded at specified time, location and manner, and the garbage of living in residential areas managed by the property industry has not been installed, the deadline for the removal of the responsibilities unit or the responsible person for the suspension of their transport instruments and fined the amount of 200 garbage per cubic mile; (xv) To refuse to comply with the obligation to remove the snow, impose a fine of up to 10 square meters per day; fail to impose a fine of $8 per square m2 per square kilometre per day and to impose a deadline for clearance; (xvi) Unless loaded at designated locations, the responsible unit is fined by more than 500,000 dollars, imposing a fine of 50 kidnapped for the direct responsible person and responsible for the removal of the deadline; (17) Unclearing the ice trajectory on the ground due to the leakage of pipes, the removal of the deadline, the uncleared charges, the imposition of a fine of 20 square meters and the imposition of fines for the principal leadership of the responsible unit of 500,000 dollars; (xviii) Subsidides, slots and hazardous blends on the ice ice iceway; loading around the transport sites and facilities, garbage containers, public toilets or loading on trees, green sets and green areas; dumping of garbage, slanders, sewage; dumping of watersheds or dumping of ice ices; (xix) Vehicles that transport construction residues and garbage are in violation of the provision that are not subject to the application of quasi-communication procedures for environmental sanitation by the District Environmental Health Administration to obtain quasi-transport documents, are subject to a fine of up to 500,000 dollars, and that the driver is warned against the authorized route, time, place of transport and load or unloaded by the vehicle, or fines of 500,000 dollars; (xxx) The transport of vehicles to be disclosed, remains or the vehicle's creativity, garettes to the contaminated road blocks, the removal of the contaminated route and the imposition of a fine of up to 10 square meters per square kilometre or the imposition of a fine of up to $250 per month per contaminated length, the fine of 50 garners, the rejection of management, the cessation of the vehicle operation and the release of its disposal; (xxi) In the event of recycling of life resources, the recovery of vehicles was not confirmed by the Recyclingers of Recycled Resources in the city, which was warned against the unification of the vehicle and could be fined under $50, depending on the circumstances. Chapter III Article 11 is one of the following acts, which are redirected by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management and punished: (i) Urban public greenfields, landscapes, greenfields and residential areas, construction of the Greenland Greenlands Design Programme, which is attached to the Green Lands, without approval or approval by the approved design programme, shall cease construction and fill the process; (ii) In violation of the provision that, without the approval of the municipal greening administrative authorities, the temporary occupation of urban green areas has not been returned, the time limit has been returned, the restitution of the status quo and the imposition of a fine of 20 square meters per day on a green land area, which is overdue by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management to request the Government of the city for approval and for the mandatory withdrawal; (iii) In violation of the provisions of the law, the responsible person is responsible for carrying out three times of trees, tree age and location, as designated by the urban greening administrative authorities, and for fines of three to five times the tree value; (iv) In violation of the provision that dislocation or unauthorized relocation of scarce precious trees or management units has resulted in damage or death for scarce precious trees and fines for those responsible for more than one million dollars; (v) In violation of the provisions, the imposition of temporary commercial services facilities and assessment points in parks, the removal of the deadline, the removal of the period of time, the failure to be dismantled, the Integrated Administration of Urban Management reported to the Government of the city for its mandatory removal and fines to the management unit of over 3,000 dollars; (vi) The Green Land Management Liability Unit, which results in the damage to the swing and greening facilities due to mismanagement, is fined by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management for more than 5,000 units. Article 12 is one of the following acts, either by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Agency for Urban Management or by its commissioned park administration, which is responsible for changing and punishing administratively: (i) In the green area of the city, trajectory, extractive flowers, cross-border green sets, trees, composts, and trees are tramped on trees, blends and livestock, with a fine of more than 50 dollars for those responsible; (ii) Accommodation of planted buildings, release of waste, residues, exhumation of pits, abundance and dumping of hazardous sewage in the green area, with a fine of up to 50,000 dollars for the responsible unit, with a fine of up to $30 million for individuals; (iii) Removal, hunting, graves and fires within the urban green area, order an immediate cessation of the offence, the removal of the deadline, and, in the light of circumstances, fines of up to US$ 100 for the responsible person; (iv) Construction caused damage to swing trees and greening facilities and ordered immediate change and fines for construction units of more than 1,000 dollars; (v) The destruction of herbed trees and greening facilities, which are compensated by the responsible person for the value of the loss. Article 13, within the scope of the park, consists of one of the following acts, either by the Integrated Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau of Urban Administration, or by the park administration entrusted by it, in accordance with the authority of management, to be responsibly corrected and to impose a fine of 500,000 dollars; to cause damage to facilities, to compensate for damages and to pay a fine of between 1 and 2 times the cost of compensation: (i) No purchase of tickets into a charge park or a basement; (ii) The self-entry of motor vehicles; (iii) Incorporating animals into parks; (iv) In parallel with chewings, droves and incests; (v) The intentional manufacture of noise or begging, the collection of abundance; (vi) Accelerating, incesting and inclination at facilities in the park; (vii) To jump water, swimm and ice ice ice ice ices at non-designated sites; (viii) Damage fences, steps, lighting facilities, booths, holidays, simulations, dressings, etc.; (ix) Tobn, collect plant seeds and mark, pharmaceutical materials, wild fruits; (x) Fishing, dressing and other wildlife; (xi) To provoke comma, intimidate, hit animals or to throw food with an intentional animal; (xii) Exhibiting exhibitions, opening up a healthy site or organizing a variety of activities for recreation; (xiii) Other damage to park facilities, equipment and public order. Chapter IV Article 14. In violation of the provisions, the Integrated Administration Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management is responsible for the period of time being converted, compensation for economic losses or recovering costs receivable and fines of three to five times the cost receivable: (i) No road to be occupied by the Interim Entrance Licence or by the scope, time-bound occupation as provided for in the Interim Entrepreneurship Licence, changes in the character of occupation and rental, transfer; (ii) There is no access to the Road Exposure Permission or exceeds the scope specified in the Road Exhumation Litigation Licence, time-bound excavations and failure to require construction and application. Article 15. Within the context of urban roads, there are one of the following acts, under the authority of management, the Integrated Administration of Urban Administration, which is responsible for the cessation of the violation, the period of time, the rehabilitation, compensation for economic losses, and fines of 1000 dollars: (i) Removal residues on the paved way, stoning, burning of items, electrical (hydro) welding and concrete and sandyalone operations; (ii) motor vehicles and livestock vehicles are moving or stopped in the paved way; (iii) The vehicle load trails the road blocks, or the brave of the vehicle in the non-designation route; (iv) Building permanent buildings and building blocks of road functions; (v) Cards on the pavement route; (vi) Other damage to roads and subsidiary facilities. Article 16 has one of the following acts in the context of urban bridging facilities and protected areas, which are governed by the executive authority of the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, which is responsible for the cessation of violations, the duration of the period of time, restitution, compensation for economic losses, and a fine of 1000 dollars: (i) The use of the bridging facilities; (ii) The brave and parking of motor vehicles on the bridge; (iii) Skills, composts and releases; (iv) The use of the bridging facilities to trigger and reload; (v) Explore sand, stones and soils; (vi) Construction of buildings and constructions that impede the normal use and maintenance of the bridge facilities; (vii) Deal operations that endanger the safety of the bridge; (viii) Other damage links and subsidiary facilities. Article 17, in the context of urban road lighting facilities, has one of the following acts: the Integrated Administrative Law Enforcement Authority of Urban Administration, which is responsible for the cessation of the offence, the duration of the period of correction, restitution, compensation for economic losses, and fines of up to 1,000 dollars: (i) Construction and storage of goods in line with road lighting facilities; (ii) The use of road lighting facilities to engage, rescind, set communications broadcast lines and other equipment; (iii) The loss of road lighting facilities, the absence of emergency protection measures or the reporting of road lighting facilities management units; (iv) Other acts that undermine the safety of road lighting facilities. Article 18 has not been authorized to destroy road lighting facilities or to construct cables under road lighting, as well as to use road lighting power sources, and is responsible for the cessation of the violation by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management in accordance with the management authority, for the period of time being converted, to compensate for economic losses and for fines of up to $20,000. Article 19 violates the provision that the completion of the drainage works has not been experienced or has been used to receive qualified inputs, and is subject to the management authority of the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority for Urban Management in the city, district and urban areas and to a fine of 1 to 5 per cent of the works. Article 20, in violation of the provisions, has not been granted the Urban Water Licence or has not been provided for drainage under the Urban Exclusive Water Licence, which is due to the management authority of the Integrated Administration of Urban Management and is fined by over 3,000 dollars. Article 21, in violation of the provisions, imposes forced drainage of water by drainage units, by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority for Urban Management, in accordance with the authority of management, to put an end, warning or imposing a fine of up to 5,000 dollars. In violation of the provisions of article 22, unauthorized changes in the scope of the offence, occupation or transcendment of the authorization, the occupation of urban drainage facilities, are governed by the management authority of the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, which is subject to a fine of up to €200 million; and damage to the facility, with a direct loss of value of between 1 and 3 times. Article 23, which has resulted in a sudden increase in water or toxic harmful,flammable substances into urban drainage facilities without timely reporting or without security measures, is fined by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Administration, in accordance with the management authority of the city, district city administration, which amounts to more than 200 dollars; damage to facilities, with a direct loss of value of between 1 and 3 times. Article 24 violates the provision that the responsibilities for the maintenance of drainage facilities are not repaired in a timely manner or that the drainage facilities for loss and damage have not been installed and rehabilitated within the prescribed time period, resulting in losses caused by accidents, which are to be compensated by the responsible unit and fined between 1 and 3 times by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, in accordance with the management authority. Article 25, in the context of urban drainage facilities and protected areas, has one of the following acts: the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority for Urban Management, in accordance with its management authority, is responsible for the cessation of violations, which have not resulted in damage to facilities, fines up to $200,000; and the damage caused the facility to impose a fine of one to five times the value of direct loss: (i) dumping or release of garbage, residues, snow cover and flammable hazardous substances within urban drainage facilities; (ii) Seouling water pipes, blocking dams, blocking water, dismantling, moving and wearing urban drainage facilities; (iii) Stereotypes, lay-downs, advertising brands on drainage; (iv) Other damage to the normal functioning of urban drainage facilities. Article 26, in violation of the provisions, consists of one of the following acts, by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, in accordance with the authority of management, the period of time being reordered or punished by a fine of more than 200 million dollars; and a fine of one to three times the value of the damage caused by the facility: (i) The construction without the consent of the city's vested water administrative authorities or the construction of protective measures; (ii) Be directly or indirectly linked to urban public drainage facilities; (iii) Emissions from construction of wastewater have resulted in a facility block. Article 27 has one of the following acts and has refused to comply with the penalties decision, which is to be dismantled by the Integrated Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau of Urban Administration in accordance with the authority of management by the Ministry of the city, the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, which is forced to dismantle within the period of time, or by the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Regional Urban Management, to request the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management to authorize the removal of these measures: (i) Repression of buildings, constructions or construction of buildings that impede the functioning of municipal utilities and security within the protected areas, construction of goods and the unauthorized use of the bridging line; (ii) Repress the gateway to prevent its use, maintenance and conservation; (iii) The approval of temporary occupation of municipal facilities, the expiry of the occupancy period or the period of occupation, which is due to the maintenance, conservation, transport management needs to be withdrawn from their own hands. Article 28, which has not been used in the construction of public utilities facilities, is vested in the Integrated Administration of Urban Management in accordance with the management authority to stop the use and to impose a fine of up to 5,000 dollars. Chapter V Article 29 performs business activities and shall be registered by the business administration and authorized to operate. The Executive Directorate of Integrated Urban Management is responsible for the discontinuation of business activities by the Regional Urban Administration Authority for the imposition of fines of up to $0.50 for operating activities that are not licensed on the street or where the license is operating outside the authorized operating place. Other provisions of chapter VI Article 33 provides for the regulation and modification of regulations based on the central exercise of the right to administrative sanctions, which are implemented by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management in accordance with new provisions. This approach and other legislation and regulations relating to urban management do not provide for administrative penalties exercised by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, which may be entrusted by law by the relevant executive organs, and the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Management exercises administrative sanctions in the name of the commissioning authority. The Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau of Urban Management, in accordance with its work needs, can commission administrative sanctions against organizations that meet statutory conditions within the statutory authority. In the context of the commissioning, an organization is entrusted with the execution of administrative sanctions in the name of the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Bureau for Urban Management. Article 31 found violations in the law enforcement of the Integrated Administration of Urban Management and should be justified by the time being, which cannot be rectified and should be responsible for the reform of their deadlines; the continued existence of an offence should be responsible for the immediate cessation of the offence or the recovery of the status quo; and the seizure of its tools and goods against the denial of an offence. Article 32, in conjunction with a number of fines under this scheme, is subject to penalties imposed by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management by one of the highest penalties. The penalty shall not be repeated, except for all types of penalties. Article 33 of this approach provides for the central exercise of the right to administrative penalties, which may not be exercised by the relevant administrative law enforcement organs and continue to be exercised and the administrative penalties imposed are null and void. Article 34 governs the execution of official duties by integrated administrative law enforcement officials in urban administration, which is subject to uniform uniformity, and wear a unified law enforcement mark and hold administrative law enforcement documents issued by the Government of the province. Article XV Integrated Administrative Enforcement in Urban Management is implemented in accordance with the law enforcement procedures set out in the National People's Republic of China Administrative Punishment Act. Article 36 Civil, legal or other organizations decides that the administrative penalties imposed by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management shall not be subject to the administrative review required by the law, subject to the applicant's choice, by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management or by the Government of the People of the Region, and that the administrative penalties imposed by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management shall not be subject to the administrative review required by law and shall be taken by the Government of the city. The parties were late in applying for review, failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the penalties decision, and the organs that had made a punitive decision had applied for enforcement or enforcement by law. Article 37 impedes the administration of integrated administrative law enforcement officials in urban administration to carry out their duties under the law, in violation of the provisions of the social security administration, which is punishable by law by the public security sector; constitutes an offence and transferred to the judiciary to be criminalized by law. Article 338 Integral Administrative Law Enforcement Officers in the administration of justice take the form of private fraud, negligence, abuse of authority, administrative disposition by their units or their superior authorities; and the transfer of criminal responsibility to the judiciary. Article 39 of this approach is implemented effective 1 August 2001. |
